Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:34:25.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Similarity and structure of the ectoparasite communities of rockfish species from the southern Chilean coast in a temporal scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2006

M. T. GONZÁLEZ
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta. Casilla 170-Antofagasta, Chile Instituto de Ecología y Evolución, Universidad Austral de Chile. Casilla 567-Valdivia, Chile
M. E. OLIVA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad de Antofagasta. Casilla 170-Antofagasta, Chile
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The understanding of the patterns and processes underlying the structure of parasite communities has progressed significantly in the last years; however, much of the evidence available to date on parasite community comes from unconfirmed studies. In this study the ectoparasite communities of 2 related rockfishes, Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi, from the southern Chilean coast (ca. 40 °S) were examined to determine whether their specific compositions are similar, structured in non-random ways, and repeatable among years. From 2001 to 2004, 189 specimens of S. capensis and 101 of H. lengerichi were examined, 10 and 9 parasite species were recorded in S. capensis and H. lengerichi, respectively. Component ectoparasite communities of these hosts were taxonomically similar (60%), but the abundances and prevalences of their parasites differed significantly among years and between hosts. The most prevalent species were Lepeophtheirus chilensis, and Microcotyle sp. for S. capensis, and Microcotyle sp., Juanetia continentalis, and Interniloculus chilensis for H. lengerichi. Infracommunities of S. capensis showed higher species richness and parasite numbers than those of H. lengerichi. The similarity among infracommunities (measured as parasite abundance) varied significantly among years both within and between hosts. Despite this, temporal nestedness patterns were observed in infracommunities of these hosts, suggesting that their ectoparasite communities are structured and might be predictable in time, at least in the southern Chilean coast where they share the same habitat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

INTRODUCTION

The parasite communities of fishes at infra, component and compound community levels (as defined by Bush et al. 1997) are affected by host and parasite phylogeny, historical ecological associations, and current ecological factors such as diet, habitat or niche overlap (Esch et al. 1990; Poulin, 1995). Thus, for example, host size or host age, schooling behaviour, and ecological overlap with other host species are factors affecting the parasite infracommunity structure of the hosts (Nelson and Dick, 2002). Likewise, the environmental characteristics such as latitude, temperature and depth can affect the parasite communities of fishes (Rohde et al. 1995; Oliva et al. 2004).

In the last decade, knowledge of the patterns and processes underlying the structure of parasite communities has progressed significantly (Sousa, 1994; Poulin, 1996, 2001). However, much of the evidence available to date on parasite community comes from unconfirmed studies on either temporal or spatial scales (Poulin and Valtonen, 2002). Therefore, the potential temporal variations in community structure remain an unresolved issue. Recently, some studies have analysed the structure of parasite communities in the same host, considering the variability in time and/or space (Carney and Dick, 2000; Poulin and Valtonen, 2002; Timi and Poulin, 2003; Vidal-Martinez and Poulin, 2003, Zelmer et al. 2004; González and Poulin, 2005). Those studies have yielded contradictory results; therefore, additional investigations are required to determine whether the observed patterns are consistent on a temporal scale.

Nested subset analyses are valuable descriptive tools for revealing ecologically meaningful non-random patterns, and are useful exploratory tools for suggesting mechanisms that may structure a particular community (Worthen, 1996). A nested pattern has been defined as a departure from a random association of species in which species that compose a depauperate island community constitute a proper subset of those species inhabiting richer islands (Patterson and Atmar, 1986). Nestedness has been well documented for parasites and has been used extensively to test for non-random patterns among species assemblages (Simková et al. 2001; Timi and Poulin, 2003; Zelmer et al. 2004; González and Poulin, 2005). Nestedness analyses can be used to assess the predictability of the parasite community structure in both space and time (Poulin and Valtonen, 2002).

In this study we examined the ectoparasite fauna of 2 related fish hosts (Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi) from the southern Chilean coast to compare, through multivariate analyses, the degree of similarity of the ectoparasite fauna of these fish hosts at both component and infracommunity levels. Then, we determined, based on nested subset analyses, whether their ectoparasite infracommunities are structured. Lastly, we examined the temporal repeatability of ectoparasite community structure in these fish hosts. The scorpaenids, S. capensis and H. lengerichi, are the only species belonging to these genera found along the southeastern Pacific coast (Kong, 1985; Eschmeyer, 2000). These species are morphologically similar, but their bathymetric ranges differ. S. capensis inhabits shallow waters, from depths of 20 m to 150 m, and H. lengerichi inhabits deeper waters, between 50 m and 300 m in depth (Pequeño, 2000). Taking into account the characteristic of these hosts, it is hypothesized that similarity and structure, if any, of their ectoparasite communities can be expected as a consequence of their close phylogenetic relationship and habitat (bathymetric) overlap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October to December 2001 and November to December 2002, and in April 2003 and September 2004, 189 specimens of S. capensis and 101 specimens of H. lengerichi, were examined. Fishes were captured as by-catch in the ray (Dipturus chilensis) fishery during 2001, 2002 and 2004; and by hand line during 2003 from Valdivia (40 °S). The fishes were captured from 40 m to 250 m depth.

Fishes were transported to the laboratory, identified according to Eschmeyer (2000), and by their otolith morphology. The fish were measured (total length (TL), precision 0·5 cm), and sexed macroscopically. The skin, fins, eyes, mouth, and gills were examined for parasites. The collection of parasites followed the traditional parasitological techniques outlined by Pritchard and Kruse (1982). The parasites were fixed in alcohol (70%), and identified using specialized literature (see González and Acuña, 1998).

For each parasite species, abundance and prevalence were estimated according to the protocol of Bush et al. (1997). Parasite richness (number of parasite species per host) and the similarity index of Bray Curtis (following log (n+1) transformation of mean abundance data) were calculated at infra- and component levels, respectively.

Due to the non-normal distribution of the data, non-parametric tests were used (Zar, 1999). For each host fish, the sizes of the examined specimens and species richness per host among different sampling years were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman correlations (rs) were used to evaluate the association between fish size and species richness, and between fish size and abundances of each parasite species.

At the infracommunity level, patterns of similarity in ectoparasite fauna composition, both among years and between hosts, were investigated with multivariate discriminant analyses, using log (n+1) transformed abundance data for each parasite species. At the component community level, correspondence analyses were used to evaluate the association between all of the parasite species and the year of sampling (Digby and Kempton, 1987). The analyses were performed using the software Statistica 6.0.

Nested subset analyses were carried out for ectoparasite infracommunities for each fish host in the different years. The matrix “temperature” (T) proposed by Atmar and Patterson (1993) was calculated, using the Nestedness Temperature Calculator Program (NTCP, Atmar and Patterson, 1995). For each community of parasites, the observed matrix temperature was compared with the T values of 1000 randomly generated presence-absence matrices produced with Monte-Carlo simulations. The statistical probability of the observed pattern was given by the proportion of simulated T values that were lower than or equal to the observed T value and was used as a measure of the departure from the structure expected under random assembly (Guégan and Hugueny, 1994). A P value <0·05 indicates communities that are significantly nested, whereas P values >0·95 characterize significantly anti-nested patterns (Vidal-Martinez and Poulin, 2003).

RESULTS

Parasite community of Sebastes capensis

A total of 10 ectoparasite species was recovered from this host. During the years 2001, 2002 and 2003, 95%, 98% and 100% of the fish, respectively, were parasitized by at least 1 parasite species. The species richness per host varied between 1 and 7 species (X=3·0; S.D.=1·34). The most prevalent parasite species were Microcotyle sp. and Lepeophtheirus chilensis through all these years (Table 1). None of the abundances of ectoparasite species were significantly correlated with fish size (P>0·05 for all species).

Table 1. Mean abundances and prevalence (%) of the ectoparasites recorded on Sebastes capensis from Valdivia (40 °S) during the years 2001, 2002 and 2003 (S=skin, G=gill, M=mouth.)

The size of S. capensis varied between 20 cm and 41 cm TL during the years of sampling (Fig. 1). Significant differences in fish sizes among years were recorded (H(2,189)=100·69; P<0·001). Also, there were significant differences in the parasite species richness per host among years (H(2,189)=24·90; P<0·001). The ectoparasite species richness per host was significantly correlated with host size during 2003 (rs=0·32; P=0·007; n=67), but there was no correlation between species richness per host and fish size during 2001 (rs=−0·07; P=0·55; n=61) and 2002 (rs=−0·15; P=0·23; n=61).

Fig. 1. Distribution of fish size of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi during sampling years.

Parasite community of Helicolenus lengerichi

A total of 9 ectoparasite species was recorded in H. lengerichi. During 2001, 2002 and 2004, 100%, 81%, and 100% respectively, of the specimens of this host were parasitized by at least 1 parasite species. The species richness per host varied between 1 and 5 species (X=2·0; S.D.=1·24). The most prevalent parasite species were Microcotyle sp. (Microcotyle specimens from both hosts belong to the same undescribed species), Juanetia continentalis, and Interniloculus chilensis (Table 2). In this host, the abundances of Gnathia sp. (rs=0·207; P=0·03; n=101), Microcotyle sp. (rs=0·214; P=0·03; n=101) and I. chilensis (rs=0·218; P=0·02; n=101) were significantly correlated with fish size.

Table 2. Mean abundances and prevalence (%) of the ectoparasites recorded on Helicolenus lengerichi from the Valdivia coast (40 °S) during the years 2001, 2002 and 2004 (S=skin, G=gill, M=mouth.)

The sizes of H. lengerichi varied between 21·2 cm and 39·7 cm during the studied years (Fig. 1). There was no significant difference in fish sizes between years of sampling (H(2,101)=4·835; P=0·089). There were significant differences in the parasite species richness per host between years (H(2,101)=27·18; P<0·001). The ectoparasite species richness per host was significantly correlated with host size during 2002 (r=0·34; P=0·009; n=56), but there was no correlation between species richness per host and fish size during 2001 (r=0·40; P=0·08; n=20) or during 2004 (rs=0·33; P=0·10; n=25).

Similarity of the ectoparasite community within and between fish hosts

The infracommunities of S. capensis harboured higher total numbers of parasite individuals (U=6,459; P<0·001), and showed higher species richness (U=5,777; P<0·001) than the infracommunities of H. lengerichi. The similarity between infracommunities within the same host among years, and between infracommunities of both hosts (considering all study periods) were evaluated using multivariate discriminant analyses. In addition to abundance (previously log(n+1) transformed), the year and host size were also considered as potential explanatory variables. The infracommunities of S. capensis showed significant differences in parasite abundances among years (F(20,354)=25·40; P<0·0001; Wilks' Lambda=0·168) (Fig. 2). Eighty-three percent of infracommunities of this host were correctly assigned in each sampling year. The discriminant variables (those with highest F- to remove) were abundances of Gnathia sp. and C. cheilodactylus, and fish size. Likewise, the infracommunities of H. lengerichi showed significant differences in parasite abundances among years (F(12,186)=9·94; P<0·0001; Wilks' Lambda=0·361) (Fig. 3). Seventy-four percent of infracommunities of this host were correctly assigned at each sampling year. The discriminant variables were the abundances of I. chilensis and Microcotyle sp. The multivariate discriminant analysis considering the variables: host species, host size and the abundances (log(n+1) transformed) of each of the parasite species showed significant differences between infracommunities of each host species (F(12,277)=28·438; P<0·0002; Wilks' Lambda=0·448). Overall, 89% of the infracommunities were correctly assigned to their respective hosts. The discriminant variables corresponded to those parasite species whose abundances and prevalences are significantly different between fish hosts: J. continentalis, I. chilensis, and L. chilensis (see Tables 1 and 2).

Fig. 2. Discriminant analysis for infracommunities of Sebsates capensis during years 2001, 2002 and 2003 using abundances of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

Fig. 3. Discriminant analysis for infracommunities of Helicolenus lengerichi during years 2001, 2002 and 2004 using abundances of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

At the component community (CC) level, S. capensis and H. lengerichi shared 60% of their parasites. The Bray-Curtis index of similarity of CC composition among years varied between 60% and 81% for S. capensis, and between 63% and 74% for H. lengerichi. Of the shared ectoparasite species 3 are specific to these scorpaeniformes: the copepod J. continentalis, and the monogeneans I. chilensis and Microcotyle sp. The correspondence analyses considering all parasite species (10 and 9 species, respectively) showed that in both hosts there were significant differences among years in their parasite prevalences (S. capensis: X2=178·88; D.F.=18, P<0·001; H. lengerichi: X2=117·26, D.F.=16, P<0·001). In S. capensis the differences were produced by the samples of 2003. In this year U. australis and C. cheilodactylus were most prevalent. In the case of H. lengerichi, the difference resulted mainly from the high prevalence of I. chilensis during 2004 (Fig. 4). Likewise, multiple correspondence analyses for component communities of each host considering all parasite prevalences and sampling years showed significant differences between hosts: S. capensis was strongly associated with the parasites L. chilensis, C. cheilodactylus, N. melleni and U. australis, while H. lengerichi was associated with their specific parasites: I. chilensis and J. continentalis (Fig. 4). Thus, although the taxonomic composition of parasites was similar during the studied years, the most prevalent species changed over time.

Fig. 4. Multiple correspondence analysis for the parasite component communities of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi using prevalence of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

Temporal nestedness analyses for each fish host

Significant nestedness was found in the ectoparasite infracommunities of S. capensis and H. lengerichi during all years of sampling (Table 3), indicating that common species are found in infracommunities of varying richness, but rare species mainly occur in more diverse infracommunities, and that the ectoparasite community structure departs from randomness through all years of sampling.

Table 3. Summary of the results of nestedness analyses within each ectoparasite component community of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi from the Valdivia coast (40 °S) for different years (P<0·05 indicates nested communities. Average=mean of 1000 simulations matrix, and (S.D.)=standard deviation.)

DISCUSSION

To describe and explain patterns of community structure is one of the central themes in ecology and in fish parasite communities remain an unresolved issue. In this context, the temporal predictability of the parasite communities in fish has not been extensively evaluated because almost all studies are carried out in a short period of time (Poulin and Morand, 2000; Poulin and Valtonen, 2002). Some studies of parasite communities on a temporal scale have evaluated the similarity of infracommunities in terms of parasite abundances, prevalences and species richness, mainly focusing upon the endohelminth fauna of the hosts (e.g. Balboa and George-Nascimento, 1998; Garcías et al. 2001, Karvonen et al. 2005, but see Bagge et al. 2004). The endohelminth communities of fish can be determined by the feeding habits of the hosts (e.g. specialist versus generalist predators) and their ontogenetic changes, as well as by the availability of different prey species (intermediate hosts) in a given environment (Poulin, 1995), but the transmission of ectoparasites is not affected by such factors. The ectoparasite communities are affected by host habitat, host behaviour (e.g. migratory or sedentary habits), host density, and by environmental characteristics (e.g. depth and temperature) (Poulin, 1995; Oliva et al. 2004). Fish ectoparasite infracommunities represent colonization-dominated systems (Rohde et al. 1995). In this study, although the temporal scale might still be restricted, the ectoparasite composition of S. capensis and H. lengerichi showed between 60 and 80% of taxonomic similarity among years respectively, but significant differences were evident in the abundances and prevalences of their ectoparasite species. For S. capensis, the differences in these community descriptors can be explained either because in 2003, fish were captured in shallow water (25 m) and/or in early Autumn, whereas the rest of the samples were captured in Spring. The copepods L. chilensis and C. cheilodactylus and their hyper-parasite U. australis can be most abundant in shallow water as these ectoparasites are also commonly present in other littoral fishes (González and Poulin, 2005). Additionally, seasonal variations in the abundances and prevalences of copepods of these genera have been reported (Boxshall, 1974; Schram et al. 1998). In the case of H. lengerichi the high intensity of infection of I. chilensis during samples of 2004 is responsible for the differences observed among years. Therefore, parasite abundance is not a useful tool to predict fish infracommunities due to their variability.

In spite of the above-mentioned difficulties, during all the years of study a nestedness pattern was observed in infracommunities of both hosts; that is, rare species mainly occur in more diverse infracommunities, which suggests that the ectoparasite communities of these hosts are structured and might be predictable in terms of specific composition. Rohde et al. (1998) concluded that parasite assemblages in marine fish were commonly unstructured and unpredictable. However, other studies have shown that an increase in parasite species richness did not occur at random but followed a predictable pattern of parasite infracommunity structure (Guégan and Hugueny, 1994; González and Poulin, 2005). Rohde et al. (1998) indicated that nested patterns in fish parasite assemblages have been found only because fish samples include both juvenile and adult hosts, and considered that a nested pattern is merely a consequence of an increased parasite diversity associated with ontogeny of the host. Our data include only adult fish, avoiding the influence of host ontogeny suggested by Rohde et al. (1998). The analysis of parasite communities considering fish of different developmental stages is likely to generate apparent nestedness because of differential colonization probabilities among parasites (Poulin and Valtonen, 2001; Vidal-Martinez and Poulin, 2003). This assumption can be applied to ectoparasite infracommunities because larger fish present more space to be colonized by new ectoparasite species (Poulin, 1995). In this study, a significant correlation between fish size and species richness was observed only for S. capensis during 2003 and H. lengerichi during 2002. Species richness was not correlated with fish size during the other studied years; in these years the examined fish were larger and covered a wider host range size. However, these infracommunities were not the richest. Therefore, in these hosts, larger fish do not harbour infracommunities richer than those of smaller fish, and the observed nested patterns are not influenced by fish size.

The nestedness in ectoparasite communities of marine fish has been explained as a consequence of epidemiological processes that in turn depend of the demographic characteristics of each parasite species in an assemblage (Morand et al. 2002). Thus, a nested pattern can be the result of different factors that affect the probability of a given host being infested by a particular parasite. In this sense, host biology may be a key determinant of parasite infracommunity structure (Zelmer and Arai, 2004; González and Poulin, 2005). The rockfish S. capensis is an abundant and sedentary species, without migratory movements, inhabiting the rocky subtidal zone, where it waits motionless in order to capture prey (Moreno, 1981; Barrientos et al. 2006). Individual fish (between 20 cm and 35 cm TL) should occupy a similar and restricted habitat, ensuring the recruitment of the same parasite species in individual hosts of these sizes. Thus, the gregarious and sedentary habits of this fish species (added to their abundance) should favour a richer and predictable ectoparasite community structure, through direct contact between individual hosts. On the other hand, H. lengerichi is a fish species distributed across a broader depth range (from 50 m to 300 m depth), which could allow wide-ranging movements of individual fish. So, it is also likely that larger fish occupy a different habitat (deeper water) than smaller fish (Massutí et al. 2001). This differential use of habitat could affect the colonization rate of ectoparasites in this host and generate the observed nested patterns (Guégan and Hugueny, 1994).

Exchanges of parasite species may occur over evolutionary time between phylogenetically related host species, and therefore related hosts living in the same geographical area could harbour richer parasite communities, sharing similar parasites (Kennedy and Bush, 1994). At the component community level, the ectoparasite taxonomic composition of S. capensis along the southern Chilean coast is similar to those recorded along the northern (González and Acuña, 1998), and central Chilean coasts (González and Poulin, 2005). Fish from the southern coast, inhabiting deeper waters, harbour only 1 additional (although rare) parasite species, the copepod Juanetia continentalis, a species originally described from H. lengerichi (Villalba and Fernández, 1985). However, the species richness of the infracommunities of S. capensis on the southern Chilean coast is higher than those recorded on the northern and central Chilean coasts. Similarly, the parasite species richness of H. lengerichi on the southern coast is higher than those recorded from central Chile (George-Nascimento and Iriarte, 1989). On the southern coast (40 °S), at the component community level these rockfish species share between 60 and 80% of their ectoparasite species. Then, the higher species richness per host and similarity in the ectoparasite faunas of both host species in this geographical area might be explained because the habitats of S. capensis and H. lengerichi overlap between 50 m and 150 m in depth, which makes possible the interchange of specific ectoparasites (e.g. Microcotyle sp., I. chilensis, J. continentalis) as well as generalist species (e.g. L. chilensis, C. cheilodactylus, Gnathia sp.) between these rockfish hosts. Additionally, S. capensis inhabits the rocky-littoral zone with diverse fish species (e.g. Prolatilus jugularis, Eleginops maclovinus, Cheilodactylus variegatus, Chromis crusma) that also harbour the copepods C. cheilodactylus and L. chilensis (Fernández and Villalba, 1986), thus facilitating the exchange of these caligid parasites between these fish hosts. On the contrary, H. lengerichi inhabits the deeper water, near the bottom (demersal), where a higher diversity of fish species is present (e.g. Merluccius spp., Genypterus spp.) (Pequeño, 2000). It is well known that these fish host harbour specific ectoparasite species that are not found in Scorpaenids. Therefore, for H. lengerichi the exchange of ectoparasite species among different fish hosts does not play an important role in the composition or species richness of their ectoparasite community.

According to Kennedy and Bush (1994), generalist parasite species should reduce the predictability of the parasite community of a host species, whereas host-specific parasites should produce predictable parasite communities. Host specificity determines whether a parasite is able to colonize a host and therefore may be a factor influencing the nestedness structure in parasite communities (Matejusová et al. 2000). This argument is supported for parasite infracommunities of H. lengerichi whose specific parasites were predominant during all the years of study. However, it is equally possible that generalist parasites can be evenly distributed between ranges of host species producing predictable parasite communities both within and between these hosts. This seems be the case for S. capensis where both specific and generalist parasites were equally present during the whole period of study. Thus, independent of the degree of specificity of their ectoparasites, the consistent temporal nested patterns observed in their infracommunities support the hypothesis that the ectoparasite communities of these rockfishes are structured and, therefore, might be predictable over time, at least in the southern Chilean coast where they share the same habitat.

We thank Professor Robert Poulin of the University of Otago for his comments and criticism. Thanks also to Julio Lamilla and Roberto Licandeo of the Zoology Department of Universidad Austral de Chile for their help with the collection of fish samples from the ray Fishery. This study was funded by fellowships CONICYT AT-4040092 and D.I.D. of the Universidad Austral of Chile granted to the principal author.

References

REFERENCES

Atmar, W. and Patterson, B. D. ( 1993). The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96, 373382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atmar, W. and Patterson, B. D. ( 1995). The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence-absence matrices. AICS Research, Inc., University Park, NM and The Field Museum, Chicago, Il. http://www.aics-research.com/nestedness/tempcalc.html.
Bagge, A. M., Poulin, R. and Valtonen, A. T. ( 2004). Fish population size, and not density, as the determining factor of parasite infection: a case study. Parasitology 128, 305311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balboa, L. and George-Nascimento, M. ( 1998). Variaciones ontogeneticas y entre años en las infracomunidades de parásitos metazoos de dos especies de peces marinos de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 71, 2737.Google Scholar
Barrientos, C., González, M. T. and Moreno, C. A. ( 2006). Feeding pattern of the rockfish, Sebastes capensis, along its geographic range of distribution in South America. Fishery Bulletin (in the Press).Google Scholar
Boxshall, G. A. ( 1974). The population dynamics of Lepeophtheirus pectoralis (Müller): seasonal variation in abundance and age structure. Parasitology 69, 361371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. and Shostak, A. W. ( 1997). Parasitology meets ecology in its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, J. P. and Dick T. A. ( 2000). Helminth communities of yellow perch, Perca flavescens (Mitchill): determinants of pattern. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 538555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digby, P. G. and Kempton, R. A. ( 1987). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. and Aho, J. M. ( 1990). Parasite Communities: Patterns and Process. Chapman and Hall, London.
Eschmeyer, E. ( 2000). http://www.fishbase.org/
Fernández, J. and Villalba, C. ( 1986). Contribución al conocimiento del género Caligus Müller, 1785 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) en Chile. Gayana Zoologia 50, 3762.Google Scholar
Garcías, F., Mendoza, R. and George-Nascimento, M. ( 2001). Variación entre años de las infracomunidades de parásitos metazoos de la corvina Cilus gilberti (Pisces: Sciaenidae) en Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 74, 833840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George-Nascimento, M. and Iriarte, J. ( 1989). Las infracomunidades de parásitos metazoos del chancharro Helicolenus lengerichi Norman, 1937 (Pisces: Scorpaenidae): un ensamble no interactivo. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 62, 217227.Google Scholar
González, M. T. and Acuña, E. ( 1998). Metazoan parasites of the red rockfish Sebastes capensis off northern Chile. Journal of Parasitology 84, 783788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, M. T. and Poulin, R. ( 2005). Spatial and temporal predictability of the parasite community structure of a benthic marine fish along its distributional range. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 13691377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J. F. and Hugueny, B. A. ( 1994). Nested parasite species subset patterns in tropical fish host as major determinant of parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 100, 184189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvonen, A., Cheng, G. H. and Valtonen, E. T. ( 2005). Within-lake dynamics in the similarity of parasite assemblages of perch (Perca fluviatilis). Parasitology 131, 817823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. and Bush, A. O. ( 1994). The relationship between pattern and scale in parasites communities: a stranger in a strange land. Parasitology 109, 187196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, I. ( 1985). Revisión de las especies chilenas de Sebastes (Osteichthyes, Scorpaeniformes, Scorpaenidae). Estudios Oceanologicos 4, 2175.Google Scholar
Massutí, E., Moranta, J., Gil de Sola, L., Morales-Nin, B. and Prats, L. ( 2001). Distribution and population structure of the rockfish Helicolenus dactylopterus (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) in the western Mediterranean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matejusová, I., Morand, S. and Gelnar, M. ( 2000). Nestedness in assemblages of gyrodactylids (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae) parasitizing two species of cyprinid-with reference to generalists and specialists. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 11531158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Rohde, K. and Hayward, C. ( 2002). Order in ectoparasite communities of marine fish is explained by epidemiological processes. Parasitology (Suppl.) 124, S57S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, C. A. ( 1981). Desarrollo de los estudios sobre relaciones tróficas en peces del sublitoral rocoso antártico y subantártico de Chile. Medio Ambiente (Chile) 5, 161174.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. and Dick, T. ( 2002). Factors shaping the parasite communities of trout-perch, Percopsis omiscomaycus Walbaum (Osteichthyes: Percopsidae), and the importance of scale. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 19861999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliva, M., González, M. T. and Acuña, E. ( 2004). Metazoan parasite fauna as biological tag for the habitat of the Flounder, Hippoglossina macrops from Northern Chile, in a depth gradient. Journal of Parasitology 90, 13741377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, B. D. and Atmar, W. ( 1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 28, 6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pequeño, G. ( 2000). Delimitaciones y relaciones biogeográficas de los peces del Pacifico suroriental. Estudios Oceanologicos 19, 5376.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 1995). Phylogeny, ecology, and the richness of parasite communities in vertebrates. Ecological Monograph 65, 283302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 1996). Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 105, 545551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. ( 2001). Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122 (Suppl.), S3S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Morand, S. ( 2000). The diversity of parasites. The Quarterly Review of Biology 75, 277293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Valtonen, E. T. ( 2001). Nested assemblages resulting from host size variation: the case of endoparasite communities in fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 11941204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. and Valtonen, E. T. ( 2002). The predictability of helminth community structure in space: a comparison of fish populations from adjacent lakes. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 12351243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, M. A. and Kruse, G. O. ( 1982). The Collection and Preservation of Animal Parasites. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, USA.
Rohde, K., Hayward, C. and Heap, M. ( 1995). Aspect of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of fishes. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 945970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., Worthen, W. B., Heap, M., Hugueny, B. and Guégan, J. F. ( 1998). Nestedness in assemblages of metazoan ecto-and endoparasites of marine fish. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 543549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, T. A., Knutsen, J. A., Heuch, P. A. and Mo, T. A. ( 1998). Seasonal occurrence of Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongatus (Copepoda: Caligidae) on sea trout (Salmo trutta), off southern Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55, 163175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simková, A., Gelnar, M. and Morand, S. ( 2001). Order and disorder in ectoparasite communities: the case of congeneric gill monogeneans (Dactylogyrus spp.). International Journal for Parasitology 31, 12051210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, W. P. ( 1994). Patterns and processes in communities of helminth parasites. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 5257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T. and Poulin, R. ( 2003). Parasite community structure within and across host populations of a marine pelagic fish: how repeatable is it? International Journal for Parasitology 33, 13531362.Google Scholar
Vidal-Martínez, V. and Poulin, R. ( 2003). Spatial and temporal repeatability in parasite community structure of tropical fish hosts. Parasitology 127, 387398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, C. and Fernández, J. ( 1985). Contribución al conocimiento de la familia Chondracanthidae en Chile (Copepoda: Poecilostomatoida) Gayana, Zoology 49, 3158.Google Scholar
Worthern, W. D. ( 1996). Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76, 417426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J. ( 1999). Biostatistical Analysis. 4th Edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.
Zelmer, D. and Arai, H. ( 2004). Development of nestedness: host biology as a Community process in parasite infracommunities of Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens (Mitchill)) from Garner Lake, Alberta. Journal of Parasitology 90, 435436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelmer, D., Paredes-Calderón, L., León-Règagnon, V. and García-Prieto, L. ( 2004). Nestedness in colonization-dominated systems: helminth infracommunities of Rana vaillanti Brocchi (Anura: Ranidae) in Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 90, 705710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean abundances and prevalence (%) of the ectoparasites recorded on Sebastes capensis from Valdivia (40 °S) during the years 2001, 2002 and 2003

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Distribution of fish size of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi during sampling years.

Figure 2

Table 2. Mean abundances and prevalence (%) of the ectoparasites recorded on Helicolenus lengerichi from the Valdivia coast (40 °S) during the years 2001, 2002 and 2004

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Discriminant analysis for infracommunities of Sebsates capensis during years 2001, 2002 and 2003 using abundances of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Discriminant analysis for infracommunities of Helicolenus lengerichi during years 2001, 2002 and 2004 using abundances of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Multiple correspondence analysis for the parasite component communities of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi using prevalence of all parasites recovered during each year of sampling.

Figure 6

Table 3. Summary of the results of nestedness analyses within each ectoparasite component community of Sebastes capensis and Helicolenus lengerichi from the Valdivia coast (40 °S) for different years