Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:05:03.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of novel polymorphic nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2018

Natalie Breidenbach
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany
Oliver Gailing
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany
Konstantin V. Krutovsky*
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany Laboratory of Population Genetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Gubkina Str. 3, Russian Federation Laboratory of Forest Genomics, Genome Research and Education Center, Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, Akademgorodok 50a/2, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russian Federation Department of Ecosystem Sciences and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2138, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: konstantin.krutovsky@forst.uni-goettingen.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The range-wide genetic structure of the highly productive and valuable timber species Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. is still insufficiently studied, although published data based on different genetic markers (nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites, AFLP, RFLP and isozymes) demonstrated relatively low population structure. However, more genetic markers are needed to increase the efficiency of population genetic studies in coast redwood. Therefore, we developed seven nuclear and five chloroplast microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers based on expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and the complete chloroplast genome sequence, respectively. All selected markers were tested in a range-wide sample representing trees from 16 locations. They are highly polymorphic microsatellite loci with the number of alleles ranging from 3 to 17, and the number of effective alleles from 1.1 to 2.48. Coast redwood is a hexaploid species, and its chloroplasts are paternally inherited. Therefore, the chloroplast SSR markers are especially useful for this species, because their genotyping is not affected by nuclear genome ploidy. Moreover, they showed high gene diversity for each locus within and across all populations and can be used to study range-wide population genetic structure, pollen-based gene flow and long-distance gene transfer. Coast redwood can propagate clonally, and nuclear polymorphic EST-SSRs can be used for clonal identification. They are linked with expressed genes and their variation can reflect variation in genes under selection, including those that could be potentially important for local adaptation of coast redwood considering the threat of climate change.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Introduction

The natural distribution of coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.) extends along the Pacific coast of northern California to southern Oregon (Roy, Reference Roy1966). It is an important timber species, but there are only a few studies concerning its range-wide genetic variation and differentiation (Hall and Langenheim, Reference Hall and Langenheim1987; Brinegar, Reference Brinegar, Standiford, Weller, Piierto and Stuart2011; Douhovnikoff and Dodd, Reference Douhovnikoff and Dodd2011). All these studies found relatively low genetic differentiation among analysed populations. On the contrary, fine scale and individual clone differentiations were highly significant (Rogers, Reference Rogers2000; Douhovnikoff et al., Reference Douhovnikoff, Cheng and Dodd2004; Ibañez et al., Reference Ibañez, Caru, Herrera, Gonzalez, Martin, Miranda and Navarro-Cerrillo2009; Narayan et al., Reference Narayan, Dodd and O'Hara2015). It seems that more genetic markers are needed to increase the efficiency of population genetic studies in coast redwood. We used publicly available expressed sequence tag (EST) and complete chloroplast genome sequence data to develop new microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for coast redwood.

Experimental

Needles from 309 trees in 16 locations were collected within the natural distribution range of coast redwood in central and northern California (Online Supplementary 1). The collected needles were dried on silica gel. DNA was extracted from two needles per sample using the DNeasy 96 Plant Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was diluted in ddH2O 1:10 for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and stored at −20°C.

Possible microsatellite motifs were found by a search for dinucleotide and trinucleotide SSR-motifs for EST-SSRs in the transcriptome data of Scott et al. (Reference Scott, Stenz, Ingvarsson and Baum2016) and for all SSR-motifs in the complete chloroplast genome sequence (NCBI GenBank accession number NC_030372.1) using the SciRoko program (Kofler et al., Reference Kofler, Schlötterer and Lelley2007). Primer3 0.4.0 (Untergasser et al., Reference Untergasser, Cutcutache, Koressaar, Ye, Faircloth, Remm and Rozen2012) was used to design the PCR primer pairs and oligoCalc (Kibbe, Reference Kibbe2007) to check for possible dimers and hairpins. In total, 57 primer pairs for different SSR-motifs were tested. The EST-SSR forward primers were labelled with either Hex or 6-FAM (Table 1). Following Schuelke (Reference Schuelke2000), PCRs for chloroplast SSRs (cpSSRs) were performed with 5′ tailed 6-FAM dye-labelled M13 (5′-CACGACGTTGTAAACGAC-3′) forward and PIG-tailed (5′-GTTTCTT-3′) reverse primers (Kubisiak et al., Reference Kubisiak, Nelson, Staton, Zhebentyayeva, Smith, Olukolu, Fang, Hebard, Anagnostakis, Wheeler, Sisco, Abbott and Sederoff2013).

Table 1. Novel EST-SSR and cpSSR markers developed in coast redwood

N a, number of alleles; N e, number of effective alleles; I, Shannon Index; H t, total gene diversity; H S, gene diversity within the population.

a Number means a number of repeat motifs in the original sequence.

For all 12 primer pairs, the following touch-down PCR program was used. First denaturation at 94°C for 15 min, followed by 17 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 67°C for 1 min and elongation at 72°C for 1 min, after each cycle the annealing temperature was decreased by 1°C, followed by 18 cycles with the annealing temperature at 50°C for 1 min.

PCR products were separated using the ABI genetic analyser 3130xl with GENSCAN ROX 500 as the internal size standard. GeneMapper 4.1. (Applied Biosystems) was used for visualization of the PCR products.

We finally selected seven EST-SSRs that were genotyped following the procedure suggested in Pfeiffer et al. (Reference Pfeiffer, Roschanski, Pannell, Korbecka and Schnittler2011). In total, 270 and 297 samples were genotyped for EST-SSRs and cpSSRs, respectively. For each locus number of alleles (N a), number of effective alleles (N e), Shannon Index (I), Nei's total gene diversity (H t) and Nei's within population gene diversity (H s) were calculated.

For EST-SSRs N a and I were calculated based on an input file with fragment sizes presenting the alleles for each locus, using the R-package ‘polysat’ for polyploid species (Clark and Jasieniuk, Reference Clark and Jasieniuk2011). Alternatively, fragment sizes per locus were converted into a binary input file and handled as pseudo-AFLP data for the calculation of H t and H s with PopGene (Yeh et al., Reference Yeh, Yang, Boyle, Ye and Mao1997) and N e with GenAlEx (Peakall and Smouse, Reference Peakall and Smouse2006, Reference Peakall and Smouse2012). Separately, cpSSRs were analysed using GenAlEx (N a, N e and I) and the R-package ‘hierfstat’ (H t and H s) (Goudet and Jombart, Reference Goudet and Jombart2015) with an input file based on fragment sizes as alleles.

Discussion

The program SciRoKo identified 76 microsatellites with dinucleotide motifs, six with trinucleotide motifs in ESTs, and six microsatellites with dinucleotide motifs in the chloroplast genome. From all EST-SSRs one with trinucleotide and six with dinucleotide motifs and among six cpSSRs five with dinucleotide motifs were reliable and polymorphic and selected for further analysis. Their N a, N e, I, H s and H t parameters are presented in Table 1. Due to the use of binary data to compute H t and H s for EST-SSRs, these parameters of gene diversity cannot be directly compared between EST-SSRs and cpSSRs (Nybom, Reference Nybom2004).

As expected, EST-SSRs showed lower number of alleles than the published random nuclear SSRs (nSSRs) (Douhovnikoff and Dodd, Reference Douhovnikoff and Dodd2011; Narayan et al., Reference Narayan, Dodd and O'Hara2015), which was observed also earlier in other plants including conifers (e.g., Euyal et al., Reference Euyal, Sorrells, Baum, Wolters and Powell2001; Rungis et al., Reference Rungis, Bérubé, Zhang, Ralph, Ritland, Ellis, Douglas, Bohlmann and Ritland2004), supposedly because EST-SSRs are linked with expressed genes and can be under selection (Bouk and Vision, Reference Bouk and Vision2007).

The newly designed chloroplast microsatellite markers (cpSSRs) showed similar or higher numbers of alleles and genetic diversity than the published single cpSSR marker (Brinegar, Reference Brinegar, Standiford, Weller, Piierto and Stuart2011). The high number of alleles and higher diversity are expected to increase the resolution of population structure analyses based on multiple markers compared with analyses based on a single chloroplast marker. Chloroplasts in coast redwood are inherited paternally (Neale et al., Reference Neale, Marshall and Sederoff1989), and their markers are excellent tools to study pollen-based gene flow and its contribution to population similarity. CpSSRs are usually highly polymorphic in conifer species (Vendramin et al., Reference Vendramin, Degen, Petit, Anzidei, Madaghiele and Ziegenhagen1999; Viard et al., Reference Viard, El-Kassaby and Ritland2001; Bucci et al., Reference Bucci, Gonzalez-Martinez, Le Provost, Plomion, Ribeiro, Sebastiani, Alía and Vendramin2007), and we found similar results in coast redwood.

Coast redwood is a hexaploid species (Stebbin, Reference Stebbin1948), which complicates microsatellite genotyping (Douhovnikoff and Dodd, Reference Douhovnikoff and Dodd2011; Narayan et al., Reference Narayan, Dodd and O'Hara2015). However, the microsatellite scoring approach based on the genotype verification using ramets of known clones resulted in unambiguous and reliable multilocus genotypes (Pfeiffer et al., Reference Pfeiffer, Roschanski, Pannell, Korbecka and Schnittler2011). Due to the usually less polymorphic nature of EST-SSRs and the haploid nature of cpSSRs, both marker types might be less prone to genotyping errors than nSSRs, which frequently have many alleles of similar length (Hoffmann and Amos, Reference Hoffmann and Amos2005). Therefore, additional new EST-SSR and cpSSR might increase the resolution power of microsatellite markers to study population structure and local adaptation in coast redwoods. The highly polymorphic cpSSRs can be especially useful for genotyping of individuals and clone assignment based on the specific haplotypes.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S147926211800045X.

Acknowledgements

We thank Alexandra Dolynska, Melanie Eckholdt and Babalola Jumoke for support during laboratory work. This project is funded by the ‘Fachagentur für nachhaltige Ressourcen (FNR) des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMEL)’.

References

Bouk, A and Vision, T (2007) The molecular ecologist's guide to expressed sequence tags. Molecular Ecology 16: 907924.Google Scholar
Brinegar, C (2011) Rangewide genetic variation in coast redwood populations at a chloroplast microsatellite locus. In: Standiford, RB, Weller, TJ, Piierto, DD and Stuart, JD (eds) Proceedings of the Coast Redwood Forests in A Changing California: A Symposium for Scientists and Managers. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-238. Albany, California, USA: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 241249.Google Scholar
Bucci, G, Gonzalez-Martinez, SC, Le Provost, G, Plomion, C, Ribeiro, MM, Sebastiani, F, Alía, R and Vendramin, GG (2007) Range-wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 16: 21372153.Google Scholar
Clark, L and Jasieniuk, M (2011) Polysat: an R package for polyploid microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 562566.Google Scholar
Douhovnikoff, V and Dodd, RS (2011) Lineage divergence in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), detected by a new set of nuclear microsatellite loci. The American Midland Naturalist 165: 2237.Google Scholar
Douhovnikoff, V, Cheng, AM and Dodd, RS (2004) Incidence, size and spatial structure of clones in second-growth stands of coast redwood, Sequoia sempervirens (Cupressaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 11401146.Google Scholar
Euyal, I, Sorrells, M, Baum, M, Wolters, P and Powell, W (2001) Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRs and genomic SSRs. Euphytica 119: 3943.Google Scholar
Goudet, J and Jombart, T (2015) hierfstat: Estimation and Tests of Hierarchical F-Statistics. R-package version 0.04-22. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hierfstat.Google Scholar
Hall, GD and Langenheim, JH (1987) Geographic variation in leaf monoterpenes of Sequoia sempervirens. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15: 3143.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, JI and Amos, W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Molecular Ecology 14: 599612.Google Scholar
Ibañez, MT, Caru, M, Herrera, MA, Gonzalez, L, Martin, LM, Miranda, J and Navarro-Cerrillo, RM (2009) Clones identification of Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl. in Chile by using PCR-RAPDs technique. Journal of Zheijang University Science B 10: 112119.Google Scholar
Kibbe, WA (2007) Oligocalc: an online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Research 35: W43W46.Google Scholar
Kofler, R, Schlötterer, C and Lelley, T (2007) Sciroko: a new tool for whole genome microsatellite search and investigation. Bioinformatics Application Notes 23: 16831685.Google Scholar
Kubisiak, TL, Nelson, CD, Staton, ME, Zhebentyayeva, T, Smith, C, Olukolu, BA, Fang, G-C, Hebard, FV, Anagnostakis, S, Wheeler, N, Sisco, PH, Abbott, AG and Sederoff, RR (2013) A transcriptome-based genetic map of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) and identification of regions of segmental homology with peach (Prunus persica). Tree Genetics & Genomes 9: 557571.Google Scholar
Narayan, L, Dodd, RS and O'Hara, KL (2015) A genotyping protocol for multiple tissue types from the polyploidy tree species Sequoia sempervirens (Cupressaceae). Applications in Plant Science 3: 1400110.Google Scholar
Neale, D, Marshall, K and Sederoff, R (1989) Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA are paternally inherited in Sequoia sempervirens D.Don.Endl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 86: 93479349.Google Scholar
Nybom, H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13: 11431155.Google Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288295.Google Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2012) Genalex 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 25372539.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, T, Roschanski, AM, Pannell, JR, Korbecka, G and Schnittler, M (2011) Characterization of microsatellite loci and reliable genotyping in a polyploidy plant Mercurialis perennis (Euphorbiaceae). Journal of Heredity 102: 479488.Google Scholar
Rogers, DL (2000) Genotypic diversity and clone size in old-growth populations of coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 14081419.Google Scholar
Roy, DF (1966) Silvical characteristics of redwood (Sequoia sempervirens [D. Don] Endl.). USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-28. Berkeley, California, USA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Rungis, D, Bérubé, Y, Zhang, J, Ralph, S, Ritland, CE, Ellis, BE, Douglas, C, Bohlmann, J and Ritland, K (2004) Robust single sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 12831294.Google Scholar
Schuelke, M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233234.Google Scholar
Scott, AD, Stenz, NWM, Ingvarsson, PK and Baum, DA (2016) Whole genome duplication in coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and its implications for explaining the rarity of polyploidy in conifers. New Phytologist 211: 186193.Google Scholar
Stebbin, GL Jr (1948) The chromosomes and relationships of Metasequoia and Sequoia. Science 108: 9598.Google Scholar
Untergasser, A, Cutcutache, I, Koressaar, T, Ye, J, Faircloth, BC, Remm, M and Rozen, SG (2012) Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115.Google Scholar
Vendramin, GG, Degen, B, Petit, RJ, Anzidei, M, Madaghiele, A and Ziegenhagen, B (1999) High level of variation at Abies alba chloroplast microsatellite loci in Europe. Molecular Ecology 8: 11171126.Google Scholar
Viard, F, El-Kassaby, YA and Ritland, K (2001) Diversity and genetic structure in populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Pinaceae) at chloroplast microsatellite loci. Genome 44: 336344.Google Scholar
Yeh, FC, Yang, RC, Boyle, TBJ, Ye, Z and Mao, JK (1997) Popgene, the user friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Alberta, Canada: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta. Available at https://sites.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/popgene.htmlGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Novel EST-SSR and cpSSR markers developed in coast redwood

Supplementary material: File

Breidenbach et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Breidenbach et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.4 KB