Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T12:11:46.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on Using Annotation for Transparent Inquiry in Mixed-Methods Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Rachel Myrick Open the ORCID record for Rachel Myrick [Opens in a new window]
Rachel Myrick*
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Annotation for Transparent Inquiry (ATI): Transparency in Practice in Qualitative and Multi-Method Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 492 - 495
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bleich, Erik, and Pekkanen, Robert. 2013. “How to Report Interview Data.” In Interview Research in Political Science, ed. Mosley, Layna, 84–105. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, Kapiszewski, Diana, and Lupia, Arthur. 2018. “Transparent Social Inquiry: Implications for Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 21:29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, David. 1995. “Human Rights and US Foreign Policy: Two Levels, Two Worlds.” Political Studies XLIII:111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, David. 2000. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2021. “Annotations to ATI.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S104909652100024X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2008. “Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.” International Organization 62 (4): 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2016. “Transparency, Research Integrity, and Multiple Methods.” APSA-CP: Comparative Politics Newsletter 2016:32–36.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, and Karcher, Sebastian. 2021. “Empowering Transparency: Annotation for Transparent Inquiry.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Ellen M. 2016. “How Are We Doing? Data Access and Replication in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (2): 268–72.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2021. “Bridging Positivist and Interpretative Approaches through Annotation for Transparent Inquiry.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milonopoulos, Theo. 2021. “Annotating Without Anxiety: Achieving Adaptability, Accessibility, and Accountability Through ATI.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravscik, Andrew. 2014. “Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 48–53.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda, and Davis, David R.. 2012. “Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrick, Rachel, and Weinstein, Jeremy. 2018. “Making Sense of Human Rights Diplomacy: Evidence from a US Campaign to Free Political Prisoners.” Presented at the 2018 Annotation for Transparent Inquiry Workshop.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Sarah Elizabeth, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2015. “Transparency in Intensive Research on Violence: Ethical Dilemmas and Unforeseen Consequences.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter 13 (1): 22–27.Google Scholar
Siewert, Markus Bjoern. 2021. “How Annotation for Transparent Inquiry Can Enhance Research Transparency in Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar