Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:47:24.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Sara L. Seck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sara L. Seck
Sara L. Seck*
Affiliation:
Western University, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 11 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

References

1 Rep. of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issues of Human Rights and Transnat’l Corp. and Other Bus. Enter., Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, at 5 (para. 14), UNHRC, 17th Sess., UN. Doc. A/HRC/17/31 (Mar. 21, 2011) (by John Ruggie).

2 Rep. of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Extractive Industries and IndigenousPeoples, UNHRC, 24th Sess., UN Doc. A/HRC/21/41 (July 1, 2013) (by James Anaya).

3 Franks, Daniel M. et al., Conflict Translates Environmental and Social Risk into Business Costs, Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (2014)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/05/08/1405135111.full.pdf+html.

4 See, e.g., UN Global Compact, A Business Reference Guide: U. N. Declaration on the Rights of IndigenousPeoples, (Dec. 2013), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/IndigenousPeoples/BusinessGuide.pdf.

5 Seck, Sara L., Canadian Mining Internationally and the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, 49 Can. Y.B. Int’l L. 51, 66–75 (2011)Google Scholar (discussing Canadian experience with Bill C-300).

6 See ETO Consortium, http://www.etoconsortium.org/ (last visited May 15, 2014).

7 Seck, Sara L., Unilateral Home State Regulation: Imperialism or Tool for Subaltern Resistance?, 46 Osgoode Hall L.J. 565 (2008)Google Scholar.

8 See Dodd-Frank, Revenue Watch Institute, http://www.revenuewatch.org/issues/dodd-frank (last visited May 15, 2014); Zajac, Andrew, SEC Conflict Minerals Rule Violates Freedom of Speech, Fin. Post, Apr. 15, 2014 Google Scholar, http://business.financialpost.com/2014/04/15/sec-conflict-mineral-rule-violates-freedom-of-speech-u-s-court-says/.

9 Seck, supra note 5.

10 See amicus briefs available at SCOTUSblog, http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum/ (last visited May 15, 2014); see also John Ruggie, Kiobel and Corporate Social Responsibility (Sept.4, 2012), http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/KIOBEL%20AND%20CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY(1).pdf.

11 The Chevron-Ecuador Dispute: A Paradigm of Complexity, 106 ASIL Proc. 415–28 (2012).