Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-9k27k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T23:51:01.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Knowledge after September 11

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2002

Markus Prior
Affiliation:
Stanford University and Princeton University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article, I examine how 9/11 and the subsequent efforts to combat terrorism have affected what people know about politics. My analysis suggests three main differences between knowledge before and after 9/11. First, knowledge of 9/11 and the “war on terrorism” shot up to uncommonly high levels, just as common sense and our theories would predict. The second point is less intuitive: Heightened interest spread to issues not directly related to the terrorist attacks and appears to have increased knowledge of politics more broadly. Finally, a comparison between knowledge related to 9/11 and general political knowledge reveals that some of the usual obstacles to learning did not matter in the aftermath of 9/11. A low sense of civic duty, lack of faith in government responsiveness, and a full-time job all kept people from getting informed about politics in general, but not from learning about the terrorist attacks and the war on terrorism.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Footnotes

I would like to thank Scott Althaus, Mo Fiorina, Shanto Iyengar, and Paul Sniderman for helpful comments.