Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:04:35.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early CD44hiCD4+ and CD44hiCD8+ T cell numbers and the absence of mannose-rich glycoconjugates determine the protective outcome of anti-leishmanial immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

L. KEDZIERSKI*
Affiliation:
Infection and Immunity Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
J. M. CURTIS
Affiliation:
Infection and Immunity Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
K. KEDZIERSKA
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Infection and Immunity Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Pde, Parkville3052, Australia. Tel: +61 3 93452475. Fax +61 3 93450852. E-mail: kedzierski@wehi.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Vaccination remains the best hope for control of all forms of leishmaniasis, and the development of a safe and effective vaccine is a critical global public-health priority. Our previous work showed that immunization with non-persistent phosphomannomutase-deficient (ΔPMM) Leishmania major parasites confers significant protection in susceptible BALB/c mice due to increased T-cell numbers and suppression of IL-10 and IL-13 early during infection. Here, we complemented the ΔPMM L. major parasites with human PMM2 to determine whether we could further improve the protection. Complemented ΔPMM parasites have restored glycoconjugate biosynthesis, while retaining avirulence of the parental knockout strain. Immunization with hPMM2 add-back parasites showed similar Th1/Th2 cytokine profiles to that observed in ΔPMM-vaccinated mice. However, the numbers of the activated CD4+CD44hi and CD8+CD44hi T cells recruited to the draining lymph nodes early after Leishmania infection were reduced, leading to decreased protection following hPMM2-immunization. Thus, the magnitude of T-cell responses early in the infection and the absence of mannose-rich glycoconjugates determine the protective outcome of anti-leishmanial immunity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

INTRODUCTION

Leishmaniasis is a disease that ranges in severity from skin lesions to serious disfigurement and fatal systemic infection. WHO estimates that there are 2 million new cases of leishmaniasis each year, 12 million people are currently infected worldwide, and leishmaniasis threatens 350 million people in 88 countries. Therefore, vaccination remains the best hope for control of all forms of the disease, and the development of a safe and effective vaccine is a critical global public-health priority. However, there are no vaccines against leishmaniasis, and chemotherapy is the only means of treatment (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Zhu and Handman2006b). The subunit vaccines tested so far did not lead to development of long-term immunity, and the lack of protection has been linked to the requirement for live, persistent parasites maintaining effector T-cell immunity (Uzonna et al. Reference Uzonna, Wei, Yurkowski and Bretscher2001). Thus, the live-attenuated vaccine provides an appealing alternative. However, it appears that parasitic persistence is not a desirable feature of a live-attenuated vaccine as evidenced by L. major parasites lacking the lpg2 gene. Although these mutant parasites persist in mice without causing the disease and trigger protective response against virulent challenge (Spath et al. Reference Spath, Lye, Segawa, Sacks, Turco and Beverley2003; Uzonna et al. Reference Uzonna, Spath, Beverley and Scott2004), they regain their ability to cause infection over time (Spath et al. Reference Spath, Lye, Segawa, Turco and Beverley2004), making them unsuitable as the vaccine. Thus, the non-persistent parasites capable of inducing potent protective anti-leishmanial immunity are of interest as potential vaccine candidates.

We have recently shown that immunization with non-persistent phosphomannomutase-deficient (ΔPMM) parasites confers protection in highly susceptible BALB/c mice (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). The protection was associated with the increased magnitude of T-cell responses in immunized animals and ability to suppress production of IL-10 and IL-13 early during infection, thus affecting the outcome of the disease in favour of the host. Non-persistence of ΔPMM parasites was a consequence of a deletion of the pmm gene, which abrogated biosynthesis of all mannose-rich glycoconjugates, including lipophosphoglycan (LPG), proteophoshpoglycan (PPG) and Parasite Surface Antigen-2 (PSA-2), molecules that are essential to parasite virulence and survival (Garami et al. Reference Garami, Mehlert and Ilg2001). However, it is possible that deletion of PMM limits the protective anti-leishmanial immunity as strong responses might be directed towards the surface glycoconjugates. Thus, in the present study we set out to determine whether ΔPMM parasites complemented with human phosphomannomutase 2 (hPMM2) would still remain non-persistent and avirulent, but elicit even more potent anti-leishmanial immunity and a better protective outcome than that seen following ΔPMM parasite immunization. To address this question, we generated L. major ΔPMM parasites complemented with hPMM2 that was expressed either episomally (hPMM2epi) or integrated into ribosomal DNA locus (hPMM2int). Our data show that these add-back parasites express hPMM2 and have restored glycoconjugate biosynthesis (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Malby, Smith, Perugini, Hodder, Ilg, Colman and Handman2006a), but remain avirulent in vivo. Although the Th1/Th2 cytokine profile in hPMM2 add-back vaccinated mice was similar to that observed in ΔPMM vaccinated mice, the numbers of the activated CD4+CD44hi and CD8+CD44hi T cells recruited to the draining lymph node early after Leishmania infection was reduced. This led to a total lack of protection by immunization with either hPMM2epi or hPMM2int parasites as assessed by lesion scores and parasite burdens. Thus, our study suggests that the magnitude of T-cell responses early in the infection and the absence of mannose-rich glycoconjugates determine the protective outcome of anti-leishmanial immunity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice, vaccinations and Leishmania infection

BALB/c mice at 6–8 weeks were bred at the Institute's animal facility. Animal experiments followed the NHMRC Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes guidelines and have been approved by the Institute's Animal Ethics Committee.

L. major MHOM/IL/80/Friedlin, ΔPMM and hPMM2 add-back parasites were maintained at 26°C in M199 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated FBS (Trace Biosciences).

To test for parasite virulence naïve BALB/c and nude (athymic) mice at 8 weeks were inoculated subcutaneously/intradermally at the base of the tail with 106 parasites (various strains) and lesion development was monitored on weekly bases. Naïve BALB/c mice at 8 weeks were vaccinated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 5×107 hPMM2 add-back or ΔPMM parasites in PBS 4 weeks prior to challenge. Mice were challenged by intradermal injection of 106 virulent L. major at the base of the tail and lesion development was monitored weekly using a semi-quantitative scoring system (Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Curtis, Handman and McKenzie1980; Mitchell, Reference Mitchell1983). The following scoring was employed: 0=no lesion or minor injection or healing scar, 1=small swelling, 2=large swelling or lesion less than 5 mm in diameter, 3=lesion 5–10 mm in diameter, 4=lesion greater than 10 mm in diameter and/or metastasis. Data are expressed as the arithmetic mean±standard error of the lesion score for the group of mice.

Generation of mutant and add-back parasites

L. major ΔPMM and hPMM2epi parasites were generated as previously described (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Malby, Smith, Perugini, Hodder, Ilg, Colman and Handman2006a). For the hPMM2 integrated gene add-back, the human pmm2 ORF was amplified from Clone 3611382 NIH Mammalian Gene Collection (Invitrogen) using primers p369 (TCCCCCGGGATGGCAGCGCCTGGCCCAGCG) and p370 (TGCTCTAGATCAGGAGAACAGCAGTTCAC) and cloned into the pIR1SAT vector (a gift from Professor Stephen Beverley, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA). The linear SwaI construct was transfected into L. major Friedlin ΔPMM promastigotes and transfectants were selected by growth in medium containing 100 μg/ml of nourseothricin (Jena Bioscience, Germany).

Tissue sampling and cell preparation

Spleens and draining (inguinal) lymph nodes (dLN) were recovered from mice at 1, 2 and 6 weeks following Leishmania infection. Spleens and LN were passed through 40 μm sieves to generate a single cell suspension. Parasite burdens were determined by limited dilution analysis (Titus et al. Reference Titus, Marchand, Boon and Louis1985). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA test with Dunnett's post-test comparing immunized groups to the control group.

Cytokine analyses

Cytokine levels were assessed by capture ELISA and ICS as previously described (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). Briefly, splenic lymphocytes and dLN cells were resuspended in C-RPMI (10% FBS, 2-mercaptoethanol, antibiotics and L-glutamine), plated in 48-well plates (Costar, NY, USA) in the presence of 4×106 irradiated (3000 rad) splenocytes and stimulated for 3 days at 37°C with soluble Leishmania antigen (SLA). For ELISA, culture supernatants were collected following stimulation and added in duplicates at appropriate dilutions to U-bottom 96-well plates (Thermo Labsystems, MA, USA) coated with capture antibodies against IL-4, IL-10, IL-12 (p40/p70) and IFN-γ (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA). Following overnight incubation at 4°C and washing, biotin anti-mouse IL-4, IL-10, IL-12 (p40/p70) and IFN-γ antibodies were added, followed by incubation with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:5000). Plates were developed with ABTS in 0·1 m citric acid, pH 4·2. Absorbance values were read at 405 nm. IL-13 ELISA was performed using Mouse IL-13 DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D Systems, MN, USA). For ICS, cultured cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml PMA and 500 ng/ml ionomycin in the presence of 2 μg/ml brefeldin A for 4 h at 37°C. Cells were stained for surface markers CD4-PE, CD8-PerCP and CD44-APC or FITC, fixed and permeabilized. Cells were stained for either IFN-γ-FITC or IL-4-APC (BD Pharmingen). Cell fluorescence was analysed by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer, data were analysed using BD CellQuest Pro software. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA test with Dunnett's post-test comparing immunized groups to the control group.

RESULTS

Human PMM2 add-back parasites are avirulent

We have previously demonstrated that hPMM2epi parasites express glycoconjugates on their surface, but do not survive in macrophages in vitro and remain avirulent in vivo. Our data show that hPMM2 add-backs (both hPMM2epi (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Malby, Smith, Perugini, Hodder, Ilg, Colman and Handman2006a) and hPMM2int, data not shown) have restored synthesis of glycoconjugates (PPG, LPG and PSA-2), whereas they could not be detected in ΔPMM parasites. The level of expression as assessed by Western blotting with appropriate antibodies was comparable to that observed in wild type (WT) parasites. In vitro, add-back parasites do not display any growth abnormalities, but hPMM2epi have growth kinetics similar to ΔPMM parasites rather than WT L. major (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Malby, Smith, Perugini, Hodder, Ilg, Colman and Handman2006a). Here, we tested the ability of hPMM2int add-backs to cause chronic Leishmania infection in susceptible BALB/c mice in comparison to WT parasites, hPMM2epi add-backs, ΔPMM parasites and PMM+/− single knockouts. Following intradermal injection of mice with either 106 hPMM2epi or hPMM2int add-back parasites at the base of the tail, no lesion development was observed after 15 weeks (Fig. 1A), or subsequent 3 months (data not shown). Furthermore, parasites could not be recovered from dLN at 2 months post-infection (Fig. 1B), confirming the avirulent nature of hPMM2-complemented parasites. Similarly, injection of hPMM2epi and hPMM2int parasites into the nude mice led to a lack of any lesion development during a period of 8 months (data not shown).

Fig. 1. hPMM2-complemented Leishmania major ΔPMM parasites are avirulent in vivo. (A) Lesion progression was monitored over a period of 15 weeks. Mean lesion scores (wild type, n=20; hPMM2epi, n=8, hPMM2int, n=12, ΔPMM+/−, n=12; ΔPMM, n=12) were plotted. Error bars represent the s.e.m. (B) dLN were harvested at 2 months post-infection and parasite burdens were estimated by limited dilution method. Representative data for 2 mice per group are plotted. Error bars represent the s.e.m.

Immunization with PMM2 add-back parasites leads to suppression of IL-10 and IL-13 production early during infection

Immunization with non-persistent ΔPMM parasites led to a strong anti-leishmanial protection associated with increased T-cell numbers and ability to suppress production of IL-10 and IL-13 early during infection (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). To assess the immune responses in mice immunized with live hPMM2-complemented parasites, we determined the levels of Th1-type cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-12) associated with protection (Fig. 2) and Th2-type cytokines (IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13) linked to suppression of protective immunity (Fig. 3). Cytokine production was assessed in spleen and dLN cells after 3 days ex vivo stimulation with soluble Leishmania antigen (SLA) by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and capture ELISA.

Fig. 2. ELISA analysis of Th1-type cytokine production by splenocytes and dLN cells from non-immunized controls and mice immunized with live hPMM2 add-back and ΔPMM parasites. At 1, 2 and 6 weeks post-challenge spleens and dLN cells were stimulated with SLA. Following 72 h stimulation at 37°C, supernatants were collected and analysed for secretion of IFN-γ and IL-12 by ELISA. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point, mean data plotted (n=3, in duplicates), error bars represent the s.e.m.

Fig. 3. ELISA analysis of Th2-type cytokine production by splenocytes and dLN cells from non-immunized controls and mice immunized with live hPMM2 add-back and ΔPMM parasites. At 1, 2 and 6 weeks post-challenge spleens and dLN cells were stimulated with SLA. Following 72 h stimulation at 37°C, supernatants were collected and analysed for secretion of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 by ELISA. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point, mean data plotted (n=3, in duplicates), error bars represent the s.e.m.

As reported previously for ΔPMM immunization (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008), no IL-4 secretion and no significant difference in the numbers of either CD44hiCD4+ or CD44hiCD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ could be detected by ICS in any of the groups at any time-point in either spleen or dLN (data not shown). Consistent with the ICS data, low levels of IL-4 secretion were detected by ELISA, with no differences found between the groups at different time-points (Fig. 3). Similarly, no differences in either IFN-γ or IL-12 production were observed between the control or immunized groups (Fig. 2).

However, the significant differences were observed early after Leishmania infection (week 1) in production of IL-10 and IL-13 in both the spleen and dLN of control mice compared to hPMM2 add-back immunized animals. An average of 3·18±0·46 ng/ml of IL-10 was detected in the cultured splenocytes of non-immunized animals compared to 0·76±0·14 ng/ml for hPMM2epi (P value in a range 0·001–0·01) and 0·99±0·02 ng/ml for hPMM2int (P value in a range 0·001–0·01) vaccinated mice. Similar differences were observed in dLN culture supernatants with controls showing 5·0±0·27 ng/ml of IL-10 compared to an average of 0·36±0·36 ng/ml for hPMM2int (P<0·001), while in hPMM2epi immunized mice IL-10 levels were below the detection level. An average of 12·8±0·69 ng/ml of IL-13 was detected for the non-immunized animals compared to 3·26±0·02 ng/ml for hPMM2epi immunized mice (P<0·001) and 4·94±0·54 ng/ml for hPMM2int immunized mice (P=0·004). In dLN culture supernatants control mice produced 13·0±0·74 ng/ml vs 0·12 ng/ml (P<0·001) and 1·53±1·29 ng/ml (P<0·001) for hPMM2epi and hPMM2int immunized mice, respectively.

No significant differences in cytokine production were found between hPMM2epi and hPMM2int immunized mice. Cytokine profiles of both groups were comparable to ΔPMM-immunized mice (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008) (Figs 2 and 3), which rendered significant protection and anti-leishmanial immunity.

Immunization with hPMM2 add-back parasites does not lead to the recruitment of the activated CD44hiCD4+ and CD44hiCD8+ T cells to the draining lymph node

Immunization with ΔPMM parasites leads to expansion of CD44hiCD4+ and CD44hiCD8+ T cell numbers and their rapid recruitment into dLN following Leishmania infection (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). We have assessed the numbers of activated CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+T cells in mice immunized with hPMM2-complemented parasites at week 1 and 2 following the virulent challenge (Fig. 4). There was no significant increase in numbers of recruited CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+ T cells in mice immunized with hPMM2int or hPMM2epi compared to controls, while in mice immunized with ΔPMM parasites we observed an increase in number of recruited CD44hiCD8+ (p value in a range 0·001–0·01 cf. controls) and CD44hiCD4+ T cells. At week 2 post-infection hPMM2int-immunized mice showed no difference in numbers of recruited antigen experienced cells compared to controls, while in hPMM2epi-immunized mice we observed a decrease in the magnitude of T cell responses. Overall, numbers of CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+ T cells in add-back immunized groups were maintained at the same or lower level as in controls, whereas ΔPMM-immunized animals displayed increased numbers of both CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+ T cells in dLN at the early stages of Leishmania infection (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Numbers of CD8+CD44hi and CD4+CD44hi T cells early after Leishmania major challenge. Numbers of antigen-experienced CD44hiCD8+ (left panel) and CD44hiCD4+ (right panel) T cells within dLN were calculated based on total cell counts and staining with mAbs against surface CD44 and CD4 or CD8. Data are plotted as absolute numbers of CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+ detected in draining lymph nodes by FACS and represent pooled dLN for each mouse and a mean value from 3 mice per group. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point. Error bars represent the s.e.m.

Vaccination with hPMM2 add-back parasites does not protect mice against virulent L. major challenge

To investigate whether live hPMM2 add-back parasites can provide protection against L. major infection, groups of 20 susceptible BALB/c mice were immunized i.p. with 5×107 hPMM2 add-back or ΔPMM parasites at 4 weeks prior to challenge. Naïve controls and vaccinated mice were subsequently challenged intradermally with 106 virulent L. major Friedlin parasites. The majority of control mice developed progressive infection and were sacrificed at 12 weeks post-challenge. As predicted from the early CD44hiCD4+ and CD44hiCD8+ T cell responses in dLN (Fig. 5), animals immunized with hPMM2 add-back parasites were not able to control the infection and developed lesions identical to those observed in unvaccinated controls (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5. Immunization with live, hPMM2-complemented ΔPMM Leishmania major parasites does not provide protection against virulent challenge. (A) Mice were vaccinated i.p. with 5×107 live hPMM2int (n=29) or hPMM2epi (n=14) parasites 4 weeks prior to infection and challenged along with naïve (n=36) and ΔPMM immunized (n=22) mice with 106L. major Friedlin parasites at the base of the tail. Lesion scores were monitored for 12 weeks, data plotted for 2 independent experiments, error bars represent the s.e.m. (B) Parasite burdens in hPMM2int and hPMM2epi vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. dLN were harvested at different time-points following challenge and parasite burdens estimated by limited dilution method. Pooled data from 2 mice are plotted, error bars represent the s.e.m. Representative data from ΔPMM vaccinated mice included for comparison (n=6 for week 2 and n=11 for week 6 and 11).

Mice from all the vaccinated groups were sacrificed at 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-challenge and parasite burdens in the dLN were estimated by limiting dilution analysis. In agreement with lesion size, vaccinated mice showed no difference in parasitic load compared to controls throughout the trial, despite an early trend indicating smaller parasite burdens in vaccinated animals (Fig. 3B). Thus, despite the favourable IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio in spleen and dLN of mice immunized with hPMM2 add-back parasites, these animals were not protected against virulent challenge, consistent with lower numbers of the activated Leishmania-specific CD44hiCD8+ T cells and CD44hiCD4+ T cells compared to those achieved after protective ΔPMM immunization.

DISCUSSION

Our study assessed protective efficacy of L. major ΔPMM parasites complemented with hPMM2, and showed that mice were not protected following immunization with live add-back parasites. This is in contrast with our previous study showing that ΔPMM parasites were able to trigger protective anti-leishmanial responses in susceptible BALB/c mice (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). Paradoxically, hPMM2 complement parasites have restored surface glycoconjugate biosynthesis, yet remain avirulent in macrophages in vitro and in mice in vivo, behaviour reminiscent of ΔPMM parasites.

Leishmanial PMM shares a high degree of similarity with its human isoforms, PMM1 and PMM2 (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Malby, Smith, Perugini, Hodder, Ilg, Colman and Handman2006a), therefore it was not surprising that hPMM2 was able to functionally complement the knockout parasites. However, the reason for their avirulence remains to be elucidated. Under culture conditions, hPMM2epi parasites maintain the episome due to the drug pressure, which can then be lost in vivo rendering the parasites virtually identical to ΔPMM mutants. However, in case of the hPMM2int add-back, the pmm2 has been integrated into the chromosomal locus of ΔPMM parasites and its expression is independent of drug selection. We have demonstrated that one copy of indigenous pmm gene is sufficient for the parasite to remain virulent, albeit with a delayed phenotype. The avirulent nature of hPMM2-complemented parasites opened an interesting possibility to explore their protective potential as a live-attenuated vaccine. Their intracellular killing and degradation should provide a full complement of peptides for presentation and all molecules that are essential for parasite survival and virulence should become available for presentation. Due to an as yet unidentified defect these molecules are not able to restore parasite virulence, hence they might not be able to modulate macrophage function and cytokine responses as reported for the wild-type parasites (Bogdan and Rollinghoff, Reference Bogdan and Rollinghoff1998). In principle, these parasites should trigger a better immune response that leads to a better protective outcome than that observed following immunization with ΔPMM parasites.

Unexpectedly, the complementation with hPMM2 led to the loss of protective capacity of ΔPMM parasites. This was due, at least in part, to reduced numbers of CD44hiCD8+ T cells and CD44hiCD4+ T cells in dLN early after Leishmania immunization. The cytokine profile in add-back immunized animals did not differ significantly between the two groups nor was it much different from that observed following ΔPMM immunization (Kedzierski et al. Reference Kedzierski, Curtis, Doherty, Handman and Kedzierska2008). We have not observed a significant imbalance in cytokine profile indicating skewing towards the deleterious Th2-type response. Strikingly though, these animals showed an impaired expansion of dLN following virulent challenge, which suggests that decreased magnitude of the T-cell response is responsible for the observed lack of protection. Since the only difference between ΔPMM and ΔPMM+hPMM2 parasites was restoration of mannose-rich glycoconjugate synthesis, our findings suggest that these molecules led to modulation of the immune response following priming with hPMM2-complemented parasites, and prevented recruitment of activated T cells in the dLN. LPG is the most abundant glycoconjugate on the promastigote surface and has been previously shown to modulate several host cell functions (Turco and Descoteaux, Reference Turco and Descoteaux1992). LPG can inhibit the migratory activity of Langerhans cells (LC) and reduce their efflux from the site of infection to dLN (Ponte-Sucre et al. Reference Ponte-Sucre, Heise and Moll2001). Migration and maturation of LC have been postulated to be critical for initiation of T-cell responses and antigen presentation, since the infected macrophages are deficient in expression of their co-stimulatory molecules necessary for T-cell activation, and have a greatly reduced capacity to present antigens following Leishmania infection (Fruth et al. Reference Fruth, Solioz and Louis1993; Kaye et al. Reference Kaye, Rogers, Curry and Scott1994). Hence, it is possible that the glycoconjugates expressed by hPMM2 add-back parasites (including LPG) were sufficient to interfere with the dendritic cell and macrophage functions upon priming with hPMM2 add-backs, and subsequently led to decreased numbers of primed T cells. As a consequence, insufficient numbers of Leishmania-specific memory T cells were available for recruitment to dLN following secondary, virulent challenge. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated that dendritic cells are required for draining lymph node expansion (Angeli et al. Reference Angeli, Ginhoux, Llodra, Quemeneur, Frenette, Skobe, Jessberger, Merad and Randolph2006; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Ekland, Agle, Chyou, Ruggieri and Lu2006), and that insufficient activation of dendritic cells leads to the impaired dLN expansion following L. mexicana infection (Hsu and Scott, Reference Hsu and Scott2007).

Our findings highlight the importance of the early T-cell responses for the control of the Leishmania infection as well as suggesting that vaccination with live-attenuated non-persistent parasites is feasible only in the absence of mannose-rich glycoconjugates abundantly present on the parasite surface. Therefore, our study provides a novel contribution to the understanding of anti-leishmanial immunity important for the rational design of vaccination and/or immunotherapy protocols.

This work was supported by an NHMRC Project Grant awarded to L. K. K. K. is an NHMRC RD Wright Research Fellow.

References

REFERENCES

Angeli, V., Ginhoux, F., Llodra, J., Quemeneur, L., Frenette, P. S., Skobe, M., Jessberger, R., Merad, M. and Randolph, G. J. (2006). B cell-driven lymphangiogenesis in inflamed lymph nodes enhances dendritic cell mobilization. Immunity 24, 203215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogdan, C. and Rollinghoff, M. (1998). The immune response to Leishmania: mechanisms of parasite control and evasion. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 121134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fruth, U., Solioz, N. and Louis, J. A. (1993). Leishmania major interferes with antigen presentation by infected macrophages. Journal of Immunology 150, 18571864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garami, A., Mehlert, A. and Ilg, T. (2001). Glycosylation defects and virulence phenotypes of Leishmania mexicana phosphomannomutase and dolicholphosphate-mannose synthase gene deletion mutants. Molecular and Cellular Biology 21, 81688183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, A. C. and Scott, P. (2007). Leishmania mexicana infection induces impaired lymph node expansion and Th1 cell differentiation despite normal T cell proliferation. Journal of Immunology 179, 82008207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaye, P. M., Rogers, N. J., Curry, A. J. and Scott, J. C. (1994). Deficient expression of co-stimulatory molecules on Leishmania-infected macrophages. European Journal of Immunology 24, 28502854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kedzierski, L., Curtis, J. M., Doherty, P. C., Handman, E. and Kedzierska, K. (2008). Decreased IL-10 and IL-13 production and increased CD44(hi) T cell recruitment contribute to Leishmania major immunity induced by non-persistent parasites. European Journal of Immunology 38, 30903100.Google Scholar
Kedzierski, L., Malby, R. L., Smith, B. J., Perugini, M. A., Hodder, A. N., Ilg, T., Colman, P. M. and Handman, E. (2006 a). Structure of Leishmania mexicana phosphomannomutase highlights similarities with human isoforms. Journal of Molecular Biology 363, 215227.Google Scholar
Kedzierski, L., Zhu, Y. and Handman, E. (2006 b). Leishmania vaccines: progress and problems. Parasitology 133 (Suppl.), S87–S112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. F. (1983). Murine cutaneous leishmaniasis: resistance in reconstituted nude mice and several F1 hybrids infected with Leishmania tropica major. Journal of Immunogenetics 10, 395412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, G. F., Curtis, J. M., Handman, E. and McKenzie, I. F. (1980). Cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice: disease patterns in reconstituted nude mice of several genotypes infected with Leishmania tropica. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 58, 521532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponte-Sucre, A., Heise, D. and Moll, H. (2001). Leishmania major lipophosphoglycan modulates the phenotype and inhibits migration of murine Langerhans cells. Immunology 104, 462467.Google Scholar
Spath, G. F., Lye, L. F., Segawa, H., Sacks, D. L., Turco, S. J. and Beverley, S. M. (2003). Persistence without pathology in phosphoglycan-deficient Leishmania major. Science 301, 12411243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spath, G. F., Lye, L. F., Segawa, H., Turco, S. J. and Beverley, S. M. (2004). Identification of a compensatory mutant (lpg2-REV) of Leishmania major able to survive as amastigotes within macrophages without LPG2-dependent glycoconjugates and its significance to virulence and immunization strategies. Infection and Immunity 72, 36223627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titus, R. G., Marchand, M., Boon, T. and Louis, J. A. (1985). A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunology 7, 545555.Google Scholar
Turco, S. J. and Descoteaux, A. (1992). The lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania parasites. Annual Review of Microbiology 46, 6594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzonna, J. E., Spath, G. F., Beverley, S. M. and Scott, P. (2004). Vaccination with phosphoglycan-deficient Leishmania major protects highly susceptible mice from virulent challenge without inducing a strong Th1 response. Journal of Immunology 172, 37933797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uzonna, J. E., Wei, G., Yurkowski, D. and Bretscher, P. (2001). Immune elimination of Leishmania major in mice: implications for immune memory, vaccination, and reactivation disease. Journal of Immunology 167, 69676974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, B., Ekland, E. H., Agle, L. M., Chyou, S., Ruggieri, R. and Lu, T. T. (2006). Regulation of lymph node vascular growth by dendritic cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 203, 19031913.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. hPMM2-complemented Leishmania major ΔPMM parasites are avirulent in vivo. (A) Lesion progression was monitored over a period of 15 weeks. Mean lesion scores (wild type, n=20; hPMM2epi, n=8, hPMM2int, n=12, ΔPMM+/−, n=12; ΔPMM, n=12) were plotted. Error bars represent the s.e.m. (B) dLN were harvested at 2 months post-infection and parasite burdens were estimated by limited dilution method. Representative data for 2 mice per group are plotted. Error bars represent the s.e.m.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. ELISA analysis of Th1-type cytokine production by splenocytes and dLN cells from non-immunized controls and mice immunized with live hPMM2 add-back and ΔPMM parasites. At 1, 2 and 6 weeks post-challenge spleens and dLN cells were stimulated with SLA. Following 72 h stimulation at 37°C, supernatants were collected and analysed for secretion of IFN-γ and IL-12 by ELISA. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point, mean data plotted (n=3, in duplicates), error bars represent the s.e.m.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. ELISA analysis of Th2-type cytokine production by splenocytes and dLN cells from non-immunized controls and mice immunized with live hPMM2 add-back and ΔPMM parasites. At 1, 2 and 6 weeks post-challenge spleens and dLN cells were stimulated with SLA. Following 72 h stimulation at 37°C, supernatants were collected and analysed for secretion of IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 by ELISA. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point, mean data plotted (n=3, in duplicates), error bars represent the s.e.m.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Numbers of CD8+CD44hi and CD4+CD44hi T cells early after Leishmania major challenge. Numbers of antigen-experienced CD44hiCD8+ (left panel) and CD44hiCD4+ (right panel) T cells within dLN were calculated based on total cell counts and staining with mAbs against surface CD44 and CD4 or CD8. Data are plotted as absolute numbers of CD44hiCD8+ and CD44hiCD4+ detected in draining lymph nodes by FACS and represent pooled dLN for each mouse and a mean value from 3 mice per group. Results are from independent experiments for each time-point. Error bars represent the s.e.m.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Immunization with live, hPMM2-complemented ΔPMM Leishmania major parasites does not provide protection against virulent challenge. (A) Mice were vaccinated i.p. with 5×107 live hPMM2int (n=29) or hPMM2epi (n=14) parasites 4 weeks prior to infection and challenged along with naïve (n=36) and ΔPMM immunized (n=22) mice with 106L. major Friedlin parasites at the base of the tail. Lesion scores were monitored for 12 weeks, data plotted for 2 independent experiments, error bars represent the s.e.m. (B) Parasite burdens in hPMM2int and hPMM2epi vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. dLN were harvested at different time-points following challenge and parasite burdens estimated by limited dilution method. Pooled data from 2 mice are plotted, error bars represent the s.e.m. Representative data from ΔPMM vaccinated mice included for comparison (n=6 for week 2 and n=11 for week 6 and 11).