Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:19:45.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with soybean seed protein content using two populations derived from crosses between Glycine max and Glycine soja

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2014

Long Yan
Affiliation:
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang Branch Center of National Center for Soybean Improvement, The Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Shijiazhuang 050035, People's Republic of China
Li-Li Xing
Affiliation:
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China
Chun-Yan Yang
Affiliation:
Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang Branch Center of National Center for Soybean Improvement, The Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Shijiazhuang 050035, People's Republic of China
Ru-Zhen Chang
Affiliation:
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China
Meng-Chen Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang Branch Center of National Center for Soybean Improvement, The Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Shijiazhuang 050035, People's Republic of China
Li-Juan Qiu*
Affiliation:
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: qiulijuan@caas.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed protein content is one of the most important traits controlled by quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in soybean. In this study, a Glycine soja accession (ZYD2738) was crossed with two elite cultivars Jidou 12 and Jidou 9 separately and subsequently the resulting F2:3 populations were used to identify QTLs associated with seed protein content. Protein contents in either population appeared to have a normal distribution with transgressive segregation. A total of five QTLs associated with high protein content were identified and mapped to chromosomes 2, 6, 13, 18 and 20, respectively. Of these QTLs, three (qPRO_2_1, qPRO_13_1 and qPRO_20_1) were identified in the same region in both the populations, whereas the other two (qPRO_6_1 and qPRO_18_1) were mapped in two different regions. qPRO_2_1 appears to be a novel protein QTL. qPRO_6_1, qPRO_18_1 and qPRO_20_1 had additive effects on seed protein content, while qPRO_13_1 had an over-dominant effect on seed protein content. These QTLs and their linked markers could serve as effective tools for marker-assisted selection to increase seed protein content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Introduction

Soybean (Glycine max) protein content is one of the most important traits targeted by many breeding programmes. It is primarily controlled by quantitative trait loci (QTLs) (Diers et al., Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992). Although phenotypic selection for high protein content in traditional breeding is usually successful (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Meng, Yang, Zhao and Wu1986; Chung et al., Reference Chung, Babka, Graef, Staswick, Lee, Cregan, Shoemaker and Specht2003), marker-assisted selection (MAS) is considered to be an efficient method (Chapman et al., Reference Chapman, Pantalone, Ustun, Allen, Landau-Ellis, Trigiano and Gresshoff2003). In the past few decades, 141 QTLs associated with soybean protein content have been discovered (http://www.soybase.org; Diers et al., Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Bailey, Mian, Carter, Shipe, Ashley, Parrott, Hussey and Boerma1996; Brummer et al., Reference Brummer, Graef, Orf, Wilcox and Shoemaker1997; Orf et al., Reference Orf, Chase, Jarvik, Mansur, Cregan, Adler and Lark1999; Sebolt et al., Reference Sebolt, Shoemaker and Diers2000; Csanádi et al., Reference Csanádi, Vollmann, Stift and Lelley2001; Chapman et al., Reference Chapman, Pantalone, Ustun, Allen, Landau-Ellis, Trigiano and Gresshoff2003; Chung et al., Reference Chung, Babka, Graef, Staswick, Lee, Cregan, Shoemaker and Specht2003; Fasoula et al., Reference Fasoula, Harris and Boerma2004; Hyten et al., Reference Hyten, Pantalone, Sams, Saxton, Landau-Ellis, Stefaniak and Schmidt2004; Panthee et al., Reference Panthee, Pantalone, West, Saxton and Sams2005; Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Glover, Carlson, Specht and Diers2006; Jun et al., Reference Jun, Van, Kim, Lee and Walker2008). Compared with QTLs associated with protein content, more QTLs associated with oil content are found in SoyBase. Most of the populations of G. max× G. max have been found to exhibit a negative correlation between protein and oil content (Diers et al., Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992), except Young × PI 416937 (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Bailey, Mian, Carter, Shipe, Ashley, Parrott, Hussey and Boerma1996). Some of the QTLs increasing protein content have been found to be not associated with decreasing oil content (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Bailey, Mian, Carter, Shipe, Ashley, Parrott, Hussey and Boerma1996). In other cases, QTLs have been found to increase both protein and oil contents (Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Arelli and Sleper1999). Although wild soybean is a potential resource for soybean improvement (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Shoemaker, Arelli and Diers2001, Reference Wang, Graef, Procopiuk and Diers2004; Concibido et al., Reference Concibido, La Vallee, Mclaird, Pineda, Meyer, Hummel, Yang, Wu and Delannay2003; Hyten et al., Reference Hyten, Song, Zhu, Choi, Nelson, Costa, Specht, Shoemaker and Cregan2006; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Fujita, Yan, Sakamoto, Xu and Abe2007; Winter et al., Reference Winter, Shelp, Anderson, Welacky and Rajcan2007; Li et al., Reference Li, Pfeiffer and Cornelius2008a; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Diers, Hyten, Rouf Mian, Shannon and Nelson2012), only one population of Glycine max× Glycine soja has been used for mapping protein content (Diers et al., Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992). This may be due to undesirable traits such as small seed size, shattering and viny growth in G. soja and labour consuming for management.

The objectives of this study were to map QTLs controlling the protein content in two populations derived from crosses between two G. max cultivars and one G. soja accession and to determine the genetic effect of these QTLs. The results of this study will be helpful for soybean improvement using MAS.

Materials and methods

Two high-protein content varieties and a G. soja accession were used as parents. Jidou 12 (mature group II) derived from Mengcheng 6/Clark//Tian'edan/Zhilibaimao and Jidou 9 (mature group III) derived from Tie 7533//Niumaohuang/Williams. ZYD2738, a G. soja accession, was collected in Chengde. Eighty-three F2 plants derived from Jidou 12 × ZYD2738 (dubbed J12) and 219 F2 plants derived from Jidou 9 × ZYD2738 (dubbed J9) were self-pollinated to obtain F2:3 populations. The F2:3 and parent plants were grown in a randomized complete-block design with three replicates, at Dishang Experimental Station, Hebei, China, during the summer of 2009. Approximately 20 g of seeds were ground with a standard coffee grinder and passed through a 35-mesh screen. Samples weighing around 0.5 g were used to measure protein content using the Kjeldahl method (Hymowitz et al., Reference Hymowitz, Dudley, Collins and Brown1974; Wolf et al., Reference Wolf, Cavins, Kleiman and Black1982) with the nitrogen conversion factor of 6.25.

The DNA of F2 plants was extracted using the Tiangen DNA Quick Plant System (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China). Based on the consensus linkage map (Song et al., Reference Song, Marek, Shoemaker, Lark, Concibido, Delannay, Specht and Cregan2004), well-distributed polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were selected and used to analyse the populations. Polymerase chain reactions were carried out using the method described by Li et al. (Reference Li, Guan, Liu, Ma, Wang, Li, Lin, Luan, Chen, Yan, Guan, Zhu, Ning, Smulders, Li, Piao, Cui, Yu, Guan, Chang, Hou, Shi, Zhang, Zhu and Qiu2008b).

Heritability was estimated as follows:

$$\begin{eqnarray} h ^{2} = \frac { \sigma _{g}^{2}}{ \sigma _{g}^{2} + \sigma _{e}^{2}/ r } \end{eqnarray}$$

where h 2 represents heritability, $$\sigma _{g}^{2} $$ is the genetic variance, $$\sigma _{e}^{2} $$ is the error variance and r is the number of replications (Funatsuki et al., Reference Funatsuki, Kawaguchi, Matsuba, Sato and Ishimoto2005). Linkage analysis was carried out using the MapManager program QTXb17 (http://mapmgr.roswellpark.org). The candidate QTLs were identified by composite interval mapping using Windows QTL Cartographer version 2.5 (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Basten and Zeng2007). A QTL was considered to exist at a position where the logarithm of the odds (LOD) score exceeded the empirical threshold based on 1000 permutations (Churchill and Doerge, Reference Churchill and Doerge1994).

Results and discussion

Protein contents in Jidou 12, Jidou 9 and ZYD2738 were 412, 405 and 401 g/kg− 1, respectively. Although the protein contents in these parents were not significantly different, those in the two populations derived from them were normally distributed with transgression. Protein content in J12 plants ranged from 388 to 473 g/kg− 1, with a mean of 418 g/kg− 1 and a standard deviation of 16.1 g/kg− 1. It ranged from 358 to 445 g/kg− 1 in J9 plants, with a mean of 399 g/kg− 1 and a standard deviation of 15.4 g/kg− 1. The heritability of protein content in J12 and J9 plants was 0.80 and 0.76, respectively.

For the analysis of J12 plants, 132 polymorphic SSR markers were used. Three of the markers exhibited significant (P≤ 0.01) segregation distortion. The 132 markers covered a total distance of 1235.7 cM, with an average distance of 10.7 cM between the markers. Four putative protein content QTLs were discovered with LOD scores ≥ 3.6 (Table 1). The QTLs had R 2 estimates ranging from 12.8 to 14.5% and were located on chromosomes 2, 6, 13 and 20. For the analysis of J9 plants, 151 polymorphic markers were used. Six of the markers exhibited significant (P≤ 0.01) segregation distortion. The 151 markers covered a total distance of 1824.7 cM, with an average distance of 10.7 cM between the markers. Four putative QTLs with R 2 estimates ranging from 6.6 to 9.6% were located on chromosomes 2, 13, 18 and 20. Diers et al. (Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992) found that all QTL alleles from G. soja contributed more to increasing protein content compared with those from G. max. In the present study, however, most of the alleles associated with higher protein content derived from G. max, except qPRO_20_1. The identification of positive QTLs from both G. soja and G. max provides an opportunity to integrate different genes for soybean improvement.

Table 1 Quantitative trait loci (QTLs), chromosome locations, linkage markers, and genetic contributions to seed protein content from QTLs identified using composite interval mapping in two F2:3 populations derived from the Glycine max×Glycine soja crosses of Jidou 12×ZYD2738 and Jidou 9×ZYD2738

LOD, logarithm of the odds.

a R 2 is the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the genotype at the marker locus.

b The unit for the additive and dominance effects of each QTL is 10 g kg− 1.

c The additive effect of each QTL is given as a unit contribution of the G. max allele.

qPRO_2_1 is apparently a novel QTL associated with protein content. In J12 plants, qPRO_2_1 linked with Satt546, the LOD score was 5.81, and the R 2 estimate was 17.5%. In J9 plants, it linked with Satt274, the LOD score was 3.7, and the R 2 estimate was 6.7% (Fig. 1). qPRO_20_1 has been reported in both G. max× G. soja and G. max× G. max populations (Diers et al., Reference Diers, Keim, Fehr and Shoemaker1992; Brummer et al., Reference Brummer, Graef, Orf, Wilcox and Shoemaker1997; Sebolt et al., Reference Sebolt, Shoemaker and Diers2000; Chung et al., Reference Chung, Babka, Graef, Staswick, Lee, Cregan, Shoemaker and Specht2003; Nichols et al., Reference Nichols, Glover, Carlson, Specht and Diers2006; Bolon et al., Reference Bolon, Joseph, Cannon, Graham, Diers, Farmer, May, Muehlbauer, Specht, Tu, Weeks, Xu, Shoemaker and Vance2010; Yesudas et al., Reference Yesudas, Bashir, Geisler and Lightfoot2013), and it was also detected in two populations in this study: linked with Satt239 in J12 plants and with Satt270 in J9 plants. The synteny regions of this QTL on chromosome 10 were compared, and the result indicated that non-shared gene contents within the duplicated genomic regions might lead to the absence/presence of QTLs related to protein content (Lestari et al., Reference Lestari, Van, Lee, Kang and Lee2013). qPRO_13_1, which linked with Satt114, was an over-dominant QTL, because the estimated dominance to the absolute value of additive effect was larger than unity (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Li, Xu, Tan, Gao, Li, Zhang and Saghai Maroof1997). Discovering more QTLs contributing to higher protein content among cultivated and wild soybean populations will be beneficial for increasing protein content by pyramiding genes.

Fig. 1 Logarithm of the odds score plot for qPRO_2_1 in two populations of Jidou 12 × ZYD2738 and Jidou 9 × ZYD2738 in chromosome 2. Genetic positions of the markers are given in centimorgans.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000719 and 31340043), the State Key Program for National Transgenic Organism New Variety Development (2013ZX08009-003 and 2011ZX08004-002), the 12th Five-Year Plan of China (2011BAD35b06), and the State High-Tech (863) (2012AA101106) and State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China (973) (2009CB118400), Chinese Crop Germplasm Platform (2012-004).

References

Bolon, YT, Joseph, B, Cannon, SB, Graham, MA, Diers, BW, Farmer, AD, May, GD, Muehlbauer, GJ, Specht, JE, Tu, ZJ, Weeks, N, Xu, WW, Shoemaker, RC and Vance, CP (2010) Complementary genetic and genomic approaches help characterize the linkage group I seed protein QTL in soybean. BMC Plant Biology 10: 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummer, EC, Graef, GL, Orf, J, Wilcox, JR and Shoemaker, RC (1997) Mapping QTL for seed protein and oil content in eight soybean populations. Crop Science 37: 370378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, A, Pantalone, VR, Ustun, A, Allen, FL, Landau-Ellis, D, Trigiano, RN and Gresshoff, PM (2003) Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F2 and F4:6 soybean population. Euphytica 129: 387393.Google Scholar
Chung, J, Babka, HL, Graef, GL, Staswick, PE, Lee, DJ, Cregan, PB, Shoemaker, RC and Specht, JE (2003) The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Science 43: 10531067.Google Scholar
Churchill, GA and Doerge, RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138: 963971.Google Scholar
Concibido, VC, La Vallee, B, Mclaird, P, Pineda, N, Meyer, J, Hummel, L, Yang, J, Wu, K and Delannay, X (2003) Introgression of a quantitative trait locus for yield from Glycine soja into commercial soybean cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 575582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csanádi, G, Vollmann, J, Stift, G and Lelley, T (2001) Seed quality QTLs identified in a molecular map of early maturing soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 912919.Google Scholar
Diers, BW, Keim, P, Fehr, WR and Shoemaker, RC (1992) RFLP analysis of soybean seed protein and oil content. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 608612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fasoula, VA, Harris, DK and Boerma, HR (2004) Validation and designation of quantitative trait loci for seed protein, seed oil, and seed weight from two soybean populations. Crop Science 44: 12181225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funatsuki, H, Kawaguchi, K, Matsuba, S, Sato, Y and Ishimoto, M (2005) Mapping of QTL associated with chilling tolerance during reproductive growth in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 851861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymowitz, T, Dudley, JW, Collins, FI and Brown, CM (1974) Estimations of protein and oil concentration in corn, soybean, and oat seed by near-infrared light reflectance. Crop Science 14: 713715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyten, DL, Pantalone, VR, Sams, CE, Saxton, AM, Landau-Ellis, D, Stefaniak, TR and Schmidt, ME (2004) Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 552561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyten, DL, Song, QJ, Zhu, YL, Choi, IY, Nelson, RL, Costa, JM, Specht, JE, Shoemaker, RC and Cregan, PB (2006) Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 1666616671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jun, TH, Van, K, Kim, MY, Lee, SH and Walker, DR (2008) Association analysis using SSR markers to find QTL for seed protein content in soybean. Euphytica 162: 179191.Google Scholar
Kim, KS, Diers, BW, Hyten, DL, Rouf Mian, MA, Shannon, JG and Nelson, RL (2012) Identification of positive yield QTL alleles from exotic soybean germplasm in two backcross populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125: 13531369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SH, Bailey, MA, Mian, MAR, Carter, TE Jr, Shipe, ER, Ashley, DA, Parrott, WA, Hussey, RS and Boerma, HR (1996) RFLP loci associated with soybean seed protein and oil content across populations and locations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 649657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lestari, P, Van, K, Lee, J, Kang, YJ and Lee, SH (2013) Gene divergence of homeologous regions associated with a major seed protein content QTL in soybean. Front Plant Science 4: 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, DD, Pfeiffer, TW and Cornelius, PL (2008a) Soybean QTL for yield and yield components associated with Glycine soja alleles. Crop Science 48: 571581.Google Scholar
Li, YH, Guan, RX, Liu, ZX, Ma, YS, Wang, LX, Li, LH, Lin, FY, Luan, WJ, Chen, PY, Yan, Z, Guan, Y, Zhu, L, Ning, XC, Smulders, MJM, Li, W, Piao, RH, Cui, YH, Yu, ZM, Guan, M, Chang, RZ, Hou, AF, Shi, AN, Zhang, B, Zhu, SL and Qiu, LJ (2008 b) Genetic structure and diversity of cultivated soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) landraces in China. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117: 857871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, BH, Fujita, T, Yan, ZH, Sakamoto, S, Xu, DH and Abe, J (2007) QTL mapping of domestication-related traits in soybean (Glycine max). Annals of Botany 100: 10271038.Google Scholar
Nichols, DM, Glover, KD, Carlson, SR, Specht, JE and Diers, BW (2006) Fine mapping of a seed protein QTL on soybean linkage group I and its correlated effects on agronomic traits. Crop Science 46: 834839.Google Scholar
Orf, JH, Chase, K, Jarvik, T, Mansur, LM, Cregan, PB, Adler, FR and Lark, KG (1999) Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Science 39: 16421651.Google Scholar
Panthee, DR, Pantalone, VR, West, DR, Saxton, AM and Sams, CE (2005) Quantitative trait loci for seed protein and oil concentration, and seed size in soybean. Crop Science 45: 20152022.Google Scholar
Qiu, BX, Arelli, PR and Sleper, DA (1999) RFLP markers associated with soybean cyst nematode resistance and seed composition in a ‘Peking’ × ‘Essex’ population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 356364.Google Scholar
Sebolt, AM, Shoemaker, RC and Diers, BW (2000) Analysis of a quantitative trait locus allele from wild soybean that increases seed protein concentration in soybean. Crop Science 40: 14381444.Google Scholar
Song, QJ, Marek, LF, Shoemaker, RC, Lark, KG, Concibido, VC, Delannay, X, Specht, JE and Cregan, PB (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 122128.Google Scholar
Wang, JL, Meng, QX, Yang, QK, Zhao, SW and Wu, TL (1986) Effect of backcrossing on overcoming viny and lodging habit of cultivated × wild and cultivated × semi-wild crosses. Soybean Science 5: 181187 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Wang, D, Shoemaker, RC, Arelli, PR and Diers, BW (2001) Loci underlying resistance to Race 3 of soybean cyst nematode in Glycine soja plant introduction 468916. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 561566.Google Scholar
Wang, D, Graef, GL, Procopiuk, AM and Diers, BW (2004) Identification of putative QTL that underlie yield in interspecific soybean backcross populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 458467.Google Scholar
Wang, SC, Basten, CJ and Zeng, ZB (2007) Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5. Raleigh, NC: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Winter, SMJ, Shelp, BJ, Anderson, TR, Welacky, TW and Rajcan, I (2007) QTL associated with horizontal resistance to soybean cyst nematode in Glycine soja PI464925B. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 114: 461472.Google Scholar
Wolf, R, Cavins, J, Kleiman, R and Black, L (1982) Effect of temperature on soybean seed constituents: oil, protein, moisture, fatty acids, amino acids and sugars. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 59: 230232.Google Scholar
Yesudas, CR, Bashir, R, Geisler, MB and Lightfoot, DA (2013) Identification of germplasm with stacked QTL underlying seed traits in an inbred soybean population from cultivars Essex and Forrest. Molecular Breeding 31: 693703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, SB, Li, JX, Xu, CG, Tan, YF, Gao, YJ, Li, XH, Zhang, QF and Saghai Maroof, MA (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetics basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 92269331.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Quantitative trait loci (QTLs), chromosome locations, linkage markers, and genetic contributions to seed protein content from QTLs identified using composite interval mapping in two F2:3 populations derived from the Glycine max×Glycine soja crosses of Jidou 12×ZYD2738 and Jidou 9×ZYD2738

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Logarithm of the odds score plot for qPRO_2_1 in two populations of Jidou 12 × ZYD2738 and Jidou 9 × ZYD2738 in chromosome 2. Genetic positions of the markers are given in centimorgans.