Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:22:51.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phylogenetic relationships among species of Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 and Phocascaris Høst, 1932 (Nematoda[ratio ]Ascaridoidea) based on nuclear rDNA sequence data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2000

S. A. NADLER
Affiliation:
Department of Nematology, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8668, USA
S. D'AMELIO
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
H.-P. FAGERHOLM
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, Department of Biology, Åbo Akademi University, Artillerigatan 6, BioCity, FIN-20520 Åbo, Finland
B. BERLAND
Affiliation:
Zoologisk Institutt, Universitetet i Bergen, Allegt. 41, N-5007, Bergen, Norway
L. PAGGI
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nuclear-encoded large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences were used to infer a phylogenetic hypothesis for 17 taxa (16 nominal species) of the genera Contracaecum and Phocascaris. Phylogenetic trees based on these data have been used to assess the validity of the taxonomic distinction between these genera, which was based on the presence or absence of certain structural features, rather than on explicit hypotheses of evolutionary history. Phylogenetic hypotheses based on parsimony, likelihood, and neighbor-joining analyses of these sequence data strongly support the hypothesis that species of Phocascaris are nested within the clade of Contracaecum species hosted by phocid seals, and are more closely related to species of the Contracaecum osculatum complex than to other Contracaecum species. Alternative tree topologies representing Phocascaris as not nested within the C. osculatum complex were significantly worse interpretations of these sequence data. Phylogenetic analysis also provides strong support for the monophyly of all taxa (Contracaecum and Phocascaris) from phocid seals, which is consistent with Berland's (1964) proposal that such species form a natural group; however, his proposal to recognize all species in phocid seals as Phocascaris, with all species from birds as Contracaecum would result in a paraphyletic Contracaecum, according to the molecular phylogenetic hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press