Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T18:03:35.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of addition of Natuzyme® to broiler diets containing different levels of canola meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

S N Mousavi ,
M Nadalian ,
H Lotfollahian  and
M Noori
S N Mousavi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
M Nadalian
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
H Lotfollahian
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran
M Noori
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
*
Email: snmousavi@hotmail.com
Get access

Extract

Canola meal (CM) is a suitable protein source in poultry diets, although it contains a number of antinutritive factors including non-starch polysaccharides and phytic acid. These factors can limit inclusion rate of canola meal in poultry diets (Kocher et al., 2000). The negative correlation between NSP levels and nutritive value of the diet has been demonstrated in poultry (Choct and Annison, 1990). In addition to reducing the availability of phosphorus to birds, phytates are also associated with a number of antinutritional effects, largely because they can chelate divalent cations and reduce protein availability (Ravindran et al., 1995). Successful use of enzymes in cereal-based diets has stimulated interest in the application of enzymes to target the vegetable protein components of poultry diets as well. The current study was, therefore, conducted to investigate the effects of a multi-enzyme on performance and serum thyroid hormone concentrations of broilers fed rations in which soybean meal was replaced by CM.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2009 , April 2009 , pp. 228
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Choct, M. and Annison, G. 1990. British Poultry Science 31, 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloss, P., Jeffery, E., Wallig, M., Tumbleson, M. and Parsons, C. 1994. Poultry Science. 73, 1542–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, A., Choct, M., Porter, M. D. and Broz, J. 2000. Poultry science. 79, 1767–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V., Bryden, W. L. and Kornegay, E. T. 1995. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews. 6, 125–143.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2001. SAS User’s Guide. Version 8 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar