Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T09:53:08.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variation in in vitro methane production of two perennial ryegrass cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

D. K. Lovett ,
A. Bortolozzo ,
D. McGilloway  and
F. P. O’Mara
D. K. Lovett*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
A. Bortolozzo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Padova University, Padova, Italy
D. McGilloway
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Food, Crop Testing Centre Backwestern, Co. Dublin, Ireland
F. P. O’Mara
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, Lyons Research Farm, University College Dublin, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
*
dan_lovett@talk21.com.
Get access

Extract

Previous studies have identified small but significant differences in in vitro methane (CH4) production between perennial ryegrass cultivars harvested pre-heading date. This raises the possibility that enteric CH4 production could be reduced through cultivar selection. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of harvest date on in vitro CH4 output of two cultivars previously identified as having a high and low methanogenic potential (Lovett et al., 2003).

Type
Feed Characterisation
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2003 , 2003 , pp. 158
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beever, D. E., Kellaway, R. C., Thomson, D. J., McRay, J. C., Wallace, C. C. and Wallace, A. S. 1978. The digestion of spring and autumn harvested perennial ryegrass by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cambridge. 90:463–470.Google Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feed. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 163:99–111 Google Scholar
Lovett, D. K., McGilloway, D., Bortolozzo, A. and O’Mara, F. P.. 2003. In vitro methane production of different cultivars of perennial ryegrass. BSAS, York.Google Scholar
Mauricio, R. M., Mould, F. L., Dhanoa, M. S., Owen, E., Channa, K. S. and Theodorou, M. K. 1999 A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 79:321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. W. and Tyrrell, H. F. 1979. Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 62:1583–1586.Google Scholar