Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:52:19.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for identification of Glycyrrhiza species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2018

Kyung Jun Lee
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Jeonju-54874, Republic of Korea
Sebastin Raveendar
Affiliation:
National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA, Jeonju-54874, Republic of Korea
Ji Seon Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Plant Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea
Jinsu Gil
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Plant Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea
Jeong Hoon Lee
Affiliation:
Herbal Crop Research Division, Department of Herbal Crop Research, NIHHS, RDA, Eumseong 27709, Republic of Korea
Yoon-Sup So*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Jong-Wook Chung*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Plant Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Republic of Korea
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: yoonsupso@chungbuk.ac.kr and jwchung73@chungbuk.ac.kr
*Corresponding author. E-mail: yoonsupso@chungbuk.ac.kr and jwchung73@chungbuk.ac.kr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) is an important medicinal herb and has long been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of several diseases worldwide. Understanding the genetic diversity within Glycyrrhiza species is important for the efficient conservation of these medicinal herbs. In this study, we have developed 20 polymorphic chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers using the chloroplast genome of G. lepidota. The cpSSR markers were tested on a total of 27 Glycyrrhiza individual plants. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to eight among the Glycyrrhiza accessions. Overall, the Shannon index (I) for each cpSSR ranged from 0.315 to 1.694, the diversity indices (h) were 0.140–0.793 and the unbiased diversity indices (uh) were 0.145–0.825. In addition, the cpSSR markers were successfully divided and classified the 27 Glycyrrhiza individuals into four groups. The cpSSR markers developed in this study could be used in the assessment of genetic diversity and rapid identification of Glycyrrhiza species.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Introduction

Licorice (Glycyrrhiza spp.) is one of the most frequently used herbs, which contains about 30 recognized species being widely distributed around the world. Generally, the dried roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza species have been used in various digestive complaints including stomach ulcers, heartburn, colic and chronic gastritis (Raveendra et al., Reference Raveendra, Jayachandra, Srinivasa, Sushma, Allan, Goudar, Shivaprasad, Venkateshwarlu, Geetharani, Sushma and Agarwal2012). Glycyrrhizic acid or glycyrrhizin is one of the main bioactive substance present in the Glycyrrhiza species, which mostly ranges from 1 to 9% depending on the species and geographical growth conditions (Fiore et al., Reference Fiore, Eisenhut, Krausse, Ragazzi, Pellati, Armanini and Bielenberg2008).

In general, the licorice species were identified by morphological characteristics of roots. Glycyrrhizin, a marker component of licorice, has also been used to identify the species but the component variations appear depending on the growth environment. Ashurmetov (Reference Ashurmetov1996) reported that G. lepidota occupies an intermediate position between glycyrrhizin-producing species (G. glabra and G. uralensis) and macedonoside C-producing species (G. echinata and G. pallidiflora). Several researches have also been performed for diversity assessment in which the molecular markers have been considered as efficient for phylogenetic studies in above-species level (Powell et al., Reference Powell, Morgante, McDevitt, Vendramin and Rafalski1995).

Chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers were mostly distributed throughout non-coding regions, which showed high sequence variation (Powell et al., Reference Powell, Morgante, McDevitt, Vendramin and Rafalski1995). In addition, cpSSR markers developed from a species can be used to amplify homologous regions across related taxa (Diekmann et al., Reference Diekmann, Hodkinson and Barth2012). In the present study, we report the development and characterization of cpSSR markers for the molecular classification among Glycyrrhiza species to facilitate their identification for conservation.

Experimental

A total of 27 accessions from Glycyrrhiza species [G. uralensis (11), G. lepidota (7), G. glabra (5), G. echinata (2) and unclassified G. spp. (2)] were obtained from the Ginseng Research Division of National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA, South Korea and USDA-ARS.

The cpSSR loci of G. lepidota were obtained from the cp genome (NCBI Accessions No.: NC_034229) according to the method mentioned in the previous study (Raveendar et al., Reference Raveendar, So, Lee, Lee, Sung and Chung2017). Among them, 25 cpSSRs for proper PCR conditions were selected. The primer design parameters were set as follows: length range, 18–23 nucleotides with 21 as the optimum; PCR product size range, 200–300 bp; optimum annealing temperature (T a), 55°C; and GC content 50–60%, with 51% as the optimum.

To determine the variability of the cpSSRs, genomic DNA of the 27 Glycyrrhiza accessions was extracted from leaves using a GenEX Plant Kit (Geneall, Seoul, Korea) following the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification reactions were performed in 20 µl total volume using 40 ng of template DNA, 1× reaction buffer containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 uM each primer, 0.05 uM dNTP and 0.1 U Taq DNA polymerase. DNA was amplified with the following thermal profile: one denaturation cycle of 3 min at 94°C, followed by 25 cycles each consisting of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 45 s, 72°C for 60 s with a final extension step at 72°C for 15 min. Fragment lengths were determined using Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Ankeny, IA, USA).

The number of observed alleles (N A) for each SSR locus was counted for all Glycyrrhiza accessions. The effective number of alleles (N E = 1/(ΣPi2)), the Shannon index (I = –ΣPi ln Pi, Pi: the frequency of the i allele), diversity index (h = 1–ΣPi2) and unbiased diversity (uh = N/(N–1) h) were calculated using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, Reference Peakall and Smouse2006). An unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was constructed by PowerMarker version 3.25 (Liu and Muse, Reference Liu and Muse2005) and visualized the phylogenetic distribution of accessions using MEGA version 5.03 software (Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Dudley, Nei and Kumar2007).

Discussion

A total of 25 cpSSR markers amplified on 27 Glycyrrhiza accessions were shown in online Supplementary Table S1. Among them, 20 primers exhibited polymorphic amplification of fragments in all accessions. In total, 88 alleles were detected in 20 cpSSR markers among the 27 samples. Number of alleles (N A) ranged from two to eight, and the effective number of alleles (N E) was calculated from 1.163 to 4.829. Shannon's index (I) for each cpSSR ranged from 0.315 to 1.694, while the diversity indices (h) and unbiased diversity (uh) ranged from 0.140 to 0.793 and 0.145 to 0.825, respectively.

The genetic relationship assessment and classification of Glycyrrhiza species based on the cpSSR markers were shown in Fig. 1. The resulting dendrogram divided the 27 Glycyrrhiza accessions into four groups as mostly expected based on the passport data. The Cluster I consists of four G. glabra accessions with a G. uralensis accession, whereas Cluster II consists of 10 G. uralensis accessions and two unclassified G. spp accessions with a G. glabra accession. The inclusion of G. uralensis accession (CBG02) in Cluster I and G. glabra accession (CBG06) in Cluster II might be misclassified, since based on the records, they were classified clearly to be with G. uralensis and G. glabra accessions, respectively. On the other hand, Clusters III and IV consisted of G. lepidota and G. echinata accessions, respectively, which makes them individual clusters. The dendrogram also revealed four groups which can be further divided into two subgroups. G. glabra and G. uralensis accessions were more closely related; whereas G. lepidota and G. echinata accessions showed much closer than the other two species.

Fig. 1. UPGMA dendrogram of Glycyrrhiza species based on 21 cpSSR marker data.

DNA sequence-based markers have practical advantages for the authentication of plant species (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Kim, Yang, Bang and Yang2014). They can be used efficiently to differentiate similar medicinal plants or their products using small amounts of sample in a time and cost-effective manner. The cpSSR markers developed in this study successfully classified 27 Glycyrrhiza accessions into four clusters in the UPGMA dendrogram. The clustering analysis have also coincided with the previous research, in which four Glycyrrhiza species (G. lepidota, G. glabra, G. uralensis and G. echinata) were classified according to their chemical constituents (Ashurmetov, Reference Ashurmetov1996).

In general, organellar DNA markers were considered more reliable for taxonomic identification because of their conserved nature (Green et al., Reference Green, Vardi and Galun1986; Cheng et al., Reference Cheng, de Vicente, Meng, Guo, Tao and Deng2005). The polymorphic cpSSR markers developed in this study based on G. lepidota chloroplast genome could be used for identification of Glycyrrhiza species, which will facilitate the conservation strategy within the Glycyrrhiza genus.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000308.

Acknowledgement

This work was carried out with the support of ‘Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01028801)’ Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Ashurmetov, OA (1996) Selection of parental pairs for obtaining hybrids in the genera Glycyrrhiza L. and Meristotropis Fisch. et Mey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 167171.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y, de Vicente, MC, Meng, H, Guo, W, Tao, N and Deng, X (2005) A set of primers for analyzing chloroplast DNA diversity in Citrus and related genera. Tree Physiology 25: 661672.Google Scholar
Diekmann, K, Hodkinson, TR and Barth, S (2012) New chloroplast microsatellite markers suitable for assessing genetic diversity of Lolium perenne and other related grass species. Annals of Botany 110: 13271339.Google Scholar
Fiore, C, Eisenhut, M, Krausse, R, Ragazzi, E, Pellati, D, Armanini, D and Bielenberg, J (2008) Antiviral effects of Glycyrrhiza species. Phytotherapy Research 22: 141148.Google Scholar
Green, RM, Vardi, A and Galun, E (1986) The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72: 170177.Google Scholar
Jung, J, Kim, KH, Yang, K, Bang, K-H and Yang, T-J (2014) Practical application of DNA markers for high-throughput authentication of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius from commercial ginseng products. Journal of Ginseng Research 38: 123129.Google Scholar
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) Powermarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21: 21282129.Google Scholar
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Resources 6: 288295.Google Scholar
Powell, W, Morgante, M, McDevitt, R, Vendramin, GG and Rafalski, JA (1995) Polymorphic simple sequence repeat regions in chloroplast genomes: applications to the population genetics of pines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92: 77597763.Google Scholar
Raveendra, KR, Jayachandra, , Srinivasa, V, Sushma, KR, Allan, JJ, Goudar, KS, Shivaprasad, HN, Venkateshwarlu, K, Geetharani, P, Sushma, G and Agarwal, A (2012) An extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra (GutGard) alleviates symptoms of functional dyspepsia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012: 9.Google Scholar
Raveendar, S, So, Y-S, Lee, KJ, Lee, D-J, Sung, J and Chung, J-W (2017) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Glycyrrhiza lepidota (Nutt.) Pursh – an American wild licorice. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 20: 295303.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Dudley, J, Nei, M and Kumar, S (2007) MEGA4: molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 15961599.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. UPGMA dendrogram of Glycyrrhiza species based on 21 cpSSR marker data.

Supplementary material: File

Lee et al. supplementary material

Lee et al. supplementary material 1

Download Lee et al. supplementary material(File)
File 43.9 KB