Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T23:21:57.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeling the pressure: work stress and mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2007

ABRAHAM REICHENBERG*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
JAMES H. MacCABE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr A. Reichenberg, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK. (Email: avi.reichenberg@iop.kcl.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Depression and anxiety are the most common mental disorders, affecting adults of working age, and the prevalence of these disorders appears to be rising, at least in Western countries. Annual deaths from suicide total almost 1 000 000 worldwide (Goldsmith et al. Reference Goldsmith, Pellmar, Kleinman and Bunney2002), and depression is a robust risk factor for suicide. At the same time, there is increasing evidence that working conditions are becoming more stressful, or at least are perceived as such, with up to 40% of workers reporting stress at work (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2006).

High job demands have consistently been associated with psychological distress and depression (Bromet et al. Reference Bromet, Dew, Parkinson, Cohen and Schwartz1992). However, with only few exceptions (e.g. Wieclaw et al. Reference Wieclaw, Agerbo, Mortensen and Bonde2005), much of the previous research in this field has suffered from methodological shortcomings or been of limited relevance to mental health professionals. First, most studies have focused on relatively minor symptoms of distress, which would not necessarily lead to clinically significant psychiatric conditions or suicide. Second, confounding by socioeconomic status has not always been adequately controlled. Third, individuals vary markedly in their propensity to report psychological distress. This can lead to spurious associations between self-reported job stress and psychiatric symptoms, especially in cross-sectional studies. Fourth, it is often difficult to exclude reverse causality: individuals with mental health problems might be less adept at avoiding stressful working environments than healthy individuals.

This issue of Psychological Medicine presents two prospective cohort studies (Agerbo et al. and Melchior et al.) on the relationship between occupation distress and mental health, both of which overcome many of the problems of earlier studies. The studies use similar methodologies but address different aspects of the question on the relationship between job stress and mental health.

Using the Dunedin birth cohort, Melchior et al. (Reference Melchior, Caspi, Milne, Danese, Poulton and Moffitt2007) documented an association between work stress and rates of depression and anxiety in young adults. Crucially, they capitalized on the prospective study design, demonstrating that working in high-demand jobs (i.e. jobs with excessive workload, or extreme time pressures) was associated with the onset of new depression and anxiety in individuals without any pre-employment history of psychiatric disorders. Overall, around 45% of new cases of depression and anxiety in the cohort were attributable to high job demands.

Following their previous work documenting an association between depression and anxiety and occupation (Wieclaw et al. Reference Wieclaw, Agerbo, Mortensen and Bonde2005), Agerbo et al. (Reference Agerbo, Gunnell, Bonde, Mortensen and Nordentoft2007) used population registers which contain information about the entire Danish population to investigate the association between occupation and suicide. Initially demonstrating that higher suicide rates were associated with lower overall job status, further analyses demonstrated that most differences in suicide risk between occupations were accounted for by differences in income and employment status.

The two most striking exceptions were the medical and nursing professions, which suffered the highest suicide rates of all 55 occupations examined. Increased risk of suicide among medical professionals has been quite consistently reported (Platt & Hawton, Reference Platt, Hawton, Hawton and van Heeringen2000; Schernhammer, Reference Schernhammer2005). Several studies have suggested that the ready availability of lethal means has a strong influence on of suicide rate (Bennewith et al. Reference Bennewith, Nowers and Gunnell2007). In the study by Agerbo and colleagues, suicide by medicines in doctors was increased around 13 times, suggesting that easy access to drugs, combined with expertise in pharmacology, may explain some of the excess. However, even when deaths by medicines were excluded, suicide rates in doctors and nurses were still comparable to those in unskilled occupations, suggesting that additional factors may be operating.

Despite the obvious methodological strengths of these studies, neither proves causality. It cannot be determined whether the higher rates of depression/anxiety or suicide reported by these studies arise as a result of the characteristics of jobs, the genetic or personality characteristics of the people who follow particular careers, or a combination of the two. Studies of gene–environment interactions in this field are crucial for better understanding aetiological processes.

Depression and anxiety are very common disorders, and are a major cause of morbidity, poor quality of life, social impairments and lost work productivity. Work stress also appears to be very common, so the population-attributable fraction of mental disorders (i.e. the proportion of reduction in the risk of the disease/s) related to modifying work stress is likely to be very large. Work stress can be reliably measured, and is potentially modifiable, either by changing job characteristics, or by avoiding appointing the most vulnerable individuals to the most stressful jobs. There may, therefore, be opportunities for primary prevention or earlier detection of stress-related psychiatric disorder in the workplace.

The public health implications of the findings of Melchior and colleagues may extend to other disorders as well. High psychological stress has been associated with the development of a wide range of health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (Hemingway & Maramot, Reference Hemingway and Maramot1999). There is a well-documented, yet not well understood, link between depression and cardiovascular disease (Hemingway & Maramot, Reference Hemingway and Maramot1999; Frasure-Smith & Lesperance, Reference Frasure-Smith and Lesperance2003).

While both studies suggest that the characteristics of a job influence the risk of psychiatric problems, it is important to bear in mind that having a job at all is probably beneficial for most people's mental health. In the study of Agerbo and colleagues, individuals who were unemployed had higher suicide rates than any occupation apart from medicine.

Declaration of Interest

None.

References

Agerbo, E., Gunnell, D., Bonde, J. P., Mortensen, P. B. & Nordentoft, M. (2007). Suicide and occupation: the impact of socioeconomic, demographic, and psychiatric differences. Psychological Medicine. Published online: 20 April 2007. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennewith, O., Nowers, M. & Gunnell, D. (2007). Effect of barriers on the Clifton suspension bridge, England, on local patterns of suicide: implications for prevention. British Journal of Psychiatry 190, 266267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromet, E. J., Dew, M. A., Parkinson, D. K., Cohen, S. & Schwartz, J. E. (1992). Effects of occupational stress on the physical and psychological health of women in a microelectronics plant. Social Science and Medicine 34, 13771383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2006). Fourth European Working Survey (http://www.eurofound.eu.int/pubdocs/2006/78/en/1/ef0678en.pdf). Accessed 12 April 2007.Google Scholar
Frasure-Smith, N. & Lesperance, F. (2003). Depression – a cardiac risk factor in search of a treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association 289, 31713173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, S. K., Pellmar, T. C., Kleinman, A. M. & Bunney, W. E. (2002). Magnitude of the Problem. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Press: Washington, DC.Google ScholarPubMed
Hemingway, H. & Maramot, M. (1999). Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. British Medical Journal 318, 14601467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchior, M., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., Danese, A., Poulton, R. & Moffitt, T. E. (2007). Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychological Medicine. Published online: 4 April 2007. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platt, S. & Hawton, K. (2000). Suicidal behaviour and the labour market. In The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide (ed. Hawton, K. and van Heeringen, K.), pp. 309384. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schernhammer, E. (2005). Taking their own lives – the high rate of physician suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 352, 24732476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wieclaw, J., Agerbo, E., Mortensen, P. B. & Bonde, J. P. (2005). Occupational risk of affective and stress-related disorders in the Danish workforce. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health 31, 343351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed