Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T18:10:06.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The digestibility and performance of complementary feedingstuffs using maillard reaction products in the post weaning pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

M. J. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Queens University Belfast, Belfast, County Down, United Kingdom
M. E. E. McCann
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, County Down, United Kingdom
V Beattie
Affiliation:
Devenish Nutrition Limited, Belfast, County Down, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The addition of ‘high quality’ complementary feedingstuffs to the diet of the post weaning pig can positively impact on growth and lean muscle deposition. The Maillard Reaction bonds amino acid and sugar molecules together, and is one of the major pathways in the chemical changes that occur in the cooking process. Cooking of feedingstuffs has been shown to improve the digestibility and nutritive value of a diet (Pickford et al, 1992). In this study, lysine (Lys), methionine (Met) and threonine (Thr) where chemically reacted with sugar molecules to give in vitro early Maillard Reaction Products (MRP). The aim of this study was to assess what effect the addition of a solution of these MRPs to a complementary feedingstuff (Matan XL) would have on overall diet digestibility and subsequent piglet performance.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pickford, J.R. (1992). Effects of processing on stability of heat liable nutrients in animal feeds. Recent Advances in Animal Science 24: 177–192.Google Scholar
Bjorck, I., Asp, N.-G., and Dahlqvist, A. (1984). Protein nutritional value of extrusion cooked wheat flours. Food Chemistry 15: 165–178.Google Scholar