Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-6tpvb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T17:55:24.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creation of a Framework of Design Tool Characteristics to Support Evaluation and Selection of Visualisation Tools

Part of: Design Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Wenwen Zhang ,
Charlie Ranscombe ,
David Radcliffe  and
Simon Jackson

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Industrial Design, new design visualisation tools are emerging offering significant benefits to the designers. However, studies show alongside some benefits, new tools can also inhibit designers' creativity or cause time inefficiency if used in the wrong context. Thus, understanding which tools to use and when during the design process is increasingly necessary to ensure the best use of resources in design practice. Existing research on understanding the performance of design tools and the resulting frameworks for comparing tools are either specific to certain tools or highly generalised making evaluation across different design tools challenging. As such, this paper reports the creation of a more comprehensive framework of design tool characteristics to facilitate a better understanding of design tools and their uses. Demonstration of application of the framework is also given in the form of a case study on the use of Digital Sketching and its comparable tools with four practising designers. In conclusion, we show how the Design Tool Characteristics (DTCs) framework is an effective way to understand design tools, with further implications for design tool development.

Keywords

EvaluationDesign Tool CharacteristicsVisualisationDecision makingCase study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 1115 - 1124
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Alcaide-Marzal, J., Diego-MÃąs, J. A., Asensio-Cuesta, S. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2013), “An exploratory study on the use of digital sculpting in conceptual product design”, Design Studies 34(2), 264–284.Google Scholar
Aldoy, N. N. (2011), “An investigation into a digital strategy for industrial design education”, PhD thesis, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Bilda, Z. and Demirkan, H. (2003), “An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media”, Design studies 24(1), 27–50.Google Scholar
Booth, J. W., Taborda, E. A., Ramani, K. and Reid, T. (2016), “Interventions for teaching sketching skills and reducing inhibition for novice engineering designers”, Design Studies 43, 1–23.Google Scholar
Buxton, B. (2010), “Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design”, Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Chen, Z.-R. (2007), “How to Improve Creativity: Can designers improve their design creativity by using conventional and digital media simultaneously?”, Springer, pp. 571–583.Google Scholar
Crilly, N. (2015), “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers”, Design Studies 38, 54–91.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (1999), “Natural intelligence in design”, Design studies 20(1), 25–39.Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001), “Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science”, Design Issues 17(3), 49–55.Google Scholar
Evans, M. and Aldoy, N. (2016), “Digital design sketching using the tablet pc”, Design Journal 19(5), 763–787.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991), “The dialectics of sketching”, Creativity Research Journal 4(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
Lutters, E., van Houten, F. J. A. M., Bernard, A., Mermoz, E. and Schutte, C. S. L. (2014), “Tools and techniques for product design”, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 63(2), 607–630.Google Scholar
Pei, E., Campbell, I. and Evans, M. (2011), “A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers”, The Design Journal 14(1), 64–91.Google Scholar
Pipes, A. (2007), Drawing for designers, Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
Purcell, A. and Gero, J. S. (1998), “Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology”, Design studies 19(4), 389– 430.Google Scholar
Ranscombe, C., Bissett-Johnson, K., Boa, D. and Hicks, B. (2017), “Designing with lego: Exploring the influence of low fidelity visualisation on collaborative design activities”, in “DS 87–8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017”.Google Scholar
Robertson, B. F. and Radcliffe, D. F. (2009), “Impact of cad tools on creative problem solving in engineering design”, Computer-Aided Design 41(3), 136–146.Google Scholar
Schon, D. A. and Wiggins, G. (1992), “Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing”, Design studies 13(2), 135–156.Google Scholar
Self, J. A. (2011), “The use of design tools in industrial design practice”, PhD thesis, Kingston University.Google Scholar
Self, J., Dalke, H. and Evans, M. (2009), “Industrial design tools and design practice: An approach for understanding relationships between design tools and practice”, International Association of Societies of Design Research.Google Scholar
Self, J. and Pei, E. (2014), “Reflecting on design sketching: Implications for problem-framing and solution-focused conceptual ideation”, Archives of Design Research 27(3), 65–87.Google Scholar
Shih, Y. T., Sher, W. D. and Taylor, M. (2015), “Understanding creative design processes by integrating sketching and cad modelling design environments: A preliminary protocol result from architectural designers”, 2015 9(3), 17.Google Scholar
Stolterman, E., McAtee, J., Royer, D. and Thandapani, S. (2009), “Designerly tools”, in Proceeding Design Research Society Conference 2008.Google Scholar
Stones, C. and Cassidy, T. (2010), “Seeing and discovering: how do student designers reinterpret sketches and digital marks during graphic design ideation?”, Design studies 31(5), 439–460.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, V. and Linsey, J. (2011), “Design fixation in physical modeling: an investigation on the role of sunk cost”, in ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 119– 130.Google Scholar