Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:47:37.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embracing intellectual humility: A response to the biopolitics forum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

Laurette T. Liesen  and
Mary Barbara Walsh
Laurette T. Liesen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Lewis University, One University Parkway, Romeoville, IL 60446 LiesenLa@lewisu.edu
Mary Barbara Walsh
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Elmhurst College, 190 Prospect Avenue, Elmhurst, IL 60126 walshm@elmhurst.edu

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Biopolitics Forum
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Spring 2013 , pp. 99 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

References

1. Liesen, Laurette T. and Walsh, Mary, “The competing meanings of ‘biopolitics’ in political science,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 31(1–2), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hannagan, Rebecca J., “Biopolitics via political psychology: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 32(1): 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hatemi, Peter K., Funk, Carolyn L., Medland, Sarah E., Maes, Hermine M., Silberg, Judy L., Martin, Nicholas G., Eaves, Lindon J., “Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a lifetime,” Journal of Politics 2009, 71(3): 1141–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Smith, Kevin, Alford, John R., Hatemi, Peter K., Eaves, Lindon J., Funk, Carolyn L., Hibbing, John R., “Biology, ideology, and epistemology: How do we know political attitudes are inherited and why should we care?” American Journal of Political Science 2012, 56(1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fletcher, Amy L., “In praise of a modest postmodernism: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 32(1), 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stewart, Patrick A., “The two cultures of ‘biopolitics’: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 32(1), 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar