Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:49:19.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XX.—Studies in Practical Mathematics. II. The Evaluation of the Latent Roots and Latent Vectors of a Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

A. C. Aitken
A. C. Aitken
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

In many branches of applied mathematics problems arise which require for their solution a knowledge of the latent roots of a matrix A, sometimes only the root of greatest modulus but often the second and other roots as well, and the corresponding latent vectors. A few examples, among many that might be cited, are problems in the dynamical theory of oscillations, problems of conditioned maxima and minima, problems of correlation between statistical variables, the determination of the principal axes of quadrics, and the solution of differential or other operational equations. It is important, therefore, to have a choice of methods for obtaining latent roots and latent vectors without undue labour, and the object of the present paper is to augment the existing store of such methods.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 57 , 1938 , pp. 269 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Aitken, A. C., 1925. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi, pp. 289–305.Google Scholar
Aitken, A. C., 1931. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. li, pp. 80–90.Google Scholar
Aitken, A. C., 1936. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, pp. 172–181.Google Scholar
Brodetsky, S., and Smeal, G., 1923. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., vol. xxii, pp. 83–87.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H., 1933. Journ. Educ. Psychol., vol. xxiv, pp. 417–441, 498–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H., 1936 a. Psychometrika, vol. i, pp. 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H., 1936 b. Biometrika, vol. xxviii, pp. 342–349.Google Scholar
Howland, R. C. J., 1928. Phil. Mag., series 7, vol. vi, pp. 839–842.Google Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M., 1933. The Calculus of Finite Differences, London, pp. 384–387.Google Scholar
Muir, T., 1920. The History of Determinants, vol. iii, London, pp. 17–18, 159.Google Scholar
Muir, T., 1923. The History of Determinants, vol. iv, pp. 178, 201, 215, 217.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. W., 1927. Proc. Edin. Math. Soc., series 2, vol. i, p. 126.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. W., and Aitken, A. C., 1932. Introduction to the Theory of Canonica Matrices, London and Glasgow, pp. 60–63.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. T., and Robinson, G., 1929. The Calculus of Observations, 2nd ed., London and Glasgow, pp. 70–72, 98, 106.Google Scholar