Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T14:47:59.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echinococcus metacestodes as laboratory models for the screening of drugs against cestodes and trematodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2009

A. HEMPHILL*
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
B. STADELMANN
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
S. SCHOLL
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
J. MÜLLER
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
M. SPILIOTIS
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
N. MÜLLER
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
B. GOTTSTEIN
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, University of Berne, Laenggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland
M. SILES-LUCAS
Affiliation:
Parasitology Laboratory, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (CSIC), Cordel de Merinas 40-52, 37008Salamanca, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Andrew Hemphill, Institute of Parasitology Vetsuisse Faculty, University of BerneLänggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Berne, Switzerland. Tel: +41 31 6312384. Fax: +41 31 6312477. Email: hemphill@ipa.unibe.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Among the cestodes, Echinococcus granulosus, Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia solium represent the most dangerous parasites. Their larval stages cause the diseases cystic echinococcosis (CE), alveolar echincoccosis (AE) and cysticercosis, respectively, which exhibit considerable medical and veterinary health concerns with a profound economic impact. Others caused by other cestodes, such as species of the genera Mesocestoides and Hymenolepis, are relatively rare in humans. In this review, we will focus on E. granulosus and E. multilocularis metacestode laboratory models and will review the use of these models in the search for novel drugs that could be employed for chemotherapeutic treatment of echinococcosis. Clearly, improved therapeutic drugs are needed for the treatment of AE and CE, and this can only be achieved through the development of medium-to-high throughput screening approaches. The most recent achievements in the in vitro culture and genetic manipulation of E. multilocularis cells and metacestodes, and the accessability of the E. multilocularis genome and EST sequence information, have rendered the E. multilocularis model uniquely suited for studies on drug-efficacy and drug target identification. This could lead to the development of novel compounds for the use in chemotherapy against echinococcosis, and possibly against diseases caused by other cestodes, and potentially also trematodes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

INTRODUCTION

The genus Echinococcus includes seven to nine described species (Nakao et al. Reference Nakao, McManus, Schantz, Craig and Ito2007; Varcasia et al. Reference Varcasia, Garippa, Pipia, Scala, Brianti, Giannetto, Battelli, Poglayen and Micagni2008). Of these, Echinococcus multilocularis (the small fox tapewom) is the most pathogenic, and E. granulosus (the small dog tapeworm) represents the most common species (Thompson, Reference Thompson and Thompson1986). Both cause life-threatening diseases of serious public health and economic concern worldwide (McManus et al. Reference McManus, Wenbao, Jun and Bartley2003). Alveolar echinococcosis (AE), caused by E. multilocularis, is largely restricted to the Northern hemisphere, such as Central Asia, Russia, Western China, Europe and Japan. Infections with E. granulosus, the causative agent of cystic echinococcosis (CE), occur globally, and mostly in the Mediterranean area, Central Europe, South America, Africa, Central Asia, and CE exists as an imported disease in Western Europe and the USA (Schantz et al. Reference Schantz, Chai, Craig, Eckert, Jenkins, Macpherson, Thakur, Thompson and Lymbery1995; Eckert and Deplazes, Reference Eckert and Deplazes2004). 3·6 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are lost due to CE (Craig et al. Reference Craig, McManus, Lightowlers, Chabalgoity, Garcia, Gavidia, Gilman, Gonzalez, Lorca, Naquira, Nieto and Schantz2007), showing that the impact of the disease is comparable to onchocercosis and African trypanosomosis (Budke et al. Reference Budke2006). AE and CE are diseases of communities that often lack essential resources, thus the development of new drugs against these diseases has not been a major focus of the pharmaceutical industry. First, because the population affected and the number of cases as such do not represent a promising market. Secondly, there has been an inherent lack of in vitro culture systems that would allow cost-effective high-throughput drug screening. However, the recent achievements in the establishment of in vitro cultivation systems, especially for E. multilocularis metacestodes, has now opened the door for medium-to-high-throughput drug screening possibilities. These developments could have considerable impact not only for the treatment of echinococcosis, but also for other diseases caused by cestodes such as Taenia, Hymenolepis, Mesocestoides and Spirometra and, potentially, trematodes.

ECHINOCOCCUS: BIOLOGY AND DISEASE

E. multilocularis and E. granulosus share some distinct features in their life cycle. The adult worms live in the intestine of their respective final host (dogs for E. granulosus, foxes, dogs and cats for E. multilocularis) where sexual reproduction and subsequent egg production takes place. Faecal shedding spreads the eggs into the environment, where they are accidentally taken up by suitable intermediate hosts, such as small rodents for E. multilocularis, and cattle and sheep for E. granulosus. These eggs contain the first larval stage, the oncosphere, and during stomach passage, the oncosphere is activated and leaves the protective egg. It actively penetrates the intestinal lining, and migrates via blood and lymphatic vessels to the visceral organs. These are primarily the liver for E. multilocularis, and the liver, lung and other target organs in the case of E. granulosus. There, these oncospheres develop into metacestodes, which represent the second larval stage. Within these metacestodes, protoscolex development takes place, and upon oral uptake by the respective final host, protoscoleces attach to the intestinal epithelium and develop into adult worms, thus concluding the life cycle (Rausch, Reference Rausch, Thompson and Lymbery1995).

Metacestodes of both species are fluid-filled vesicles, and represent the disease-causing stage. They are structured into an inner cellular and an outer acellular compartment (Fig. 1). The outer, acellular surface of the metacestode is formed by the laminated layer, a carbohydrate-rich structure synthesized by the parasite. The laminated layer covers the entire metacestode surface, and is much more prominent in E. granulosus metacestodes (Morseth, Reference Morseth1967; Gottstein and Hemphill, Reference Gottstein and Hemphill1997). The actual larval tissue is formed by the germinal layer, which itself is composed of a population of different cell types (Figs. 1 and 2). One part consists of the tegument, which is directly associated with the inner surface of the laminated layer. It is characterized by microvilli-like extensions, microtriches, which protrude into the matrix of the laminated layer and thereby increase the resorbing surface of the parasite (Fig. 2). In addition, the germinal layer contains highly differentiated cell types including connective tissue, muscle cells, and glycogen storage cells, as well as many undifferentiated cells (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. SEM of E. granulosus (A, B) and E. multilocularis (C, D) metacestodes. A and C represent lower magnification views of broken vesicles, exoposing both the acellular laminated layer (LL) and the germinal layer (GL); bars=1·5 mm. B and D represent higher magnification views of the germinal layer of E. granulosus and E. multilocularis, respectively; bars=400 μm.

Fig. 2. TEM of E. multilocularis metacestodes cultured in vitro. A shows a low magnification view of a section through the metacestode wall, with laminated (LL) and germinal layer (GL); bar=7 μm. B shows a higher magnification view, demonstrating LL, GL-tissue with different cell types including undifferentiated cells with a large nucleus and nucleolus (uc), and the tegument with microtriches (arrows); bar=3·2 μm. C and D show higher magnification views of longitudinally sectioned (C; bar=0·56 μm) and cross-sectioned (D; bar=0·43 μm) microtriches revealing actin microfilaments as main structural components. Also note the filamentous meshwork of electron-dense thin filaments that is embedded into the matrix of the LL.

The fully mature E. granulosus metacestode (i.e. hydatid cyst) is a single-chambered or septate unilocular cyst that shows expansive growth and thereby causes compression of neighbouring tissue, tissue damage and organ dysfunction (Kern, Reference Kern2006). Accidental or traumatic cyst rupture can result in release of cyst fluid and dissemination of protoscoleces, leading to anaphylactic reactions and metastases (secondary echinococcosis) (Stey and Jost, Reference Stey and Jost1993). E. granulosus metacestodes are surrounded by a host fibrous capsule, the adventitial layer, which is composed of host connective tissue.

In E. multilocularis infection, metacestode development exhibits different characteristics. There is no limiting host-tissue barrier comparable to the adventitial layer. The metacestode tissue represents a multivesicular structure that is reproducing asexually, by formation and budding of daughter vesicles, with progressive tumour-like growth (Ali-Khan et al. Reference Ali-Khan, Siboo, Gomersall and Faucher1983). This leads to the formation of a large and heterogenous parasitic mass that is intermingled with host connective tissue, proliferative in the periphery, and often necrotic in the centre (Gottstein and Hemphill, Reference Gottstein and Hemphill1997). Metastases formation may occur in other organs due to the release of germinal layer cells into the blood or lymph system (Ali-Khan et al. Reference Ali-Khan, Siboo, Gomersall and Faucher1983; Eckert et al. Reference Eckert, Thompson and Mehlhorn1983; Mehlhorn et al. Reference Mehlhorn, Eckert and Thompson1983). Thus, AE can resemble a benign malignant tumour (Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). Protoscolex development in humans has been rarely observed.

BENZIMIDAZOLES FOR THE CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS (CE) AND ALVEOLAR ECHINOCOCCOSIS (AE)

For many years, the preferred treatment strategy for CE has been radical resection of the parasite mass (Kern, Reference Kern2003, Reference Kern2006). Other options include image-guide percutaneous treatment (PAIR=puncture, aspiration, injection, reaspiration) (Brunetti et al. Reference Brunetti, Troia, Garlaschelli, Gulizia and Filice2004) and chemotherapy (El-On, Reference El-On2002). Both surgery and PAIR are always accompanied by chemotherapy and, for inoperable cases, chemotherapy remains the only option. These cases include patients exhibiting cysts in crucial organs such as spine, pelvis and other sites that are not easily accessible, or patients with multiple cysts in several organs. The currently used drugs are mebendazole and albendazole. These drugs clearly have the potential to kill metacestodes, and to cure the patients. Benzimidazoles exert their action by binding to tubulin, inducing microtubule depolymerization and inhibiting polymerization of this essential cytoskeletal element (reviewed by Hemphill and Müller, Reference Hemphill and Mueller2009). However, the efficacy of these benzimidazoles depends on size and type of cyst (benzimidazoles are more effective against smaller cysts), on the age of the patient (these drugs work better in younger than in older patients), and on which organ is affected (e.g. cysts localized in bones are less susceptible to chemotherapy than those in liver and lungs). The duration of treatment plays a crucial role, with prolonged drug administration producing the most favourable results for the patients (Horton, Reference Horton1997; Franchi et al. Reference Franchi, DiVico and Teggi1999; Vutova et al. Reference Vutova, Mechkov, Vachkov, Petkov, Georgiev, Handjiev, Ivanov and Todorov1999). Praziquantel, a heterocyclic pyrazinoisoquinoline derivative, has been proposed to be used alongside benzimidazoles in CE-patients. Praziquantel is well tolerated, less toxic and better absorbed than albendazole. Praziquantel is used against the adult stages of Echinococcus and many other cestodes, and was shown to exhibit a high efficacy against protoscoleces (Morris et al. Reference Morris, Richards and Chinnery1986) and metacestodes in animal experiments (Urrea-Paris et al. Reference Urrea-Paris, Moreno, Casado and Rodriguez-Caabeiro1999, Reference Urrea-Paris, Casado, Moreno and Rodriguez-Caabeiro2001). The mode of action of praziquantel is a matter of debate. Respective studies were mostly carried out with schistosomes, where praziquantel represents the only drug that is currently marketed. Possibilities of praziquantel toxicity include its actions on nucleoside uptake (Angelucci et al. Reference Angelucci, Basso, Bellelli, Brunori, Pica Maattoccia and Valle2007), inhibition of phospho-inositide turnover (Wiest et al. Reference Wiest, Li, Olds and Bowen1992), binding to parasite actin (Tallima and El Ridi, Reference Tallima and El Ridi2007) and the parasite myosin light chain, and possibly inhibiting its functional activity (Gnanasekar et al. Reference Gnanasekar, Salunkhe, Mallia, He and Kalyanasundaram2009), interference in glutathione-S-transferase activity (McTigue et al. Reference McTigue, Williams and Tainer1995), and stimulation of Ca2+ entry through voltage-operated Ca2+ channels (VOCCs) (Kohn et al. Reference Kohn, Roberts-Misterly, Anderson, Khan and Greenberg2003; Jeziorski and Greenberg, Reference Jeziorski and Greenberg2006). The most compelling evidence for the involvement of VOCCs was recently provided by Nogi et al. (Reference Nogi, Zhang, Chan and Marchant2009) : they used the free-living flatworm Dugesia japonicum and investigated regeneration of fragments excised from this planarian that have the ability to reform a complete body plan, an ability that is driven by a totipotent population of stem cells called neoblasts. In the presence of praziquantel, however, this regeneration process yielded complete duplication of the entire antierior-posterior axis, resulting in two-headed organisms with duplicated nervous and organ systems. This effect of praziquantel was selectively ablated by in vivo RNAi of VOCC beta-subunits, but not by knock-down of alpha-subunits. At higher doses of praziquantel, knock-down of VOCC beta-subunit also conferred resistance to praziquantel, confirming the critical involvement of this beta subunit in the action of the drug.

A combined treatment regimen with albendazole and praziquantel given during the month prior to surgery of E. granulosus-infected patients increased the number of human patients with non-viable protoscoleces as compared to therapy with albendazole alone (Cobo et al. Reference Cobo, Yarnoz, Sesma, Fraile, Aizcorbe, Trujillo, Diaz-de-Liano and Ciga1998). Thus, praziquantel is regarded as useful in cases where cyst content is spilled during surgery.

For the treatment of AE, surgery and chemotherapy are the two only treatment options (Ammann and Eckert, Reference Ammann, Eckert, Thompson and Lymbery1995). Spontaneous cure of AE, leading to calcified lesions, is possible, but it is not known how commonly this occurs (Gottstein and Hemphill, Reference Gottstein and Hemphill1997; Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). Radical surgery of viable lesions is carried out if possible, but can be difficult to achieve, and only about one third of all cases are actually operated on. In contrast to E. granulosus metacestodes, E. multilocularis metacestodes are almost exclusively located in the liver. However, metastases can occur, also involving distant sites including lungs, spleen and brain. Chemotherapy should last for at least 2 years post-surgery, and monitoring of patients should be continued for 10 years. Inoperable cases must undergo long-term chemotherapy, often life-long (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Jensen, Buttenschoen, Kratzer and Kern2000; Reference Reuter, Buck, Manfras, Kratzer, Seitz, Darge, Reske and Kern2004; Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). The experiences with long-term use of benzimidazoles has had an enormous impact on the use of surgery. Generally, palliative surgery should be avoided and replaced by benzimidazole treatment alone or combined with percutaneous or perendoscopic interventions to treat biliary or vascular complications (Bresson-Hadni et al. Reference Bresson-Hadni, Vuitton, Bartholomot, Heyd, Godart, Meyer, Hrusovsky, Becker, Mantion, Lenys and Miguet2000, Reference Bresson-Hadni, Delabrousse, Blagosklonov, Bartholomot, Koch, Miguet, André Mantion and Angèle Vuitton2006; Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). Extensive animal experimentation and clinical experience in human patients have both demonstrated that albendazole and mebendazole exhibit a parasitostatic rather than parasiticidal effect against E. multilocularis metacestodes (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Buck, Manfras, Kratzer, Seitz, Darge, Reske and Kern2004; Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). Thus benzimidazoles only prevent parasite growth, and the recurrence rates after interruption of therapy are high. Nevertheless, clinical studies have shown that chemotherapy has significantly increased the 10-year survival rate of inoperable or non-radically operated AE patients from 6–25% to 80–83% (Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Spicher, Stadelmann, Mueller, Naguleswaran, Gottstein and Walker2007).

Benzimidazoles are generally well tolerated, but problems can occur. Adverse reactions include hepatotoxicity, alopoecia, gastrointestinal disturbances and leukopaenia, which is sometimes severe and irreversible (Horton, Reference Horton1997). Risks also include embryotoxicity and teratogenicity. In order to improve bioavailability, liposome-entrapped formulations and emulsions of albendazole have been tested (Wen et al. Reference Wen, New, Muhmut, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Shao and Craig1996; Chai et al. Reference Chai, Menghebat Wie, Deyu, Bin, Jincao, Chen, Xiong, Yiding, Xiuling, Dolikun, Guliber, Yanchun, Fanghua and Shuhua2004). The use of cimetidine is discouraged, since it increases intestinal absorption (Wen et al. Reference Wen, New, Muhmut, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Shao and Craig1996; Schipper et al. Reference Schipper, Koopmans, Nagy, Butter, Kaeger and Van Boxtel2000), which in turn could result in toxic effects.

Major problems associated with benzimdazoles are the intra- and inter-individual variations of the pharmacokinetics, which make it necessary to measure albendazole sulphoxide and mebendazole plasma levels on a regular basis in order to adjust drug dosage and to avoid toxicity (Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). This is only possible in specialized facilities, and thus precludes the use of benzimidazoles in those endemic areas where efficient drugs would be mostly needed. In addition, it is unknown whether there is a stage-specific response to exposure to benzimidazoles, and the actual concentration at the site where the drug exerts its action is not known. These pharmacological uncertainties, together with the difficulties in assessing metacestode viability in humans, show that novel and improved chemotherapeutical tools are needed in order to optimize the treatment of CE and AE.

THE ROLE OF IN VITRO CULTURE IN DRUG DISCOVERY

In order to identify novel potential alternatives for chemotherapy against echinococcosis, the strategy used most commonly has been whole organism screening of E. multilocularis and E. granulosus metacestodes and/or protoscoleces. In most cases, researchers have focused on broad-spectrum anti-infective agents and anti-cancer compounds, many of which also exhibited reasonable efficacy against Echinococcus (Hemphill and Müller, Reference Hemphill and Mueller2009).

In vitro chemotherapy studies on CE have mostly, but not exclusively, been carried out on protoscoleces, since these are easily obtained from cysts of an infected animal. The metabolism, and thus drug-susceptibility, of E. granulosus protoscoleces might however be different from the metacestode stage tissue. As an example, praziquantel is highly active against adult tapeworms and against protoscoleces, but only of limited efficacy against metacestodes. Conversely, albendazole is less active against protoscoleces, but of significantly higher efficacy against metacestodes (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Richards and Morris1989).

Infection of laboratory animals with E. granulosus protoscoleces results in the development of metacestodes, which mimics the process of secondary hydatid disease in humans, and this differentiation process can also be achieved in vitro (Walker et al. Reference Walker, Rossignol, Torgerson and Hemphill2004). E. granulosus metacestodes do not proliferate in vitro but, as in vivo, show a marked increase in size. Thus, extensive animal experimentation is necessary for constant supply of metacestode material. In contrast, E. multilocularis metacestodes, besides increasing in size, also proliferate asexually and, provided with the corresponding nutrients and growth factors, will form new vesicles either endogenously (from within the germinal layer) or exogenously (by budding of daughter metacestodes from older vesicles; Fig. 3). Thus, the fact that E. multilocularis metacestodes proliferate in vitro has rendered this model suitable for the experimental assessment of the effects of chemotherapeutically interesting compounds.

Fig. 3. Exogenous and endogenous proliferation of E. multilocularis metacestodes in vitro. Exogenous outgrowth of a newly formed vesicle (arrows in A–B) from a pre-exisiting parent vesicle appears to be followed by budding off of the daughter vesicle (C). Vesicles are also formed within older metacestodes, most likely by emerging out of the germinal layer, and these smaller metacestodes are released upon desintegration of the older metacestode (D, E).

Historically, the in vitro culture of E. multilocularis metacestodes was achieved by dissection of infected rodents and placing small pieces of infected tissue or vesicle suspension into a suitable culture medium at 37°C. After a few weeks, newly formed metacestodes emerged, which were infective when re-introduced back into rodents (Hemphill and Gottstein, Reference Hemphill and Gottstein1995). These were co-culture systems, as parasites could be maintained for several months in the presence of feeder cells, and in the absence of feeder cells, metacestodes degenerated within a few weeks. Jura et al. (Reference Jura, Bader, Hartmann, Maschek and Frosch1996) introduced a second in vitro co-culture system, which was based on co-incubation of homogenized parasite tissue obtained from infected rats with primary rat hepatocytes embedded in a collagen layer. Although useful in many instances (reviewed in Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Stettler, Walker, Siles-Lucas, Fink and Gottstein2002, Reference Hemphill, Spicher, Stadelmann, Mueller, Naguleswaran, Gottstein and Walker2007; Brehm and Spilitois, Reference Spiliotis, Brehm, Rupp and Sohn2008a), these co-culture systems provided only moderate yields and only a very limited number of drugs could be studied. Thus, the amount of metacestodes that could be generated was not sufficient for larger scale investigations.

Recently, Spiliotis and Brehm (Reference Spiliotis, Brehm, Rupp and Sohn2008) have overcome this problem and established a large-scale cultivation system which utilizes homogenized metacestode tissue that is incubated in liquid culture together with rat hepatoma feeder cells. Using this system, high numbers of metacestodes with comparable sizes can be generated within a few weeks of incubation. Thus, a major task of feeder cells appears to be the provision and secretion of growth factors that are needed by the parasites to undergo proliferation, growth and differentiation. E. multilocularis metacestodes possess several receptors that interact with human epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin, transforming growth factor-beta and steroid hormones (Brehm et al. Reference Brehm, Spiliotis, Zavala-Gongora, Konrad and Frosch2006; Brehm and Spiliotis, Reference Brehm and Spiliotis2008b), and these most likely allow the parasite to communicate with its host and adapt to alterations in living conditions, regulating gene expression to its favour. Of course, these receptors, and associated signalling pathways within the parasite, represent interesting targets for potential chemotherapeutical intervention (Brehm et al. Reference Brehm, Spiliotis, Zavala-Gongora, Konrad and Frosch2006; Gelmedin et al. Reference Gelmedin, Caballero-Gamiz and Brehm2008). In addition, Spiliotis et al. (Reference Spiliotis, Tappe, Sesterhenn and Brehm2004) developed the methodology to culture E. multilocularis metacestodes axenically, in the absence of feeder cells, under reducing and anaerobic conditions. In the presence of oxygen, these metacestodes degenerate within few weeks (Spilitois et al. Reference Spiliotis, Tappe, Sesterhenn and Brehm2004), illustrating the high sensitivity of E. multilocularis metacestodes to oxygen intermediates. The specific adaptation of the mitochondrial respiratory system to anaerobic environments has been shown also for E. multilocularis protoscoleces (Matsumoto et al. Reference Matsumoto, Sakamoto, Shiniyo, Kido, Yamamoto, Yagi, Miyoshi, Nonaka, Katakura, Kita and Oku2008). Thus, another important task of feeder cells is to remove toxic oxygen intermediates (Brehm and Spiliotis, Reference Brehm and Spiliotis2008a).

METHODS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTI-ECHINOCOCCAL DRUG CANDIDATES

By using animal experimentation, the primary assessment of anti-echinococcal drug candidates has often been performed in mice or gerbils, through evaluation of parasite mass and/or health parameters of the host. This has led to the extensive use of animal experimentation, but has often yielded inconclusive results (reviewed in Siles-Lucas and Hemphill, Reference Siles-Lucas and Hemphill2002). More recently, in vitro cultured Echinococcus metacestodes have been increasingly used for the primary assessment of drug susceptibilities (Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Stettler, Walker, Siles-Lucas, Fink and Gottstein2002, Reference Hemphill, Spicher, Stadelmann, Mueller, Naguleswaran, Gottstein and Walker2007).

A major problem associated with drug-efficacy assessment has always been the monitoring of the actual metacestode viability following in vitro drug treatment. In a primary evaluation, the effects of in vitro drug treatment can be assessed mainly by visual inspection of morphological alterations and light-microscopy. SEM and TEM have also been used extensively to investigate tissue damage in more detail (Ingold et al. Reference Ingold, Bigler, Thormann, Cavaliero, Gottstein and Hemphill1999; Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Geary, Rossignol and Hemphill2003; Naguleswaran et al. Reference Naguleswaran, Spicher, Vonlaufen, Ortega-Mora, Torgerson, Gottstein and Hemphill2006; Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Naguleswaran, Ortega-Mora, Mueller, Gottstein and Hemphill2008a; see also Fig. 2E, F), and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) has been applied to investigate metabolic changes imposed upon the parasites by drug treatments (Ingold et al. Reference Ingold, Bigler, Thormann, Cavaliero, Gottstein and Hemphill1999). Others have attempted to assess parasite viability and growth by the quantification of the expression of molecular marker genes such as 14-3-3 and II/3-10 (Matsumoto et al. Reference Matsumoto, Müller, Hemphill, Oku, Kamiya and Gottstein2006). Visual inspection relies on subjective observations and thus requires experienced personnel, while other techniques such as SEM, TEM, NMR and RT-real time PCR are intrinsically time-consuming and expensive. Although these approaches have lead to the identification of several compounds with reasonable activities in the micromolar range in vitro (see below), it has not been possible to implement these techniques in a cost-effective manner at a larger scale, and they have not always produced conclusive results. For instance, in vitro culture of E. multilocularis metacestodes in the presence of albendazole sulphoxide for 14 days resulted in altered composition of vesicle fluid metabolites as assessed by NMR, and complete destruction of the metacestode structural integrity as visualized by SEM and TEM (Ingold et al. Reference Ingold, Bigler, Thormann, Cavaliero, Gottstein and Hemphill1999). However, bioassay (re-inoculation of treated parasite material into mice) subsequently showed that the parasite had not been killed completely (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Geary, Rossignol and Hemphill2003). This was confirmed by Reuter et al. (Reference Reuter, Manfras, Merkle, Harter and Kern2006), and illustrates the difficulties in viability assessment following drug treatment.

Although several potentially interesting compounds were identified, and combinations of some of these drugs with albendazole led to slightly improved treatment efficacy in experimentally infected mice or gerbils, none of these compounds exhibited improved activities compared to albendazole (reviewed in Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Spicher, Stadelmann, Mueller, Naguleswaran, Gottstein and Walker2007). Thus, many more drugs and/or compound classes should be investigated, and there is an urgent need for a reliable, but also easy-to-handle and rapid in vitro drug screening assay for the identification of chemotherapeutically interesting compounds in vitro.

Attempts to develop screening assays based on the use of vital dyes employed for the assessment of cell viability, such as Alamar blue and Trypan blue, were undertaken. They worked well for protoscolex viability asessment (Walker et al. Reference Walker, Rossignol, Torgerson and Hemphill2004), but they were not practical when used with metacestodes, as these dyes tend to bind to components of the laminated layer (M. Spicher et al. unpublished observations). The MTT viability assay, which is based on the activity of mitochondrial reductase that reduces yellow 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide to purple formazan in living cells, worked well for E. multilocularis metacestodes in an experimental setting (Emery et al. Reference Emery, Bories, Liance and Houin1995), but was not found to be useful for the assessment of larger numbers of compounds (A. Hemphill, unpublished observations).

Another biomarker-based approach to develop such a screening assay could be to identify specific enzyme activities in culture supernatant obtained from drug-treated parasites, which release vesicle fluid components once they are damaged or structurally impaired upon exposure to an active compound. Such biomarkers indicating damage are not present in culture supernatants of untreated metacestodes. E. multilocularis metacestodes are basically fluid-filled vesicles that are surrounded by an outer, acellular laminated layer, and the inner surface of this laminated layer is delineated by the actual parasite tissue, the germinal layer. The germinal layer secretes the components of the laminated layer towards the metacestode periphery into the laminated layer, and also secretes and/or releases metabolites into the vesicle fluid. One enzyme that represents an intrinsic component of the vesicle fluid, and which is also found on the laminated layer, is alkaline phosphatase (AP; Sarciron et al. Reference Sarciron, Hamoud, Azzar and Petavy1991; Lawton et al. Reference Lawton, Hemphill, Deplazes, Gottstein and Sarciron1997). The detection of AP activity in medium supernatants of drug-treated metacestode cultures has been proposed as a method to screen for active drugs (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Siles-Lucas, Sarciron, Lawton, Gottstein and Hemphill2001). AP-activity was indeed increased in culture supernatants of metacestodes treated with nitazoxanide (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Geary, Rossignol and Hemphill2003), 2-methoxyestradiol and artemisinin-derivatives (Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Naguleswaran, Ortega-Mora, Mueller, Gottstein and Hemphill2008a, Reference Spicher, Roethlisberger, Lany, Stadelmann, Keiser, Ortega-Mora, Gottstein and Hemphillb), but the sensitivity of this assay was not always satisfactory (Gelmedin et al. Reference Gelmedin, Caballero-Gamiz and Brehm2008; A. Hemphill, unpublished observations). Thus, detection of AP activity does not represent a reliable measure for drug screening in vitro. Another enzyme, phosphoglucose isomerase, released by dying E. multilocularis metacestodes, was found to be a promising marker that allows assessment of parasite viability of drug-treated E. multilocularis metacestodes. The potential of this screen for high-throughput assays will be published soon (B. Stadelmann et al. unpublished observations).

Parasite-derived biomarkers could also play a major role for monitoring drug efficacy in patients suffering from echinococcosis during drug trials. For instance, it was previously shown that the serological response of patients against E. multilocularis alkaline phosphatase could reflect viability following surgery and/or chemotherapy (Sarciron et al. Reference Sarciron, Bresson-Hadni, Mercier, Lawton, Duranton, Lenys, Petavy and Vuitton1997). Such immunological tests are dependent on the availability and specificity of antigens and do not always provide clear-cut results; the same applies to molecular tests, such as PCR, which require specific primers. Thus, more recently, disease-specific biomarkers have been identified by metabolic profiling emplyoing 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). This technology delivers an overview of the metabolic composition of biofluids and tissues in diseased versus non-diseased individuals, and such studies have provided the means for detection and differentiation of e.g. coronary heart disease and schizophrenia (Ordovas and Moser, Reference Ordovas and Mooser2006; Holmes et al. Reference Holmes, Tsang, Huang, Leweke, Koethe, Gerth, Nolden, Gross, Schreiber, Nicholson and Bahn2006). Metabolic profiling has been carried out in rodents infected with S. mansoni (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Holmes, Nicholson, Cloarec, Chollet, Tanner, Singer and Utzinger2004), S. japonicum (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Utzinger, Xiao, Xue, Nicholson, Tanner, Singer and Holmes2006), T. spiralis (Martin et al. Reference Martin, Verdu, Wang, Dumas, Yap, Cloarec, Bergonzelli, Corthesy-Theulaz, Kochhar, Holmes, Lindon, Collins and Nicholson2006), Trypanosoma brucei brucei (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Utzinger, Saric, Li, Burckhardt, Dirnhofer, Nicholson, Singer, Brun and Holmes2008), Plasmodium berghei (Li et al. Reference Li, Wang, Saric, Nicholson, Dirnhofer, Singer, Tanner, Wittlin, Holmes and Utzinger2008), and Echinostoma caproni (Saric et al. Reference Saric, Li, Wang, Keiser, Bundy, Holmes and Utzinger2008), and could be of high interest for other infections where good markers for disease progression and/or regression are still missing. For instance, a recent study (Hosch et al. Reference Hosch, Junghanss, Stojkovic, Brunetti, Heye, Kauffmann and Hull2008) has shown that there is a good correlation between metabolic viability assessment achieved through 1H NMR of E. granulosus cyst fluid measured ex vivo from 50 patients with different degrees of disease classification and the classical ultrasound/light microscopy disease assessment, demonstrating the potential benefit of the use of metabolic biomarkers in disease and parasite viability assessments, e.g. during chemotherapy.

DRUG CANDIDATES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ECHINOCOCCOSIS

Cystic echinococcosis (CE)

A selection of drugs and potential drug candidates against CE is provided in Table 1. In many instances, in vitro studies on compounds active against E. granulosus have employed protoscoleces. Experimental prophylactic therapy of E. granulosus protoscoleces was carried out as a model that would mimic spillage during surgery, by treating protoscoleces with praziquantel (Urrea-Paris et al. Reference Urrea-Paris, Casado, Moreno and Rodriguez-Caabeiro2001) or a combination of praziquantel and albendazole (Casado et al. Reference Casado, Urrea-Paris, Moreno and Rodriguez-Caabeiro2001) prior to injection into mice. The combination of albendazole and praziquantel has been used successfully in the treatment of human CE (Cobo et al. Reference Cobo, Yarnoz, Sesma, Fraile, Aizcorbe, Trujillo, Diaz-de-Liano and Ciga1998). Other promising compounds with in vitro protoscolicidal actions against E. granulosus were cetrimide (Frayha et al. Reference Frayha, Bikhazi and Kachachi1981) and the ionophore monensin (Rogan and Richards, Reference Rogan and Richards1986), but these drugs were rather ineffective against metacestodes. Levamisole and ivermectin, which are classically used against nematode infections, exhibited in vitro activities similar to benzimidazoles (Martinez et al. Reference Martinez, Perez-Serrano, Bernadina and Rodriguez-Caabeiro1999; Elissondo et al. Reference Elissondo, Ceballos, Alvarez, Sánchez Bruni, Lanusse and Denegri2009). The direct injection of ivermectin into E. granulosus cysts in laparotomised patients has also shown parasiticidal effects (Ochieng'-Mitula and Burt, Reference Ochieng'-Mitula and Burt1996). The combination of ivermectin plus albendazole has shown synergistic effects in infected mice (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Casado, Urrea-París and Rodríguez-Caabeiro2002). Benzimidazoles vary considerably with regard to their protoscolicidal action. Albendazole and albendazole sulphoxide have been shown to be active against E. granulosus protoscoleces in vitro (Chinnery and Morris, Reference Chinnery and Morris1986; Morris et al. Reference Morris, Chinnery and Ubhi1987; Perez-Serrano et al. Reference Perez Serrano, Casado, Guillermo, Denegri and Rodriguez-Caabeiro1994), but the in vitro protoscolicidal action of these drugs is rather slow and requires a longer incubation period compared to mebendazole (Morris et al. Reference Morris, Chinnery and Ubhi1987; Rodriguez-Caabeiro et al. Reference Rodriguez-Caabeiro, Casado and Juarez-Pelaez1989) or oxfendazole, the major fenbendazole sulphoxide metabolite. Against E. granulosus infection in rodents, a combination of fenbendazole and netobimin (Garcia-Llamazarez et al. Reference Garcia-Llamazares, Alvarez-de-Felipe, Redondo-Cardena, Voces-Alonso and Prieto-Fernandez1997) showed synergistic effects, allowing the administration of lower drug dosages. Oxfendazole, like albendazole, is a benzimidazole, used in veterinary medicine for the treatment of nematode infections, and has a similar antimicrobial spectrum but a longer half-life. Experimental treatments of naturally E. granulosus-infected sheep and goats suggested that oxfendazole may be as efficacious as albendazole, but does not require daily uptake of the drug because of its prolonged bioavailability (Blanton et al. Reference Blanton, Wachira, Zeyhle, Njoroge, Magambo and Schantz1988; Dueger et al. Reference Dueger, Moro and Gilman1999). Nitazoxanide, a nitro-thiazole-analogue (Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Mueller and Esposito2006) induced severe damage to E. granulosus protoscoleces and the germinal layer of E. granulosus metacestodes within few days of in vitro culture (Walker et al. Reference Walker, Rossignol, Torgerson and Hemphill2004). Nitazoxanide treatment was not effective against experimental E. granulosus infection in sheep, but oxfendazole treatment, and a combination of oxfendazole and nitazoxanide, significantly decreased the number of fertile cysts and increased the number of degenerated cysts (Gavidia et al. Reference Gavidia, Gonzalez, Lopera, Jayashi, Angelats, Barron, Ninaquispe, Villareal, Garcia, Verastegui and Gilman2009). On the other hand, a recent case report has suggested beneficial effects of nitazoxanide in the treatment of refractory bony hydatid disease in a human patient (Winning et al. Reference Winning, Braslins and McCarthy2009). This patient had been suffering from progressive disease despite treatment with albendazole and praziquantel, and the clinical response on nitazoxanide treatment showed marked improvement in the soft tissue cysts, with stable disease in the bony pelvis. Although further studies are required, this report suggests that nitazoxanide may be an effective treatment option in CE, particularly in patients with progressive disease who are receiving conventional treatment (Winning et al. Reference Winning, Braslins and McCarthy2009).

Table 1. A selection of drug candidates against cystic hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus.

Profound protoscolicidal activity was also reported for another benzimidazole-derivative, flubendazole (Ellissondo et al. Reference Elissondo, Dopchiz, Ceballos, Alvarez, Sanchez Bruni, Lanusse and Denegri2006, Reference Elissondo, Ceballos, Alvarez, Sánchez Bruni, Lanusse and Denegri2009). Further studies subsequently showed that flubendazole also exhibited anti-E. granulosus metacestocidal activities in vitro and in vivo in experimentally infected mice (Elissondo et al. Reference Elissondo, Ceballos, Dopchiz, Andresiuk, Alvarez, Sanchez Bruni, Lanusse and Denegri2007). The same authors, together with Kammerer and Perez-Esandi (Reference Kammerer and Perez-Esandi1975), showed that thymol, one of the major components of the essential oils of Thymus, was found to exhibit substantial protoscolicidal activity (Elissondo et al. Reference Elissondo, Albani, Gende, Eguaras and Denegri2008).

Cyclosporin A, employed mainly as an immunosuppressant during the management of organ transplants, also exhibits anti-echinococcal activity. The administration of cyclosporin A in five consecutive daily doses, beginning 2 days prior to the infection of mice with E. granulosus protoscoleces, resulted in a significant reduction in cyst numbers and cyst masses measured at 20 weeks after infection. However, no changes in cyst mass and numbers were recorded when the drug was administered 18 weeks after infection, but the wet weight was decreased by 42% compared with untreated controls. Ultrastructural examination of the germinal membrane and laminated layer of late-treated E. granulosus revealed abnormalities in all cysts studied whereas control and early-treated hydatids were normal (Hurd et al. Reference Hurd, Mackenzie and Chappell1993). Cyclosporin A has also been shown to affect E. granulosus protoscoleces in vitro (Colebrook et al. Reference Colebrook, Jenkins, Jones, Tatarczuch and Lightowlers2004).

Alveolar echinococcosis (AE)

A selection of drugs and potential drug candidates for the treatment of AE is provided in Table 2. Cyclosporin A, contrary to what was found in CE, lacked anti-parasitic activity against E. multilocularis infection in experimentally infected mice (Liance et al. Reference Liance, Bresson-Hadni, Vuitton, Lenys, Carbillet and Houin1992). Doxorubicin, or hydroxyldaunorubicin, a DNA-interacting drug used widely in the treatment of a wide range of cancers (Launchbury and Habboubi, Reference Launchbury and Habboubi1993), was bound to poly-isohexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles (a colloidal biodegradable drug carrier) and applied in E. mutlilocularis-infected mice, resulting in the reduction of the development of the parasite in the liver and a reduced viability of the metacestode. Free doxorubicin or unbound nanoparticles had no antiparasitic activity (Liance et al. Reference Liance, Nemati, Bories and Couvreur1993). Animal experimentation in rodents demonstrated parasitostatic effects of mytomicin C, piperazine and quinolone derivates, alkylaminoethers and propargylic alcohols, either at a lower level or comparable to benzimidazoles (reviewed in Siles-Lucas and Hemphill, Reference Siles-Lucas and Hemphill2002). The efficacy of praziquantel was inadequate (Marchiondo et al. Reference Marchiondo, Ming, Andersen, Slusser and Conder1994), although showing some effects on protoscoleces in vitro (Taylor and Morris, Reference Taylor and Morris1988). Also, the treatment of E. multilocularis-infected mice with alpha-difluoromethylornithine was not successful (Miyaji et al. Reference Miyaji, Katakura, Matsufuji, Murakami, Hayashi, Oku, Okamoto and Kamiya1993).

Table 2. A selection of drug candidates against alveolar echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus multilocularis

* Parasitostatic

More recently, studies on chemotherapeutically interesting compounds have employed in vitro cultured parasites. Nitazoxanide, a broad-spectrum anthelminthic also used for treatment against enteric bacteria, Giardia and Cryptosporidium (Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Mueller and Esposito2006), was identified as a compound inducing significant distortion of the germinal layer in vitro, and nitazoxanide-treated E. multilocularis metacestodes were non-viable when introduced into susceptible mice (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Geary, Rossignol and Hemphill2003). Reuter et al. (Reference Reuter, Manfras, Merkle, Harter and Kern2006) investigated the in vitro efficacy of a series of compounds against E. multilocularis metacestodes, including albendazole, artemether, caspofungin, itraconazole, ivermectin, methiazole, miltefosine, nitazoxanide, rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. They found that albendazole, itraconazole, methiazole and nitazoxanide effectively destroyed parasite vesicles in vitro. However, after drug discontinuation, re-growth of vesicles occurred, indicating a parasitostatic effect only. Combination treatment with albendazole/nitazoxanide at concentrations between 1 and 10 μg/ml for 3 weeks yielded no re-growth of parasites during 8 months of drug discontinuation, and the subsequent evaluation in a bioassay in gerbils did also not result in viable parasite infections. In this respect, Stettler et al. (Reference Stettler, Rossignol, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Merli, Theurillat, Thormann, Dricot, Segers and Hemphill2004) showed that nitazoxanide, applied orally to E. multilocularis infected mice, either alone or in combination with ABZ, exhibited a profound anti-parasitic efficacy, with the albendazole/nitazoxanide combination yielding the most promising outcome in terms of reducing parasite weight. The pharmacokinetic analysis of corresponding serum levels in mice showed that the application of albendazole in combination with nitazoxanide increased considerably the levels and the half-life of albendazole sulfoxide (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Rossignol, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Merli, Theurillat, Thormann, Dricot, Segers and Hemphill2004). Therefore, the increased efficacy observed in mice could be the result of an increased availability of albendazole sulfoxide in mice receiving the combination treatment. Despite these promising results, neither nitazoxanide monotherapy nor nitazoxanide-albendazole combination therapies were highly effective in human patients sufffering from AE (Kern et al. Reference Kern, Abboud, Kern, Stich, Bresson-Hadni, Guerin, Buttenschoen, Gruener, Reuter and Hemphill2008).

Amphotericin B desoxycholate (cAMB), an antifungal compound, effectively inhibited the growth of E. multilocularis metacestodes, first in vitro, and subsequently in human patients in vivo (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Merkle, Brehm, Kern and Manfras2003a, Reference Reuter, Buck, Grebe, Nüssle-Kügele, Kern and Manfrasb). A major limitation of cAMB is its mode of administration (intra-venous), which makes it unsuitable for prolonged use, except for salvage treatment (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Buck, Grebe, Nüssle-Kügele, Kern and Manfras2003b). Also, the action of cAMB is only parasitostatic and, since the drug is nephrotoxic, its widespread use is limited. Nevertheless, prolonged application of cAMB for months to years may be feasible in some cases, as side effects are mild and serious organ damage does not appear to occur (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Buck, Grebe, Nüssle-Kügele, Kern and Manfras2003b).

In vitro studies on E. multilocularis metacestodes and E. granulosus protoscoleces have shown that genistein, representing a major component of soya and the most prominent isoflavonoid, as well as a number of genistein derivatives, are also highly effective against these parasites. The molecular basis of the efficacy of genistein and its derivative Rm6423 have not yet been elucidated, but these compounds could interfere in signalling, for instance, through an inhibition of the tyrosine kinase activity associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor identified in E. multilocularis (see Brehm et al. Reference Brehm, Spiliotis, Zavala-Gongora, Konrad and Frosch2006). Recently, Gelmedin et al. (Reference Gelmedin, Caballero-Gamiz and Brehm2008) identified pyridinyl imidazoles as ATP-competitive inhibitors of a p38-like mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) of E. multilocularis by adding them to in vitro cultures, demonstrating death of parasite vesicles at concentrations that did not affect cultured mammalian cells.

An endogenous metabolite of oestrogen with both anti-angiogenic and anti-tumour effects, 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME) (reviewed by Schumacher and Neuhaus, Reference Schumacher and Neuhaus2001) was shown to induce severe damage to E. multilocularis metacestodes in vitro in a dose-dependent manner (Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Naguleswaran, Ortega-Mora, Mueller, Gottstein and Hemphill2008a). However, 2-ME-treatment of experimentally infected mice did not result in a reduction in parasite weight compared to the control, demonstrating that in vitro and in vivo situations are not always comparable. Best results were achieved with a treatment using a combination of 2-ME and albendazole, which lead to a reduction in parasite weight compared to albendazole treatment alone, but results did not show statistical significance (Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Naguleswaran, Ortega-Mora, Mueller, Gottstein and Hemphill2008a). In vitro treatment of E. multilocularis and E. granulosus larval stages with the antimalarials dihydroartemisinin and artesunate exhibited promising results, while 6 weeks of in vivo treatment of mice with infected E. multilocularis metacestodes had no effect. Again, combination treatments of both drugs with albendazole led to a substantial but statistically not significant reduction in parasite weight compared to results with albendazole alone (Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Roethlisberger, Lany, Stadelmann, Keiser, Ortega-Mora, Gottstein and Hemphill2008b).

The in vitro effect of isoprinosine and its derivates has also been demonstrated against protoscoleces of E. multilocularis (Lawton et al. Reference Lawton, Walchshofer and Sarciron2001).

RELEVANCE OF ECHINOCOCCUS METACESTODE SCREENING MODELS FOR OTHER CESTODES AND TREMATODES

Numerous studies have demonstrated that many of those drugs that were active in E. granulosus drug screening models were also of significant relevance for E. multilocularis and vice versa (see above). In addition, there is ample evidence that most compounds with good in vitro and in vivo efficacy against Echinococcus metacestodes are also of relevance for combatting infections by other cestode larval stages. For instance, cysticerci of T. taeniaeformis were highly sensitive to praziquantel (Becker et al. Reference Becker, Mehlhorn, Andrews and Thomas1981), and the same applied to T. solium and T. pisiformis (Garcia-Dominguez et al. Reference Garcia-Dominguez, Correa, Rabiela and Flisser1991; Martinez Zedillo et al. Reference Martinez Zedillo, Hoyo Badillo, Amezcua and Gonzalez Barranco1992). Albendazole and mebendazole (or modified derivatives) were also active against T. taeniaeformis cysticerci in experimentally infected mice (Verheyen et al. Reference Verheyen, Vanparijs, Borgers and Thienpont1978; Jain et al. Reference Jain, Gupta, Katiyar, Maitra, Singh and Bhakuni1989). To date, albendazole and praziquantel, taken as short-term treatments (8–15 days) are the main drugs of choice for chemotherapeutic treatment of neurocysticercosis in humans (Garcia et al. Reference Garcia, Gonzales, Evans and Gilman2003; Shandera and Kass, Reference Shandera and Kass2006). A recent in vitro study on T. crassiceps indicates that a combination of nitazoxanide and albendazole could be used for the treatment of cysticercosis infections (Palomares-Alonso et al. Reference Palomares-Alonso, Piliado, Palencia, Ortiz-Plata and Jung-Cook2007), but in vivo evidence is still lacking. The effects of other benzimidazoles, such as flubendazole, were evaluated in T. solium-infected swine, with promising results (Tellez-Giron et al. Reference Tellez-Giron, Ramos and Montante1981) that were subsequently confirmed in human patients (Tellez-Giron, Reference Tellez-Giron, Ramos, Dufour, Montante, Tellez, Rodriguez, Gomez-Mendez and Mireles1984).

The activity of benzimidazole derivatives against Hymenolepis larvae was evaluated in the intermediate host Tribolium confusum, demonstrating clear effects with regard to larval development (Novak and Blackburn, Reference Novak and Blackburn1985). However, in the rodent model it was shown that benzimidazole drugs were only effective against H. nana oncosphere infection, but already developed cysticercoids were difficult to cure (Gupta et al. Reference Gupta, Katiyar and Sen1981; Maki and Yanagisawa, Reference Maki and Yanagisawa1985), and neither flubendazole nor thiabendazole could clear H. nana cysticercoid infections in mice. Mebendazole and a series of modified benzimidazole derivatives were effective against H. nana and H. diminuta cysticercoids (Dubey et al. Reference Dubey, Abuzar, Sharma, Chatterjee and Katiyar1985).

In vitro studies on the effects of exposure of Mesocestoides corti tetrathyridia to anti-parasitic drugs revealed that liposomized praziquantel and albendazole had a deleterious effect on the parasite morphology and development (Hrckova et al. Reference Hrckova, Velebny and Corba1998; Britos et al. Reference Britos, Dominguez, Ehrlich and Marin2000; Saldana et al. Reference Saldana, Marin, Fernandez and Dominguez2001). The efficacy and mode of action of praziquantel were studied in the mouse model, showing that application of praziquantel had an adverse effect on the tetrathyridia burden in the liver and peritoneum (Hrckova and Velebny, Reference Hrckova and Velebny1995, Reference Hrckova and Velebny1997). Following the oral administration of mebendazole to M. corti-infected mice, a parasiticidal effect was observed (Heath et al. Reference Heath, Christie and Chevis1975; Eckert and Pohlenz, Reference Eckert and Pohlenz1976). This is in contrast to other cestode larvae, against which mebendazole exerts a parasitostatic effect only. Deleterious actions of other drugs on Mesocestoides tetrathyridia, including cyclosporin A (Chappell et al. Reference Chappell, Wastling and Hurd1989) and albendazole (Terenina et al. Reference Terenina, Kosovatova, Gerasimova and Shalaeva1998), have also been reported.

Potentially, the Echinococcus screening models could also have some, albeit limited, relevance for a number of trematode species, including Schistosoma japonicum, S. manoni, Chlonorchis sinensis, Fasciola hepatica and Opistorchis viverrini. For instance, praziquantel is the drug of choice for the treatment of schistosomiasis (King, Reference King2007). The drug is highly effective against the adult worm (as for cestodes), but has only a minor activity against the larval schistosomula. Another class of drugs that show similarities between Echinococcus and trematodes are the artemisinins and synthetic trioxolanes. These antimalarial drugs possess a broad spectrum of activity against trematodes, causing profound damage in vitro and substantially reducing the worm burden in experimentally infected mice (reviewed by Keiser and Utzinger, Reference Keiser and Utzinger2007a, Reference Keiser and Utzingerb). Echinoccoccus metacestodes were also susceptible to artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in vitro, while the schistosomula were found to be particularly susceptible to artemether and artesunate (Utzinger et al. Reference Utzinger, Chollet, Tu, Xiao and Tanner2002; Spicher et al. Reference Spicher, Roethlisberger, Lany, Stadelmann, Keiser, Ortega-Mora, Gottstein and Hemphill2008b). The promising activity of mefloquine, another anti-malarial drug, in mice experimentally infected with S. japonicum and S. mansoni, has been reported (Keiser et al. Reference Keiser, Chollet, Xiao, Mei, Jiao, Utzinger and Tanner2009), and recent studies in our laboratory also revealed that mefloquine has a profound impact on in vitro cultured E. multilocularis metacestodes (A. Hemphill et al. unpublished observations).

On the other hand, albendazole and mebendazole, the main anti-echinococcal drugs, have no impact on S. mansoni (Schmidt, Reference Schmidt1998). In contrast, flubendazole, a mebendazole-derivative, was active against S. mansoni in experimentally infected mice (Nessim et al. Reference Nessim, Hassan, William and El-Baz2000; Williams et al. Reference Williams, Guirgus and Nessim2003), and another benzimdazole, triclabendazole, was active against Fasciola hepatica (Robinson et al. Reference Robinson, Hoev, Fairweather, Dalton, McGonigle and Trudgett2001). As for Echinococcus, F. hepatica was susceptible to nitazoxanide treatment in vitro, and clinical studies showed that nitazoxanide could be used for the treatment of fasciolasis in children and adults (reviewed in Hemphill et al. Reference Hemphill, Mueller and Esposito2006).

WHERE TO GO FROM HERE?

As outlined in this review, considerable efforts have been undertaken to improve the therapeutic options for the treatment of CE and AE (reviewed in Vuitton, Reference Vuitton2009). These efforts have largely concentrated on the establishment of procedures on how to manage the diseases and by setting up guidelines for treatment and classifications of disease status. Although most successful to a large extent, the current benzimidazole-based chemotherapy is far from optimal and, owing to the limited efficacy of this class of compounds, their side-effects and their costs, alternative drugs or drugs that could be integrated into a combination treatment are clearly needed. Thus, considerably more input and support is needed from academic institutions as well as pharmaceutical and biotechnological industries and governmental agencies to provide solutions for these neglected diseases. A recent survey on the financial resources going into research and development funding in 2007 has shown, that HIV/AIDS received 1·1 billion US dollars, malaria and tuberculosis obtained over 400 million US dollars each, and kinetoplastid diseases and diarrhoeal diseases were granted over 125 and 114 million dollars each. On the other hand, helminth infections as a whole, encompassing nematodes, cestodes and trematodes, received only 51·6 million dollars (Voelker, Reference Voelker2009).

But finances alone will not provide novel possibilities. Until recently, Echinococcus drug discovery has been based on rather anecdotal reports, where a limited number of drugs belonging to a certain compound class have been investigated. However, the Echinococcus drug discovery process has been lacking several important aspects that are compulsary for successfully identifying the best and most interesting compounds. First, we need to gain access to comprehensive compound libraries, and we need to be able to screen these libraries. This can only be done through the implementation of easy-to-handle and reliable medium-to-high-throughput in vitro assays that allow screening of larger numbers of anti-parasitic drugs in an efficient manner. Preferentially, these assays do not rely on subjective microscopic evaluation, but on objective criteria, such as specific markers (e.g. enzyme activities) that indicate parasite viability/intactness or non-viability/damage, and which could be detected preferentially in an (at least) semi-automated system. The development of such assays is ongoing, but should be intensified.

Secondly, large-scale drug screening activities are only possible if sufficient numbers of parasite organisms can be generated in vitro. This prerequisite has been fullfilled due to the pioneering work of Brehm and co-workers (see Spiliotis and Brehm, Reference Spiliotis, Brehm, Rupp and Sohn2008), who developed an E. multilocularis metacestode in vitro culture system that allows the generation of massive numbers of metacestodes out of a relatively small quantity of parasite tissue. This does not only enable researchers to carry out numerous drug-screening assays, but also provides the basis for biochemical studies, including the identification of drug targets for specific compounds by affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry-based sequencing.

Thirdly, it is important to have access to genomic and EST databases. In 2008, shotgun sequencing of the E. multilocularis genome was completed (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Echinococcus/). This opens the door for increased use of in silico approaches for drug target identification, similar to the discovery of the anti-metacestodicidal activity of clarithromycin reported by Mathis et al. already in 2005. In addition, the availiability of a genome database permits drug target identification by affinity chromatography of parasite extracts on drug-coupled matrices and subsequent protein identification by mass spectroscopy (Müller et al. Reference Müller, Naguleswaran, Müller and Hemphill2008a, Reference Müller, Sidler, Nachbur, Wastling, Brunner and Hemphillb).

Furthermore, a system is required to verify putative drug targets and investigate their functional role, preferentially by genetic means, such as over-expression or silencing of genes of interest. The basis for this was set in 2008, when a method for the long-term in vitro cultivation and proliferation of primary cells isolated from axenically grown E. multilocularis metacestodes was established by Spiliotis et al. (Reference Spiliotis, Lechner, Tappe, Scheller, Krohne and Brehm2008). Isolated E. multilocularis cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid carrying the gene coding for the cyano-fluorescent-protein (CFP), and the corresponding gene product was expressed and detected by Western blot analysis. When co-cultured with hepatocytes, cultured E. multilocularis cells form aggegates, and eventually undergo complete in vitro regeneration of metacestode vesicles. Prospectively, this could well lead to the development of transgenic larval stages, and even adult E. multilocularis worms, and genetic tools can be exploited to elucidate the exact functional role of putative drug targets in different stages of development (reviewed in Brehm and Spiliotis, Reference Brehm and Spiliotis2008a).

Finally, the in vitro activity of a compound that exhibits outstanding performance can be verified in vivo, initially preferentially in a relevant small laboratory animal model. The murine or gerbil models for primary and secondary AE (Stettler et al. Reference Stettler, Rossignol, Fink, Walker, Gottstein, Merli, Theurillat, Thormann, Dricot, Segers and Hemphill2004; Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Manfras, Merkle, Harter and Kern2006) represent reliable tools for such in vivo studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 2 billion helminth infections occur in humans worldwide, and these involving the larval stages of the three cestodes E. multilocularis, E. granulosus and T. solium are among the most serious and life-threatening ones (Brehm et al. Reference Brehm, Spiliotis, Zavala-Gongora, Konrad and Frosch2006). From a practical point of view, the E. multilocularis model, in contrast to other cestodes, clearly fulfills the criteria that would allow for intensified drug-screening processes. It displays advantages such as rapid growth and proliferation in vitro, access to comprehensive genomic information and EST- databases, the possibility to maintain parasite isolates routinely in laboratory mice, and to verify in vitro results in a relevant in vivo model. Currently, the monitoring of therapy effectiveness in humans is based methods based on PET scan using 18F-deoxyglucose (Reuter et al. Reference Reuter, Buck, Manfras, Kratzer, Seitz, Darge, Reske and Kern2004). After optimization, such methods could be used for the follow-up of suitable drug candidates in mice or gerbils thereby further reducing the number of animals per study. Compounds that not only act parasitostatic but also parasitocidal against Echinococcus in vivo have not been discovered to date, but it is conceivable that such compounds exist, and that they would be a very useful addition to the arsenal of anti-parasitic drugs against cestodes and trematodes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We apologize to those authors whose contributions could not be cited in this paper. This work was supported through the National Science Foundation (31-111780), the Novartis Research Foundation, Helvetia Sana Foundation, and the Swiss Life Jubiläumsstiftung. JM is a recipient of a research fellowship provided by Novartis Animal Health, and BS has been supported by the Karl Enigk Stiftung.

References

REFERENCES

Ali-Khan, Z., Siboo, R., Gomersall, M. and Faucher, M. (1983). Cystolytic events and the possible role of germinal cells in metastasis in chronic alveolar hydatidosis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 77, 497512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ammann, R. and Eckert, J. (1995). Clinical diagnosis and treatment of echinococcosis in humans. In Echinococcosis and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J.), pp. 411430. CAB International, Wallmingford.Google Scholar
Angelucci, F., Basso, A., Bellelli, A., Brunori, M., Pica Maattoccia, L. and Valle, C. (2007). The anti-schistosomal drug praziquantel is an adenosine antagonist. Parasitology 134, 215–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, B., Mehlhorn, H., Andrews, P. and Thomas, H. (1981). Ultrastructural investigations on the effect of praziquantel on the tegument of five species of cestodes. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 64, 257269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanton, R. E., Wachira, T. M., Zeyhle, E., Njoroge, E. M., Magambo, J. K. and Schantz, P. M. (1988). Oxfendazole treatment of cystic hydatid disease in naturally infected animals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 601605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, K. and Spiliotis, M. (2008 a). Recent advances in the in vitro cultivation and genetic manipulation of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes and germinal cells. Experimental Parasitology 119, 506515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brehm, K. and Spiliotis, M. (2008 b). The influence of host hormones and cytokines on Echinococcus multilocularis signalling and development. Parasite 15, 286289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brehm, K., Spiliotis, M., Zavala-Gongora, R., Konrad, C. and Frosch, M. (2006). The molecular mechanisms of larval cestode development: first steps into an unknown world. Parasitology International 55, S15S21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresson-Hadni, S., Delabrousse, E., Blagosklonov, O., Bartholomot, B., Koch, S., Miguet, J. P., André Mantion, G. and Angèle Vuitton, D. (2006). Imaging aspects and non-surgical interventional treatment in human alveolar echinococcosis. Parasitology International 55 (Suppl.), S267S272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresson-Hadni, S., Vuitton, D. A., Bartholomot, B., Heyd, B., Godart, D., Meyer, J. P., Hrusovsky, S., Becker, M. C., Mantion, G., Lenys, D. and Miguet, J. P. (2000). A twenty year history of alveolar echinococcosis: analysis of a series of 117 patients from eastern France. European Journal of Gasteroenterology and Hepatology 12, 327336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britos, L., Dominguez, L., Ehrlich, R. and Marin, M. (2000). Effect of praziquantel on the strobilar development of Mesocestoides corti in vitro. Journal of Helminthology 74, 295299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunetti, E., Troia, G., Garlaschelli, A. L., Gulizia, R. and Filice, C. (2004). Twenty years of percutaneous treatments for cystic echinococcosis: a preliminary assessment of their use and safety. Parassitologia 46, 367370.Google ScholarPubMed
Budke, C. M. (2006). Global socioeconomic impact of cystic echinococcosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, 296303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, L. H., Wastling, J. M. and Hurd, H. (1989). Action of cyclosporin A on the tapeworms Hymenolepis microstoma, H. diminuta and Mesocestoides corti in vivo. Parasitology 98, 291299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casado, N., Urrea-Paris, M. A., Moreno, M. J. and Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F. (2001). Combined praziquantel and albendazole chemoprophylaxis in experimental hydatidosis. Parasitology Research 87, 787789.Google ScholarPubMed
Chai, J., Menghebat Wie, J., Deyu, S., Bin, L., Jincao, S., Chen, F., Xiong, L., Yiding, M., Xiuling, W., Dolikun, , Guliber, , Yanchun, W., Fanghua, G. and Shuhua, X. (2004). Observations on clinical efficacy of albendazole emulsion in 264 cases of hepatic cystic echinococcosis. Parasitology International 53, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinnery, J. B. and Morris, D. L. (1986). Effects of albendazole sulphoxide on viability of hydatid protoscoleces in vitro. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80, 815817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobo, F., Yarnoz, C., Sesma, B., Fraile, P., Aizcorbe, M., Trujillo, R., Diaz-de-Liano, A. and Ciga, M. A. (1998). Albendazole plus praziquantel versus albendazole alone as preoperative treatment in intra-abdominal hydatidosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus. Tropical Medicine and International Health 3, 462466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colebrook, A. L., Jenkins, D. J., Jones, M. K., Tatarczuch, L. and Lightowlers, M. W. (2004). Effect of cyclosporin A on the survival and ultrastructure of Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces in vitro. Parasitology 129, 497504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, P. S., McManus, D. P., Lightowlers, M. W., Chabalgoity, J. A., Garcia, H. H., Gavidia, C. M., Gilman, R. H., Gonzalez, A. E., Lorca, M., Naquira, C., Nieto, A. and Schantz, P. M. (2007). Prevention and control of cystic echinococcosis. Lancet Infectious Diseases 7, 385394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubey, R., Abuzar, S., Sharma, S., Chatterjee, R. K. and Katiyar, J. C. (1985). Synthesis and anthelmintic activity of 5(6)-(benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamoyl) and (4-substituted piperazin-1-yl)benzimidazoles. Journal of Medical Chemistry 28, 17481750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dueger, E. L., Moro, P. L. and Gilman, R. H. (1999). Oxfendazole treatment of sheep with naturally acquired hydatid disease. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43, 22632267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J. and Deplazes, P. (2004). Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17, 107135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J. and Pohlenz, J. (1976). On the effect of mebendazole on metacestodes of Mesocestoides corti and Echinococcus multilocularis. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie 27, 247262.Google ScholarPubMed
Eckert, J., Thompson, R. C. A. and Mehlhorn, H. (1983). Proliferation and metastases formation of larval Echinococcus multilocularis. I. Animal model, macroscopical and histological findings. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 69, 737748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elissondo, M. C., Albani, C. M., Gende, L., Eguaras, M. and Denegri, G. (2008). Efficacy of thymol against Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. Parasitology International 57, 185190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elissondo, M. C., Ceballos, L., Alvarez, L., Sánchez Bruni, S., Lanusse, C. and Denegri, G. (2009). Flubendazole and ivermectin in vitro combination therapy produces a marked effect on Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces and metacestodes. Parasitology Research. doi. 10.1007/s00436-009-1469-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elissondo, M., Ceballos, L., Dopchiz, M., Andresiuk, V., Alvarez, L., Sanchez Bruni, S., Lanusse, C. and Denegri, G. (2007). In vitro and in vivo effects of flubendazole on Echinococcus granulosus metacestodes. Parasitology Research 100, 10031009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elissondo, M. C., Dopchiz, M. C., Ceballos, L., Alvarez, L., Sanchez Bruni, S., Lanusse, C. and Denegri, G. (2006). In vitro effects of flubendazole on Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces. Parasitology Research 98, 317323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-On, J. (2002). Benzimidazole treatment of cystic echinococcosis. Acta Tropica 85, 243252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, I., Bories, C., Liance, M., and Houin, R. (1995). In vitro quantitative assessment of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode viability after in vivo and in vitro maintenance. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 275278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franchi, C., DiVico, B. and Teggi, A. (1999). Long term evaluation of patients with hydatidosis treated with benzimidazole carbamates. Clinical Infectious Diseases 29, 304309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frayha, G. J., Bikhazi, K. J. and Kachachi, T. A. (1981). Treatment of hydatid cysts (Echinococcus granulosus) by Cetrimide. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75, 447450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, H. H., Gonzales, A. E., Evans, C. A. W. and Gilman, R. H. (2003). Taenia solium cysticercosis. The Lancet 361, 547556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Dominguez, C., Correa, D., Rabiela, M. T. and Flisser, A. (1991). Praziquantel treatment of muscle Taenia solium cysticercosis. 4. Reversible in vitro effect. Parasitology Research 77, 691696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Llamazares, J. L., Alvarez-de-Felipe, A. I., Redondo-Cardena, P., Voces-Alonso, J. A. and Prieto-Fernandez, J. G. (1997). In vivo inhibition of the regenerative capacity of hydatid material after treatment with netobimin. Parasitology Research 83, 105108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavidia, C. M., Gonzalez, A. E., Lopera, L., Jayashi, C., Angelats, R., Barron, E. A., Ninaquispe, B., Villareal, L., Garcia, H. H., Verastegui, M. R. and Gilman, R. (2009). Evaluation of nitazoxanide and oxfendazole efficacy against cystic echinococcosis in naturally infected sheep. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80, 367372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelmedin, V., Caballero-Gamiz, R. and Brehm, K. (2008). Characterization and inhibition of a p38-like mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) from Echinococcus multilocularis: Antiparasitic activities of a p38 MAPK inhibitors. Biochemical Pharmacology 76, 10681081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gnanasekar, M., Salunkhe, A. M., Mallia, A. K., He, Y. X. and Kalyanasundaram, R. (2009). Prazquantel affects the regulatory myosin light chain of Schistosoma mansoni. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 53, 10541060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (1997). Immunopathology of echinococcosis. Chemical Immunology 66, 177208.Google ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S., Katiyar, J. C. and Sen, A. B. (1981). Effect of mode of infection on the development and chemotherapeutic response of Hymenolepis nana in rats. Journal of Helminthology 55, 101107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, D. D., Christie, M. J. and Chevis, R. A. (1975). The lethal effect of mebendazole on secondary Echinococcus granulosus, cysticerci of Taenia pisiformis and tetrathyridia of Mesocestoides corti. Parasitology 70, 273285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, A. and Gottstein, B. (1995). Immunological and morphological studies on the proliferation of in vitro cultivated Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. Parasitology Research 81, 605614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, A. and Kern, P. (2008). Special issue: experimental studies in echinococcosis. Experimental Parasitology 119, 437438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, A. and Mueller, J. (2009). Alveolar and cystic echinococcosis: towards novel chemotherapeutical treatment options. Journal of Helminthology 83, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, A., Mueller, J. and Esposito, M. (2006). Nitazoxanide, a broad-spectrum thiazolide anti-infective agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal infections. Expert Opinion in Pharmacotherapy 7, 953964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, A., Spicher, M., Stadelmann, B., Mueller, J., Naguleswaran, A., Gottstein, B. and Walker, M. (2007). Innovative chemotherapeutical treatment options for alveolar and cystic echinococcosis. Parasitology 134, 16571670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, A., Stettler, M., Walker, M., Siles-Lucas, M., Fink, R. and Gottstein, B. (2002). Culture of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes; an alternative to animal use. Trends in Parasitology 18, 445449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, E., Tsang, T. M., Huang, J. T., Leweke, F. M., Koethe, D., Gerth, C. W., Nolden, B. M., Gross, S., Schreiber, D., Nicholson, J. K. and Bahn, S. (2006). Metabolic profiling of CSF: evidence that early intervention may impact on disease progression and outcome in schizophrenia. PloS Medicine 3, e327. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, R. J. (1997). Albendazole in the treatment of human cystic echinococcosis: 12 years of experience. Acta Tropica 64, 7993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosch, W., Junghanss, T., Stojkovic, M., Brunetti, E., Heye, T., Kauffmann, G. W. and Hull, W. E. (2008). Metabolic viability assessment of cystic echinococcosis using high field 1H MRS of cyst contents. NMR in Biomedicine 21, 734754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrckova, G. and Velebny, S. (1995). Effects of free and liposomized praziquantel on worm burden and antibody response in mice infected with Mesocestoides corti tetrathyridia. Journal of Helminthology 69, 213221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrckova, G. and Velebny, S. (1997). Effect of praziquantel and liposome-incorporated praziquantel on peritoneal macrophage activation in mice infected with Mesocestoides corti tetrathyridia (Cestoda). Parasitology 114, 475482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrckova, G., Velebny, S. and Corba, J. (1998). Effects of free and liposomized praziquantel on the surface morphology and motility of Mesocestoides vogae tetrathyridia (syn. M. corti; Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) in vitro. Parasitology Research 84, 230238.Google Scholar
Hurd, H., Mackenzie, K. S. and Chappell, L. H. (1993). Anthelmintic effects of cyclosporin A on protoscoleces and secondary hydatid cysts of Echinococcus granulosus in the mouse. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 315320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingold, K., Bigler, P., Thormann, W., Cavaliero, T., Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (1999). Efficacies of albendazole sulfoxide and albendazole sulfone against in vitro cultivated Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 43, 10521061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, M. K., Gupta, S., Katiyar, J. C., Maitra, S. C., Singh, J. and Bhakuni, D. S. (1989). Methyl 5(6)-(alpha-hydroxyphenyl methyl) benzimidazole-2-carbamate and cysticercosis: chemotherapeutic and electron microscopic studies. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 27, 454459.Google Scholar
Jeziorski, M. C. and Greenberg, R. M. (2006). Voltage-cated calcium channel subunits from platyhelminths: potential role in praziquantel action. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 625632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jura, H., Bader, A. and Frosch, M. (1998). In vitro activities of benzimidazoles against Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 42, 10521056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jura, H., Bader, A., Hartmann, M., Maschek, H. and Frosch, M. (1996). Hepatic tissue culture model for study of host-parasite interactions in alveolar echinococcosis. Infection and Immunity 64, 34843490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kammerer, W. S. and Perez-Esandi, M. V. (1975). Chemotherapy of experimental Echinococcus granulosus infection. Trials in CF1 mice and jirds (Meriones unguiculatus). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24, 9095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keiser, J., Chollet, J., Xiao, S. H., Mei, J. Y., Jiao, P. Y., Utzinger, J. and Tanner, M. (2009). Mefloquine – an aminoalcohol with promising antischistosomal properties in mice. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keiser, J. and Utzinger, J. (2007 a). Food-borne trematodiasis: current chemotherapy and advance with artemisinins and synthetic trioxolanes. Trends in Parasitology 23, 555562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keiser, J. and Utzinger, J. (2007 b). Artemisinins and synthetic trioxolanes in the treatment of helminthic infections. Current Opinions in Infectious Diseases 20, 605612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, P. (2003). Echinococcus granulosus infection: clinical presentation, medical treatment and outcome. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery 388, 413420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, P. (2006). Medical treatment of echinococcosis under the guidance of Good Clinical Practice (GCP/ICH). Parasitology International 55 (Suppl.), S273S282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, P., Abboud, P., Kern, W. V., Stich, A., Bresson-Hadni, S., Guerin, B., Buttenschoen, K., Gruener, B., Reuter, S. and Hemphill, A. (2008). Critical appraisal of nitazoxanide for the treatment of alveolar echinococcosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, 119.Google Scholar
King, C. H. (2007). Lifting the burden of schistosomiasis – defining elements of infection-associated disease and the benefits of anti-parasite treatment. Journal of Infectious Diseases 196, 653655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, A. B., Roberts-Misterly, J. M., Anderson, P. A. V., Khan, N. and Greenberg, R. M. (2003). Specific sites in the beta interaction domain of schistosome Ca2+ channel -subunit are key to its role in sensitivity to the anti-schistosomal drug praziquantel. Parasitology 127, 349356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launchbury, A. P. and Habboubi, N. (1993). Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity. Cancer Treatment Reviews 19, 197228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, P., Hemphill, A., Deplazes, P., Gottstein, B., and Sarciron, M. E. (1997). Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes: immunological and immunocytochemical analysis of the relationships between alkaline phosphatase and the Em2 antigen. Experimental Parasitology 87, 142149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, P., Walchshofer, N. and Sarciron, M. E. (2001). In vitro effects of isoprinosine and a dipeptide methyl ester on Echinococcus multilocularis protoscoleces. Journal of Helminthology 75, 251257.Google Scholar
Li, J. V., Wang, Y. L., Saric, J., Nicholson, J. K., Dirnhofer, S., Singer, B. H., Tanner, M., Wittlin, S., Holmes, E. and Utzinger, J. (2008). Gobal metabolic responses of NMRI mice to an experimental Plasmodium berghei infection. Journal of Proteome Research 7, 39483956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liance, M., Bresson-Hadni, S., Vuitton, D. A., Lenys, D., Carbillet, J. P. and Houin, R. (1992). Effects of cyclosporin A on the course of murine alveolar echinococcosis and on specific cellular and humoral immune responses against Echinococcus multilocularis. International Journal for Parasitology 22, 2328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liance, M., Nemati, F., Bories, C. and Couvreur, P. (1993). Experience with doxorubicin-bound polyisohexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles on murine alveolar echinococcosis of the liver. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 427429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maki, J. and Yanagisawa, T. (1985). Anthelmintic effects of bithionol, paromomycin sulphate, flubendazole and mebendazole on mature and immature Hymenolepis nana in mice. Journal of Helminthology 59, 211216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, F. P. J., Verdu, E. F., Wang, Y. L., Dumas, M. E., Yap, I. K. S., Cloarec, O., Bergonzelli, G. E., Corthesy-Theulaz, I., Kochhar, S., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., Collins, S. M. and Nicholson, J. K. (2006). Transgenomic interactions in a mouse disease model: interaction of Trichinella spiralis infection with dietary Lactobacillus paracasei supplementation. Journal of Proteome Research 5, 21852193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, J., Perez-Serrano, J., Bernadina, W. E. and Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F. (1999). Echinococcus granulosus: in vivo effects of ivermectin and praziquantel on hsp60 and hsp70 levels. Experimental Parasitology 93, 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez Zedillo, G., Hoyo Badillo, C., Amezcua, J. and Gonzalez Barranco, D. (1992). Verapamil does not block the spastic response of praziquantel on the larvae of Taenia pisiformis. Archives of Medical Research 23, 7377.Google Scholar
Marchiondo, A. A., Ming, R., Andersen, F. L., Slusser, J. H. and Conder, G. A. (1994). Enhanced larval cyst growth of Echinococcus multilocularis in praziquantel-treated jirds (Meriones unguiculatus). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 50, 120127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathis, A., Wild, P., Boettger, E. C., Kapel, C. M. O. and Deplazes, P. (2005). Mitochondrial ribosome as the target for the macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin in the helminth Echinococus multilocularis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49, 32513255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, J., Müller, N., Hemphill, A., Oku, Y., Kamiya, M. and Gottstein, B. (2006). 14-3-3- and II/3-10 gene expression as molecular markers to address viability and growth activity of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. Parasitology 392, 98–105.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, J., Sakamoto, K., Shiniyo, N., Kido, Y., Yamamoto, N., Yagi, K., Miyoshi, H., Nonaka, N., Katakura, K., Kita, K. and Oku, Y. (2008). Anaerobic NADH-fumarate reductase system is predominant in the respiratory chain of Echinococcus multilocularis providing a novel target for the chemotherapy of alveolar echinococcosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 164170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, D. P., Wenbao, Z., Jun, L. and Bartley, P. B. (2003). Echinococcosis. The Lancet 362, 12951304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McTigue, M. A., Williams, D. R. and Tainer, J. A. (1995). Crystal structures of a schistosomal drug and vaccine target: glutathione S-transferase from Schistosoma japonica and its complex with the leading anti-schistosomal drug praziquantel. Journal of Molecular Biology 246, 2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlhorn, H., Eckert, J. and Thompson, R. C. A. (1983). Proliferation and metastases formation of larval Echinococcus multilocularis II. Ultrastructural investigations. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 69, 749763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyaji, S., Katakura, K., Matsufuji, S., Murakami, Y., Hayashi, S., Oku, Y., Okamoto, M. and Kamiya, M. (1993). Failure of treatment with alpha-difluoromethylornithine against secondary multilocular echinococcosis in mice. Parasitology Research 79, 7576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, M. J., Casado, N., Urrea-París, M. A. and Rodríguez-Caabeiro, F. (2002). Could ivermectin have a synergic effect with albendazole in hydatidosis therapy? Parasitology Research 88, 563567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, D. L., Chinnery, J. B. and Ubhi, C. (1987). A comparison of the effects of albendazole, its sulphone metabolite, and mebendazole on the viability of protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus in an in vitro culture system. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 804806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. L., Richards, K. S. and Chinnery, J. B. (1986). Protoscolicidal action of praziquantel – in vitro and electron microscopical studies on Echinococcus granulosus. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 18, 687691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morseth, D. J. (1967). Fine structure of the hydatid cyst and protoscolex of Echinococcus granulosus. Journal of Parasitology 53, 312325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, J., Naguleswaran, A., Müller, N. and Hemphill, A. (2008 a). Neospora caninum: functional inhibition of protein disulfide isomerase by the broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug nitazoxanide and other thiazolides. Experimental Parasitology 118, 8088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, J., Sidler, D., Nachbur, U., Wastling, J., Brunner, T. and Hemphill, A. (2008 b). Thiazolides inhibit growth and induce glutathione-S-transferase Pi (GSTP1)-dependent cell death in human colon cancer cells. International Journal of Cancer 123, 17971806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naguleswaran, A., Spicher, M., Vonlaufen, N., Ortega-Mora, L. M., Torgerson, P., Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (2006). In vitro metacestodicidal activities of genistein and other isoflavones against Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, 37703778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakao, M., McManus, D. P., Schantz, P. M., Craig, P. S. and Ito, A. (2007) A molecular phylogeny of the genus Echinococcus inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Parasitology 134, 713722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nessim, N. G., Hassan, S. I., William, S. and El-Baz, H. (2000). Efffect of the broad spectrum antheminthic drug flubenadazole upon Schistosoma mansoni experimentally infected mice. Arztneimittelforschung 50, 11291133.Google Scholar
Nogi, T., Zhang, D., Chan, J. D., and Marchant, J. S. (2009). A novel bological activity of praziqunatel requiring voltage-operated Ca2+ channel beta subunits: subversion of flatworm regenerative polarity. PloS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, e464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, M. and Blackburn, B. J. (1985). Comparison of the effects of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carbamates and benzimidazole-2-carbamates on the development of Hymenolepis nana in Tribolium confusum. Experientia 41, 687689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochieng'-Mitula, P. J. and Burt, M. D. (1996). The effects of ivermectin on the hydatid cyst of Echinococcus granulosus after direct injection at laparotomy. Journal of Parasitology 82, 155157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordovas, J. M. and Mooser, V. (2006). Metagenomics: the role of the microbiome in cardivascular diseases. Current Opinion in Lipidology 17, 157161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomares-Alonso, F., Piliado, J. C., Palencia, G., Ortiz-Plata, A. and Jung-Cook, H. (2007). Efficacy of nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, and tizoxanide/albendazole sulphoxide combination against Taenia crassiceps cysts. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 59, 212218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez Serrano, J., Casado, N., Guillermo, , Denegri, , Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F. (1994). The effects of albendazole and albendazole sulphoxide combination-therapy on Echinococcus granulosus in vitro. International Journal for Parasitology 24, 219224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rausch, R. L. (1995). Life cycle patterns and geographic distribution of Echinococcus species. In Echinococcosis and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J.), pp. 8999. Wallmingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Reuter, S., Buck, A., Grebe, O., Nüssle-Kügele, K., Kern, P. and Manfras, B. (2003 b). Salvage treatment with amphotericin B in progressive human alveolar echinococcosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 35863591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuter, S., Buck, A., Manfras, B., Kratzer, W., Seitz, H. M., Darge, K., Reske, S. N. and Kern, P. (2004). Structured treatment interuption in patients with alveolar echinococcosis. Hepatology 39, 509517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, S., Jensen, B., Buttenschoen, K., Kratzer, W. and Kern, P. (2000). Benzimidazoles in the treatment of alveolar echinococcosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 46, 451460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuter, S., Manfras, B., Merkle, M., Harter, G. and Kern, P. (2006). In vitro activities of itraconazole, methiazole, and nitazoxanide versus Echinococcus multilocularis larvae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, 29662970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuter, S., Merkle, M., Brehm, K., Kern, P. and Manfras, B. (2003 a). Effect of amphotericin B on larval growth of Echinococcus multilocularis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 620625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, M. W., Hoev, E. M., Fairweather, I., Dalton, J. P., McGonigle, S. and Trudgett, A. (2001). Characterization of a beta tubulin gene from the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 12641268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F., Casado, N. and Juarez-Pelaez, E. (1989). Efecto in vitro de praziquantel, mebendazole y oxfendazole sobre protoscolex de Echinococcus granulosus. Revista Iberica Parasitologica 49, 7783.Google Scholar
Rogan, M. T. and Richards, K. S. (1986). Echinococcus granulosus: in vivo effect of monensin on the tegument of the protoscolex. Parasitology 93, 347355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldana, J., Marin, M., Fernandez, C. and Dominguez, L. (2001). In vitro taurocholate-induced segmentation and clustering of Mesocestoides vogae (syn. corti) tetrathyridia (Cestoda) – inhibition by cestocidal drugs. Parasitology Research 87, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarciron, E. M., Bresson-Hadni, S., Mercier, M., Lawton, P., Duranton, C., Lenys, D., Petavy, A. F. and Vuitton, D. A. (1997). Antibodies against Echinococcus multi locularis phosphatase as markers for the specific diagnosis and the serological monitoring of alveolar echinococcosis. Parasite Immunology 19, 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarciron, M. E., Hamoud, W., Azzar, G., and Petavy, A. F. (1991). Alkaline phosphatase from Echinococcus multilocularis: purification and characterization. Compendium of Biochemistry and Physiology 100, 253258.Google ScholarPubMed
Saric, J., Li, J. V., Wang, Y., Keiser, J., Bundy, J. G., Holmes, E. and Utzinger, J. (2008). Metabolic profiling of an Echinostoma caproni infection in the mouse for biomarker discovery. PloS Neglected Tropcial Diseases 2, e254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schantz, P. M., Chai, J., Craig, P. S., Eckert, J., Jenkins, D. J., Macpherson, C. N. L. and Thakur, A. (1995). Epidemiology and control of hydatid disease. In Echinococcosis and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A. and Lymbery, A. J.),pp. 233245. Wallmingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Schipper, H. G., Koopmans, R. P., Nagy, J., Butter, J. J., Kaeger, P. A. and Van Boxtel, C. J. (2000). Effect of dose increase or cimetidine co-administration on albendazole bioavailability. American Journal of Trpocial Medicine and Hygiene 63, 270273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, J. (1998). Effects of benzimidazole antheminthics as microtubule-active drugs on the synthesis of surface glycoconjugates in Echinostoma caproni, Hymenolepis microstoma and Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology Research 84, 362368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G. and Neuhaus, P. (2001). The physiological estrogen metabolite 2-methoxyestradiol reduces tunor growth and induces apoptosis in human solid tunors. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 127, 405410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shandera, W. X. and Kass, J. S. (2006). Neurocysticercosis: current knowledge and advances. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 6, 453459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siles-Lucas, M. and Hemphill, A. (2002). Cestode parasites: Application of in vivo and in vivo models for studies on the host-parasite relationship. Advances in Parasitology 51, 133230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicher, M., Naguleswaran, A., Ortega-Mora, L. M., Mueller, J., Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (2008 a). In vitro and in vivo effects of 2-methoxyestradiol, either alone, or combined with albendazole, against Echinococcus metacestodes. Experimental Parasitology 119, 475482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spicher, M., Roethlisberger, C., Lany, C., Stadelmann, B., Keiser, J., Ortega-Mora, L. M., Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (2008 b). In vitro and in vivo treatments of Echinococcus protoscoleces and metacestodes with artemisinin derivatives. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 34473450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiliotis, M. and Brehm, K. (2008). Axenic in vitro cultivation of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode vesicles and the generation of primary cell cultures. In Host Pathogen Interactions (ed. Rupp, S. and Sohn, K.),pp. 245262. Humana Press.Google Scholar
Spiliotis, M., Lechner, S., Tappe, D., Scheller, D., Krohne, G. and Brehm, K. (2008). Transient tranfection of Echinococcus multilocularis primary cells and complete in vitro regeneration of metacestode vesicles. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 10251039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiliotis, M., Tappe, D., Sesterhenn, L. and Brehm, K. (2004). Long-term in vitro cultivation of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes under axenic conditions. Parasitology Research 92, 430432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stettler, M., Fink, R., Walker, M., Gottstein, B., Geary, T. G., Rossignol, J. F. and Hemphill, A. (2003). In vivo parasiticidal effect of nitazoxanide against Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 467474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stettler, M., Rossignol, J. F., Fink, R., Walker, M., Gottstein, B., Merli, M., Theurillat, R., Thormann, W., Dricot, E., Segers, R. and Hemphill, A. (2004). Secondary and primary murine alveolar echinococcosis: combined albendazole/nitazoxanide chemotherapy exhibits profound anti-parasitic activity. International Journal for Parasitology 34, 615624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stettler, M., Siles-Lucas, M., Sarciron, E., Lawton, P., Gottstein, B. and Hemphill, A. (2001). Echinococcus multilocularis alkaline phosphatase as a marker for metacestode damage induced by in vitro drug treatment with albendazole sulphoxide and albendazole sulfone. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 22562262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stey, C. and Jost, R. (1993). Rezidivierende, lebensbedroliche Anaphylaxie als Erstmanifestation eines Echinococcus cysticus (granulosus) der Leber. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenzeitschrift 123, 14451450.Google Scholar
Tallima, H. and El Ridi, R. (2007). Praziquantel binds Schistosoma mansoni adult worm actin. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 29, 570575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. H. and Morris, D. L. (1988). In vitro culture of Echinococcus multilocularis: protoscolicidal action of praziquantel and albendazole sulphoxide. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82, 265267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. H., Richards, K. S. and Morris, D. L. (1989). Rapid recovery of Echinococcus granulosus following ‘successful’ albendazole therapy in a gerbil model. Journal of Helminthology 63, 349352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellez-Giron, E., Ramos, M. C. and Montante, M. (1981). Effect of flubendazole on Cysticercus cellulosae in pigs. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 30, 135138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellez-Giron, E., Ramos, M. C., Dufour, L., Montante, M., Tellez, E. Jr.Rodriguez, J., Gomez-Mendez, F. and Mireles, E. (1984). Treatment of neurocysticercosis with flubendazole. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 33, 627631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terenina, N. V., Kosovatova, L. A., Gerasimova, E. I. and Shalaeva, N. M. (1998). The effect of anthelmintics on the serotonin content of cestodes. Meditsinskaia parazitologiia i parazitarnye bolezni 1, 1015.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. A. (1986). Biology and systematics of Echinococcus. In The Biology of Echinococcus and Hydatid Disease (ed. Thompson, R. C. A.), pp. 5–17. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Urrea-Paris, M. A., Casado, N., Moreno, M. J. and Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F. (2001). Chemoprophylactic praziquantel treatment in experimental hydatidosis. Parasitology Research 87, 510512.Google ScholarPubMed
Urrea-Paris, M. A., Moreno, M. J., Casado, N. and Rodriguez-Caabeiro, F. (1999). Echinococcus granulosus: praziquantel treatment against the metacestode stage. Parasitology Research 85, 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utzinger, J., Chollet, J., Tu, Z., Xiao, S. and Tanner, M. (2002). Comparative study of the effects of artemether and artesunate on juvenile and adult Schistosoma mansoni in experimentally infected mice. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96, 318323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varcasia, A., Garippa, G., Pipia, A. P., Scala, A., Brianti, E., Giannetto, S., Battelli, G., Poglayen, G. and Micagni, G. (2008) Cystic echinococcosis in equids in Italy. Parasitology Research 102, 815818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verheyen, A., Vanparijs, O., Borgers, M. and Thienpont, D. (1978). Scanning electron microscopic observations of Cysticercus fasciolaris (=Taenia taeniaeformis) after treatment of mice with mebendazole. Journal of Parasitology 64, 411425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voelker, R. (2009). Attention sought for negelected diseases. Journal of the American Medical Association 301, 17551756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuitton, D. (2009). Benzimidazoles for the treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis: what is the consensus? Expert Review in Anti-Infective Therapy 7, 145149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vutova, K., Mechkov, G., Vachkov, P., Petkov, R., Georgiev, P., Handjiev, S., Ivanov, A. and Todorov, T. (1999). Effect of mebendazole on human cystic echinococcosis: the role of dosage and treatment duration. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 93, 357365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, M., Rossignol, J. F., Torgerson, P. and Hemphill, A. (2004). In vivo effects of nitazoxanide on Echinococcus granulosus protoscoleces and metacestodes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 54, 609616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. L., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., Cloarec, O., Chollet, J., Tanner, M., Singer, B. H. and Utzinger, J. (2004). Metabolomic investigations in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni: an approach for biomarker identification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 1267612681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. L., Utzinger, J., Saric, J., Li, J. V., Burckhardt, J., Dirnhofer, S., Nicholson, J. K., Singer, B. H., Brun, R. and Holmes, E. (2008). Global metabolic responses of mice to Trypanosoma brucei brucei infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105, 61276132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y. L., Utzinger, J., Xiao, S. H., Xue, J., Nicholson, J. K., Tanner, M., Singer, B. H. and Holmes, E. (2006). System level metabolic effects of a Schistosoma japonicum infection in the Syrian hamster. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 146, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, H., New, R. R., Muhmut, M., Wang, J. H., Wang, Y. H., Zhang, J. H., Shao, Y. M. and Craig, P. S. (1996). Pharmacology and efficacy of liposome-entrapped albendazole in experimental secondary alveolar echinococcosis and effect of co-administration with cimetidine. Parasitology 113, 111121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiest, P. M., Li, Y., Olds, R. and Bowen, W. D. (1992). Inhibition of phosphoinositide turnover by praziquantel in Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 78, 753755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, S., Guirgus, F. and Nessim, N. G. (2003). Effect of simultaneous and/or consective administration of the broad spectrum anthelminthic flubendazole together with praziquantel in experimental Schistosoma mansoni infection. Arztneimittelforschung 53, 532537.Google Scholar
Winning, A., Braslins, P. and McCarthy, J. S. (2009). Case report: nitazoxanide for the treatment of refractory bony hydatid disease. American Journal of Tropical Medicne and Hygiene 80, 176178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. SEM of E. granulosus (A, B) and E. multilocularis (C, D) metacestodes. A and C represent lower magnification views of broken vesicles, exoposing both the acellular laminated layer (LL) and the germinal layer (GL); bars=1·5 mm. B and D represent higher magnification views of the germinal layer of E. granulosus and E. multilocularis, respectively; bars=400 μm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. TEM of E. multilocularis metacestodes cultured in vitro. A shows a low magnification view of a section through the metacestode wall, with laminated (LL) and germinal layer (GL); bar=7 μm. B shows a higher magnification view, demonstrating LL, GL-tissue with different cell types including undifferentiated cells with a large nucleus and nucleolus (uc), and the tegument with microtriches (arrows); bar=3·2 μm. C and D show higher magnification views of longitudinally sectioned (C; bar=0·56 μm) and cross-sectioned (D; bar=0·43 μm) microtriches revealing actin microfilaments as main structural components. Also note the filamentous meshwork of electron-dense thin filaments that is embedded into the matrix of the LL.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Exogenous and endogenous proliferation of E. multilocularis metacestodes in vitro. Exogenous outgrowth of a newly formed vesicle (arrows in A–B) from a pre-exisiting parent vesicle appears to be followed by budding off of the daughter vesicle (C). Vesicles are also formed within older metacestodes, most likely by emerging out of the germinal layer, and these smaller metacestodes are released upon desintegration of the older metacestode (D, E).

Figure 3

Table 1. A selection of drug candidates against cystic hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus.

Figure 4

Table 2. A selection of drug candidates against alveolar echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus multilocularis