Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T10:50:19.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The investigation of genetic variation in Mazandaran buffalo population using microsatellite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

M Aminafshar ,
C Amirinia ,
R Vaez Torshizi ,
A Javanrouh  and
H.R Seiedabadi
M Aminafshar*
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, College of Agriculture & Natural Resource, Science & Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
C Amirinia
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
R Vaez Torshizi
Affiliation:
Animal Science Department, Tarbiat Moddares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
A Javanrouh
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
H.R Seiedabadi
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
*
Email:aminafshar@gmail.com
Get access

Extract

Iranian buffalo have a wide geographical distribution. Buffalo production is an important livestock sector, as a source of milk and meat. Knowledge of the genetic population of the buffalo is one of the main steps in breed conservation programmes and may have implications for future breeding strategies. Microsatellites are now widely used since they are numerous, randomly distributed in the genome, highly polymorphic and show co-dominance inheritance (Hillel et al., 2003). The objective of the present study is to determine and characterise the genetic diversity and the genetic structure of the Mazandaran buffalo population by using 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2008 , 2008 , pp. 150
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arora, R., Lakhchaura, B.D., Prasad, R.B., Tantia, M.S., and Vijh, R.K.. 2004. J. of Anim. Breeding & Genet.. 121: 111–118.Google Scholar
Bassam, B.J. and Caetano-Anolles, G., 1993. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 42: 181–188.Google Scholar
Beigi Naseri, M.T., Hamidi, Z. and Tavakoli, S., 2007. International Journal of Poultry Science 6 (9): 675–678.Google Scholar
Crooijmans, K. Elo, M.W. Feldman, P.J.Freidlin. 2003. Sel. Evol., 35: 533–557.Google Scholar
FAO. 2004. ISAG and FAO publication.Google Scholar
Hillel, J.M., Geroenen, A.M., Tixier-boichard, M., Korol, A.B., David, L., Kirzhner, V.M., Burke, T., Barre-dirie, A., Hedrick, R.P.M.A., P.W., , 1999. Arizona state university.Google Scholar
Soysal, M. İ., Özkan, E., Kök, S.., Tuna, Y. T.., Gürcan, E. K.. 2005. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 2(3):240–244 Google Scholar