Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:21:25.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difficult Discussions: Military Intervention and United Nation Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.
Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology; Director, Asia-Pacific Center for Biosecurity, Disaster and Conflict Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii
*
E-mail: skipmd77@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 286 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

References

1.Western, J: Doctrinal divisions: The politics of US military interventions. Harvard International Review 2004;26(1):46–50.Google Scholar
2.Hansch, S: Humanitarian Assistance: CSIS-Brookings foreign assistance for the 21st Century Project. Georgetown University Institute for the Study of International Migration, Unpublished data, 2005.Google Scholar
3.Martone, G: Guidelines for interaction with military and belligerent parties. International Rescue Committee, Draft document (08 April 2003):1–8.Google Scholar
4.Evans, G, Sahnoun, M: The responsibility to protect. Foreign Affairs 2002;81(6):99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar