Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-fw45b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T05:16:37.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong, Weak, and Functional Equivalence in Machine Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

A. Rosenberg  and
N. J. Mackintosh
A. Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University and University of Sussex
N. J. Mackintosh
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University and University of Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1974 , pp. 412 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Fodor, J. Psychological Explanation. New York: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
[2] Rosenberg, A. and MacKintosh, N. J. “On Fodor's Distinction Between Strong and Weak Equivalence in Machine Simulation.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 118–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Wilks, Y. “More on Fodor's Distinction Between Strong and Weak Simulations.” Philosophy of Science 41 (1974): 408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar