Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T13:56:01.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schistosomiasis then and now: what has changed in the last 100 years?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2020

R. Alan Wilson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Immunology and Infection, Department of Biology, University of York, YorkYO10 5DD, UK
*
Author for correspondence: R. Alan Wilson, E-mail: alan.wilson@york.ac.uk

Abstract

Only with the completion of the life cycles of Fasciola hepatica in 1883 and 30 years later those of Schistosoma japonicum (1913), Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni (1915) did research on schistosomiasis really get underway. One of the first papers by Cawston in 1918, describing attempts to establish the means of transmission of S. haematobium in Natal, South Africa, forms the historical perspective against which to judge where we are now. Molecular biology techniques have produced a much better definition of the complexity of the schistosome species and their snail hosts, but also revealed the extent of hybridization between human and animal schistosomes that may impact on parasite adaptability. While diagnostics have greatly improved, the ability to detect single worm pair infections routinely, still falls short of its goal. The introduction of praziquantel ~1982 has revolutionized the treatment of infected individuals and led directly to the mass drug administration programmes. In turn, the severe pathological consequences of high worm burdens have been minimized, and for S. haematobium infections the incidence of associated squamous cell carcinoma has been reduced. In comparison, the development of effective vaccines has yet to come to fruition. The elimination of schistosomiasis japonica from Japan shows what is possible, using multiple lines of approach, but the clear and present danger is that the whole edifice of schistosome control is balanced on the monotherapy of praziquantel, and the development of drug resistance could topple that.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

A paper titled ‘Bilharziasis in Natal’, published in Parasitology in 1918 by Dr F. G. Cawston, provides a window on the state of knowledge at the time (Cawston, Reference Cawston1918). He was a British physician and zoologist practising in South Africa, whose interest was aroused by a patient with ‘bilharziosis’ (most probably infected with Schistosoma haematobium) (Cawston, Reference Cawston1915). In fact, the very first volume of Parasitology had published an article on the same topic (Turner, Reference Turner1909), with speculations on the mode of transmission but no mention of snails. Dr Cawston was of the opinion, echoing both Turner and Sir Patrick Manson in a lecture given in 1914, that the disease was caught by swimming in freshwater pools, an activity more common in boys than girls. Theodor Bilharz had identified parasitic trematodes as the cause of this disease in Egypt in 1851, hence the term bilharziasis (for a description of the discovery see: http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/2829.html). However, the intestinal and urinary forms were not distinguished with any clarity. The disease had been recorded from South Africa as far back as 1864, associated with symptoms of haematuria and dysentery (= S. mansoni infection?). Dr Cawston's paper came at the trailing edge of a period of very intense research and to appreciate its context and significance we need to trace the developments that preceded its publication.

Historical perspective

Trematode cercariae emerging from molluscs were reported as far back as the 18th century and classified by taxonomists with the generic name Cercaria and suitable specific names. There was a vague realization that these cercariae might be the larval stages of the numerous species of trematodes parasitic in vertebrates. Indeed, in 1842 the Danish scientist Steenstrup put forward the idea of alternation of generations as a ‘peculiar form of breeding among the lower animals’. He meant this not as the alternating haploid and diploid generations found in lower plants but as alternate generations reproducing sexually and asexually. The practical problem was making the link between mollusc and vertebrate and we know with hindsight that larval trematodes can have quite stringent species-specificity for their hosts. It is clear from the literature of the time that the colourful sporocysts packed with cercariae, seen in the tentacles of the snails Succinea sp, were the larval stages of Leucochloridium paradoxum, a bird intestinal fluke that took only six days to mature after ingestion. However, the route of transmission back to the snail was not confirmed.

Over the winter of 1879/1880 there was a massive mortality of sheep in the UK due to liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) infection. Such was the consternation nationally that in April 1880 the outbreak occasioned that very British institution of letters to The Times newspaper (https://gdc.gale.com/gdc/artemis/home. In advanced search use ‘fluke’ as the search term in Entire Document, limited by Publication Dates 1 and 30 April 1880, and Document Type as Letter to the editor). It should be borne in mind that this was less than 20 years after Louis Pasteur proposed his ‘germ theory’ of disease and only four years after Robert Koch conclusively identified Bacillus anthracis as the cause of anthrax in cattle. On one side of the correspondence were a Mr Bowick who clearly saw flukes as some kind of germ that would only establish in unhealthy animals, a Mr Harley who was convinced that the transmission was direct via fluke eggs in animal droppings contaminating the pastures, and a Mr Gabb who thought that the flukes developed from the eggs of tapeworms! (This may be the same Mr J Harley who had reported on endemic haematuria in southern Africa the 1860s.) In 1880 the idea that snails might transmit disease was anathema to some people who disputed the existence of any intermediate host. Ranged against these correspondents was Professor Rolleston of Oxford whose contribution, apart from being dismissive of Harley, was to suggest that the fluke was very specific in its choice of larval host. Most telling was the contribution of Professor Cobbold of the Royal Veterinary College, who was aware of the Leucochloridium life cycle and quoted a letter he had received from Prof Leuckart in Germany saying that the latter had successfully infected the snail Lymnaea= Galba) truncatula with miracidia of F. hepatica and obtained cercariae. The Royal Agricultural Society of England was prompted by Professor Rolleston to fund Algernon Thomas, working at the Oxford Museum, to investigate the causes of fluke disease. Thomas settled the question, describing the miracidium infecting the snail L. truncatula, the intramolluscan stages, and the metacercarial cyst on grass (Thomas, Reference Thomas1883). The infection of livestock by ingestion of metacercaria via the oral route had a rather unhelpful influence on later thinking about schistosomes.

Research on schistosomes progressed slowly after Bilharz's initial description. In 1893 Patrick Manson finally separated the two clinical forms with lateral- and terminal-spined eggs (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915), and a new species, S. mansoni, was erected by Sambon in 1909 for the lateral spined egg producer (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915). In spite of Thomas's publication, in 1884 Looss promoted the hypothesis that schistosome infection was direct, with miracidia hatching from eggs and penetrating the skin when humans entered water (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915). Unsurprisingly, heroic attempts to infect potential mammalian hosts using miracidia failed, but 25 years later Looss was still advocating human skin penetration by miracidia (Looss, Reference Looss1909). (Ironically, he was an associate of Leuckart in Leipzig where the life cycle of Fasciola was well understood.) Such was the confusion that in 1914 Manson himself hedged his bets by suggesting that miracidia might enter a mollusc, crustacean or arthropod, and encyst, before oral ingestion and entry into human tissues across the gut wall (c.f. Fasciola) (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915). In spite of Looss being utterly mistaken, one beneficial outcome of the focus on schistosome transmission by an aquatic larva was the recommendation that urination and defaecation should not take place near water.

Independent of work in Europe, Japanese researchers were investigating six very focal diseases associated with rice paddies and nearby river banks (summarized by Tanaka and Tsuji, Reference Tanaka and Tsuji1997). To deliberately misquote Pasteur, this was a case of ‘fortune favours the unprepared mind’ as the Japanese were not burdened by the misconceptions then prevalent in Europe. Initially, the cause was thought to be ingestion of a poison, but parasite eggs were observed in human livers at autopsy and in 1904 Katsurada described adult worms from a cat, with the same eggs in utero. Realizing the similarity with S. haematobium he proposed the name Schistosoma japonicum for the new species (Katsurada, Reference Katsurada1904). It was felt that since worms were found in mesenteric vessels, infection was likely via the oral route, with penetration of the gut wall (c.f. Fasciola again). However, Miyagawa immersed dogs and rabbits in paddy field water and showed they became infected with schistosomes (he was helped in his quest by the fact that S. japonicum is a true zoonosis). He also performed histology on exposed skin and demonstrated the presence of schistosomula (Miyagawa, Reference Miyagawa1912). Finally the direct link between schistosomes and snails was made when Miyairi and Suzuki identified the snail Oncomelania in the paddy fields and showed that the emerging cercariae were the infective stage for mammals (Miyairi and Suzuki, Reference Miyairi and Suzuki1913).

News of these rapid advances reached London and prompted the rather grandly titled ‘Wandsworth Expedition’ to Shanghai, China with a side trip to Japan, to investigate trematode diseases of humans. It was led by Professor Leiper of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine from February to August 1914 (Leiper and Atkinson, Reference Leiper and Atkinson1915). In their visit to Japan, the authors mention finding a small opeculate snail in Katayama (of Katayama Fever fame), now known as Oncomelania hupensis nosophora. Back in Shanghai these snails showed an extraordinarily marked attraction for S. japonicum miracidia, hatched from eggs shed by a heavily infected dog. Ultimately, a single mouse exposed to cercariae teased from Oncomelania snails yielded paired adult worms in the mesenteric veins. The findings of Miyairi and Suzuki were confirmed as one of the great discoveries of all time in parasitology.

In 1915, as a result of the First World War, the British Government sent a mission, headed by Leiper, to Egypt where British troops were stationed. Its task was to obtain ‘a clear appreciation of the factors and the conditions under which the disease (i.e. schistosomiasis) was contracted and propagated’ (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915). In the Introduction to his report on the mission he was very critical of Looss whose direct infection theory had dominated all research on schistosomes in Africa for the previous 25 years. Apparently Looss even objected to the description of S. haematobium and S. mansoni as two distinct species (Leiper, Reference Leiper1915).

Armed with his knowledge from Japan and China, Leiper's plan was to collect and dissect large numbers of snails from districts near Cairo where schistosome infections were common. He knew that he was looking for a fork-tailed cercaria lacking a pharynx, and wanted to see if these could infect animals brought from the UK. He focused on El Marg village, with a S. haematobium prevalence of 91% in boys. He collected Planorbis boissyi ( = Biomphalaria sp) Melania tuberculata and a Bulinus sp. snail. His problems were compounded by the observation of four trematode species with fork-tailed cercariae, namely ‘both forms’ of S. haematobium (i.e. S. mansoni as well), S. bovis and Bilharziella polonica. He infected rats, mice and other species, and concluded that infection was by skin penetration (or drinking cercarial-contaminated water). He also recorded that the worms took 6–7 weeks to develop after exposure of monkeys brought from London (probably sooty mangabeys, Cercocebus atys). What is notable in this and all preceding work was the total focus on S. haematobium to the almost complete exclusion of S. mansoni. Was it simply that haematuria and eggs in the urine were very visible manifestations, compared with eggs in faeces? Leiper subsequently published a note stating that Bulinus contortus (= B. truncatus) and B. dybowski (unknown) shed cercariae that gave rise to worms releasing terminal-spined eggs whilst cercariae from Planorbis boissyi ( = Biomphalaria sp) gave rise to worms laying lateral spined eggs (Leiper, Reference Leiper1916).

Writing in 1918, Dr Cawston was aware of the discoveries about the life cycle of S. japonicum, and the results of the Wandsworth expedition. To investigate schistosome transmission in South Africa, in 1915 he first attempted to infect the abundant Lymnaea natalensis snails using S. haematobium miracidia, without success (ironically these snails are hosts of Fasciola gigantica). In 1916 he collected large numbers of Physopsis africana (= Bulinus africanus) from various parts of Natal. He described specimens shedding fork-tailed cercariae, and containing sporocysts. He subsequently made a study of the freshwater snails of Natal, noting additionally the presence of Planorbis (= Biomphalaria) pfeifferi but saying that S. mansoni was absent. (Today it is listed as endemic to KwaZulu-Natal, along with S. mattheei in livestock.) He also collected Isidora tropica and Isidora forskali (= Bulinus tropicus and B. forskali) which did not shed fork-tailed cercariae, but are known schistosome hosts elsewhere. He was successful in infecting Bulinus africanus with miracidia of S. haematobium and obtaining cercariae, but he failed to infect rats, guinea pigs and pigeons with these.

Cawston also took the standpoint of the medical practitioner, noting that in one school 76% of boys were infected and he lists symptoms such as renal calcium deposits, renal colic and haematuria. He did not consider the infection life-threatening or even life-shortening. Indeed his greatest concern was how catching schistosomiasis would affect the prospects for getting life insurance. His advice was to avoid bathing in freshwater pools and his list of treatments intended to relieve symptoms rather than cure patients, included diuretics and urinary antiseptics, such as hexamine, aspirin, the local herbal medicine Buchu, and tincture of henbane (Hyoscamus)!

What are the current gaps in schistosome knowledge?

Where are our research gaps in schistosomiasis 100 years after the publication of Cawston's paper? We now have a much greater understanding of the complexities of the disease, its impact on infected individuals and an appreciation that high worm burdens generate severe and life-threatening pathologies. In this update some recent advances are highlighted, but equally importantly there is a focus on what we still don't know in 2019.

Schistosome species and their snail hosts

The number of schistosome species known to infect humans now stands at six, with description in the intervening period of S. intercalatum (1934) and S. guineensis (2003) in Central Africa, and of S. mekongi (1978) is South-East Asia. However, the advent of molecular genetics has revealed a more complex situation with the discovery of hybrids between human and animal schistosomes (Webster et al., Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013). The hybridization appears to be introgressive and may have an impact on the adaptation and evolution of the parasites. In Africa, there are two members of the S. mansoni clade and nine members of the S. haematobium clade. As molecular tools have become more discerning, the detection of hybrids has moved from laboratory experiments to human/snail populations in endemic areas. Hybrids between S. mansoni and S. rodhaini (rodent host) have been reported in East Africa and between various members of the S. haematobium group in West Africa (reviewed by Leger and Webster, Reference Leger and Webster2017). The latest reports from Malawi using single aberrant eggs as starting material have revealed interactions between S. haematobium and the livestock schistosomes S. mattheei and S. bovis (Webster et al., Reference Webster, Alharbi, Kayuni, Makaula, Halstead, Christiansen, Juziwelo, Stanton, LaCourse, Rollinson, Kalua and Stothard2019). An appreciation of the importance of schistosome promiscuity was revealed when a new focus of schistosome infection in humans was identified in Corsica in 2013, where Bulinus truncatus is endemic (Boissier et al., Reference Boissier, Grech-Angelini, Webster, Allienne, Huyse, Mas-Coma, Toulza, Barre-Cardi, Rollinson, Kincaid-Smith, Oleaga, Galinier, Foata, Rognon, Berry, Mouahid, Henneron, Mone, Noel and Mitta2016). Molecular analysis showed that hybrids between S. haematobium and S. bovis were present, very likely originating in Senegal. Given the abundance of the snail host, the fear is that the hybrid could become established in rodents or livestock as reservoir hosts. Indeed, the range of schistosome species in animals sharing their habitat with humans, and their propensity for hybridization, could have long-term implications for attempts to eradicate the disease from the human population.

Before the molecular era, the classification of the snail intermediate hosts relied primarily on shell characteristics, a particularly plastic feature (Mandahl-Barth, Reference Mandahl-Barth1965). A better definition of the snail hosts is now being achieved using molecular techniques. Thirty-six species within the genus Bulinus, hosts of several schistosome species, have been placed into four species groups by DNA barcoding, but substantial genetic diversity has been revealed within groups and individual species (Kane et al., Reference Kane, Stothard, Emery and Rollinson2008). The same approach has been used with the genus Biomphalaria, the hosts of S. mansoni around the world (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Bu, Laidemitt, Lu, Mutuku, Mkoji and Loker2018). The molecular profile of 15 species of Biomphalaria in South America, four of which are hosts of S. mansoni, has also been established (Caldeira et al., Reference Caldeira, Teodoro, Jannotti-Passos, Lira-Moreira, Goveia and Carvalho2016). The genetic diversity of Oncomelania hupensis, the host of S. japonicum across China, has similarly been characterized (Guan et al., Reference Guan, Li, Abe, Webster, Rollinson and Zhou2016). However, the physiological basis for the compatibility between particular schistosome and snail species (or even isolates) remains something of a mystery.

There have been significant advances in our understanding of the snail immune system, and its ability to combat schistosome infection (Mitta et al., Reference Mitta, Gourbal, Grunau, Knight, Bridger and Theron2017; Pila et al., Reference Pila, Li, Hambrook, Wu and Hanington2017). Most intriguing is the possibility that miracidia may locate snail hosts by latching onto molluscan pheromone/chemoattractant systems (Adema et al., Reference Adema, Hillier, Jones, Loker, Knight, Minx, Oliveira, Raghavan, Shedlock, do Amaral, Arican-Goktas, Assis, Baba, Baron, Bayne, Bickham-Wright, Biggar, Blouin, Bonning, Botka, Bridger, Buckley, Buddenborg, Lima Caldeira, Carleton, Carvalho, Castillo, Chalmers, Christensens, Clifton, Cosseau, Coustau, Cripps, Cuesta-Astroz, Cummins, di Stephano, Dinguirard, Duval, Emrich, Feschotte, Feyereisen, FitzGerald, Fronick, Fulton, Galinier, Gava, Geusz, Geyer, Giraldo-Calderon, de Souza Gomes, Gordy, Gourbal, Grunau, Hanington, Hoffmann, Hughes, Humphries, Jackson, Jannotti-Passos, de Jesus Jeremias, Jobling, Kamel, Kapusta, Kaur, Koene, Kohn, Lawson, Lawton, Liang, Limpanont, Liu, Lockyer, Lovato, Ludolf, Magrini, McManus, Medina, Misra, Mitta, Mkoji, Montague, Montelongo, Moroz, Munoz-Torres, Niazi, Noble, Oliveira, Pais, Papenfuss, Peace, Pena, Pila, Quelais, Raney, Rast, Rollinson, Rosse, Rotgans, Routledge, Ryan, Scholte, Storey, Swain, Tennessen, Tomlinson, Trujillo, Volpi, Walker, Wang, Wannaporn, Warren, Wu, Yoshino, Yusuf, Zhang, Zhao and Wilson2017; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wyeth, Liang, Bose, Ni, McManus and Cummins2019); this could provide a mechanism with sufficient inherent specificity to explain the often tight host preference displayed by the intramolluscan stages.

Diagnostics

The inaccessible location of adult schistosomes in either the veins of the vesical plexus or the hepatic portal system makes the direct estimation of their number (infection intensity) virtually impossible, yet it is the size of that population that is crucial both for the ensuing pathology and the capacity for onward transmission. Surrogate measurements of infection intensity therefore need to be used; egg output was the original measurement of choice, both because the egg is the principal agent of pathogenesis and also because a direct correlation with infection intensity was assumed.

For S. haematobium, the detection of eggs in urine was always a relatively simple matter, particularly when coupled with the visible presence of haematuria, and that has not changed in the last 100 years. Indeed, detection of haematuria by dipstick, and the counting of eggs in the urine after filtration or centrifugation may provide adequate estimates of infection intensity, and the method has a high specificity (reviewed by Le and Hsieh, Reference Le and Hsieh2017). However, a recent study using a urine-based up-converting phosphor-lateral flow assay for circulating antigen detected a considerably higher number of infections than egg counting (Knopp et al., Reference Knopp, Corstjens, Koukounari, Cercamondi, Ame, Ali, de Dood, Mohammed, Utzinger, Rollinson and van Dam2015). A research gap for S. haematobium infections is that calibration of egg excretion relative to actual worm burden has not been achieved. Unlike S. mansoni or S. japonicum, there is no large animal model where that parameter might be established. Even in a permissive host like the baboon very few or no worms reach the bladder wall and eggs are excreted through the gut wall. This is largely due to the limiting size of the anastomoses between the inferior mesenteric/rectal veins of the portal system and the vesical plexuses of the systemic circulation around the bladder, although it is also not understood why S. haematobium should take this route when S. mansoni and S. japonicum do not. The best information available on egg production remains that obtained from cystectomy and autopsy investigations on human patients in Egypt more than 40 years ago. A mean output of 203 eggs per worm pair per day was estimated (Cheever et al., Reference Cheever, Torky and Shirbiney1975), and there was a positive correlation between number of female worms recovered from the urogenital system and the passage of viable eggs in the urine (Cheever et al., Reference Cheever, Kamel, Elwi, Mosimann and Danner1977). Taking the average human urine production per day as 1400 mL, the usual sample size of 10 mL urine ought to be adequate for single worm pair detection, although diurnal variation in egg excretion needs to be considered, together with the inhibition of egg excretion by tissue fibrosis.

For S. mansoni and S. japonicum, diagnosis of light infections currently presents a significant problem. The introduction of the standardized Kato/Katz fecal smear test did much to improve detection rates (Katz et al., Reference Katz, Chaves and Pellegrino1972). However, a single smear has an intrinsic limit of 20 eggs per gram, based on the standard ~50 mg capacity of the test chamber. Combining this information with an egg output for S. mansoni of ~300 per female per day, and a human fecal production of 250 grams shows that detection of one egg in a single smear is equivalent to 17 worm pairs (Ogongo et al., Reference Ogongo, Kariuki and Wilson2018). Using data from S. mansoni vaccination studies in baboons to calibrate the Kato/Katz method, based on nine replicate smears, the threshold of detection was determined as 16 worm pairs (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, van Dam, Kariuki, Farah, Deelder and Coulson2006). Given the low sensitivity of the smear technique, other surrogate measures have come to the fore, including the detection of glycoproteins from the worm gut, released into the bloodstream, and also parasite DNA in serum, faeces and urine (reviewed by Weerakoon et al., Reference Weerakoon, Gobert, Cai and McManus2015; Ogongo et al., Reference Ogongo, Kariuki and Wilson2018). The emphasis is now on detection of schistosome antigens in the bloodstream and urine, especially using reagent strip assays (Corstjens et al., Reference Corstjens, De Dood, Kornelis, Fat, Wilson, Kariuki, Nyakundi, Loverde, Abrams, Tanke, Van Lieshout, Deelder and Van Dam2014). In areas of low S. mansoni endemicity, direct comparison of a lateral flow cassette assay to detect circulating cathodic antigen in urine with the Kato/Katz fecal smear, reveals a 1.5−6-fold higher prevalence (Kittur et al., Reference Kittur, Castleman, Campbell, King and Colley2016). The increased sensitivity has led to the realization that there is much more low-intensity schistosomiasis than previously thought (Colley et al., Reference Colley, Andros and Campbell2017). However, the detection of a single S. mansoni worm pair still requires sample concentration (Corstjens et al., Reference Corstjens, De Dood, Kornelis, Fat, Wilson, Kariuki, Nyakundi, Loverde, Abrams, Tanke, Van Lieshout, Deelder and Van Dam2014) and cannot be considered routine. That goal is crucial if eradication of the disease is to be achieved. Much is now known about the secretions of adult worms and eggs released into the host bloodstream and tissues. There is a need for biomarker studies on blood and especially urine of infected humans and laboratory hosts like the baboon to identify those markers of the live worm and egg secretomes that might be developed as new diagnostic targets (Ogongo et al., Reference Ogongo, Kariuki and Wilson2018).

Chemotherapy

The first chemotherapeutic agent against an infection (arsenic-containing salvarsan for syphilis and later human trypanosomiasis) was introduced in 1910, eight years before Cawston's paper. Early therapies against schistosomes used equally toxic compounds like antimony potassium tartrate (tartar emetic) injected intravenously, and it took many decades for therapeutics with only mild side-effects to emerge that would eliminate the adult schistosome population from infected individuals (reviewed by Cioli et al., Reference Cioli, Pica-Mattoccia and Archer1995). The introduction of modern chemotherapeutics dates to the 1960s and 1970s but there were a number of false starts. Niridazole (1964) was the first orally administered compound, activated by passage through the liver, but it proved to have serious side-effects (including psychoses), especially in S. mansoni-infected hepatosplenic patients with porta-caval shunts (see below). Hycanthone (1975) provided a salutary warning, as the compound was found to have a long list of undesirable properties, causing frameshift mutations in microbial systems while its mutagenicity, teratogenicity and carcinogenicity were demonstrated in mammalian experiments. Amoscanate (1980) proved highly effective against S. japonicum but caused liver toxicity; the use of all the above compounds was ultimately discontinued.

On the positive side, metrifonate (1967), an organophosphorous insecticide derivative, is active against S. haematobium with an unusual mode of action. It is an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase, and acts by paralysing worms so that they release their hold and transit through the venous system to the lungs from where they cannot return to the bladder (Cioli et al., Reference Cioli, Pica-Mattoccia and Archer1995). This provides a clear distinction from S. mansoni and S. japonicum, which if paralysed only travel as far as the liver, and can then re-migrate back up the portal veins. Oxamniquine (1972), active only against S. mansoni, gives a 80–90% cure rate with only mild side-effects. Unfortunately, drug resistance was reported in Brazil and Kenya and the drug was superseded by praziquantel. However, efforts are currently underway to design oxamniquine derivatives that can treat infection caused by all schistosome species, as a hedge against resistance emerging to current therapy (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Roberts, Cao, Clark, Holloway, Donati, Polcaro, Pica-Mattoccia, Tarpley, McHardy, Cioli, LoVerde, Fitzpatrick and Hart2017).

Praziquantel (1982) is well tolerated and active against adult worms of all schistosome species, as well as other flukes and tapeworms. It does have some limitations, such as inactivity against schistosomula, but now underpins mass drug treatment programmes aimed at controlling and ultimately eradicating the disease (Fenwick et al., Reference Fenwick, Rollinson and Southgate2006; Colley, Reference Colley2014). As with any mass drug administration programme there is a danger that resistance will arise. The selection for Praziquantel resistance by S. mansoni was first demonstrated in the laboratory by serial passage through mice treated with multiple subcurative doses (Fallon and Doenhoff, Reference Fallon and Doenhoff1994), although its occurrence in the field is unclear (Stelma et al., Reference Stelma, Talla, Sow, Kongs, Niang, Polman, Deelder and Gryseels1995). The slow rate of replication of schistosomes (a minimum of about 12 weeks for one turn of the cycle) is not a protection against drug resistance arising, witness the situation with F. hepatica which has a similar or even slower replication rate. The drug triclabendazole was introduced in the early 1980s, but reports of treatment failure and the isolation of resistant flukes are now widespread (Kelley et al., Reference Kelley, Elliott, Beddoe, Anderson, Skuce and Spithill2016). Combination therapies can be adopted to circumvent the problem, but treatment of schistosomiasis is currently a monotherapy. Panic and Keiser (Reference Panic and Keiser2018) have reviewed the topics of praziquantel usage and potential resistance. They note that the research community has been active in preclinical research to identify novel or resurrected candidates but record that ‘the landscape for novel anti-schistosomal clinical candidates is, to put it bluntly, a desert’. The timeline from laboratory bench through clinical trials to field application calls for extreme vigilance in the mass treatment programmes to detect any signs of praziquantel resistance.

As of December 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that preventive chemotherapy was required in 52 countries for ~100 million adults and 120 million school-aged children infected with one of the six species of schistosomes (World_Health_Organization, 2018). It is not clear if these estimates took account of the findings on prevalence reported by Kittur et al. (Reference Kittur, Castleman, Campbell, King and Colley2016) and Colley et al. (Reference Colley, Andros and Campbell2017); if not then the number of doses required may be appreciably higher. For 2017, WHO estimated that ~17 million adults and 82 million children were treated. For adults in particular this represented only 17% of global needs; taken together, about 45% of the global need was met. It should be emphasized that annual treatments may be required for some time to come to prevent resurgence. The good news is that since 2017, Merck has been donating 250 million tablets annually.

Pathogenesis/Pathology

It seems remarkable that Cawston (Reference Cawston1918) did not consider schistosomiasis life-threatening or life-shortening: does that reflect relatively low worm burdens in the infected populations at the time? The disease was certainly prevalent in Egypt in ancient times (1250–1000BC), doubtless as a consequence of the reliance of that civilization on irrigation agriculture. Indeed, Symmers described the peri-portal pipe stem fibrosis associated with heavy S. mansoni infections, while working in Egypt (Symmers, Reference Symmers1904). As the 20th century progressed it seems probable that multiple factors generated a greater overall parasite burden, and an increased awareness of the potential serious consequences of schistosome infection. There has been a marked increase in human populations over the last 100 years, and hence a greater density of potential hosts (e.g. KwaZulu/Natal: 1.1 million in 1904 to 11.3 million in 2018; Egypt: 11.7 million in 1910 to 83 million in 2009). Over the same period irrigation schemes have been developed throughout Africa, providing ideal conditions for the expansion of snail intermediate host populations. The Gezira scheme in Sudan (1925) is an early example, while Scott reported on the effects of moving from basin (intermittent) to perennial irrigation in Egypt (Scott, Reference Scott1937). He found that almost half the total population was infected with one or both species, with huge differences in prevalence between the two irrigation systems (6% vs 60% for S. haematobium in Upper Egypt). The impact of the more recent construction of the Diama Dam on the Senegal River in 1986 on increased schistosome transmission has also been documented (Picquet et al., Reference Picquet, Ernould, Vercruysse, Southgate, Mbaye, Sambou, Niang and Rollinson1996).

The schistosome egg is the principal agent of pathogenesis, taking around 5–6 days to develop in the tissues where it is deposited; only then does it begin to secrete the glycoproteins that trigger the host inflammatory response to the embolized egg (Ashton et al., Reference Ashton, Harrop, Shah and Wilson2001). That response is an essential aid to egg escape from the intestine or bladder wall since excretion is much reduced in immunocompromised animal hosts (Doenhoff et al., Reference Doenhoff, Pearson, Dunne, Bickle, Lucas, Bain, Musallam and Hassounah1981) and humans (Karanja et al., Reference Karanja, Colley, Nahlen, Ouma and Secor1997). This provides a classic example of a parasite recruiting a host immune response to its own ends. Proteases have been conjectured in egg secretions (Costain et al., Reference Costain, MacDonald and Smits2018) but none were identified in proteomic analyses (Mathieson and Wilson, Reference Mathieson and Wilson2010). Approximately 90% of the secretions from live eggs comprised two proteins, IPSE and omega-1 ribonuclease (Mathieson and Wilson, Reference Mathieson and Wilson2010), and their immunogenicity was overwhelmingly associated with the glycan moiety (Kariuki et al., Reference Kariuki, Farah, Wilson and Coulson2008). The granulomatous response that accumulates around the egg is dominated by macrophages but with other leucocytes and fibroblasts recruited. The associated immunological processes are complex (Costain et al., Reference Costain, MacDonald and Smits2018) and must perform a balancing act, promoting a response that aids egg passage through the gut or bladder wall but not the fibrosis that would immobilize it in situ; this balance is poorly understood (Costain et al., Reference Costain, MacDonald and Smits2018). However, a proportion of eggs fail to escape and remain in the tissues or travel downstream to lodge in the liver (S. mansoni, S. japonicum) or lungs (S. haematobium), with consequences for morbidity.

The embolized eggs are strongly fibrogenic and initiate a chain reaction of pathology (von Lichtenberg, Reference von Lichtenberg, Rollinson and Simpson1987), best characterized in S. mansoni infections but becoming better understood for S. haematobium. The intensity of S. mansoni infection undoubtedly plays a major role in generating the severe pathology, but other factors such as genetic background may be important (Andrade, Reference Andrade2009). The majority of patients in a classic study from Brazil showed few symptoms, mostly related to the digestive tract (intestinal or hepatointestinal form), but in areas of high transmission up to 7% had damage to the liver, spleen and lungs (hepatosplenic form) (Coutinho and Barreto, Reference Coutinho and Barreto1969). Pipe-stem fibrosis reduces blood flow through the liver, causing portal hypertension and the development of anastomoses with the esophageal veins. These allow escape of eggs to the venous circulation and lungs, leading in turn to pulmonary fibrosis, hypertension and hypertrophy of the right side of the heart. The peri-portal fibrosis takes many months to develop (so is not replicated in the mouse model), but experiments with baboons indicate that repeated exposures, associated with TGFβ and IL-4 production predispose to its development (Farah et al., Reference Farah, Mola, Kariuki, Nyindo, Blanton and King2000).

The pathogenesis associated with S. haematobium infection is rather different and until recently has received less attention. The deposition of eggs in the urinary system is focal and residual eggs in these ‘patches’ have a tendency to calcification; in the ureters this can lead to obstruction of flow and hydronephrosis. However, egg deposition is not confined to the urinary system and bladder but also occurs in all parts of the male and female genitalia; female genital schistosomiasis is now recognized as a specific condition (Christinet et al., Reference Christinet, Lazdins-Helds, Stothard and Reinhard-Rupp2016). An important consequence of female genital schistosomiasis may be the greater susceptibility to infection by HIV and other viruses (Kjetland et al., Reference Kjetland, Leutscher and Ndhlovu2012). The analogous male genital schistosomiasis is even less well understood, having a range of effects on sexual function and male fertility (Kayuni et al., Reference Kayuni, Corstjens, LaCourse, Bartlett, Fawcett, Shaw, Makaula, Lampiao, Juziwelo, de Dood, Hoekstra, Verweij, Leutscher, van Dam, van Lieshout and Stothard2019).

The association of bladder cancer with S. haematobium infection is arguably the most important pathological sequela. In a large autopsy study in Egypt, a quarter of all deaths attributed to schistosomiasis resulted from bladder cancer (Cheever et al., Reference Cheever, Kamel, Elwi, Mosimann, Danner and Sippel1978). This study also drew attention to a major feature of S. haematobium infection, where the tissue egg burden reflects the cumulative past infection intensity, compared to S. mansoni infection where eggs are cleared more rapidly. S. mansoni and S. japonicum infections are not associated with cancer in the intestinal mucosa or liver so the bladder site must be an important determinant while the greater persistence of the egg as an irritant provides another component. This is comparable with the suggestion that long-term indwelling catheters may be a trigger for bladder cancer (Groah et al., Reference Groah, Weitzenkamp, Lammertse, Whiteneck, Lezotte and Hamman2002). The bladder and ureters are lined by a specialized transitional epithelium, termed urothelium, which has both a very low turnover rate and a very low passive permeability for electrolytes and other compounds. In the intact bladder this barrier excludes toxic urine constituents but can be breached in bacterial infections permitting leakage into the underlying lamina propria (Lewis, Reference Lewis2000). It is clear that the urothelial barrier is breached by egg excretion during chronic S. haematobium infection, as evidenced by the accompanying haematuria from burst blood vessels. It can be inferred that the damaged urothelium may allow greater entry of carcinogenic chemicals from the bladder lumen. Associated chronic bacterial infections, generating nitrites and nitrosamines in the bladder wall and lumen, may also be a contributory factor (Tricker et al., Reference Tricker, Mostafa, Spiegelhalder and Preussmann1989).

S. haematobium-related cancers may be differentiated from non-schistosome bladder cancers by their younger age of onset, a greater male-to-female ratio and by their pathology and clinical presentation (Brand, Reference Brand1979; Salem et al., Reference Salem, Mitchell, El-Alim El-Dorey, Smith and Barocas2011). S. haematobium infection predisposes to aggressive squamous cell carcinoma in contrast to the more widespread transitional cell carcinoma, for which smoking is the highest risk factor. The nature of the mechanism linking high S. haematobium prevalence, chronic fibrotic inflammation and the development of squamous cell carcinoma has not yet been established (Brand, Reference Brand1979; Ishida and Hsieh, Reference Ishida and Hsieh2018). Recent attempts to identify transcriptional pathways by co-culture of S. haematobium and S. mansoni eggs with human cell lines, found no marked differences in oncogenesis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and apoptosis pathways between the two species (Nacif-Pimenta et al., Reference Nacif-Pimenta, da Silva Orfano, Mosley, Karinshak, Ishida, Mann, Coelho, da Costa, Hsieh, Brindley and Rinaldi2019). The major egg secretion ShIPSE has also been proposed as an aetiological agent due to its ability to enter host cells, and its possession of a nuclear localization motif (Pennington et al., Reference Pennington, Alouffi, Mbanefo, Ray, Heery, Jardetzky, Hsieh and Falcone2017), but it shares those properties with non-carcinogenic SmIPSE glycoprotein (Kaur et al., Reference Kaur, Schramm, Everts, Scholzen, Kindle, Beetz, Montiel-Duarte, Blindow, Jones, Haas, Stolnik, Heery and Falcone2011), which argues against. Whatever the cause, the capacity of S. haematobium to elicit bladder cancer is the strongest argument for not tolerating even low levels of infection in human populations, especially when fibrosis in the urogenital tract may diminish egg excretion, preventing detection of infection by urine filtration.

There can be no doubt that the introduction of praziquantel has been the great success story for schistosomiasis treatment and control, considerably reducing morbidity and causing a sharp decline in the severe life-threatening pathologies. The application of the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) concept has provided a rational method to assess disease impact (King et al., Reference King, Dickman and Tisch2005) and the achievement of mass treatment programmes has been to reduce overall worm burdens and hence morbidity. However, for S. mansoni in particular, the diagnostic deficit means that there are many individuals in endemic areas with low worm burdens, which may not cause detectable clinical disease but are still able to facilitate transmission. Recent work in East Africa suggests this may be also true for S. haematobium (Rollinson et al., Reference Rollinson, Knopp, Levitz, Stothard, Tchuem Tchuente, Garba, Mohammed, Schur, Person, Colley and Utzinger2013; Secor and Colley, Reference Secor and Colley2018).

Vaccines

An effective vaccine would be a great addition to the toolbox of control measures, not least because schistosomiasis is such a cryptic disease and chemotherapy does not prevent reinfection. The development of a vaccine against a helminth that can live for decades in the host bloodstream is a priori a tough proposition. In comparison with the advances in other areas, progress towards a vaccine has been painfully slow. A Medline search with the terms schisto* and vaccine reveals very little work before 1970, with an almost linear increase thereafter to a peak of 75 papers in 2015, before a downturn. We now have a better understanding of how adult worms can live in the bloodstream, yet survive immune attack (Skelly and Wilson, Reference Skelly and Wilson2006; Wilson and Coulson, Reference Wilson and Coulson2009). Thus far, only Bilhvax incorporating 26 kDa glutathione-S-transferase from S. haematobium underwent Phase III trials in humans, but failed to elicit significant protection in Senegalese recipients (Riveau et al., Reference Riveau, Schacht, Dompnier, Deplanque, Seck, Waucquier, Senghor, Delcroix-Genete, Hermann, Idris-Khodja, Levy-Marchal, Capron and Capron2018). Other candidates are in earlier phase human trials and results are eagerly awaited (Hotez et al., Reference Hotez, Bottazzi, Bethony and Diemert2019). In evaluating the obstacles to successful immunization against helminths, Hewitson and Maizels have pointed out that there is no reason to expect a single protein to be a sufficient target to disable a sophisticated parasite with a large number of coding genes (Hewitson and Maizels, Reference Hewitson and Maizels2014). Indeed it would be a remarkable weak spot if one could be identified. In that context, Crosnier et al. tested 96 cell surface and secreted schistosome proteins, expressed in mammalian cells, for protective efficiency in mice, including some candidates where protection was obtained by other groups (Crosnier et al., Reference Crosnier, Brandt, Rinaldi, McCarthy, Barker, Clare, Berriman and Wright2019). Although the approach has worked well with Plasmodium falciparum (Douglas et al., Reference Douglas, Baldeviano, Lucas, Lugo-Roman, Crosnier, Bartholdson, Diouf, Miura, Lambert, Ventocilla, Leiva, Milne, Illingworth, Spencer, Hjerrild, Alanine, Turner, Moorhead, Edgel, Wu, Long, Wright, Lescano and Draper2015), no schistosome antigen induced any protection in their experimental system, underscoring the problems underlying schistosome vaccine development.

Protective immunity against schistosomes can be induced in rodents and primates by radiation-attenuated cercariae, whilst both the brown rat and the rhesus macaque are able to terminate infections around 4 and 12 weeks, respectively (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Langermans, van Dam, Vervenne, Hall, Borges, Dillon, Thomas and Coulson2008; Li et al., Reference Li, Xu, Vance, Wang, Lv, van Dam, Cao and Wilson2015). The effector mechanism of the partial protective response elicited in mice by the attenuated vaccine involves blocked migration in the lungs, likely mediated by lung stage secretions (Wilson and Coulson, Reference Wilson and Coulson2009). Elimination of liver stage worms in the rat is associated with hepatic mastocytosis and high levels of specific IgE; more recently, nitric oxide levels have been demonstrated as a key component (Shen et al., Reference Shen, Lai, Wilson, Chen, Wang, Yu, Li, He, Hide, Sun, Yang, Wu, Ayala and Lun2017). The worm antigens triggering these responses in the rat are not well explored. The rhesus macaque may be unique in its ability to eliminate established mature schistosomes, beginning about 10 weeks after infection. The mechanism appears to involve sustained immunological pressure over a period of weeks to months, manifested as a sequence of degenerative changes in the worms, involving cessation of feeding, starvation and ultimately organ failure. Multiple tegument surface and alimentary tract proteins are targets of the IgG response (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Langermans, van Dam, Vervenne, Hall, Borges, Dillon, Thomas and Coulson2008). With the advent of transcriptomic, proteomic and glycomic analysis techniques it has been possible to define a subset of proteins and glycoproteins expressed at or released from the parasite−host interface (Wilson, Reference Wilson2012; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Wilson, Thomas, Kariuki, van Diepen and Hokke2019). However, many problems remain to be solved before a truly effective vaccine becomes a reality. These include the need to identify multiple targets and evaluate their relative contributions to protection. The formulation of those antigens in adjuvants that will elicit the desired high-intensity response, which must persist with minimal boosting from infection, is also a challenge.

Conclusions

Our understanding of schistosomiasis has advanced enormously in 100 years since Cawston's paper, so much that in 2012 the World Health Assembly endorsed measures to eliminate the disease. Indeed, the roadmap of the WHO in the same year talked optimistically about elimination in some regions by 2020. However, workers running large control programmes in the field have questioned whether current targets for elimination are realistic (Fenwick and Jourdan, Reference Fenwick and Jourdan2016; Secor and Colley, Reference Secor and Colley2018).

  • The propensity for introgressive hybridization between the large number of animal and human schistosome species, is a future concern for schistosome adaptability.

  • The goal of routine detection of a single worm pair for the diagnosis of both urinary and intestinal schistosomiaisis remains distant, leaving a diagnostic deficit to be filled.

  • The introduction of praziquantel proved a game-changer but the development of resistance seems inevitable. Given the lead time for new drugs, the institution of a clinical pipeline for human trials seems prudent to avoid the collapse of control measures if/when praziquantel resistance emerges.

  • Mass treatment programmes have led to the almost complete elimination of the severe pathologies, but for schistosomiasis mansoni with limited drug coverage, hepatosplenic cases are still detected, while for schistosomiasis haematobia both female and male urogenital sequelae are under appreciated.

  • Work with animal models has shown that immunity to this persistent blood parasite can be acquired. However, translating that knowledge into a highly protective vaccine has proved elusive and the current focus on single ‘magic bullet’ antigens seems unlikely to yield the desired product. More ingenious approaches are needed.

Is it feasible to move from controlling schistosomiasis and its associated morbidities to an all-out programme for eradication, as some researchers are now advocating (Rollinson et al., Reference Rollinson, Knopp, Levitz, Stothard, Tchuem Tchuente, Garba, Mohammed, Schur, Person, Colley and Utzinger2013)? In this respect we are in a similar situation to malariologists in 1955 when the Global Malaria Eradication Programme was established (Li et al., Reference Li, Kondrashin, Greenwood, Lindblade, Loku Galappaththy and Alonso2019). It had initial successes but notably, the African subcontinent was excluded. The programme was revitalized in 2000, with more comprehensive definitions of objectives and of the interventions/surveillance systems needed to achieve and then verify the absence of transmission, before certification that a country was disease-free. A similar organizational structure is needed for schistosomiaisis and the last word in this context must go to the thought-provoking article by Secor and Colley (Reference Secor and Colley2018). They suggest that we do not yet know how to bring about a cessation of transmission, or equally important to verify that it has been accomplished. It seems very unlikely that it can be achieved by annual mass drug treatment programmes alone. These need to go hand in hand with topics not covered here: snail control; health education; sanitation. The eradication of schistosomiasis japonica in Japan shows that it can be done, even for a zoonotic parasite. However, it took 73 years from the identification of S. japonicum in 1904 to the last infected human detected in 1977 and many different measures plus economic development played a significant part in that success story.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor Jenny Southgate of the Jack Birch Unit for Molecular Carcinogenesis, Department of Biology, University of York, for critical reading of the section on bladder cancer.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Adema, CM, Hillier, LW, Jones, CS, Loker, ES, Knight, M, Minx, P, Oliveira, G, Raghavan, N, Shedlock, A, do Amaral, LR, Arican-Goktas, HD, Assis, JG, Baba, EH, Baron, OL, Bayne, CJ, Bickham-Wright, U, Biggar, KK, Blouin, M, Bonning, BC, Botka, C, Bridger, JM, Buckley, KM, Buddenborg, SK, Lima Caldeira, R, Carleton, J, Carvalho, OS, Castillo, MG, Chalmers, IW, Christensens, M, Clifton, S, Cosseau, C, Coustau, C, Cripps, RM, Cuesta-Astroz, Y, Cummins, SF, di Stephano, L, Dinguirard, N, Duval, D, Emrich, S, Feschotte, C, Feyereisen, R, FitzGerald, P, Fronick, C, Fulton, L, Galinier, R, Gava, SG, Geusz, M, Geyer, KK, Giraldo-Calderon, GI, de Souza Gomes, M, Gordy, MA, Gourbal, B, Grunau, C, Hanington, PC, Hoffmann, KF, Hughes, D, Humphries, J, Jackson, DJ, Jannotti-Passos, LK, de Jesus Jeremias, W, Jobling, S, Kamel, B, Kapusta, A, Kaur, S, Koene, JM, Kohn, AB, Lawson, D, Lawton, SP, Liang, D, Limpanont, Y, Liu, S, Lockyer, AE, Lovato, TL, Ludolf, F, Magrini, V, McManus, DP, Medina, M, Misra, M, Mitta, G, Mkoji, GM, Montague, MJ, Montelongo, C, Moroz, LL, Munoz-Torres, MC, Niazi, U, Noble, LR, Oliveira, FS, Pais, FS, Papenfuss, AT, Peace, R, Pena, JJ, Pila, EA, Quelais, T, Raney, BJ, Rast, JP, Rollinson, D, Rosse, IC, Rotgans, B, Routledge, EJ, Ryan, KM, Scholte, LLS, Storey, KB, Swain, M, Tennessen, JA, Tomlinson, C, Trujillo, DL, Volpi, EV, Walker, AJ, Wang, T, Wannaporn, I, Warren, WC, Wu, XJ, Yoshino, TP, Yusuf, M, Zhang, SM, Zhao, M and Wilson, RK (2017) Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail. Nature Communications 8, 15451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, ZA (2009) Schistosomiasis and liver fibrosis. Parasite Immunology 31, 656663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, PD, Harrop, R, Shah, B and Wilson, RA (2001) The schistosome egg: development and secretions. Parasitology 122, 329338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissier, J, Grech-Angelini, S, Webster, BL, Allienne, JF, Huyse, T, Mas-Coma, S, Toulza, E, Barre-Cardi, H, Rollinson, D, Kincaid-Smith, J, Oleaga, A, Galinier, R, Foata, J, Rognon, A, Berry, A, Mouahid, G, Henneron, R, Mone, H, Noel, H and Mitta, G (2016) Outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in Corsica (France): an epidemiological case study. Lancet Infectious Diseases 16, 971979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, KG (1979) Schistosomiasis − cancer: etiological considerations. A review. Acta Tropica 36, 203214.Google ScholarPubMed
Caldeira, RL, Teodoro, TM, Jannotti-Passos, LK, Lira-Moreira, PM, Goveia, CO and Carvalho, OD (2016) Characterization of South American snails of the genus Biomphalaria (Basommatophora: Planorbidae) and Schistosoma mansoni (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) in molluscs by PCR-RFLP. Biomedical Research International 2016, 1045391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawston, FG (1915) Bilharziosis in Natal. British Medical Journal 2, 746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawston, FG (1918) Bilharziasis in Natal. Parasitology 11, 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheever, AW, Torky, AH and Shirbiney, M (1975) The relation of worm burden to passage of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in the urine of infected patients. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24, 284288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheever, AW, Kamel, IA, Elwi, AM, Mosimann, JE and Danner, R (1977) Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium infections in Egypt. II. Quantitative parasitological findings at necropsy. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 26, 702716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheever, AW, Kamel, IA, Elwi, AM, Mosimann, JE, Danner, R and Sippel, JE (1978) Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium infections in Egypt. III. Extrahepatic pathology. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 5575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christinet, V, Lazdins-Helds, JK, Stothard, JR and Reinhard-Rupp, J (2016) Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS): from case reports to a call for concerted action against this neglected gynaecological disease. International Journal for Parasitology 46, 395404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cioli, D, Pica-Mattoccia, L and Archer, S (1995) Antischistosomal drugs: past, present … and future? Pharmacology and Therapeutics 68, 3585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, DG (2014) Morbidity control of schistosomiasis by mass drug administration: How can we do it best and what will it take to move on to elimination? Tropical Medicine and Health 42, 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, DG, Andros, TS and Campbell, CH Jr (2017) Schistosomiasis is more prevalent than previously thought: what does it mean for public health goals, policies, strategies, guidelines and intervention programs? Infectious Diseases of Poverty 6, 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corstjens, PL, De Dood, CJ, Kornelis, D, Fat, EM, Wilson, RA, Kariuki, TM, Nyakundi, RK, Loverde, PT, Abrams, WR, Tanke, HJ, Van Lieshout, L, Deelder, AM and Van Dam, GJ (2014) Tools for diagnosis, monitoring and screening of Schistosoma infections utilizing lateral-flow based assays and upconverting phosphor labels. Parasitology 141, 18411855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costain, AH, MacDonald, AS and Smits, HH (2018) Schistosome egg migration: mechanisms, pathogenesis and host immune responses. Frontiers in Immunology 9, 3042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutinho, A and Barreto, FT (1969) Treatment of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis mansoni with niridazole: relationships among liver function, effective dose, and side effects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 160, 612628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosnier, C, Brandt, C, Rinaldi, G, McCarthy, C, Barker, C, Clare, S, Berriman, M and Wright, GJ (2019) Systematic screening of 96 Schistosoma mansoni cell-surface and secreted antigens does not identify any strongly protective vaccine candidates in a mouse model of infection. Wellcome Open Research 4, 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doenhoff, MJ, Pearson, S, Dunne, DW, Bickle, Q, Lucas, S, Bain, J, Musallam, R and Hassounah, O (1981) Immunological control of hepatotoxicity and parasite egg excretion in Schistosoma mansoni infections: stage specificity of the reactivity of immune serum in T-cell deprived mice. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75, 4153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, AD, Baldeviano, GC, Lucas, CM, Lugo-Roman, LA, Crosnier, C, Bartholdson, SJ, Diouf, A, Miura, K, Lambert, LE, Ventocilla, JA, Leiva, KP, Milne, KH, Illingworth, JJ, Spencer, AJ, Hjerrild, KA, Alanine, DG, Turner, AV, Moorhead, JT, Edgel, KA, Wu, Y, Long, CA, Wright, GJ, Lescano, AG and Draper, SJ (2015) A PfRH5-based vaccine is efficacious against heterologous strain blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum infection in aotus monkeys. Cell Host & Microbe 17, 130139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fallon, PG and Doenhoff, MJ (1994) Drug-resistant schistosomiasis: resistance to praziquantel and oxamniquine induced in Schistosoma mansoni in mice is drug specific. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, IO, Mola, PW, Kariuki, TM, Nyindo, M, Blanton, RE and King, CL (2000) Repeated exposure induces periportal fibrosis in Schistosoma mansoni-infected baboons: role of TGF-beta and IL-4. Journal of Immunology 164, 53375343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenwick, A and Jourdan, P (2016) Schistosomiasis elimination by 2020 or 2030? International Journal for Parasitology 46, 385388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenwick, A, Rollinson, D and Southgate, V (2006) Implementation of human schistosomiasis control: challenges and prospects. Advances in Parasitology 61, 567622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groah, SL, Weitzenkamp, DA, Lammertse, DP, Whiteneck, GG, Lezotte, DC and Hamman, RF (2002) Excess risk of bladder cancer in spinal cord injury: evidence for an association between indwelling catheter use and bladder cancer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83, 346351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guan, W, Li, SZ, Abe, EM, Webster, BL, Rollinson, D and Zhou, XN (2016) The genetic diversity and geographical separation study of Oncomelania hupensis populations in mainland China using microsatellite loci. Parasites and Vectors 9, 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewitson, JP and Maizels, RM (2014) Vaccination against helminth parasite infections. Expert Review of Vaccines 13, 473487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotez, PJ, Bottazzi, ME, Bethony, J and Diemert, DD (2019) Advancing the development of a human schistosomiasis vaccine. Trends in Parasitology 35, 104108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishida, K and Hsieh, MH (2018) Understanding urogenital schistosomiasis-related bladder cancer: an update. Frontiers in Medicine 5, 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, RA, Stothard, JR, Emery, AM and Rollinson, D (2008) Molecular characterization of freshwater snails in the genus Bulinus: a role for barcodes? Parasites and Vectors 1, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karanja, DM, Colley, DG, Nahlen, BL, Ouma, JH and Secor, WE (1997) Studies on schistosomiasis in western Kenya: i. Evidence for immune-facilitated excretion of schistosome eggs from patients with Schistosoma mansoni and human immunodeficiency virus coinfections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 56, 515521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kariuki, TM, Farah, IO, Wilson, RA and Coulson, PS (2008) Antibodies elicited by the secretions from Schistosome cercariae and eggs are predominantly against glycan epitopes. Parasite Immunology 30, 554562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsurada, F (1904) Determination of the cause of a new parasite disease seen in Yamanashi and other prefectures [in Japanese]. [Tokyo Iji Shinshi] Tokyo Medical Journal 1371, 1332.Google Scholar
Katz, N, Chaves, A and Pellegrino, J (1972) A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in Schistosomiasis mansoni. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 14, 397400.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaur, I, Schramm, G, Everts, B, Scholzen, T, Kindle, KB, Beetz, C, Montiel-Duarte, C, Blindow, S, Jones, AT, Haas, H, Stolnik, S, Heery, DM and Falcone, FH (2011) Interleukin-4-inducing principle from Schistosoma mansoni eggs contains a functional C-terminal nuclear localization signal necessary for nuclear translocation in mammalian cells but not for its uptake. Infection and Immunity 79, 17791788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayuni, SA, Corstjens, P, LaCourse, EJ, Bartlett, KE, Fawcett, J, Shaw, A, Makaula, P, Lampiao, F, Juziwelo, L, de Dood, CJ, Hoekstra, PT, Verweij, JJ, Leutscher, PDC, van Dam, GJ, van Lieshout, L and Stothard, JR (2019) How can schistosome circulating antigen assays be best applied for diagnosing male genital schistosomiasis (MGS): an appraisal using exemplar MGS cases from a longitudinal cohort study among fishermen on the south shoreline of Lake Malawi. Parasitology 146, 17851795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, JM, Elliott, TP, Beddoe, T, Anderson, G, Skuce, P and Spithill, TW (2016) Current threat of triclabendazole resistance in Fasciola hepatica. Trends in Parasitology 32, 458469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, CH, Dickman, K and Tisch, DJ (2005) Reassessment of the cost of chronic helmintic infection: a meta-analysis of disability-related outcomes in endemic schistosomiasis. Lancet 365, 15611569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kittur, N, Castleman, JD, Campbell, CH, King, CH and Colley, DG (2016) Comparison of Schistosoma mansoni prevalence and intensity of infection, as determined by the circulating cathodic antigen urine assay or by the Kato-Katz fecal assay: a systematic review. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 94, 605610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjetland, EF, Leutscher, PD and Ndhlovu, PD (2012) A review of female genital schistosomiasis. Trends in Parasitology 28, 5865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knopp, S, Corstjens, PL, Koukounari, A, Cercamondi, CI, Ame, SM, Ali, SM, de Dood, CJ, Mohammed, KA, Utzinger, J, Rollinson, D and van Dam, GJ (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of a urine circulating anodic antigen test for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium in low endemic settings. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, L and Hsieh, MH (2017) Diagnosing urogenital schistosomiasis: dealing with diminishing returns. Trends in Parasitology 33, 378387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leger, E and Webster, JP (2017) Hybridizations within the genus Schistosoma: implications for evolution, epidemiology and control. Parasitology 144, 6580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiper, RT (1915) Report on the results of the Bilharzia mission in Egypt, 1915. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 25, 148.Google Scholar
Leiper, RT (1916) On the relation between the terminal-spined and lateral-spined eggs of bilharzia. British Medical Journal 1, 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiper, RT and Atkinson, EL (1915) Observations on the spread of Asiatic schistosomiasis. British Medical Journal 1, 201–192 204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SA (2000) Everything you wanted to know about the bladder epithelium but were afraid to ask. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 278, F867F874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, XH, Xu, YX, Vance, G, Wang, Y, Lv, LB, van Dam, GJ, Cao, JP and Wilson, RA (2015) Evidence that rhesus macaques self-cure from a Schistosoma japonicum infection by disrupting worm esophageal function: a new route to an effective vaccine? PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, XH, Kondrashin, A, Greenwood, B, Lindblade, K, Loku Galappaththy, G and Alonso, P (2019) A historical review of WHO certification of malaria elimination. Trends in Parasitology 35, 163171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Looss, A (1909) Bilharziosis of women and girls in Egypt in the light of the “Skin-Infection Theory”. British Medical Journal 1, 773777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandahl-Barth, G (1965) The species of the genus Bulinus, intermediate hosts of Schistosoma. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 33, 3344.Google Scholar
Mathieson, W and Wilson, RA (2010) A comparative proteomic study of the undeveloped and developed Schistosoma mansoni egg and its contents: the miracidium, hatch fluid and secretions. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 617628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitta, G, Gourbal, B, Grunau, C, Knight, M, Bridger, JM and Theron, A (2017) The compatibility between Biomphalaria glabrata snails and Schistosoma mansoni: an increasingly complex puzzle. Advances in Parasitology 97, 111145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyagawa, Y (1912) Route of migration of Schistosoma japonicum from the skin to the portal vein, and morphology of the young worm at the time of penetrating the skin [in Japanese]. Tokyo Medical Journal 26, 34.Google Scholar
Miyairi, K and Suzuki, M (1913) On the development of Schistosoma japonicum. [Tokyo Iji Shinshi] the Tokyo Medical Journal] 1836, 19611965.Google Scholar
Nacif-Pimenta, R, da Silva Orfano, A, Mosley, IA, Karinshak, SE, Ishida, K, Mann, VH, Coelho, PMZ, da Costa, JMC, Hsieh, MH, Brindley, PJ and Rinaldi, G (2019) Differential responses of epithelial cells from urinary and biliary tract to eggs of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni. Science Reports 9, 10731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogongo, P, Kariuki, TM and Wilson, RA (2018) Diagnosis of Schistosomiasis mansoni: an evaluation of existing methods and research towards single worm pair detection. Parasitology 145, 13551366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panic, G and Keiser, J (2018) Acting beyond 2020: better characterization of praziquantel and promising antischistosomal leads. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 42, 2733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, LF, Alouffi, A, Mbanefo, EC, Ray, D, Heery, DM, Jardetzky, TS, Hsieh, MH and Falcone, FH (2017) H-IPSE is a pathogen-secreted host nucleus-infiltrating protein (Infiltrin) expressed exclusively by the Schistosoma haematobium egg stage. Infection and Immunity 85, e00301-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picquet, M, Ernould, JC, Vercruysse, J, Southgate, VR, Mbaye, A, Sambou, B, Niang, M and Rollinson, D (1996) The epidemiology of human schistosomiasis in the Senegal river basin. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90, 340346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pila, EA, Li, H, Hambrook, JR, Wu, X and Hanington, PC (2017) Schistosomiasis from a snail's perspective: advances in snail immunity. Trends in Parasitology 33, 845857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riveau, G, Schacht, AM, Dompnier, JP, Deplanque, D, Seck, M, Waucquier, N, Senghor, S, Delcroix-Genete, D, Hermann, E, Idris-Khodja, N, Levy-Marchal, C, Capron, M and Capron, A (2018) Safety and efficacy of the rSh28GST urinary schistosomiasis vaccine: a phase 3 randomized, controlled trial in Senegalese children. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12, e0006968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollinson, D, Knopp, S, Levitz, S, Stothard, JR, Tchuem Tchuente, LA, Garba, A, Mohammed, KA, Schur, N, Person, B, Colley, DG and Utzinger, J (2013) Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Tropica 128, 423440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salem, S, Mitchell, RE, El-Alim El-Dorey, A, Smith, JA and Barocas, DA (2011) Successful control of schistosomiasis and the changing epidemiology of bladder cancer in Egypt. BJU International 107, 206211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JA (1937) The incidence and distribution of the human schistosomes in Egypt. American Journal of Hygiene 25, 566614.Google Scholar
Secor, WE and Colley, DG (2018) When should the emphasis on schistosomiasis control move to elimination? Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 3. Article number 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J, Lai, DH, Wilson, RA, Chen, YF, Wang, LF, Yu, ZL, Li, MY, He, P, Hide, G, Sun, X, Yang, TB, Wu, ZD, Ayala, FJ and Lun, ZR (2017) Nitric oxide blocks the development of the human parasite Schistosoma japonicum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114, 1021410219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelly, PJ and Wilson, RA (2006) Making sense of the schistosome surface. Advances in Parasitology 63, 185284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelma, FF, Talla, I, Sow, S, Kongs, A, Niang, M, Polman, K, Deelder, AM and Gryseels, B (1995) Efficacy and side effects of praziquantel in an epidemic focus of Schistosoma mansoni. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 53, 167170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symmers, WSC (1904) Note on a new form of liver cirrhosis due to the presence of the ova of Bilharzia haematobia. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 9, 237239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H and Tsuji, M (1997) From discovery to eradication of schistosomiasis in Japan: 1847−1996. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 14651480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, AB, Roberts, KM, Cao, X, Clark, NE, Holloway, SP, Donati, E, Polcaro, CM, Pica-Mattoccia, L, Tarpley, RS, McHardy, SF, Cioli, D, LoVerde, PT, Fitzpatrick, PF and Hart, PJ (2017) Structural and enzymatic insights into species-specific resistance to schistosome parasite drug therapy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 292, 1115411164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, AP (1883) The life history of the liver-fluke (Fasciola hepatica). Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 23, 90133.Google Scholar
Tricker, AR, Mostafa, MH, Spiegelhalder, B and Preussmann, R (1989) Urinary excretion of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds in Schistosomiasis and bilharzia bladder cancer patients. Carcinogenesis 10, 547552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, GA (1909) Bilharziosis in South Africa. Parasitology 1, 195217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Lichtenberg, F (1987) Consequences of infections with schistosomes. In Rollinson, D and Simpson, AJG (eds), The Biology of Schistosomes: From Genes to Latrines. London: Academic Press, pp. 185232.Google Scholar
Wang, T, Wyeth, RC, Liang, D, Bose, U, Ni, G, McManus, DP and Cummins, SF (2019) A Biomphalaria glabrata peptide that stimulates significant behaviour modifications in aquatic free-living Schistosoma mansoni miracidia. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13, e0006948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, BL, Diaw, OT, Seye, MM, Webster, JP and Rollinson, D (2013) Introgressive hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium group species in Senegal: species barrier break down between ruminant and human schistosomes. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, BL, Alharbi, MH, Kayuni, S, Makaula, P, Halstead, F, Christiansen, R, Juziwelo, L, Stanton, MC, LaCourse, EJ, Rollinson, D, Kalua, K and Stothard, JR (2019) Schistosome interactions within the Schistosoma haematobium group, Malawi. Emerging Infectious Diseases 25, 12451247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weerakoon, KG, Gobert, GN, Cai, P and McManus, DP (2015) Advances in the diagnosis of human schistosomiasis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 28, 939967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RA (2012) Proteomics at the schistosome-mammalian host interface: any prospects for diagnostics or vaccines? Parasitology 139, 11781194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RA and Coulson, PS (2009) Immune effector mechanisms against schistosomiasis: looking for a chink in the parasite's armour. Trends in Parasitology 25, 423431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, RA, van Dam, GJ, Kariuki, TM, Farah, IO, Deelder, AM and Coulson, PS (2006) The detection limits for estimates of infection intensity in schistosomiasis mansoni established by a study in non-human primates. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 12411244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RA, Langermans, JA, van Dam, GJ, Vervenne, RA, Hall, SL, Borges, WC, Dillon, GP, Thomas, AW and Coulson, PS (2008) Elimination of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms by rhesus macaques: basis for a therapeutic vaccine? PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2, e290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World_Health_Organisation (2018) Schistosomiasis and soil transmitted helminthiases: numbers of people treated in 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Record 93, 681692.Google Scholar
Yang, YYM, Wilson, RA, Thomas, SRL, Kariuki, TM, van Diepen, A and Hokke, CH (2019) Micro array-assisted analysis of anti-schistosome glycan antibodies elicited by protective vaccination with irradiated cercariae. Journal of Infectious Diseases 219, 16711680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, SM, Bu, L, Laidemitt, MR, Lu, L, Mutuku, MW, Mkoji, GM and Loker, ES (2018) Complete mitochondrial and rDNA complex sequences of important vector species of Biomphalaria, obligatory hosts of the human-infecting blood fluke. Schistosoma mansoni. Science Reports 8, 7341.Google ScholarPubMed