Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T13:12:17.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sovereignty, Endurance, and the Elusive Search for Humanitarian Space in North Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
Senior Scholar, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, USA Senior Fellow, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Professor, Department of Community Emergency Health & Paramedic Practice, Monash University Medical School, Melbourne, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comments
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2009

References

1.Glosserman, B: North Korea: Where NGOs fear to go.The Asian Bookshelf. The Japan Times, 23 November 2003. Available at http://search.japan-times.co.jp/print/fb20031123a1.html. Accessed 28 January 28 2009.Google Scholar
2.Wagner, JG: An IHL/ICRC perspective on humanitarian space. Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, HPN: Humanitarian Practice Network. December 2005; Issue 32. Available at http://www.odihpn.org/report.asp?ID=2765. Accessed 28 January 2009.Google Scholar
3.von Pilar, U: Humanitarian space under siege: Some remarks from an aid agency's perspective. Symposium on Europe and Humanitarian Aid: What Future? Learning from Crisis, Bad Neuenahr, Médecins sans Frontières (Germany), Background Paper, 22–23 April 1999: 121.Google Scholar
4.United Nations Security Council: Report of the Secretary-General on the protection of civilians in armed conflict. 28 October 2007;S/2007/643: 119.Google Scholar
5.Bass, GJ: Freedom's Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008, p 33.Google Scholar
6.North Korea: Annual Report 2008. Reporters Without Borders. 02 November 2008. Available at http://www.rsf.org/print.php3?id_article=25675. Accessed 30 January 2009.Google Scholar
7.Smith, H: Overcoming humanitarian dilemmas in the DPRK (North Korea). United States Institute of Peace. Special Report. July 2002; No.90. Available at http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/sr90.html. Accessed 28 January 2009.Google Scholar
8. Food Aid Flows: World Food Program/Interfais, 2008. Available at http://www.wfp.org/interfais/index2.htm# Accessed 03 February 2009.Google Scholar
9.Hawk, D: Concentrations of Inhumanity. Freedom House, 2007 Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/press_release/Concentrations_Inhumanity.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2009.Google Scholar
10.Kumaoka, M: North Korea from an NGO perspective.Grassroots Network, Japan Center for International Exchange. Available at http://www.jcie.or.jp/grassroots/8.html. Accessed 28 January 2009.Google Scholar
11.US Committee for Refugees World Report Survey 2001: North Korea. U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. 20 June 2001. Available at http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3b31e16710.html. Accessed 28 January 2009.Google Scholar
12.Feffer, J: North Korea and the politics of famine. Foreign Policy in Focus: FPIF Special Report. 18 September 2006. Available at http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/3524. Accessed 03 February 2009.Google Scholar
13.Flake, LG, Snyder, S: Paved with Good Intentions: The NGO Experience in North Korea. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
14.Frank, R: The future of political leadership in North Korea. Policy Forum Online 08-072A, 23 September 2008. Available at http://wwwnautilus.org/fora/security/08072. Accessed 27 January 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Snyder, S: American Religious NGOs in North Korea: A Paradoxical Relationship. Ethics & International Affairs 2007; 21(4). Available at http://www.cceia.org/resources/journal/21_4essays/003.html/pf_printable?. Accessed 28 January 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. DPRK:Floods Emergency Appeal No.MDRKP001 Final Report.FL-2007-000126- PRK,20 August 2007–15 May 2008. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/MCOT-7NHGYK?OpenDocument. Accessed 30 January 2009.Google Scholar
17.Committee to Protect Journalists: In Russia, Putin signs restrictive NGO bill. New York, 17 January 2006. Availale at http://www.cpj.org/2000/01/in-rus-sia-putin-signs-restrictive-ngo-bill.php. Accesssed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
18.Malhotra, HB: NGOs losing privileged status. The Epoch Times, Washington, DC. 31 January 2006. http://www.english.epochtimes.com/news/6-1-31/37/609.html. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
19.Le-Ba, S: Analyzing threats to civil society around the world. Global Policy Forum. November 7, 2008. http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/state/2008/1107analyzing.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
20.Obiro, V: Why NGOs will never change the world. The Arusha Times, Tanzania. 08–14 April 2006; Issue 00414.Availabe at http://www.arusha-times.co.tz/2006/14/features_5.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
21.Guinane, K: U.S. counterterrorism developments impacting charities. International Journal of Not-For-Profit Law. 2007;10(1). Available at http://www.icnl.org?KNOWLEDGE/IJNL/VOL10ISS1/special_1.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
22.Memarian, O: Civil society feels conservative' wrath. Global Policy Forum. 03 July 2006. http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/state/2006/0703wrath.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
23.Kaba, E: Foreign humanitarian agencies suspend work in Russia. Reuters. Oct 16, 2006. http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L19198883.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
24.Mutasah, T: Don't cramp the NGO's style. Mail & Guardian Online. Comment, 07 August 2007.Google Scholar
25.Digger, CW: Zimbabwe tells all aid groups to halt efforts.The New York Times.June 6, 2008. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/world/africa/06zim-babwe,html?fta=y&pagewanted=pr. Accessed 28 February 2009.Google Scholar
26.Integrated Regional Information Networks. Promotion of Democracy Banned. Global Policy Forum. 02 September 2008. Available at http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/state/2008/0902zimbabweweban.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
27.DPRK, FAQ: Document approved by ZoSun Il. Official Webpages of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. 2005-05-05. Available at http://www.korea-dpr.com/faq.htm#18. Accessed 03 February 2009.Google Scholar
28.Kim, HR: Transnational network dynamics of NGOs for North Korean refugees and human rights. Paper presented at the International Conference: Civil Society, Religion & Global Governance: Paradigms of Power & Persuasion, 1–2 September 2005. http://law.anu.edu.au/nissl/kim.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2009.Google Scholar
29.Sassen, S: A new geography of power? Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations. Global Policy Forum. http://www.globalpolicy.org/nations/sassen.htm. Accessed 28 January 2009. Burkle 165Google Scholar
30.Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty: The Responsibility to Protect. December 2001. http://www.iciss.ca/pdf/Commission-Report.pdf. Accessed 02 February 2009.Google Scholar
31. Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations: UN Reform. Global Policy Forum. Available at http://www.globalpolicy.org/reform/index.htm. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
32.The Undersigned. Responsibility to Protect Petition. http://www.petitiononline.com/BurmaAID/petition.html. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
33.Traub, J: Cyclone Nargis: Whose responsibility to protect? Meeting Summary. 12 June 2008, CUNY Graduate Center, New York. Available at http://glob-alr2p.org/pdf/related/Nargis_Summ.pdf. Accessed 04 February 2009.Google Scholar
34.Ferris, F, Reiffel, L: Cyclone Nargis: Catalyst for Change in Myanmar? Brookings. The Brookings Institute. 16 May 2008. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2008/0516_myanmar_ferris.aspx. Accessed 03 February 2009.Google Scholar