No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Notes on the Romulan Reform of Conventions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1049096514002273/resource/name/firstPage-S1049096514002273a.jpg)
- Type
- Profession Symposium: Reinventing the Scholarly Conference: Reflections from the Field
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015
References
REFERENCES
Akerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics
84 (3): 488–500.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Michelle D. 2015. “Reconsidering the Scholarly Conference for the Contemporary Academic.” PS: Political Science and Politics (48) 2: this issue.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha, and Quirk, Paul J.. 1985. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review
94 (2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark. 2012. “The Scholarly Conference: Do We Want Democracy and Markets or Authority and Tradition?” Journal of Political Science Education
8: 333–51.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark. 2015. “Reinventing the Scholarly Conference: Videotape the Presentations, Flip the Panels.” PS: Political Science and Politics
48 (2): this issue.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Amanda. 2015. “Conquering the ‘Lumbering Dinosaur’: Graduate Student Experiences at Political Science Conferences.” PS: Political Science and Politics
48 (2): this issue.Google Scholar