Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-nzzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T04:24:34.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray powder diffraction data for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate, C10H15N2⋅C7H5O4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

Zhi Qiang Li
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Shan Zhai Shang
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Xiao Xiang Liao
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Ping Lei
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Jing Mei Han
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Bin Yi
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Ji Yang
Affiliation:
R&D Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd., Kunming 650231, China
Qi Yi Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Zi Li Suo
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Hui Li*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: lihuilab@sina.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate is a nicotine salt that can be used as the nicotine source in tobacco products. X-ray powder diffraction data, unit-cell parameters, and space group for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate, C10H15N2⋅C7H5O4, are reported [a = 7.726(8) Å, b = 11.724(3) Å, c = 9.437(1) Å, α = 90°, β = 109.081(3)°, γ = 90°, unit-cell volume V = 802.902 Å3, Z = 2, ρcal = 1.309 g cm−3, and space group P21] at room temperature. All measured lines were indexed and were consistent with the P21 space group.

Type
Data Report
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Centre for Diffraction Data

I. INTRODUCTION

Electronic cigarettes are becoming more and more popular. Compared with conventional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes are relatively less harmful to users and bystanders (Yong et al., Reference Yong, Borland, Balmford, Hitchman, Cummings and Driezen2017). Nicotine salts are important parts of e-liquids and meet the need for more effective and appealing e-cigarette products to provide satisfying alternatives to smoking (Grant et al., Reference Grant, Pritchard, Prue, Thompson, Verron, Graf and Walele2019). To the best of our knowledge, the structure of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate has not been reported in the literature. In this study, nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate was synthesized. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) and detailed powder XRD data of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate were supplied at room temperature (25 °C).

II. EXPERIMENTAL

A. Sample preparation

Nicotine and 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid each were accurately weighed to achieve a 1:1 molar mixture when combined. Nicotine was added dropwise to the aqueous solution of 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid under full stirring. The reaction liquid was transferred to a dark container, and ultrasonic reaction was conducted in a 30–40 °C water bath for 4 h. The reaction solution was freeze-dried to obtain gray solid powder. The solid powder (500 mg) was dissolved in 4 ml ethanol and kept in dark for 1 week to obtain transparent bulk crystal of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate. FT-IR and 1H-NMR spectra (provided in the Supplementary Material) confirmed that the obtained compound was nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate. There was almost no water in nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate by a Karl Fischer coulometer. Finally, a portion of the crystals were dried at room temperature and ground into powder.

B. Powder diffraction data collection and reduction

The powder XRD measurement was performed at room temperature using an X'Pert PRO diffractometer (PANalytical Co., Ltd., Netherlands) with a PIXcel 1D detector and Cu radiation (generator setting: 40 kV and 40 mA). The diffraction data were collected over the angular range from 4 to 50° 2θ with a step size of 0.02626° 2θ. The scan speed is 0.01340 °/s. The powder XRD pattern is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. XRD pattern of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate using Cu radiation (red line) and the simulated pattern of ours (black line).

The Material Studio 8.0 (Accelrys Co., Ltd., CA, California, USA) software package was used to process the data in the Analytical & Testing Center (Sichuan University, Chengdu, China). The powder XRD pattern was pre-treated by subtracting the background, smoothing, and stripping off the 2 component. Automatic indexing results obtained by X-Cell algorithm (Neumann, Reference Neumann2003) were refined using the Pawley method (Pawley, Reference Pawley1981), which involves the assignment of Miller indices (h, k, l) to each observed peak in the experimental powder XRD pattern. The Pawley refinement was performed on the raw data.

C. Single-crystal XRD

The single-crystal XRD data for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate were collected on an Xcalibur, Eos diffractometer. The crystal was kept at 293.15 K during data collection. The structure was solved with structure solution program Olex2 (Dolomanov et al., Reference Dolomanov, Bourhis, Gildea, Howard and Puschmann2009) using intrinsic phasing. The structure was refined with the ShelXL (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2008) refinement package using least squares minimization (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015). The single-crystal structure refinement details are provided in the Supplementary Material.

III. RESULTS

The Pawley refinement results confirmed that the title compound was monoclinic with space group P21 and unit-cell parameters: a = 7.726(8) Å, b = 11.724(3) Å, c = 9.437(1) Å, α = 90°, β = 109.081(3)°, γ = 90°, unit-cell volume V = 802.902 Å3, Z = 2, ρ cal = 1.309 g cm−3. The values of 2θ obs, d obs, I obs, h, k, l, 2θ cal, d cal, Δ are listed in Table I. The results were in good agreement with single crystal data [a = 7.7108(7) Å, b = 11.6910(12) Å, c = 9.4114(12) Å, α = 90°, β = 108.996(12)°, γ = 90°, unit-cell volume V = 802.21(16) Å3, Z = 2, ρ cal = 1.310 g cm−3]. The principal acquisition parameters and structure refinement values for single-crystal nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate compound are listed in Supplementary Table SI. The structural formula of 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate is shown in Figure 2. Crystallographic data for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) with a supplementary publication number of CCDC-2084167. The comparison of the experimental powder XRD pattern with the simulated pattern of ours is shown in Figure 1. The presented powder pattern for the nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate compound has been carefully measured and confirmed via a good match to the calculated pattern based on the crystal structure.

Figure 2. Structural formula of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate.

Table I. Indexed X-ray powder diffraction data for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate

The d-values were calculated using Cu 1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å), F 20 = 43.3 (0.0145, 32).

IV. DEPOSITED DATA

CIF and RAW data files were deposited with ICDD. You may request this data from ICDD at .

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715622000070.

References

Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., and Puschmann, H. (2009). “OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 339341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, O., Pritchard, J. D., Prue, C., Thompson, J., Verron, T., Graf, D., and Walele, T. (2019). “A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt formulations in US adult smokers,” Intern. Emerg. Med. 14, 853861.Google Scholar
Neumann, M. A. (2003). “X-Cell: a novel indexing algorithm for routine tasks and difficult cases,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 356365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, G. S. (1981). “Unit-cell refinement from powder diffraction scans,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14(6), 357361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). “Foundations of crystallography,” Acta Crystallogr. A 64, 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). “Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL,” Acta Crystallogr. C71, 38.Google Scholar
Yong, H. H., Borland, R., Balmford, J., Hitchman, S. C., Cummings, K. M., and Driezen, P. (2017). “Prevalence and correlates of the belief that electronic cigarettes are a lot less harmful than conventional cigarettes under the different regulatory environments of Australia and the UK,” Nicotine Tob. Res. 19(2), 258263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. XRD pattern of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate using Cu radiation (red line) and the simulated pattern of ours (black line).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Structural formula of nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate.

Figure 2

Table I. Indexed X-ray powder diffraction data for nicotine 2,6-dihydroxybenzoate

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 192 KB