Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T21:44:16.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diagnosis of schistosomiasis: antibody detection, with notes on parasitological and antigen detection methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1999

J. V. HAMILTON
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK, LL57 2UW
M. KLINKERT
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell Biology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 43 Viale Marx, 00137 Rome, Italy
M. J. DOENHOFF
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK, LL57 2UW
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Schistosomiasis remains a serious world-wide public health problem with a still unfulfilled need for routine cost-effective methods of diagnosis. Such methods are required not only for people in endemic areas, but increasingly for tourists who may have become infected during visits to such places. This article reviews the wide range of immunoassays and antigenic preparations that have been shown to have potential for diagnosis of schistosomiasis by the indirect method of antibody detection. Antigens in native form derived from cercariae, adult worms and eggs are considered, as well as schistosome antigens produced by recombinant DNA technology and the schistosome cross-reactive antigen, keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH). Respective advantages and disadvantages of antibody detection, circulating antigen detection and parasitological methods of diagnosis are analysed. It is suggested that due to the relative insensitivity of both parasitology and antigen detection, antibody detection methods could find increasing use in situations of low infection intensity.

Type
Current status
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press