Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:57:19.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic characterization of some wild grape populations (Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris) of Zagros mountains (Iran) to indentify a conservation strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

Hamed Doulati-Baneh
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Center of West Azerbaijan, PO Box 365, Ourmia, Iran
Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666, Iran
Massimo Labra*
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, Milan I-20126, Italy
Fabrizio De Mattia
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, Milan I-20126, Italy
Ilaria Bruni
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, Milan I-20126, Italy
Valerio Mezzasalma
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, Milan I-20126, Italy
Rahim Abdollahi
Affiliation:
Ms Horticulture, Oshnaviyeh Payame Noor University, West Azerbaijan Province, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: massimo.labra@unimib.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, the genetic constitution of wild grape populations distributed in the Zagros Mountains in the north-west part of Iran was investigated to assess their risk of extinction and to identify the most suitable conservation strategy. A total of 65 wild grapevine samples from five different populations were analysed using 23 SSR loci. Consistent allelic richness was detected in all the analysed populations (from 4.01 to 5.35). The observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity were high with mean values of 0.67 and 0.69, respectively. A modest heterozygosity deficiency was detected only in the Piranshahr and Sardasht-Shalmash populations. The neighbour-joining dendrogram clustered the accessions into three groups corresponding to the geographical distribution of the populations. Molecular data combined with field evaluation revealed that an ex situ conservation approach is the most suitable strategy for preserving the genetic richness of Iranian wild grape populations with consistent rare alleles (about 20%). We propose in situ preservation only in the case of the Sardasht-Ghasmarash population to ensure that evolutionary dynamic forces continue to influence plant adaptation and survival in response to environmental alterations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2014 

Introduction

Cultivated Vitis vinifera subsp. sativa has been domesticated from wild Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris (Lacombe et al., Reference Lacombe, Laucou, Di Vacchi, Bordenave, Bourse, Siret, David, Boursiquot, Bronner, Merdinoglu and This2003), distributed from Middle East to European regions (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Imazio, Failla, Scienza, Ocete Rubio, Lopez, Sala and Labra2003a), for the development of genes tolerant to biotic and abiotic stresses that it is exposed to in new environments (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Fan, Jiang, Guo, Sun, Zh and Feng2012). Over the past few centuries, historical evidence combined with ampelographic data has frequently been used to characterize grape germplasm and to investigate the origin and relationships among wild and cultivated individuals (Labra et al., Reference Labra, Moriondo, Schneider, Grassi, Failla, Scienza and Sala2002; Barth et al., Reference Barth, Forneck, Verzeletti, Blaich and Schumann2009; Ocete et al., Reference Ocete, Muñoz, López, Pérez, Benito, Cabello and Valle2011). Nowadays, molecular markers are commonly being used to study genetic relationships among Vitis accessions (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Labra, Imazio, Spada, Sgorbati, Scienza and Sala2003b; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Fan, Jiang, Guo, Sun, Zh and Feng2012). The EU-PROJECT GENRES CT96 NO81 has identified a universal set of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers useful for univocally distinguishing each cultivar (This and Dettweiler, Reference This and Dettweiler2003). This marker set has also been used to investigate the evolution of wild grape populations, the gene flow among different areas, and the response of wild accessions to environmental impacts and human activities (De Mattia et al., Reference De Mattia, Imazio, Grassi, Doulaty Baneh, Scienza and Labra2008; Ergül et al., Reference Ergül, Perez-Rivera, Soylemezoglu, Karzan and Arroyo-Garcia2011; Imazio et al., Reference Imazio, Maghradze, De Lorenzis, Bacilieri, Laucou, This, Scienza and Failla2013). Moreover, from the start of grapevine genome analysis (Velasco et al., Reference Velasco, Zharkikh, Troggio, Cartwright and Cestaro2007), several peculiar DNA traits have been identified in the European germplasm (Kuczmog et al., Reference Kuczmog, Galambos, Horváth, Mátai, Kozma, Szegedi and Putnoky2012; Battilana et al., Reference Battilana, Lorenzi, Moreira, Moreno-Sanz, Failla, Emanuelli and Grando2013; Riahi et al., Reference Riahi, Zoghlami, Dereeper, Laucou, Mliki and This2013). Unfortunately until now, only a few DNA investigations have been carried out on the wild germplasm of the Middle East regions (Forneck et al., Reference Forneck, Walker, Schreiber, Blaich and Schumann2003; Doulati-Baneh et al., Reference Doulati-Baneh, Mohammadi, Labra, Nazemieh, De Mattia and Mardi2007; Ergül et al., Reference Ergül, Perez-Rivera, Soylemezoglu, Karzan and Arroyo-Garcia2011). In these regions, wild grapes grow under environmental conditions that are different from those in Europe and plants are exposed to different stresses. Due to these reasons, the Middle East wild germplasm represents an important source of gene resistance traits suitable for improving cultivated grapevines. However, in the last few years, the natural habitats of wild grapevines have been altered by forest exploitation, overgrazing, soil drying, deforestation and other human activities. In Iran, wild grape populations are distributed in riparian wood habitats on river margins and in some regions a few of these populations can still be found near cultivated grape vineyards. The size of the Iranian wild grape populations has clearly decreased (Doulati-Baneh et al., Reference Doulati-Baneh, Mohammadi and Hassani2011) and the germplasm is at a risk of becoming extinct. Therefore, high priority should be given to the characterization and preservation of genetic variability. The present study analysed the genetic constitution of wild grape populations distributed in the Zagros Mountains located in West Azerbaijan and Kurdistan Provinces in the north-west region of Iran (Sabeti, Reference Sabeti1976) to (1) assess the level of genetic diversity; (2) determine the risk of extinction; (3) identify the most suitable conservation strategy.

The Zagros Mountains are considered to be an important site of biodiversity (Djamali et al., Reference Djamali, De Beaulieu, Miller, Andrieu-Ponel, Ponel, Lak, Sadeddin, Akhani and Fazeli2009; Karami et al., Reference Karami, Sefidi and Feghi2014); however, the recent landscape ecology evaluation (Karami et al., Reference Karami, Sefidi and Feghi2014) has shown that human activities (grazing and agriculture) have led to a reduction of natural areas, especially of humid forests where wild grape populations grow. Therefore, accurate characterization and preservation of the existing grapevine germplasm of this area are urgently required to prevent potential genetic erosion.

Materials and methods

Plant material

In this study, a total of 65 wild grapevine samples were collected from five populations from the forest and wetland regions of the Zagros Mountains in Kurdistan and West Azerbaijan Provinces, Iran. In Fig. 1, the geographical coordinates and distribution of the analysed populations are shown. Each population is represented by a variable number of wild grape individuals (from 7 to 23) distributed in a limited area of about 500 m2. A distance of at least 40 km separates each population from the other population. The Piranshahr (P) population consisted of 15 individuals (nine males and six females) distributed in the humid area of Piranshahr; the Baneh B population consisted of ten individuals (seven males and three famales) distributed in Baneh in Kurdistan Province. The other three populations were distributed in Sardasht: the Sardasht-Grjal (S-GR) population was the smallest one consisting of five males and two females, the Sardasht-Shalmash (S-SH) population consisted of ten individuals (eight males and two females), and the Sardasht-Ghasmarash (SG) population was the largest one consisting of 23 individuals (12 males and 11 females). Each individual was morphologically characterized based on the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) descriptors (see Table S1; available online).

Fig. 1 Geographical coordinates and distribution of the analysed wild grape populations of the north-west region of Iran. P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH, Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash.

The populations are located at the altitude of 1100–1800 m above sea level and the region was characterized by the typical environmental conditions of wild grapevine habitats: wetlands and forests with a high degree of humidity due to rivers and brooks. Wild grape grows as a liana on different trees such as oak, hawthorn, willow, pear and terebinth.

The plant sampling strategy followed in the study was the same for all the populations and was designed to prevent errors such as collection of clones or individuals of cultivated subspecies (Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera L.). To avoid sampling of clones, young leaves from individuals spaced at least 30 m apart were collected. The risk of collecting cultivated varieties was very low for the P and B populations, as these were distributed in remote areas far away from vineyards (more than 30 km). In contrast, there were many vineyards in Sardasht. Rasha and Khoshnav (a clone of Rasha) are the main cultivated hermaphrodite varieties followed by Taifi, Angotka, Zardka and Kazav. Although the wild populations analysed in this study were located far from vineyards (almost 5 km), to reduce the risk of sampling of cultivated varieties only dioecious individuals were collected in the SG, S-SH and S-GR populations (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Labra, Imazio, Spada, Sgorbati, Scienza and Sala2003b). Moreover, to exclude sampling errors, the SSR profiles of the cultivars (Doulati-Baneh et al., Reference Doulati-Baneh, Mohammadi and Labra2013) were compared with the molecular data obtained in our work related to wild accessions.

In Sardasht, three female varieties, Mam Braima, Bol Mazu and Sarghola, are also distributed in a few vineyards. To differentiate the female wild grapevine varieties from the cultivated ones, we evaluated the berry characteristics. All the collected female wild grapevine varieties had small, round and black berries with sour taste, while the fruits of the three cultivars were big and sweet with yellow (Mam Braima and Bol Mazu) or red (Sarghola) colour.

DNA extraction and SSR analysis

For each sample, two to three young leaves were used for genomic DNA extraction according to the procedure described by Lodhi et al. (Reference Lodhi, Ye, Weeden and Reisch1994). Molecular characterization was carried out using 23 SSR markers for each sample (Table 1). The SSR loci and annealing temperatures used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis are listed in Table 1. Primer sequences were obtained from Thomas and Scott (Reference Thomas and Scott1993); Bowers and Meredith (Reference Bowers and Meredith1996); Bowers et al. (Reference Bowers, Boursiquot, This, Chu, Johansson and Meredith1999); Sefc et al. (Reference Sefc, Regner, Turetschek, Glöessl and Steinkellenr1999); Lefort et al. (Reference Lefort, Pelsy, Schehrer and Merdinoglu2003). PCRs were carried out in a final volume of 10 μl, containing 15 ng of each primer, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Sinagen Company, Teheran, Iran), 100 μM of each of the four dNTPs, 1 ×  PCR buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 50 mM KCl and 1.5 mM MgCl2), 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 50 ng of template DNA and distilled deionized water. Amplification reactions were carried out using the following cycling profile: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58–68°C for 1 min (see Table 1), and 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were separated on 6% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining.

Table 1 Genetic parameters of SSR markers across the analysed wild grape genotypes

AT, annealing temperatures; AS, allele sizes; AF, allele frequency; AN, allele number; H e, expected heterozygosity; H o, observed heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphic information content.

The allele sizes of the SSR bands were determined using internal size markers and by comparison with a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles (This et al., Reference This, Jung, Boccacci, Borrego, Botta, Costantini, Crespan, Dangl, Eisenheld, Ferreira-Monterio, Grando, Ibáñez, Lacombe, Laucou, Magalhães, Meredith, Milani, Peterlunger, Regner, Zulini and Maul2004). For each SSR locus, allele number, allele frequency, expected heterozygosity (H e), observed heterozygosity (H o) and polymorphic information content (PIC) were calculated. Gene diversity, often referred to as expected heterozygosity, is the probability that two randomly chosen alleles at a locus within a set of genotypes will be different (Nei, Reference Nei1987). The PIC values were estimated as described by Botstein et al. (Reference Botstein, White, Skolnick and Davis1980). These genetic parameters were estimated using PowerMarker version 3.20 (Liu, Reference Liu2002). For each population, genetic parameters, such as observed average allele number (N a), allelic richness (A [14]), H o, H e, coefficient of inbreeding (F is) and private allele (P a), were calculated using the program FSTAT (Goudet, Reference Goudet2001).

Intrapopulation genetic diversity was also determined in terms of A (El Mousadik and Petit, Reference El Mousadik and Petit1996) using a fixed sample size of seven (14 gene copies), corresponding to the number of individuals of the smaller population (S-GR). The F is was calculated for polymorphic loci both to test the deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and to estimate the genetic differentiation among the populations (Weir and Cockerham, Reference Weir and Cockerham1984). The significance of deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, as evidenced by the deviation of F is from zero, was tested by randomization using the FSTAT software (Goudet, Reference Goudet2001). All the calculations were done using POPGENE version 3.2 (Yeh et al., Reference Yeh, Yang and Boyle1999) and FSTAT (Goudet, Reference Goudet2001).

Genetic distance was calculated by determining microsatellite allele frequencies using Nei's index (Nei, Reference Nei1987). The resulting genetic distance matrices were used to construct a neighbour-joining (NJ) dendrogram. The dendrogram was constructed using the MEGA4 software (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Dudley, Nei and Kumar2007). A hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was carried out to separate total molecular variance into within-population and between-population variance using PowerMarker version 3.20 (Liu, Reference Liu2002).

To exclude hybrids between local cultivated varieties and the analysed wild individuals, we used the Bayesian clustering method of Pritchard et al. (Reference Pritchard, Stephens and Donnelly2000), implemented in the program STRUCTURE 2.1. In this case, the program was run using the ‘admixture model’, and all STRUCTURE analyses included no previous population information and correlated allele frequencies and were carried out using runs of one million interactions, following a burn-in period of 200,000 interactions. Clustering analyses were carried out in quadruplicate to ensure the convergence of parameters. The program New Hybrids (Anderson and Thompson, Reference Anderson and Thompson2002) was also used to carry out a more detailed analysis of admixture proportions and hybrid ancestry, by inferring the posterior probability assignment of each sampled individual to six genotype frequency classes: pure wild (W), pure cultivated (C), F1, F2, wild backcross and cultivated backcross. Tests were carried out for all the 23 loci with uniform priors and with a run of 500,000 iterations after a burn-in period of 50,000 iterations. This approach reduces the influence of low-frequency alleles, preventing sampling and genotyping errors in closely related populations.

Results

DNA of good quality was observed in all the analysed samples. The amplification of the 23 SSR loci yielded 182 different alleles, ranging from three (VVMD21) to 13 (VVMD5 and VVMD8) per locus, with an average of 7.9 alleles/locus (Table 1 and Table S2, available online). The mean PIC value was consistent (0.71); the highest value was obtained for VVMD8 (0.89) and the lowest value for VVS3 (0.47).

The H e values ranged from 0.53 (SsrVrZAG83) to 0.90 (VVMD8), while the H o values ranged from 0.44 (VVS4) to 0.97 (VMC6G7).

The consistent polymorphisms detected among the used SSR markers allowed characterizing the genetic structure of the analysed populations. The results given in Table 2 reveal consistent A in all the analysed populations ranging from 4.01 for the B population to 5.35 for the S-SH population. The mean values of H o and H e were 0.67 and 0.69, respectively. A modest heterozygosity deficiency was detected only in the P and S-SH populations; the other populations had quite similar H o and H e. In accordance with the detected heterozygosity deficiency, the F is values of the P (0.115) and S-SH (0.124) populations indicated slight inbreeding. In the B, S-GR and SG populations, the F is values were close to 0, implying a randomly mating population.

Table 2 Genetic characteristics of the analysed populations evaluated based on the polymorphisms of the 23 simple sequence repeat loci

P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH; Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash; N a, average number of alleles; A, allelic richness; H o, observed heterozygosity; H e, expected heterozygosity; SD, standard deviation; F is, coefficient of inbreeding.

* Significant deviation of the F is value from zero was tested with 1000 randomizations (P< 0.05).

The AMOVA (Table 3) revealed that 76.3% of the total molecular variation was within the populations and only 23.7% between the populations. The minimum within-population variation was recorded in the S-GR population, while the SG population exhibited the highest molecular variation (32%).

Table 3 Analysis of molecular variance among and within the analysed populations

P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH; Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash; MS, mean square.

To better evaluate the relationships among different grape accessions, a dendrogram based on NJ algorithm was constructed (Fig. 2). The analysed samples were assigned to three major groups. Group 1 consisted of 16 samples, with most of the samples belonging to the B population. Group 2 consisted of 28 genotypes belonging to the Sardasht populations (SG, S-SH and S-GR). All the samples of the S-GR population clustered in this group with the exclusion of the S-GR2 population, while the samples of the S-GR population exhibited a consistent genetic difference and clustered in all the three branches of the dendrogram. Group 3 consisted of 21 wild genotypes, with most of them belonging to the P population.

Fig. 2 Dendrogram depicting genetic relationships among the wild grape populations based on shared allele distance and neighbour-joining algorithm. P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH, Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash.

The analysis of rare alleles indicated that 34 (18.68%) of the 182 detected alleles at the 23 loci were private (Table 4). A total of 14 private alleles were observed in the SG population followed by the B and P populations with eight and seven private alleles, respectively.

Table 4 Distribution of rare SSR alleles in the wild grape populations

PO, name of the population; AF, allele frequency; AS, allele size; S-SH; Sardasht-Shalmash; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash; P, Piranshahr; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; B, Baneh.

To exclude the hybrid origin of wild accessions, the obtained SSR profiles of the cultivated and wild varieties were analysed with STRUCTURE 2.1 analysis (Zecca et al., Reference Zecca, De Mattia, Lovicu, Labra, Sala and Grassi2010). The results revealed that the W samples were genetically distinct from the C ones (Fig. S1, available online). At the same time, the analysis carried out using the New Hybrids program confirmed the sharp distinction between the W and C accessions, where each plant was assigned to each genotype frequency class with an average posterior probability >0.95 (Fig. S2, available online).

Discussion

Consistent genetic diversity was detected among the analysed wild grape populations distributed in the Zagros Mountains (Iran). Similar results have been obtained for Anatolia populations (Ergül et al., Reference Ergül, Perez-Rivera, Soylemezoglu, Karzan and Arroyo-Garcia2011), and they indicate that the genetic diversity of wild grape populations in the Middle East regions is higher than that of populations distributed in other areas such as the Mediterranean basin (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Imazio, Failla, Scienza, Ocete Rubio, Lopez, Sala and Labra2003a; Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Mendoca, Rodrigues do Santos, Eiras-Dias and da Câmara Machado2009; Zinelabidine et al., Reference Zinelabidine, Haddioui, Bravo, Arroyo-García and Martínez-Zapater2010). Moreover, no inbreeding depression events were observed in the analysed populations. Previously, studies had demonstrated a clear reduction in H o in most of the European wild grape populations (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Imazio, Failla, Scienza, Ocete Rubio, Lopez, Sala and Labra2003a; Di Vecchi-Staraz et al., Reference Di Vecchi-Staraz, Laucou, Bruno, Lacombe, Gerber, Bourse, Boselli and This2009; Lopes et al., Reference Lopes, Mendoca, Rodrigues do Santos, Eiras-Dias and da Câmara Machado2009), probably due to the reduction of population size by human activities. We can conclude that although in the last few years the Zagros Mountains have been subjected to intense deforestation activities (Karami et al., Reference Karami, Sefidi and Feghi2014), the local wild grape germplasm has not yet undergone a genetic erosion. However, most of the analysed populations exhibited an unbalanced sex ratio. The modest number of female individuals in most of the Zagros Mountains populations (i.e. B, SG and S-SH) reduced the seed-dispersal ability of the species. This was also confirmed by our field evaluation during plant sampling activity; a large proportion of individuals were very old (more than 25–30 years old) and a few young plantlets were detected only in the SG population. We conclude that Iranian wild grape populations have a reduced regeneration ability probably due to modest seed productions or/and environmental alterations that lead to an inhospitable habitat for young seedlings (Arnold et al., Reference Arnold, Schnitzler, Douard, Peter and Gillet2005; Ocete et al., Reference Ocete, López, Gallardo and Arnold2008).

In the last few years, the Zagros Mountains have been subject to consistent anthropic pressure, deforestation and overgrazing (Noroozi et al., Reference Noroozi, Akhani and Breckle2008) with the consequence being environmental alteration. Deforestation and river management have been indicated as the main threats to wild grape populations (Arnold et al., Reference Arnold, Schnitzler, Douard, Peter and Gillet2005). The effect of habitat modifications was particularly evident in Sardasht region, where grazing, forest fire and agriculture (Haidari et al., Reference Haidari, Bazyar, Hosseini, Hossein Haidari and Shabanian2013) drastically reduced the riparian areas suitable for wild grape growth (Grassi et al., Reference Grassi, Imazio, Failla, Scienza, Ocete Rubio, Lopez, Sala and Labra2003b). The S-GR and S-SH populations are relegated to a small area surrounded by cultivated fields and human activities, especially in Shalmash region. These rapid environmental alterations do not alter the genetic constitution of the existing wild grape individuals, as indicated by our molecular investigation, but induce population decline and prevent the development of new plantlets. In 2005, the UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) approved a ten-year project for biodiversity conservation in the central Zagros Mountains (http://www.undp.org.ir/index.php/component/content/article/77) with the main goal being the preservation of the endangered habitat including the humid forest and wetland areas. This is an essential step for preserving the wild grape and several riparial taxa distributed in the Zagros Mountains.

The SG population is distributed in a large humid area located at the Iraq–Iran border. This area is subject to conspicuous rainfall that guarantees full rivers and humidity. The consistent number of individuals and a proper balance between males and females and the presence of young plantlets indicate that the SG population is not at a risk of becoming extinct. Moreover, due to the war between Iran and Iraq, in the last 8 years, very few people have travelled to this area and thus the anthropic pressure on biodiversity is modest.

The evident effect of population erosion was also observed in the B population. In this area, local communities mainly depend on ranching and a serious forage shortage has occurred in the last few years. Local people began to exploit trees such as oak to feed cattle (Fatahi, Reference Fatahi1994; Moradi et al., Reference Moradi, Oladi, Fallah and Fatehi2010) and deforestation has led to drastic effects on climber species such as wild grape.

The P population is distributed in Prdanan tourist area and it is distributed far from the other populations. Although this is the second largest analysed population, the increase in tourism, overgrazing, seasonal river floods and agricultural activities has led to negative effects on riparian plants including wild grape. To preserve the genetic diversity of this population, some individuals have been propagated and transferred to the germplasm collection of the Kahriz Horticultural Research Station in Ourmia.

The results of our molecular investigation combined with field evaluation suggested that wild grape populations distributed in the Zagros Mountains have consistent genetic richness, but are at a risk becoming extinct due to human activities, especially deforestation, and increase in agricultural activities.

Ex situ conservation approaches are convenient and rapid for preserving genetic traits (Barth et al., Reference Barth, Forneck, Verzeletti, Blaich and Schumann2009). Most of the wild grape accessions had peculiar alleles (see Table S2, available online); these samples should be the first to be preserved in germplasm collections. Moreover, preliminary evaluation carried out by a team of researchers of the Agricultural Research Center of West Azerbaijan provides evidence that characteristics such as powdery mildew and fanleaf virus resistance and salinity tolerance are present in some accessions in the germplasm (H. Doulati-Baneh, pers. commun.). This is in agreement with the results of a recently conducted analysis highlighting the presence of pest resistance traits in the wild grape germplasm (Riaz et al., Reference Riaz, Boursiquot, Dangl, Lacombe, Laucou, Tenscher and Walker2013). We underline that such evaluations are very important for future breeding programmes of table and wine grape.

Plants propagated using ex situ strategies should also be also used for restoration ecology programmes (i.e. replanting and reinforcement). Reintroduction programmes that have been very successful have been implemented using local genotypes; for this reason, we suggest that the wild grape collection be separated into three distinct groups corresponding to the dendrogram groups that reflect the geographical distribution of the populations.

Unfortunately, plants conserved by ex situ strategies do not evolve under natural forces and processes. By contrast, the conservation of genetic resources under in situ conditions ensures that evolutionary dynamic forces continue to influence plant adaptation and survival. Based on the results of the present study, we suggest that the SG population be maintained in its natural habitat through the establishment of a local protected area where the river margins are preserved and tourism activity is regulated to reduce the negative effects of human activities. In situ conservation is a practical way to complement ex situ conservation and meets the need of expanding germplasm collections with new genetic traits coming from the natural evolutionary processes (Pavek et al., Reference Pavek, Lamboy and Garvey2003).

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262114000598

References

Anderson, EC and Thompson, EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 12171229.Google Scholar
Arnold, C, Schnitzler, A, Douard, A, Peter, R and Gillet, F (2005) Is there a future for wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera subsp. silvestris) in the Rhine valley? Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 15071523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, S, Forneck, A, Verzeletti, F, Blaich, R and Schumann, F (2009) Genotypes and phenotypes of an ex situ Vitis vinifera ssp. sylvestris (Gmel.) Beger germplasm collection from the upper Rhine valley. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 11711181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J, Lorenzi, S, Moreira, FM, Moreno-Sanz, P, Failla, O, Emanuelli, F and Grando, MS (2013) Linkage mapping and molecular diversity at the flower sex locus in wild and cultivated grapevine reveal a prominent SSR haplotype in hermaphrodite plants. Molecular Biotechnology 54: 10311037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botstein, D, White, RL, Skolnick, M and Davis, RW (1980) Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314331.Google Scholar
Bowers, JE and Meredith, CP (1996) Genetic similarities among wine grape cultivars revealed by restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121: 620624.Google Scholar
Bowers, J, Boursiquot, JM, This, P, Chu, K, Johansson, H and Meredith, C (1999) Historical genetics: the parentage of Chardonnay, Gamay and other wine grapes of Northeastern France. Science 285: 15621564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Mattia, F, Imazio, S, Grassi, F, Doulaty Baneh, H, Scienza, A and Labra, M (2008) Study of genetic relationships between wild and domesticated grapevine distributed from middle east regions to European countries. Rendiconti Lincei 19: 223240.Google Scholar
Di Vecchi-Staraz, M, Laucou, V, Bruno, G, Lacombe, T, Gerber, S, Bourse, T, Boselli, M and This, P (2009) Low level of pollen mediated gene flow from cultivated to wild grapevine: consequences for the evolution of the endangered subspecies Vitis vinifera L. subsp. silvestris . Journal of Heredity 100: 6675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djamali, M, De Beaulieu, JL, Miller, NF, Andrieu-Ponel, V, Ponel, P, Lak, R, Sadeddin, N, Akhani, H and Fazeli, H (2009) Vegetation history of the SE section of the Zagros Mountains during the last five millennia; a pollen record from the Maharlou Lake, Fars Province, Iran. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 18: 123136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doulati-Baneh, H, Mohammadi, SA, Labra, M, Nazemieh, A, De Mattia, F and Mardi, M (2007) Chloroplast microsatellite markers to assess genetic diversity in wild and cultivated grapevines of Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 18551859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doulati-Baneh, H, Mohammadi, SA and Hassani, GH (2011) Genetic relationship of Iranian wild and cultivated grapevine by microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences 42: 207215.Google Scholar
Doulati-Baneh, H, Mohammadi, SA and Labra, M (2013) Genetic structure and diversity analysis in Vitis vinifera L. cultivars from Iran using SSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae 160: 2936.Google Scholar
El Mousadik, A and Petit, RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 832839.Google Scholar
Ergül, A, Perez-Rivera, G, Soylemezoglu, G, Karzan, K and Arroyo-Garcia, R (2011) Genetic diversity in Anatolian wild grapes (Vitis vivifera subsp. sylvestris) estimated by SSR markers. Plant Genetic Resources 9: 375383.Google Scholar
Fatahi, M (1994) Pollarding (pruning of oak trees). Journal of Research and Construction 23: 411.Google Scholar
Forneck, A, Walker, MA, Schreiber, A, Blaich, R and Schumann, F (2003) Genetic diversity in Vitis vinifera ssp. sylvestris Gmelin from Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Acta Horticulturae 603: 549553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudet, J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available at: http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html.Google Scholar
Grassi, F, Imazio, S, Failla, O, Scienza, A, Ocete Rubio, R, Lopez, MA, Sala, F and Labra, M (2003a) Genetic isolation and diffusion of wild grapevine Italian and Spanish populations estimated by nuclear and chloroplast SSR analysis. Plant Biology 5: 608614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, F, Labra, M, Imazio, S, Spada, A, Sgorbati, S, Scienza, A and Sala, F (2003b) Evidence of a secondary grapevine domestication centre detected by SSR analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 13151320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidari, M, Bazyar, M, Hosseini, SA, Hossein Haidari, R and Shabanian, N (2013) Study of forest destruction by used the diversity index in the Northern Zagros Forest (Case study: Oak forest). International Journal of Biological and Medical Research 4: 27202725.Google Scholar
Imazio, S, Maghradze, D, De Lorenzis, G, Bacilieri, R, Laucou, V, This, P, Scienza, A and Failla, O (2013) From the cradle of grapevine domestication: molecular overview and description of Georgian grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) germplasm. Tree Genetics & Genomes 9: 641658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karami, A, Sefidi, K and Feghi, J (2014) Structure and spatial pattern of land uses patches in the Zagros Mountains region in the west of Iran. Biodiversitas 15: 5157.Google Scholar
Kuczmog, A, Galambos, A, Horváth, S, Mátai, A, Kozma, P, Szegedi, E and Putnoky, P (2012) Mapping of crown gall resistance locus Rcg1 in grapevine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125: 15651574.Google Scholar
Labra, M, Moriondo, G, Schneider, A, Grassi, F, Failla, O, Scienza, A and Sala, F (2002) Biodiversity of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) growing in the Aosta valley. Vitis 41: 8992.Google Scholar
Lacombe, T, Laucou, V, Di Vacchi, M, Bordenave, L, Bourse, T, Siret, R, David, J, Boursiquot, J-M, Bronner, A, Merdinoglu, D and This, P (2003) Inventory and characterization of Vitis vinifera ssp. silvestris in France. Acta Horticulturae 603: 553559.Google Scholar
Lefort, F, Pelsy, F, Schehrer, L and Merdinoglu, D (2003) Assessment of two highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in 103 accessions of Vitis species. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 37: 6774.Google Scholar
Liu, J (2002) POWERMARKER – A powerful software for marker data analysis. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Bioinformatics Research Center. Available at: http://www.powermarker.net.Google Scholar
Liu, CH, Fan, X, Jiang, J, Guo, D, Sun, H, Zh, Y and Feng, J (2012) Genetic diversity of Chinese wild grape species by SSR and SRAP markers. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 12: 28992903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, MA, Ye, GN, Weeden, NF and Reisch, BI (1994) A simple and efficient method for DNA extraction from grapevine cultivars, Vitis species and Ampelopsis . Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 12: 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, MS, Mendoca, D, Rodrigues do Santos, JE, Eiras-Dias, JE and da Câmara Machado, A (2009) New insights on the genetic basis of Portuguese grapevine and on grapevine domestication. Genome 52: 790800.Google Scholar
Moradi, A, Oladi, J, Fallah, A and Fatehi, P (2010) An evaluation of the capability of IRS-P6 data for monitoring pollarding forest areas of Northern Zagros (Case study: Kurdistan, pollarded forests of Baneh). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 12: 299308.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Noroozi, J, Akhani, H and Breckle, SW (2008) Biodiversity and phytogeography of the alpine flora of Iran. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 493521.Google Scholar
Ocete, R, López, MA, Gallardo, A and Arnold, C (2008) Comparative analysis of wild and cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Basque region of Spain and France. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123: 9598.Google Scholar
Ocete, R, Muñoz, G, López, MA, Pérez, MA, Benito, A, Cabello, F and Valle, JM (2011) Environmental, sanitary and ampelographic characterization of wild grapevine in Western PyrenÉes (Spain, France). Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 45: 112.Google Scholar
Pavek, DS, Lamboy, WF and Garvey, EJ (2003) Selecting in situ conservation sites for grape genetic resources in the USA. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 165173.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945959.Google Scholar
Riahi, L, Zoghlami, N, Dereeper, A, Laucou, V, Mliki, A and This, P (2013) Single nucleotide polymorphism and haplotype diversity of the gene NAC4 in grapevine. Industrial Crops and Products 43: 718724.Google Scholar
Riaz, S, Boursiquot, JM, Dangl, GS, Lacombe, T, Laucou, V, Tenscher, AC and Walker, MA (2013) Identification of mildew resistance in wild and cultivated Central Asian grape germplasm. BMC Plant Biology 13: 149.Google Scholar
Sabeti, H (1976) Forests, Trees and Shrubs of Iran. Tehran: Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Organization, Iran (In Farsi).Google Scholar
Sefc, KM, Regner, F, Turetschek, E, Glöessl, J and Steinkellenr, H (1999) Identification of microsatellite sequences in Vitis riparia and their applicability for genotyping of different Vitis species. Genome 42: 367373.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Dudley, J, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 15961599.Google Scholar
This, P and Dettweiler, E (2003) Eu-PROJECT GENRES CT96 NO81: European Vitis database and results regarding the use of a common set of microsatellite markers. Acta Horticulturae 603: 5966.Google Scholar
This, P, Jung, A, Boccacci, P, Borrego, J, Botta, R, Costantini, L, Crespan, M, Dangl, GS, Eisenheld, C, Ferreira-Monterio, F, Grando, S, Ibáñez, J, Lacombe, T, Laucou, V, Magalhães, R, Meredith, CP, Milani, N, Peterlunger, E, Regner, F, Zulini, L and Maul, E (2004) Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 14481458.Google Scholar
Thomas, MR and Scott, NS (1993) Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphisms when analysed as sequence-tagged sites (STSs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 985990.Google Scholar
Velasco, R, Zharkikh, A, Troggio, M, Cartwright, DA and Cestaro, A (2007) A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS One 2: e1326.Google Scholar
Weir, BS and Cockerham, CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 13581370.Google Scholar
Yeh, FC, Yang, RC and Boyle, T (1999) POPGENE Version 1.31: Microsoft Window-Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
Zecca, G, De Mattia, F, Lovicu, G, Labra, M, Sala, F and Grassi, F (2010) Wild grapevine: silvestris, hybrids or cultivars that escaped from vineyards? Molecular evidence in Sardinia. Plant Biology 12: 558562.Google Scholar
Zinelabidine, LH, Haddioui, A, Bravo, G, Arroyo-García, R and Martínez-Zapater, JM (2010) Genetic origins of cultivated and wild grapevines from Morocco. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 61: 8390.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Geographical coordinates and distribution of the analysed wild grape populations of the north-west region of Iran. P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH, Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash.

Figure 1

Table 1 Genetic parameters of SSR markers across the analysed wild grape genotypes

Figure 2

Table 2 Genetic characteristics of the analysed populations evaluated based on the polymorphisms of the 23 simple sequence repeat loci

Figure 3

Table 3 Analysis of molecular variance among and within the analysed populations

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Dendrogram depicting genetic relationships among the wild grape populations based on shared allele distance and neighbour-joining algorithm. P, Piranshahr; B, Baneh; S-SH, Sardasht-Shalmash; S-GR, Sardasht-Grjal; SG, Sardasht-Ghasmarash.

Figure 5

Table 4 Distribution of rare SSR alleles in the wild grape populations