Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T16:43:33.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of EcoTILLING to identify natural allelic variants of rice candidate genes involved in salinity tolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

S. Negrão
Affiliation:
ITQB (Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica), IBET (Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
C. Almadanim
Affiliation:
ITQB (Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica), IBET (Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
I. Pires
Affiliation:
ITQB (Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica), IBET (Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
K. L. McNally
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
M. M. Oliveira*
Affiliation:
ITQB (Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica), IBET (Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mmolive@itqb.unl.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rice is a salt-sensitive species with enormous genetic variation for salt tolerance hidden in its germplasm pool. The EcoTILLING technique allows us to assign haplotypes, thus reducing the number of accessions to be sequenced, becoming a cost-effective, time-saving and high-throughput method, ideal to be used in laboratories with limited financial resources. Aiming to find alleles associated with salinity tolerance, we are currently using the EcoTILLING technique to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small indels across 375 germplasm accessions representing the diversity available in domesticated rice. We are targeting several genes known to be involved in salt stress signal transduction (OsCPK17) or tolerance mechanisms (SalT). So far, we found a total of 15 and 23 representative SNPs or indels in OsCPK17 and SalT, respectively. These natural allelic variants are mostly located in 3′-untranslated region, thus opening a new path for studying their potential contribution to the regulation of gene expression and possible role in salt tolerance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Introduction

Soil salinity existed long before humans and agriculture; however, the problem has been aggravated by agricultural practices such as irrigation (Zhu, Reference Zhu2001). It is estimated that about 20% of irrigated agricultural land throughout the world is adversely affected by salinity. Plants differ greatly in their tolerance to salinity, with rice (Oryza sativa L.) being the most sensitive cereal. Rice is the primary food source for over half of the world's population and has been the subject of countless breeding programmes to increase its productivity and tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying salinity tolerance is being undertaken to provide practical contributions to food production, particularly to mitigate the effects of increasing salinization and climate change.

In rice, differences among genotypes account for its response towards salinity (Zeng, Reference Zeng2005). The importance of genes hidden in the primary rice gene pool (including low-yielding ancestors and traditional landraces) to enhance rice performance in stress conditions was previously illustrated (Ali et al., Reference Ali, Xu, Ismail, Fu, Vijaykumar, Gao, Domingo, Maghirang, Yu, Gregorio, Yanaghihara, Cohen, Carmen, Mackill and Li2006). Since the most common forms of genetic variation within natural populations are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions and deletions (indels), a further step can be achieved by investigating such variation in key-responsive genes from diverse germplasm (Raghavan et al., Reference Raghavan, Naredo, Wang, Atienza, Liu, Qiu, McNally and Leung2007). While we are now in the ‘next-generation sequencing’ era, many research programmes have limited funding and need more cost-effective, high-throughput techniques. The EcoTILLING method allows SNPs and indels discovery and the delineation of haplotypes at loci of interest (Comai et al., Reference Comai, Young, Till, Reynolds, Greene, Codomo, Enns, Johnson, Burtner, Odden and Henikoff2004). We are using EcoTILLING to explore the natural variability existing in rice germplasm at key genes related to salinity tolerance. Although this large-scale analysis is still ongoing, we have already obtained promising results showing high genetic variability in rice germplasm at salinity tolerance loci and the potential to deliver superior alleles for breeding programmes targeting salinity tolerance.

Materials and methods

We used 375 genotypes that represent the diversity present in O. sativa, which were selected from the set genotyped by single sequence repeats in the ‘Generation Challenge Program’ with a population structure similar to that of Garris et al. (Reference Garris, Tai, Coburn, Kresovich and McCouch2005). Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from leaf tissue according to Fulton et al. (Reference Fulton, Chunwongse and Tanksley1995). DNA from all samples was brought to a concentration of 0.5 ng/μl. For EcoTILLING, DNA from each genotype was contrasted with either ‘IR64’ (against indica, admixed and Aus accessions) or ‘Nipponbare’ (against japonica, aromatic and admixed) separately, in a 1:1 ratio.

Target genes were SalT (LOC_Os01g24710) and OsCPK17 (LOC_Os07g06740). Primers were designed (based on the ‘Nipponbare’ genome sequence) with Primer3 software to amplify part of an intron and the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of OsCPK17 (forward – AATTGGAGGTTGGGCCATAG; reverse – TGTGAGGTGGAAGAAGCAAAC) and the second exon and the 3′-UTR region of SalT (forward – ACCACTCAACACCGGTAGGACACT; reverse – GCAGATTAAACTGGGCTCCTCTGA), corresponding to 979 and 825 bp products, respectively.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 14 μl final volume, using 3.5 ng of total DNA as template, 0.4 U/reaction of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The PCR cycling conditions were set at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 61–64°C (depending on primer specificity) for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s and a final extension of 7 min at 72°C. The PCR products were denatured at 99°C for 10 min and renatured initially at 70°C for 20 s followed by 69 cycles with a temperature decrease by 0.3°C per cycle. Celery juice extract (CJE) was produced by the technique of Till et al. (Reference Till, Burtner, Comai and Henikoff2004). The mismatch cleavage (CJE digestion optimized for each primer) and EcoTILLING analysis in agarose gel were performed according to Raghavan et al. (Reference Raghavan, Naredo, Wang, Atienza, Liu, Qiu, McNally and Leung2007).

Results and discussion

Rice cultivars with different salt sensitivities have been studied using transcriptomic approaches (Walia et al., Reference Walia, Wilson, Condamine, Liu, Ismail, Zeng, Wanamaker, Mandal, Xu, Cui and Close2005, Reference Walia, Wilson, Zeng, Ismail, Condamine and Close2007; Kumari et al., Reference Kumari, Panjabi, Kushwaha, Sopory, Singla-Pareek and Pareek2009; Senadheera et al., Reference Senadheera, Singh and Maathuis2009), revealing highly significant differences in gene regulatory mechanisms between genotypes. A clear example of the importance of genotypic differences between varieties towards salt stress was given by the allelic differences found in OsHKT8 gene between two different genotypes (Ren et al., Reference Ren, Gao, Li, Cai, Huang, Chao, Zhu, Wang, Luan and Lin2005). The six nucleotide substitutions in the coding region leading to four amino acid changes present in ‘Nona Bokra’ enhanced the overall Na+ transport activity (Ren et al., Reference Ren, Gao, Li, Cai, Huang, Chao, Zhu, Wang, Luan and Lin2005), showing the importance of discovering superior alleles in salt stress-related genes.

We are presently evaluating the haplotype groups of OsCPK17 and SalT genes by EcoTILLING. OsCPK17 encodes a calcium-dependent protein kinase, and its promoter contains cis elements responsive to various stress stimuli. Wan et al. (Reference Wan, Lin and Mou2007) showed that OsCPK17 is down-regulated by salt, cold and drought, indicating its importance in stress signal transduction in rice. The SalT gene was first isolated and characterized from the roots of rice plants treated with salt (Claes et al., Reference Claes, Dekeyser, Villarroel, Vandenbulcke, Bauw, Vanmontagu and Caplan1990) and co-localizes with the Saltol Quantitative Trait Loci. Although several studies have already been performed (Claes et al., Reference Claes, Dekeyser, Villarroel, Vandenbulcke, Bauw, Vanmontagu and Caplan1990; Zhang and Blumwald, Reference Zhang and Blumwald2001; de Souza et al., Reference de Souza, Ferreira, Dias, Queiroz, Branco, Bressan-Smith, Oliveira and Garcia2003), the function of SalT is not clearly understood.

In our EcoTILLING assay, we amplified c. 1 kb targets of each gene using specific primers. If the amplicons differ in sequence content between the reference and target germplasm, heteroduplex mismatch molecules will occur on re-annealing. Digestion with CJE endonuclease reveals bands other than full-length products indicating SNPs or/and indels. By comparing the digestion patterns, haplotypes can be assigned, as shown in Fig. 1. The number, position and type of SNPs in the haplotypes were validated by sequencing the PCR amplicons.

Fig. 1 Analysis of the EcoTILLING digestion patterns in agarose gel for OsCPK17 in different rice varieties. The varieties shown were contrasted with ‘IR64’ and created four haplotype groups (A, B, E and D) according to CJE-cleaved products. 1, PATNAI 23; 2, CODE NO. 31293; 3, TOS7564; 4, KHAO PON; 5, MALLIGAI (KOTTAMALLI SAMBA); 6, TUNGHWANPEI; 7, DE ABRIL; 8, LAGEADO; 9, BALA; 10, SINNA SITHIRA KALI; M, molecular marker.

The analysis of the EcoTLLING digestion patterns identified ten haplotypes for OsCPK17 and six haplotypes for SalT (Table 1). For OsCPK17, haplotypes A and G (which include the reference types ‘IR64’ and ‘Nipponbare’, respectively) are more frequent, whereas E, F, I and J are very rare (each represented by one accession). The observed mismatches were explained by 15 SNPs or indels with most of the indels being detected in repetitive sequences: (CT), (T) or (GT). All polymorphisms detected in OsCPK17 do not seem to interfere with 3′-splice sites. As of now, we have found 23 SNPs or indels in the SalT gene. Haplotype A is the most frequent and includes both reference genotypes ‘IR64’ and ‘Nipponbare’. The transition T/C (position 1108) is a silent mutation, whereas the transition A/C (position 1159) leads to a glutamate to aspartate change. Since these two amino acids belong to the same group, this change may have little or no consequence on protein structure/function. The remaining SNPs and indels were located in the 3′-UTR region. These variations may be of significance since it is now recognized that 3′-UTRs play crucial roles in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression through the modulation of nucleocytoplasmic messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) transport, regulation of mRNA polyadenylation and translation, translation efficiency, sub-cellular localization and messenger stability (Mignone et al., Reference Mignone, Grillo, Licciulli, Iacono, Liuni, Kersey, Duarte, Saccone and Pesole2005).

Table 1 Sequence and position of the SNPs and indels found in OsCPK17 and SalT genes

Our large-scale analysis is also targeting and analysing other regions of SalT and OsCPK17, as well as of other genes important in salinity tolerance. We will further assess the relevance of the DNA variations by testing association with salinity tolerance phenotypes. Eventually, we hope to uncover novel superior alleles that can be used in rice-breeding programmes for salt stress tolerance.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal) through the project FCT- PTDC/AGR-GPL/70920/2006. Sónia Negrão gratefully acknowledges FCT-Portugal for the financial support (SFRH/BPD/34593/2007). All the plant material was kindly provided by the International Rice Genebank, located at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI, The Philippines). We also thank Ma. Elisabeth B. Naredo (IRRI) for the laboratory support, and Isabel Abreu (IBMC, Portugal) for the protein analysis and help with the CJE production. Nelson Saibo is also acknowledged for the critical review of this manuscript.

References

Ali, AJ, Xu, JL, Ismail, AM, Fu, BY, Vijaykumar, CHM, Gao, YM, Domingo, J, Maghirang, R, Yu, SB, Gregorio, G, Yanaghihara, S, Cohen, M, Carmen, B, Mackill, D and Li, ZK (2006) Hidden diversity for abiotic and biotic stress tolerances in the primary gene pool of rice revealed by a large backcross breeding program. Field Crops Research 97: 6676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claes, B, Dekeyser, R, Villarroel, R, Vandenbulcke, M, Bauw, G, Vanmontagu, M and Caplan, A (1990) Characterization of a rice gene showing organ-specific expression in response to salt stress and drought. Plant Cell 2: 1927.Google Scholar
Comai, L, Young, K, Till, BJ, Reynolds, SH, Greene, EA, Codomo, CA, Enns, LC, Johnson, JE, Burtner, C, Odden, AR and Henikoff, S (2004) Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling. Plant Journal 37: 778786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Souza, GA, Ferreira, BS, Dias, JM, Queiroz, KS, Branco, AT, Bressan-Smith, RE, Oliveira, JG and Garcia, AB (2003) Accumulation of SALT protein in rice plants as a response to environmental stresses. Plant Science 164: 623628.Google Scholar
Fulton, TM, Chunwongse, J and Tanksley, SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13: 207209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garris, AJ, Tai, TH, Coburn, J, Kresovich, S and McCouch, S (2005) Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics 169: 16311638.Google Scholar
Kumari, S, Panjabi, V, Kushwaha, H, Sopory, S, Singla-Pareek, S and Pareek, A (2009) Transcriptome map for seedling stage specific salinity stress response indicates a specific set of genes as candidate for saline tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Functional and Integrative Genomics 9: 109123.Google Scholar
Mignone, F, Grillo, G, Licciulli, F, Iacono, M, Liuni, S, Kersey, PJ, Duarte, J, Saccone, C and Pesole, G (2005) UTRdb and UTRsite: a collection of sequences and regulatory motifs of the untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 33: D141D146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghavan, C, Naredo, MEB, Wang, HH, Atienza, G, Liu, B, Qiu, FL, McNally, KL and Leung, H (2007) Rapid method for detecting SNPs on agarose gels and its application in candidate gene mapping. Molecular Breeding 19: 87101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, ZH, Gao, JP, Li, LG, Cai, XL, Huang, W, Chao, DY, Zhu, MZ, Wang, ZY, Luan, S and Lin, HX (2005) A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Genetics 37: 11411146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senadheera, P, Singh, RK and Maathuis, FJM (2009) Differentially expressed membrane transporters in rice roots may contribute to cultivar dependent salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 25532563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Till, BJ, Burtner, C, Comai, L and Henikoff, S (2004) Mismatch cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 26322641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walia, H, Wilson, C, Condamine, P, Liu, X, Ismail, AM, Zeng, LH, Wanamaker, SI, Mandal, J, Xu, J, Cui, XP and Close, TJ (2005) Comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting rice genotypes under salinity stress during the vegetative growth stage. Plant Physiology 139: 822835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walia, H, Wilson, C, Zeng, LH, Ismail, AM, Condamine, P and Close, TJ (2007) Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of salinity stressed japonica and indica rice genotypes during panicle initiation stage. Plant Molecular Biology 63: 609623.Google Scholar
Wan, B, Lin, Y and Mou, T (2007) Expression of rice Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) genes under different environmental stresses. FEBS Letters 581: 11791189.Google Scholar
Zeng, LH (2005) Exploration of relationships between physiological parameters and growth performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings under salinity stress using multivariate analysis. Plant and Soil 268: 5159.Google Scholar
Zhang, HX and Blumwald, E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnology 19: 765768.Google Scholar
Zhu, JK (2001) Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 6: 6671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Analysis of the EcoTILLING digestion patterns in agarose gel for OsCPK17 in different rice varieties. The varieties shown were contrasted with ‘IR64’ and created four haplotype groups (A, B, E and D) according to CJE-cleaved products. 1, PATNAI 23; 2, CODE NO. 31293; 3, TOS7564; 4, KHAO PON; 5, MALLIGAI (KOTTAMALLI SAMBA); 6, TUNGHWANPEI; 7, DE ABRIL; 8, LAGEADO; 9, BALA; 10, SINNA SITHIRA KALI; M, molecular marker.

Figure 1

Table 1 Sequence and position of the SNPs and indels found in OsCPK17 and SalT genes