No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some Changes in International Administrative Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700086481/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700086481a.jpg)
- Type
- Year of International Law in Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
1 GA RES. A/RES/50/54, 29 January 1996.
2 GA RES A/RES/33/119 Section 1, paragraph 2, 19 December 1978. On the issue of the fusion of the international administrative jurisdictions, see Paul Tavernier, ANNUAIRE FRANCAIS DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL 442 (1979).
3 See Professor Alain Pellet, LES VOIES DE RECOURS OUVERTES AUX ONCTIONNAIRES INTERNATIONAUX, Pedone (1982), at 19.
4 The possibility of creating a single Administrative Tribunal, A/40/471, July 23, 1985.
5 Fasla: ICJ Reports 1973, p. 166.
6 Mortished: ICJ Reports 1982, p. 325.
7 Yakimetz: 26 ILM 1264 (1987). ICJ Rep. 1987, p. 18
8 The latest report of the Secretary-General on this question is that of December 8, 1995, A/C5/50/2. The observations of the Tribunal are found in UN Doc. A-C/50/2 Add. 1, and those of the CCQAB in UN Doc. A/5(V7/Add. 8.