Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-14T11:07:11.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic field configurations of magnetars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2018

Kotaro Fujisawa ,
Akihiro Yatabe  and
Shota Kisaka
Kotaro Fujisawa
Affiliation:
Advanced Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan
Akihiro Yatabe
Affiliation:
Advanced Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan
Shota Kisaka
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematics, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5258, Japan email: fujisawa@heap.phys.waseda.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We evaluated ambipolar diffusion velocity in a magnetar. Previous studies concerning ambipolar diffusion ignored the presence of the crust, although a magnetar has both core and crust. We considered both core and crust and examined the influence of the crust in this study. We found that the crustal magnetic field can accelerate the ambipolar diffusion in its core.

Keywords

stars: neutronstars: magnetic fields
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S337: Pulsar Astrophysics the Next Fifty Years , September 2017 , pp. 334 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Akgün, T., Reisenegger, A., Mastrano, A., & Marchant, P., 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, F., Reisenegger, A., & Valdivia, J. A., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 507Google Scholar
Douchin, F. & Haensel, P., 2001, A&A, 380, 151Google Scholar
Fujisawa, K. & Kisaka, S., 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendenning, N. K. & Moszkowski, S. A., 1991, Phys. Rev. Letters, 67, 2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Reisenegger, A., 1992, ApJ, 395, 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourgouliatos, K. N., et al., 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusakov, M. E., Kantor, E. M., & Ofengeim, D. D., 2017, preprint, arXiv 1705.00508Google Scholar
Hoyos, J., Reisenegger, A., & Valdivia, J. A., 2008, A&A, 487, 789Google Scholar
Kojima, Y. & Kisaka, S., 2012, MNRSA, 421, 2722Google Scholar
Naito, T. & Kojima, Y., 1994, MNRAS, 266, 597Google Scholar
Passamonti, A., et al., 2017, 465, 3416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, N., et al., 2010, Science, 330, 944Google Scholar
Viganò, D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar