Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:30:18.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gorenstein homological theory for differential modules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Jiaqun Wei
Jiaqun Wei*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, People’s Republic of China, (weijiaqun@njnu.edu.cn)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that a differential module is Gorenstein projective (injective, respectively) if and only if its underlying module is Gorenstein projective (injective, respectively). We then relate the Ringel–Zhang theorem on differential modules to the Avramov–Buchweitz–Iyengar notion of projective class of differential modules and prove that for a ring R there is a bijective correspondence between projectively stable objects of split differential modules of projective class not more than 1 and R-modules of projective dimension not more than 1, and this is given by the homology functor H and stable syzygy functor ΩD. The correspondence sends indecomposable objects to indecomposable objects. In particular, we obtain that for a hereditary ring R there is a bijective correspondence between objects of the projectively stable category of Gorenstein projective differential modules and the category of all R-modules given by the homology functor and the stable syzygy functor. This gives an extended version of the Ringel–Zhang theorem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 145 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 639 - 655
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2015 

References

1 Auslander, M. and Bridger, M.. Stable module theory. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 94 (Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1969).Google Scholar
2 Avramov, L. L., Buchweitz, R. and Iyengar, S.. Class and rank of differential modules. Invent. Math. 169 (2007), 1–35.Google Scholar
3 Beligiannis, A.. On algebras of finite Cohen–Macaulay type. Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 1973–2019.Google Scholar
4 Bennis, D. and Mahdou, N.. Global Gorenstein dimensions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), 461–465.Google Scholar
5 Cartan, H. and Eilenberg, S.. Homological algebra (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
6 Chen, X.. An Auslander-type result for Gorenstein-projective modules. Adv. Math. 218 (2008), 2043–2050.Google Scholar
7 Enochs, E. and Estrada, S.. Relative homological algebra in the category of quasi-coherent sheaves. Adv. Math. 194 (2005), 284–295.Google Scholar
8 Enochs, E. and Jenda, O. M. G.. Relative homological algebra. De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, vol. 30 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000).Google Scholar
9 Gao, N.. Gorenstein derived categories. J. Alg. 323 (2010), 2041–2057.Google Scholar
10 Huang, Z. and Sun, J.. Invariant properties of representations under excellent extensions. J. Alg. 358 (2012), 87–101.Google Scholar
11 Ringel, C. and Zhang, P.. Representations of quivers over the algebra of dual numbers. Preprint, 2013. (Available at http://arXiv.org/abs/1112.1924v2.)Google Scholar
12 Yang, X. and Liu, Z.. Gorenstein projective, injective, and flat complexes. Commun. Alg. 39 (2011), 1705–1721.Google Scholar