Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:47:24.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlates of blood parasitism in a threatened marshland passerine: infection by kinetoplastids of the genus Trypanosoma is related to landscape metrics of habitat edge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2019

Justyna Kubacka*
Affiliation:
Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland
Alina Gerlée
Affiliation:
Department of Geoecology, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland
Julien Foucher
Affiliation:
Association pour la Connaissance et la Recherche Ornithologique Loire et Atlantique (ACROLA), 10 rue de la Paix, 44480 Donges, France
Judith Korb
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), Hauptstrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
Edyta Podmokła
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Justyna Kubacka, E-mail: jkubacka@miiz.waw.pl

Abstract

In birds, vector-borne parasites invading the bloodstream are important agents of disease, affect fitness and shape population viability, thus being of conservation interest. Here, we molecularly identified protozoan blood parasites in two populations of the threatened Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola, a migratory passerine nesting in open marsh. We explored whether prevalence and lineage diversity of the parasites vary by population and whether infection status is explained by landscape metrics of habitat edge and individual traits (body mass, fat score, wing length and sex). Aquatic Warblers were infected by genera Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and Trypanosoma, with seven, one and four lineages, and 29.9, 0.7 and 12.5% prevalence, respectively. No Haemoproteus infections were detected. Prevalence did not vary between the populations, but lineage diversity was higher in Polesie than in Biebrza for all the lineages pooled and for Plasmodium. Infection by Trypanosoma decreased with patch core area and increased with density of habitat edge. Infection status was not predicted by the individual traits. Our study is the first to show an association between edge-related landscape features and blood parasitism in an open habitat bird. This finding will support informed conservation measures for avian species of the globally shrinking marshland and other treeless habitats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Introduction

The vector-borne hemoparasites that parasitize birds are widespread and diverse (Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005; Zídková et al., Reference Zídková, Cepicka, Szabová and Svobodová2012). The key taxons involve the intra-erythrocytic hemosporidians (Aconoidasida: Haemosporida): Plasmodium (the agent of avian malaria), Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon, and the extracellular trypanosomatids of the genus Trypanosoma (Kinetoplastea: Trypanosomatida). To date, 3173 genetic lineages of the three genera of hemosporidians have been identified (MalAvi database, as of December 2018, Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Hellgren and Pérez-TRIS2009) and at least 80 species of trypanosomes are known (Apanius, Reference Apanius1991). Blood parasites of birds occur worldwide, except for Antarctica, and infect several avian hosts (Kučera, Reference Kučera1982; Sehgal et al., Reference Sehgal, Jones and Smith2001; Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005). For instance, in Western Palearctic birds, the most frequently recorded genus is Haemoproteus (51% species sampled), followed by Leucocytozoon (46%), Trypanosoma (36%) and Plasmodium (23%), with the mean prevalence of 11, 10, 4 and 1%, respectively (Arriero and Møller, Reference Arriero and Møller2008). Vectors of bird blood parasites are dipteran hematophagous insects, such as ceratopogonid and hippoboscid flies, simulids and culicine mosquitoes. Birds become infected through a bite (hemosporidians) or digestion (trypanosomes) of an infected arthropod (Molyneux, Reference Molyneux1977; Atkinson et al., Reference Atkinson, Thomas and Hunter2008; Votýpka et al., Reference Votýpka, Szabová, Rádrová, Zídková and Svobodová2012; Svobodová et al., Reference Svobodová, Dolnik, Čepička and Rádrová2017). Blood parasites are important agents of disease in birds and affect their fitness. For example, infection by Plasmodium causes damage of internal organs and destruction of red blood cells, leading to a reduction in metabolism efficiency and acute anaemia (Marzal, Reference Marzal and Okwa2012). As shown by medication experiments, malaria parasites decrease clutch sizes, offspring hatching success, parental provisioning rates and offspring fledging success (Merino et al., Reference Merino, Moreno, Sanz and Arriero2000; Marzal et al., Reference Marzal, de Lope, Navarro and Møller2005; Knowles et al., Reference Knowles, Palinauskas and Sheldon2010). In birds infected by trypanosomes, males arrive later to the breeding grounds in spring [which is known to decrease their breeding success (Verhulst and Nilsson, Reference Verhulst and Nilsson2008)], sire fewer young, and show compromised nest defence against a predator, relative to uninfected males (Rätti et al., Reference Rätti, Dufva and Alatalo1993; Hakkarainen et al., Reference Hakkarainen, Ilmonen, Koivunen and Korpimäki1998; Dyrcz et al., Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005). Blood parasites are therefore expected to limit bird population growth and viability (Loye and Carroll, Reference Loye and Carroll1995; Holmes, Reference Holmes1996; Marzal, Reference Marzal and Okwa2012). Especially in species of conservation concern, it is important to gain further knowledge of their distribution, diversity and prevalence.

The diversity and prevalence of blood parasites within an avian host species are explained by a range of factors, of which potent ones are landscape features (Sehgal, Reference Sehgal2015; Ferraguti et al., Reference Ferraguti, Martínez-de la Puente, Bensch, Roiz, Ruiz, Viana, Soriguer and Figuerola2018; Pérez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Pérez-Rodríguez, Khimoun, Ollivier, Eraud, Faivre and Garnier2018). Prevalence is related to, for instance, the altitude and distance to water course or water body, as well as habitat degradation (van Riper et al., Reference van Riper, van Riper, Goff and Laird1986; Wood et al., Reference Wood, Cosgrove, Wilkin, Knowles, Day and Sheldon2007; Bonneaud et al., Reference Bonneaud, Sepil, Mila, Buermann, Pollinger, Sehgal, Valkiūnas, Iezhova, Saatchi and Smith2009; Loiseau et al., Reference Loiseau, Iezhova, Valkiūnas, Chasar, Hutchinson, Buermann, Smith and Sehgal2010; Belo et al., Reference Belo, Pinheiro, Reis, Ricklefs and Braga2011; Knowles et al., Reference Knowles, Wood, Alves, Wilkin, Bensch and Sheldon2011; Gonzalez-Quevedo et al., Reference Gonzalez-Quevedo, Davies and Richardson2014; Krama et al., Reference Krama, Krams, Cīrule, Moore, Rantala and Krams2015; Reinoso-Pérez et al., Reference Reinoso-Pérez, Canales-Delgadillo, Chapa-Vargas and Riego-Ruiz2016). Also, habitat fragmentation and heterogeneity are expected to affect parasite infection in birds, through increased edge effects and the introduction of new parasite lineages by species occupying ecotones and areas between fragments (Loye and Carroll, Reference Loye and Carroll1995; Holmes, Reference Holmes1996). However, studies that addressed the relationship between habitat fragmentation/edge and blood parasite infection in birds are scarce, focused solely on forest habitats and only two of them involved intraspecific comparisons (Sebaio et al., Reference Sebaio, Braga, Branquinho, Manica and Marini2010; Laurance et al., Reference Laurance, Jones, Westcott, Mckeown, Harrington and Hilbert2013; Gudex-Cross et al., Reference Gudex-Cross, Barraclough, Brunton and Derraik2015; Pérez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Pérez-Rodríguez, Khimoun, Ollivier, Eraud, Faivre and Garnier2018). For example, in a forest passerine, the Antillean Bullfinch (Loxigilla noctis), prevalence of two hemosporidian lineages is positively related to variables describing habitat fragmentation and amount of edge (Pérez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Pérez-Rodríguez, Khimoun, Ollivier, Eraud, Faivre and Garnier2018). To our knowledge, treeless habitats have not been studied in this respect, while a similar pattern could be expected due to negative edge effects on parasitism in some animal taxa (Ries et al., Reference Ries, Fletcher, Battin and Sisk2004). It appears that in particular habitat specialist birds inhabiting peatlands need to be addressed in this context, as these ecosystems have been globally degrading and shrinking due to habitat loss and fragmentation. Blood parasite prevalence in birds is also explained by individual traits. For example, within species, blood parasite prevalence is female-biased (McCurdy et al., Reference McCurdy, Shutler, Mullie and Forbes1998), higher in older than in younger individuals (Wood et al., Reference Wood, Cosgrove, Wilkin, Knowles, Day and Sheldon2007) and higher in individuals of poorer body condition (Shutler et al., Reference Shutler, Clark, Rutherford and Mullie1999; Dawson and Bortolotti, Reference Dawson and Bortolotti2000; Hatchwell et al., Reference Hatchwell, Wood, Anwar, Chamberlain and Perrins2001; Dyrcz et al., Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005; Shurulinkov et al., Reference Shurulinkov, Chakarov and Daskalova2012). Negative effects of blood parasite infection on body mass in birds were demonstrated experimentally, through inoculation and medication treatments (Atkinson et al., Reference Atkinson, Forrester and Greiner1988; Merino et al., Reference Merino, Moreno, Sanz and Arriero2000; Valkiūnas et al., Reference Valkiūnas, Z̆ic̆kus, Shapoval and Iezhova2006). To gain a broader understanding of the link between individual features and parasitism, more bird species of diverse ecologies should be studied.

The Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola is a globally-threatened passerine bird with the Vulnerable IUCN status. It breeds in temperate regions, in extensive, permanently water-logged fen mires with low vegetation, and winters in sub-Saharan Africa. Following massive habitat loss, the species saw a steep decline. Today, the Aquatic Warbler is fluctuating around approximately 12 200 singing males and breeds in the highly fragmented and scarce remaining fens of East-Central Europe (Aquatic Warbler Conservation Team, 1999; Briedis and Keišs, Reference Briedis and Keišs2016; BirdLife International, 2017; Flade et al., Reference Flade, Malashevich, Krogulec, Poluda, Preiksa, Végvári, Lachmann, Tanneberger and Kubacka2018). Blood parasites have been studied in the Aquatic Warbler during migration and wintering (Neto et al., Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015) but only to a limited extent on the breeding grounds (Dyrcz et al., Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005). Here, we identified blood parasites in breeding Aquatic Warblers from two core populations using molecular techniques and tested for differences in prevalence and diversity between the populations. We further evaluated whether infection status is related to habitat edge and individual traits. Specifically, we predicted that (1) the amount, proximity and/or complexity of edges is positively related to infection probability, (2) individuals of lower body condition are more likely to be infected than individuals in higher body condition, and (3) females are more likely to be infected than males.

Methods

Study area and sampling

Aquatic Warblers were sampled from two core breeding populations, in the Biebrza Valley (NE Poland; four sites sampled) and the western Polesie region (SE Poland; seven sites sampled, Fig. 1). The distance between the two regions is c. 250 km and they differ by habitat fragmentation, vegetation, patch size, as well as density and numbers of Aquatic Warblers. The Biebrza Valley comprises relatively large, continuous and extensive fen mires, while the Polesie is more fragmented and consists of smaller habitat patches (Fig. 1). The Biebrza Valley holds 2000–2600 singing males, with the density in the sampled areas of about 10 males per 10 ha. The Polesie population is 400–700 singing males and the density is about half that of the Biebrza (Kubacka et al., Reference Kubacka, Oppel, Dyrcz, Lachmann, Barros Da Costa, Kail and Zdunek2014; Polish Society for the Protection of Birds, 2014; Kubacka unpubl.).

Fig. 1. Distribution of the 11 sampling locations including the numbers of Aquatic Warblers. The map was created using QGIS (QGIS Development Team, 2018).

We captured 144 Aquatic Warblers with mist-nets during the breeding season, between May and August of 2014. Locations of captures were saved with a GPS device. We sampled 54 individuals in the Biebrza Valley (17 adult females, 33 adult males and four first-year individuals of unknown sex) and 90 individuals in Polesie (18 adult females, 71 adult males and one first-year individual of unknown sex). Sex was identified by the presence of cloacal protuberance (adult males) or brood-patch (adult females), and age was determined by examination of plumage: partially or completely worn in adults and completely new for first-year birds (Svensson, Reference Svensson1992). Wing length was measured with a ruler to the nearest millimetre, according to the method described by Svensson (Reference Svensson1992). Fat score was assessed on the scale of 0–8 according to Kaiser (Reference Kaiser1993). Body mass was measured with a Pesola spring balance to the nearest 0.1 g. Approximately 5–100 µL of blood was sampled from each individual through brachial venepuncture. The blood samples were immediately transferred to tubes with 1 mL of 96% ethanol and stored at room temperature until laboratory analysis.

Identification and diversity of blood parasites

DNA was isolated using a phenol-chloroform protocol (Sambrook and Russell, Reference Sambrook and Russell2001). With molecular techniques, the blood samples were screened for the presence of blood parasites by amplifying:

  1. 1) A 478 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cyt b gene in the case of Leucocytozoon, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium, with the thermal profile according to Hellgren et al. (Reference Hellgren, Waldenström and Bensch2004). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in volumes of 25 µL, which included 2 µL of genomic DNA, 0.125 mM of each dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.6 µM of each primer (first-round primers: HaemNFI and HaemNR3; second-round primers: HaemF and HaemR2 in the case of Plasmodium/Haemoproteus, HaemFL and HaemR2L in the case of Leucocytozoon), and 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the accompanying PCR buffer at 1 × final concentration.

  2. 2) A 326 bp fragment of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene in the case of Trypanosoma, with the PCR thermal profile according to Sehgal et al. (Reference Sehgal, Jones and Smith2001). Each 25 µL reaction mixture contained 2 µL of genomic DNA, 0.125 mM of each dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 1.25 µM of each primer (first-round primers: S-762 and S-763; second-round primers: S-755 and S-823) and 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the accompanying PCR buffer at 1 × final concentration.

Four μL of PCR products from the second round were run on 2% agarose gels stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualised under ultraviolet light. Each plate contained the positive (DNA from birds with confirmed infection based on blood smear screening) and negative (ddH2O) control. Products of positive samples were purified with FastAP (Fermentas) and sequenced directly with an automated ABI 3130 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems), using BigDye terminator v3.1 (Applied Biosystems). The obtained sequences were visually inspected and aligned using the BioEdit software (Hall, Reference Hall1999), which offers a local BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) (Altschul et al., Reference Altschul, Gish, Miller, Myers and Lipman1990). They were then compared against the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Hellgren and Pérez-TRIS2009) in the case of Leucocytozoon, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium, and GenBank (Benson et al., Reference Benson, Cavanaugh, Clark, Karsch-Mizrachi, Lipman, Ostell and Sayers2013) in the case of Trypanosoma, using nucleotide BLAST and selecting the best hit match. Leucocytozoon, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium were identified at the lineage level, and Trypanosoma was identified at the species/genus level, due to the short length of the sequenced fragment. In the case of double infections (indicated by double peaks in the chromatogram), parasite lineages were assigned visually by comparing DNA sequences with the pool of lineages known to occur in our study (in the pool of other analysed samples). This method was confirmed to be reliable in a previous study, by cloning PCR products and showing that the sets of lineages identified by cloning and by visual comparison of lineages were in complete accordance (Podmokła et al., Reference Podmokła, Dubiec, Drobniak, Arct, Gustafsson and Cichoń2014).

To describe the diversity of the identified blood parasites, two ecological diversity indices were used: the species richness (S; the total number of detected lineages) and the Shannon index (H; combines information on species richness and relative abundance).

Patch and landscape metrics

Each site was a patch of continuous breeding habitat, separated from another site by a stretch of non-breeding habitat (other than fen mire or peat meadow) of at least a few kilometres. Using QGIS software (QGIS Development Team, 2018) and ellipsoidal (GRS 1980) measurement, for each patch and/or capture point, we calculated biologically informative metrics characterizing the proximity, amount and complexity of edge in the breeding habitat (Table 1). These metrics are commonly applied in landscape ecology, also in the context of blood parasitism and vector occurrence (McGarigal et al., Reference McGarigal, Cushman, Neel and Ene2012; Li et al., Reference Li, Roux, Dessay, Girod, Stefani, Nacher, Moiret and Seyler2016; Pérez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Pérez-Rodríguez, Khimoun, Ollivier, Eraud, Faivre and Garnier2018). To ease interpretation of the effects of the metrics on infection status, we provide their correlation matrix, alongside with the total length of edge and the area of a patch (Table S1).

Table 1. Patch and landscape metrics of habitat edge used in the study

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed in the R environment (R Core Team, 2018). We first computed population prevalence, Shannon diversity and species richness, for all the lineages pooled and for each of the identified genera separately. The two diversity indices were calculated in the ‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Blanchet, Friendly, Kindt, Legendre, McGlinn, Minchin, O'Hara, Simpson, Solymos, Henry, Stevens, Szoecs and Wagner2019). The prevalences were compared between the two populations with the test for equal proportions (command ‘prop.test’ from the ‘stats’ package) and asymptotic 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a custom function. The 95% CIs of the Shannon indices and their differences between the populations were calculated in the ‘boot’ package (Canty and Ripley, Reference Canty and Ripley2017) according to the recommendations of Gardener (Reference Gardener2014). Asymptotic CIs were estimated based on 1000 bootstrap resamples [custom R command ‘H_boot’ from Gardener (Reference Gardener2014)]. The statistical significance of the difference in the diversity index between populations was estimated using a randomisation method based on 2000 bootstrap resamples [custom R command ‘H_bss’ from Gardener (Reference Gardener2014)].

To evaluate the effect of the patch and landscape metrics, and individual variables on infection status, we used generalized linear mixed models with binomial error structure and logit link, fitted with the package ‘lme4’ and the ‘glmer’ command (Bates et al., Reference Bates, Mächler, Bolker and Walker2015). The information theoretic (IT) approach was used for inference and the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) was applied for model selection (Burnham and Anderson, Reference Burnham and Anderson2002). The IT approach has been increasingly used in ecology, especially in non-experimental studies. In this approach, unlike in null hypothesis testing, an a priori set of biologically plausible candidate models is constructed and each model within the set is evaluated in terms of how well it approximates the relationship between the predictors and the dependent variable relative to the other models, given the data. Then, the models are ranked by AICc and the best-ranking model (or a subset of best models) is selected. Models that are within 2 AICc units of the top model (which has the lowest AICc) are considered to be highly supported (Burnham and Anderson, Reference Burnham and Anderson2004). Including a null model in the candidate set, i.e. a model assuming that the response variable is constant, enables evaluation of ‘absolute’ support for each model. The strength of evidence of each model is provided by computing model likelihood (the relative likelihood of a model in the candidate set, given the data), the Akaike weight (ωAICc) and the evidence ratio. ωAICc is the probability of a model for a given set of candidate models. For a given model, the evidence ratio is the ratio of its probability to the top model probability, which has an evidence ratio equal to one.

We ran two separate analyses, each with four candidate model sets, with the response being infection status (coded as a binary variable: 1 – infected, 0 – uninfected) by (1) any of the blood parasite lineages pooled, (2) Plasmodium, (3) lineage SW2 (the most frequent, Table 3) and (4) Trypanosoma. Each model included the random effect (random intercept) of site, to account for possible non-independence between individuals mist-netted within a given patch (Bolker et al., Reference Bolker, Brooks, Clark, Geange, Poulsen, Stevens and White2009). Because Leucocytozoon was found only in one individual and no Haemoproteus infections were detected (see Results), we did not run separate models for these genera. The two lineages that are not known to be transmitted in Europe (PAS106 and PAS112, detected in 8 individuals, Table 3) are suggested to have a broad geographical distribution (Šlapeta et al., Reference Šlapeta, Morin-Adeline, Thompson, McDonell, Shiels, Gilchrist, Votýpka and Vogelnest2016), and hence we included all the lineages in both analyses.

In the first analysis, we tested whether the infection status was explained by any of the patch and landscape variables. Each of the four candidate model sets consisted of eight models, with seven models each containing one patch or landscape metric (Table 1) as the fixed variable, and a null model assuming that infection status was constant across individuals. This enabled us to see which of the patch and landscape variables was the best predictor of infection status (by all the parasites pooled, Plasmodium, Trypanosoma and the SW2 lineage) and whether the most parsimonious model was more informative than the null model. In the second analysis, we assessed whether infection status was explained by variables related to the individual: sex (binary categorical variable), fat score, wing length and body mass (all continuous variables). This analysis was performed on a dataset that excluded missing values for the biometrical parameters (hence the retained sample size for the second analysis was N = 111). Each of the four candidate model sets consisted of five models, with four models allowing the infection status to vary with (1) sex, (2) fat score, (3) wing length, (4) body mass and (5) a null model, which assumed a constant infection status. We reported support for the models with the evidence ratio and Akaike weight (ωAICc).

Results

Description of blood parasites

The blood parasites found in breeding Aquatic Warblers belonged to three genera (Plasmodium, Trypanosoma and Leucocytozoon; no Haemoproteus infections were detected) and 12 lineages (Table 2). One out of the five first-year individuals was infected (with Trypanosoma culicavium). Six lineages were found in the Biebrza and ten lineages were found in the Polesie population. In both populations, the most prevalent lineage was SW2 (Plasmodium homonucleophilum). One individual was co-infected by two different Plasmodium lineages (SW2 and SW5) and eight individuals were infected by both Plasmodium and Trypanosoma. None of the identified lineages were specific to the Acrocephalus genus. Prevalence did not differ between the populations, however, lineage diversity was higher in Polesie than in the Biebrza Valley, in the case of all the parasites pooled and Plasmodium, but not Trypanosoma (Table 3).

Table 2. Blood parasites identified in breeding Aquatic Warblers. For Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon, information on the species, host range and transmission was obtained from the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Hellgren and Pérez-TRIS2009), as of December 2018, with the transmission of SYAT24, SW5 and SYBOR02 additionally checked in other available literature. A lineage was considered to be transmitted in Europe if it has previously been found in juvenile birds of a migratory species or adult/juvenile birds of a resident species. For Trypanosoma, data were obtained from GenBank (features of deposited sequences) and through screening of published literature

Table 3. Diversity and prevalence of blood parasites in the two studied breeding populations of the Aquatic Warbler. Differences significant at the 0.05 level are marked in bold

a Yates correction applied.

Association of patch and landscape metrics with infection status

There was no clear support for the correlation of a patch or landscape metric with infection by any parasite or by Plasmodium, as none of the models ranked better than the null model and all the odds ratio (OR) estimates spanned 1 (Table 4a). The probability of infection by the most frequent Plasmodium lineage, SW2, appeared to increase with the relative amount of non-breeding habitat within a patch, however, the confidence interval of its OR reached 1 (Table 4a). In the case of Trypanosoma, we found support for two patch metrics, core area index (CAI) and edge density (ED), to affect infection status. The ORs of CAI and ED were both different from one, the models with these variables were the only ones within ΔAICc ⩽ 2 and they were about three times more probable than the null model. The probability of infection by trypanosomes decreased 0.94 times with one unit change in CAI and increased 1.07 times with one unit change in ED (Table 4a, Fig. 2). These two metrics, CAI and ED were correlated (Table S1), which explains their similar support and exactly opposite mutual effects.

Table 4. Model selection results and estimates of the fixed variables converted to odds ratios (OR) from the analysis relating a) landscape metrics and b) individual variables to infection status. Models within ΔAICc⩾2 (i.e. with strong relative support) and ORs different from 1, based on their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), are marked in bold. K – number of estimable parameters. AICc – Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size, ΔAICc – difference of AICc relative to the top model, ωAICc – Akaike weight (probability of a model)

a Males relative to females.

b Model did not converge.

Fig. 2. Probability of infection of Aquatic Warblers by genus Trypanosoma in relation to (a) core area index and (b) edge density of breeding habitat patches. The lines were fitted based on the estimates from the respective top models in Table 4a and the bands show confidence intervals. Circles show infected (y = 1) and uninfected (y = 0) individuals, with the circle area proportional to the number of individuals (n) for a given value of the metric.

Effects of sex, wing length, fat deposits and body mass

Infection status was not clearly related to sex or biometrics variables, whether for all the parasites pooled, Plasmodium, SW2 lineage, or Trypanosoma. Constant infection models always ranked best and for each of the explanatory variables the confidence intervals of its estimated odds ratio spanned one (Table 4b).

Discussion

Our study is the first account of blood parasites in the Aquatic Warbler from a range of its breeding locations. We showed population differences in lineage diversity but not in prevalence. While we did not find support for infection status to vary with body mass, fat reserves, wing length and sex, we demonstrated, apparently for the first time in an open habitat bird, that infection probability by a blood parasite is affected by metrics of habitat edge.

Diversity and prevalence of blood parasites

The prevalence of blood parasites in the Aquatic Warbler in our study is difficult to compare with that of other birds due to high variation in prevalence attributable to location, habitat, year, age or sample size. Overall, considering studies carried out during the breeding season that inspected more than 20 individuals, Plasmodium prevalence in the Aquatic Warbler appears to be higher than in at least four out of seven other Acrocephalus species breeding in Europe, and is the closest to that found in the Great Reed Warbler (A. arundinaceus), 24–27% (Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Stjernman, Hasselquist, Ostman, Hansson, Westerdahl and Pinheiro2000, Reference Bensch, Waldenström, Jonzén, Westerdahl, Hansson, Sejberg and Hasselquist2007; Zehtindjiev et al., Reference Zehtindjiev, Ilieva, Westerdahl, Hansson, Valkiunas and Bensch2008, Reference Zehtindjiev, Ilieva, Krizanauskiene, Oparina, Oparin and Bensch2009; Dimitrov et al., Reference Dimitrov, Zehtindjiev and Bensch2010, Reference Dimitrov, Ilieva, Ivanova, Brlik and Zehtindjiev2018; Biedrzycka et al., Reference Biedrzycka, Migalska and Bielański2015). Although absent in Aquatic Warblers, also during migration and wintering (Neto et al., Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015), Haemoproteus was detected in other acrocephalids breeding in Europe, with a high variation in prevalence within and across species. Studies that examined at least 20 individuals during the breeding season reported prevalences of 10–96% in the Great Reed Warbler, 9% in the Common Reed Warbler (A. scirpaceus), 4–54% in the Sedge Warbler (A. schoenobaenus) and 21–24% in the Paddyfield Warbler (A. agricola) (Bensch et al., Reference Bensch, Stjernman, Hasselquist, Ostman, Hansson, Westerdahl and Pinheiro2000, Reference Bensch, Waldenström, Jonzén, Westerdahl, Hansson, Sejberg and Hasselquist2007; Zehtindjiev et al., Reference Zehtindjiev, Ilieva, Westerdahl, Hansson, Valkiunas and Bensch2008, Reference Zehtindjiev, Ilieva, Krizanauskiene, Oparina, Oparin and Bensch2009; Dimitrov et al., Reference Dimitrov, Zehtindjiev and Bensch2010, Reference Dimitrov, Ilieva, Ivanova, Brlik and Zehtindjiev2018; Fernández et al., Reference Fernández, Rojo, Casanueva, Carrión, Hernández and Campos2010; Biedrzycka et al., Reference Biedrzycka, Migalska and Bielański2015). The prevalence of Leucocytozoon in our study was remarkably low, and so it is in other European Acrocephalus species, ranging between 0 and 1% during the breeding season (Shurulinkov and Chakarov, Reference Shurulinkov and Chakarov2006; Svoboda et al., Reference Svoboda, Marthinsen, Turčoková, Lifjeld and Johnsen2009; Fernández et al., Reference Fernández, Rojo, Casanueva, Carrión, Hernández and Campos2010; Biedrzycka et al., Reference Biedrzycka, Migalska and Bielański2015; Dimitrov et al., Reference Dimitrov, Ilieva, Ivanova, Brlik and Zehtindjiev2018). The lack of Haemoproteus and the low prevalence of Leucocytozoon in our study can be due to lack of vectors in the breeding habitat of Aquatic Warblers. Trypanosoma was found in Aquatic Warblers previously in one of the locations that we studied, the Biebrza Valley (Dyrcz et al., Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005), with 48.5% breeding males being infected. This is a high prevalence compared to the one that we found in that population (12.5%), which could stem from the change in the occurrence of vectors, for example, due to different weather and humidity conditions in the year of sampling, relative to Dyrcz et al. (Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005).

The three genera of hemosporidians that we targeted in our molecular analysis were previously studied in Aquatic Warblers during migration and wintering (Neto et al., Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015). In that study, only three Plasmodium lineages were found, with a prevalence of 26.9% on the migration stop-over site in Portugal and 5.5% on a wintering site in Senegal. In our study, we identified seven lineages of Plasmodium, with the 29.9% prevalence being similar to the one during migration but clearly higher than in wintering quarters. Aquatic Warblers could have higher infection rates during the breeding period due to the spring relapse of blood parasites, associated with higher vector activity (Beaudoin et al., Reference Beaudoin, Applegate, Davis and McLean1971; Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005; Hellgren et al., Reference Hellgren, Wood, Waldenström, Hasselquist, Ottosson, Stervander and Bensch2013), but also because infected birds die before reaching their wintering sites. In addition, Neto et al. (Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015) established that two threatened acrocephalids, the Seychelles Warbler (A. seychellensis) and the Aquatic Warbler, had the lowest number of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus lineages found in relation to host samples screened, compared to common acrocephalids. They hypothesized that this is due to their rarity and habitat specialisation. Our results refute this hypothesis and demonstrate that the Aquatic Warbler shows an average number of lineages per number of analysed samples, relative to other acrocephalids listed in Neto et al. (Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015), which is likely attributable to our study being conducted on breeding birds.

As parasites affect survival and breeding success of birds, studying population differences is important to inform conservation management of threatened species. The comparable prevalence rates in both populations indicate that blood parasitaemia is of similar importance in terms of population viability in both locations. The higher diversity of lineages in Polesie than in the Biebrza Valley is likely a result of different sample sizes (90 and 54, respectively), as the number of lineages identified grows asymptotically with the number of screened individuals (e.g. Neto et al., Reference Neto, Pérez-Rodríguez, Haase, Flade and Bensch2015). Another possibility is the variation in vector diversity between the two regions, especially that Polesie consists of several patches, scattered over a larger area, which are more diverse than the fairly uniform habitat in the Biebrza Valley. The higher heterogeneity of the Polesie sites also likely translates to a more diverse bird community, which could be another factor affecting parasite lineage diversity, due to cross-species infections (Waldenström et al., Reference Waldenström, Bensch, Kiboi, Hasselquist and Ottosson2002; Reullier et al., Reference Reullier, Pérez-Tris, Bensch and Secondi2006; Sehgal, Reference Sehgal2015). Host community and species are known to be powerful predictors of parasite diversity, including Plasmodium (Scordato and Kardish, Reference Scordato and Kardish2014; Fecchio et al., Reference Fecchio, Pinheiro, Felix, Faria, Pinho, Lacorte, Braga, Farias, Aleixo, Tkach, Collins, Bell and Weckstein2018; Ferraguti et al., Reference Ferraguti, Martínez-de la Puente, Bensch, Roiz, Ruiz, Viana, Soriguer and Figuerola2018).

Effects of patch and landscape metrics on infection

Aquatic Warblers breeding in patches with a relatively larger core area (CAI) and lower amount of habitat edge per area unit (ED) were less likely to be infected by trypanosomes. The CAI is a function of patch size and total edge length, while ED is affected by edge length (Table 1). These two metrics are correlated (Table S1) and it is difficult to conclude which landscape feature specifically determines the probability of infection. Nevertheless, our results show that the known factors of habitat change and loss in peatlands, such as succession, fragmentation, drainage or eutrophication, could exacerbate the risk of infection by trypanosomes in the Aquatic Warbler, through reduction of the size of a patch and/or increase in habitat heterogeneity and edge length. This could translate into a lower breeding success, survival and population growth. We are not aware of other studies linking landscape features associated with edge to blood parasite infection in birds of open habitats. Core area of habitat (positively) and edge density (negatively) were found to be related to bird abundance in a grassland passerine (Herse et al., Reference Herse, With and Boyle2018). Within-species research on blood parasite infection in relation to habitat edge and fragmentation all concerned forest habitats and showed negative (Pérez-Rodríguez et al., Reference Pérez-Rodríguez, Khimoun, Ollivier, Eraud, Faivre and Garnier2018), positive (Laurance et al., Reference Laurance, Jones, Westcott, Mckeown, Harrington and Hilbert2013) or no associations (Sebaio et al., Reference Sebaio, Braga, Branquinho, Manica and Marini2010; Gudex-Cross et al., Reference Gudex-Cross, Barraclough, Brunton and Derraik2015). This area clearly requires more research, especially in birds of open habitats.

Our results should be given some reservation since the study covered a limited number of patches (11) and because we did not know whether all of the identified parasite lineages are transmitted specifically in the studied area. For instance, although the blood parasites identified in our study areas are all most likely transmitted in Europe (Table 2), some of them could be transmitted to Aquatic Warblers only during migration or on African wintering grounds, e.g. due to the absence of lineage-specific vectors in fen mires. In our study, removing the unexplained variance caused by individuals infected only by lineages not transmitted in Central-European fens could have revealed additional relationships with the landscape and patch metrics. For a more robust result, the association that we found requires further study in more breeding sites and fine-scale determination of transmission.

A range of mechanisms can underlie the relationship between trypanosome infection, CAI and ED. There is some evidence for increased parasitism near habitat edges for birds, mammals and amphibians (Ries et al., Reference Ries, Fletcher, Battin and Sisk2004). In the case of arthropod-borne blood parasites, this effect could be due to exposure of birds to more (and different) vectors and/or presence of different parasite lineages in the adjacent habitat, infecting the birds utilising this habitat. Hematozoan vectors are more abundant in the forest than in treeless habitats (Bennett et al., Reference Bennett, Montgomerie and Seutin1992) and forest bird species have higher prevalences of blood parasites than species from open habitats (Tella et al., Reference Tella, Blanco, Forero, Gajon, Donazar and Hiraldo1999). One reason for the low vector abundance in open habitats could be greater wind speeds, which are known to reduce host-seeking activity of vectors such as biting midges and black flies (Lillie et al., Reference Lillie, Kline and Hall1988; Fredeen and Mason, Reference Fredeen and Mason1991; Martin et al., Reference Martin, McCreadie and Colbo1994; Martínez-De La Puente et al., Reference Martínez-De La Puente, Merino, Lobato, Rivero-De Aguilar, Del Cerro, Ruiz-De-Castañeda and Moreno2009). In addition, increased heterogeneity of habitat reduces its quality for open-marshland specialist birds and might attract avian predators occupying overgrown or fragmented areas (Thomson et al., Reference Thomson, Tomás, Forsman, Broggi and Mönkkönen2010). This can lead to social and physiological stress, which is known to compromise immune function (Lyles and Dobson, Reference Lyles and Dobson1993; Oppliger et al., Reference Oppliger, Clobert, Lecomte, Lorenzon, Boudjemadi and John-Alder1998). On the other hand, if social or physiological stress was elevated and affected immunity of individuals in the patches with more edge in our study, we would have observed this effect also in Plasmodium.

Individual traits and infection status

In our study, sex, wing length, fat score or body mass had no discernible effect on the probability of infection of Aquatic Warblers by blood parasites. This was true both for overall parasite infection and when the analysis was performed separately for Plasmodium, the SW2 lineage and Trypanosoma. In an earlier study, breeding Aquatic Warbler males infected by trypanosomes were lighter than uninfected males but their wing length and fat deposits did not differ (Dyrcz et al., Reference Dyrcz, Wink, Kruszewicz and Leisler2005). In other bird species, experimental studies demonstrated negative effects of blood parasite infection on body mass (Atkinson et al., Reference Atkinson, Forrester and Greiner1988; Merino et al., Reference Merino, Moreno, Sanz and Arriero2000; Valkiūnas et al., Reference Valkiūnas, Z̆ic̆kus, Shapoval and Iezhova2006) and females of lower body condition had higher parasitaemia (Shutler et al., Reference Shutler, Clark, Rutherford and Mullie1999; Dawson and Bortolotti, Reference Dawson and Bortolotti2001; Hatchwell et al., Reference Hatchwell, Wood, Anwar, Chamberlain and Perrins2001). Sex effects have also been observed, for example, breeding females are more often infected by Haemoproteus than breeding males (McCurdy et al., Reference McCurdy, Shutler, Mullie and Forbes1998). It is possible that in our study variation arising due to differences in capture date or age confounded potential associations between blood parasite infection and body mass, fat score, wing length and sex.

Concluding remarks

In this study, we describe the diversity and prevalence of blood parasites in the threatened Aquatic Warbler, a breeder of fen mires, and demonstrate that infection risk by the genus Trypanosoma increases with habitat edge density and decreases with the amount of core area in a patch. This relationship indicates that habitat changes causing reduction of breeding area or increase in edge length could negatively affect the fitness of Aquatic Warblers through higher parasitism by trypanosomes. This could also be true for other avian habitat specialists breeding in open habitats, such as marshland and grassland, but to date research in this area is lacking. Our result contributes to informed conservation management of the Aquatic Warbler, as well as other bird species of the globally shrinking marshland ecosystems.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019000350

Author ORCIDs

Justyna Kubacka, 0000-0003-1211-8324

Acknowledgements

We greatly thank Marine Boucaux, Mathilde Gely, Nicolas Hillier, Paul Lenrume, Piotr Marczakiewicz, Liza Olson, Zuzanna Pestka and Joanna Wołoszkiewicz for help in the field. Anna Dubiec and three anonymous reviewers provided extensive comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Borys Jurgiel kindly supported QGIS analysis.

Financial support

The study was supported by British Ornithologists' Union (J.K., Career Development Bursary); Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology lab at the University of Freiburg; and the National Science Centre, Poland (E.P., grant number 2011/03/N/NZ8/02106), (J.K., grant number 2016/20/S/NZ8/00434).

Ethical standards

The study was conformed to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes and its appendix. The procedure of blood-sampling was approved of by the First Ethical Committee in Lublin, Poland. Capture and ringing of the birds were performed under permits from the Polish Ministry of the Environment, the Biebrza National Park, the Poleski National Park and the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Lublin, in line with the requirements of the Polish Nature Protection Act.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Altschul, SF, Gish, W, Miller, W, Myers, EW and Lipman, DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215, 403410.Google Scholar
Apanius, V (1991) Avian trypanosomes as models of hemoflagellate evolution. Parasitology Today 7, 8790.Google Scholar
Aquatic Warbler Conservation Team (1999) World population, trends and conservation status of the Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. Die Vogelwelt 2, 1232.Google Scholar
Arriero, E and Møller, AP (2008) Host ecology and life-history traits associated with blood parasite species richness in birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 15041513.Google Scholar
Atkinson, CT, Forrester, DJ and Greiner, EC (1988) Pathogenicity of Haemoproteus meleagridis (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) in experimentally infected domestic turkeys. The Journal of Parasitology 74, 228239.Google Scholar
Atkinson, CT, Thomas, NJ and Hunter, DB (eds) (2008) Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds. Ames, IA, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.Google Scholar
Beaudoin, RL, Applegate, JE, Davis, DE and McLean, RG (1971) A model for the ecology of avian malaria. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 7, 514.Google Scholar
Belo, NO, Pinheiro, RT, Reis, ES, Ricklefs, RE and Braga, ÉM (2011) Prevalence and lineage diversity of avian haemosporidians from three distinct cerrado habitats in Brazil. PLoS ONE 6, e17654.Google Scholar
Bennett, GF, Montgomerie, R and Seutin, G (1992) Scarcity of Haematozoa in birds breeding on the Arctic tundra of North America. The Condor 94, 289292.Google Scholar
Bensch, S, Stjernman, M, Hasselquist, D, Ostman, O, Hansson, B, Westerdahl, H and Pinheiro, RT (2000) Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267, 15831589.Google Scholar
Bensch, S, Waldenström, J, Jonzén, N, Westerdahl, H, Hansson, B, Sejberg, D and Hasselquist, D (2007) Temporal dynamics and diversity of avian malaria parasites in a single host species. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 112122.Google Scholar
Bensch, S, Hellgren, O and Pérez-TRIS, J (2009) MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources 9, 13531358.Google Scholar
Benson, DA, Cavanaugh, M, Clark, K, Karsch-Mizrachi, I, Lipman, DJ, Ostell, J and Sayers, EW (2013) Genbank. Nucleic Acids Research 41, D36D42.Google Scholar
Biedrzycka, A, Migalska, M and Bielański, W (2015) A quantitative PCR protocol for detecting specific Haemoproteus lineages: molecular characterization of blood parasites in a Sedge Warbler population from southern Poland. Journal of Ornithology 156, 201208.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2017) Acrocephalus paludicola (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22714696A110042215.Google Scholar
Bolker, BM, Brooks, ME, Clark, CJ, Geange, SW, Poulsen, JR, Stevens, MHH and White, J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 127135.Google Scholar
Bonneaud, C, Sepil, I, Mila, B, Buermann, W, Pollinger, J, Sehgal, RNM, Valkiūnas, G, Iezhova, TA, Saatchi, S and Smith, TB (2009) The prevalence of avian Plasmodium is higher in undisturbed tropical forests of Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25, 439447.Google Scholar
Briedis, M and Keišs, O (2016) Extracting historical population trends using archival ringing data – an example: the globally threatened Aquatic Warbler. Journal of Ornithology 157, 419425.Google Scholar
Burnham, KP and Anderson, DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Burnham, KP and Anderson, DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 33, 261304.Google Scholar
Canty, A and Ripley, B (2017) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-20. CRAN R Project. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq232.Google Scholar
Dawson, RD and Bortolotti, GR (2000) Effects of hematozoan parasites on condition and return rates of American Kestrels. The Auk 117, 373381.Google Scholar
Dawson, RD and Bortolotti, GR (2001) Sex-specific associations between reproductive output and hematozoan parasites of American Kestrels. Oecologia 126, 193200.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, D, Zehtindjiev, P and Bensch, S (2010) Genetic diversity of avian blood parasites in SE Europe: cytochrome b lineages of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) from Bulgaria. Acta Parasitologica 55, 201209.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, D, Ilieva, M, Ivanova, K, Brlik, V and Zehtindjiev, P (2018) Detecting local transmission of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites (Apicomlexa, Haemosporida) at a Special Protection Area of Natura 2000 network. Parasitology 117, 21872199.Google Scholar
Dyrcz, A, Wink, M, Kruszewicz, A and Leisler, B (2005) Male reproductive success is correlated with blood parasite levels and body condition in the promiscuous Aquatic Warbler (Acrocephalus paludicola). The Auk 122, 558565.Google Scholar
Fecchio, A, Pinheiro, R, Felix, G, Faria, IP, Pinho, JB, Lacorte, GA, Braga, EM, Farias, IP, Aleixo, A, Tkach, VV, Collins, MD, Bell, JA and Weckstein, JD (2018) Host community similarity and geography shape the diversity and distribution of haemosporidian parasites in Amazonian birds. Ecography 41, 505515.Google Scholar
Fernández, M, Rojo, , Casanueva, P, Carrión, S, Hernández, and Campos, F (2010) High prevalence of haemosporidians in Reed Warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Sedge Warbler Acrocephalus schoenobaenus in Spain. Journal of Ornithology 151, 2732.Google Scholar
Ferraguti, M, Martínez-de la Puente, J, Bensch, S, Roiz, D, Ruiz, S, Viana, DS, Soriguer, RC and Figuerola, J (2018) Ecological determinants of avian malaria infections: an integrative analysis at landscape, mosquito and vertebrate community levels. Journal of Animal Ecology 87, 727740.Google Scholar
Flade, M, Malashevich, U, Krogulec, J, Poluda, A, Preiksa, Z, Végvári, Z and Lachmann, L (2018) World distribution, population, and trends. In Tanneberger, F and Kubacka, J (eds), The Aquatic Warbler Conservation Handbook. Potsdam, Germany: Brandenburg State Office for Environment (LfU), pp. 2235.Google Scholar
Fredeen, FJ and Mason, PG (1991) Meteorological factors influencing host-seeking activity of female Simulium luggeri (Diptera: Simuliidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 28, 831840.Google Scholar
Gardener, M (2014) Community Ecology: Analytical Methods Using R and Excel. Exeter, UK: Pelagic Publishing.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Quevedo, C, Davies, RG and Richardson, DS (2014) Predictors of malaria infection in a wild bird population: landscape-level analyses reveal climatic and anthropogenic factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 83, 10911102.Google Scholar
Gudex-Cross, D, Barraclough, RK, Brunton, DH and Derraik, JGB (2015) Mosquito communities and avian malaria prevalence in Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) within forest edge and interior habitats in a New Zealand regional park. EcoHealth 12, 432440.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, H, Ilmonen, P, Koivunen, V and Korpimäki, E (1998) Blood parasites and nest defense behaviour of Tengmalm's Owls. Oecologia 114, 574577.Google Scholar
Hall, TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. doi: citeulike-article-id:691774.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, BJ, Wood, MJ, Anwar, MA, Chamberlain, DE and Perrins, CM (2001) The haematozoan parasites of Common Blackbirds Turdus merula: associations with host condition. Ibis 143, 420426.Google Scholar
Hellgren, O, Waldenström, J and Bensch, S (2004) A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. Journal of Parasitology 90, 797802.Google Scholar
Hellgren, O, Wood, MJ, Waldenström, J, Hasselquist, D, Ottosson, U, Stervander, M and Bensch, S (2013) Circannual variation in blood parasitism in a sub-Saharan migrant passerine bird, the Garden Warbler. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, 10471059.Google Scholar
Herse, MR, With, KA and Boyle, WA (2018) The importance of core habitat for a threatened species in changing landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 22412252.Google Scholar
Holmes, JC (1996) Parasites as threats to biodiversity in shrinking ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation 5, 975983.Google Scholar
Kaiser, A (1993) A new multi-category classification of subcutaneous fat deposits of songbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 64, 246255.Google Scholar
Knowles, SCL, Palinauskas, V and Sheldon, BC (2010) Chronic malaria infections increase family inequalities and reduce parental fitness: experimental evidence from a wild bird population. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, 557569.Google Scholar
Knowles, SCL, Wood, MJ, Alves, R, Wilkin, TA, Bensch, S and Sheldon, BC (2011) Molecular epidemiology of malaria prevalence and parasitaemia in a wild bird population. Molecular Ecology 20, 10621076.Google Scholar
Krama, T, Krams, R, Cīrule, D, Moore, FR, Rantala, MJ and Krams, IA (2015) Intensity of haemosporidian infection of parids positively correlates with proximity to water bodies, but negatively with host survival. Journal of Ornithology 156, 10751084.Google Scholar
Kubacka, J, Oppel, S, Dyrcz, A, Lachmann, L, Barros Da Costa, JPD, Kail, U and Zdunek, W (2014) Effect of mowing on productivity in the endangered Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. Bird Conservation International 24, 4558.Google Scholar
Kučera, J (1982) Blood parasites of birds in Central Europe. 4. Trypanosoma, “Atoxoplasma”, microfilariae and other rare haematozoa. Folia Parasitologica 29, 107113.Google Scholar
Laurance, SGW, Jones, D, Westcott, D, Mckeown, A, Harrington, G and Hilbert, DW (2013) Habitat fragmentation and ecological traits influence the prevalence of avian blood parasites in a tropical rainforest landscape. PLoS ONE 8, e76227.Google Scholar
Li, Z, Roux, E, Dessay, N, Girod, R, Stefani, A, Nacher, M, Moiret, A and Seyler, F (2016) Mapping a knowledge-based malaria hazard index related to landscape using remote sensing: application to the cross-border area between French Guiana and Brazil. Remote Sensing 8, 319.Google Scholar
Lillie, TH, Kline, DL and Hall, DW (1988) Host-seeking activity of Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) near Yankeetown, Florida. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 4, 485493.Google Scholar
Loiseau, C, Iezhova, T, Valkiūnas, G, Chasar, A, Hutchinson, A, Buermann, W, Smith, TB and Sehgal, RNM (2010) Spatial variation of haemosporidian parasite infection in African rainforest bird species. Journal of Parasitology 96, 2129.Google Scholar
Loye, J and Carroll, S (1995) Birds, bugs and blood: avian parasitism and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, 232235.Google Scholar
Lyles, AM and Dobson, AP (1993) Infectious disease and intensive management: population dynamics, threatened hosts, and their parasites. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24, 315326.Google Scholar
Martin, F, McCreadie, J and Colbo, M (1994) Effect of trap site, time of day, and meteorological factors on abundance of host-seeking mammalophilic black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). The Canadian Entomologist 126, 283289.Google Scholar
Martínez-De La Puente, J, Merino, S, Lobato, E, Rivero-De Aguilar, J, Del Cerro, S, Ruiz-De-Castañeda, R and Moreno, J (2009) Does weather affect biting fly abundance in avian nests? Journal of Avian Biology 40, 653657.Google Scholar
Marzal, A (2012) Malaria parasites. In Okwa, DO (ed.), Rijeka, Chroatia: InTech, pp. 135159. doi: 10.5772/33730.Google Scholar
Marzal, A, de Lope, F, Navarro, C and Møller, AP (2005) Malarial parasites decrease reproductive success: an experimental study in a passerine bird. Oecologia 142, 541545.Google Scholar
McCurdy, DG, Shutler, D, Mullie, A and Forbes, MR (1998) Sex-biased parasitism of avian hosts: relations to blood parasite taxon and mating system. Oikos 82, 303312.Google Scholar
McGarigal, K, Cushman, SA, Neel, MC and Ene, E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. University of Massachusettes, Amherst, MA. URL . doi: citeulike-article-id:287784.Google Scholar
Merino, S, Moreno, J, Sanz, JJ and Arriero, E (2000) Are avian blood parasites pathogenic in the wild? A medication experiment in Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 267, 25072510.Google Scholar
Molyneux, DH (1977) Vector relationships in the Trypanosomatidae. Advances in Parasitology 15, 182.Google Scholar
Neto, JM, Pérez-Rodríguez, A, Haase, M, Flade, M and Bensch, S (2015) Prevalence and diversity of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus parasites in the globally-threatened Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. Parasitology 142, 11831189.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Henry, M, Stevens, H, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-4.Google Scholar
Oppliger, A, Clobert, J, Lecomte, J, Lorenzon, P, Boudjemadi, K and John-Alder, HB (1998) Environmental stress increases the prevalence and intensity of blood parasite infection in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Ecology Letters 1, 129138.Google Scholar
Pérez-Rodríguez, A, Khimoun, A, Ollivier, A, Eraud, C, Faivre, B and Garnier, S (2018) Habitat fragmentation, not habitat loss, drives the prevalence of blood parasites in a Caribbean passerine. Ecography 41, 18351849.Google Scholar
Podmokła, E, Dubiec, A, Drobniak, SM, Arct, A, Gustafsson, L and Cichoń, M (2014) Determinants of prevalence and intensity of infection with malaria parasites in the Blue Tit. Journal of Ornithology 155, 721727.Google Scholar
Polish Society for the Protection of Birds (2014) Raport monitoringów w projekcie LIFE+ „Wodniczka i biomasa” (lata 2011-2014) wraz z oceną działań projektu. Marki, Poland: OTOP.Google Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2018) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.Google Scholar
Rätti, O, Dufva, R and Alatalo, RV (1993) Blood parasites and male fitness in the pied flycatcher. Oecologia 96, 410414.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reinoso-Pérez, MT, Canales-Delgadillo, JC, Chapa-Vargas, L and Riego-Ruiz, L (2016) Haemosporidian parasite prevalence, parasitemia, and diversity in three resident bird species at a shrubland dominated landscape of the Mexican highland plateau. Parasites and Vectors 9, 307.Google Scholar
Reullier, J, Pérez-Tris, J, Bensch, S and Secondi, J (2006) Diversity, distribution and exchange of blood parasites meeting at an avian moving contact zone. Molecular Ecology 15, 753763.Google Scholar
Ries, L, Fletcher, RJ, Battin, J and Sisk, TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 491522.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J and Russell, DW (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edn. New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbor.Google Scholar
Schaefer, HM, Naef-Daenzer, B, Leisler, B, Schmid, V, Muller, JK and Schulze-Hagen, K (2000) Spatial behaviour in the Aquatic Warbler (Acrocephalus paludicola) during mating and breeding. Journal fur Ornithologie 141, 418424.Google Scholar
Scordato, ESC and Kardish, MR (2014) Prevalence and beta diversity in avian malaria communities: host species is a better predictor than geography. Journal of Animal Ecology 83, 13871397.Google Scholar
Sebaio, F, Braga, ÉM, Branquinho, F, Manica, LT and Marini, (2010) Blood parasites in Brazilian Atlantic Forest birds: effects of fragment size and habitat dependency. Bird Conservation International 20, 432439.Google Scholar
Sehgal, RNM (2015) Manifold habitat effects on the prevalence and diversity of avian blood parasites. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4, 421430.Google Scholar
Sehgal, RNM, Jones, HI and Smith, TB (2001) Host specificity and incidence of Trypanosoma in some African rainforest birds: a molecular approach. Molecular Ecology 10, 23192327.Google Scholar
Shurulinkov, P and Chakarov, N (2006) Prevalence of blood parasites in different local populations of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). Parasitology Research 99, 588592.Google Scholar
Shurulinkov, P, Chakarov, N and Daskalova, G (2012) Blood parasites, body condition, and wing length in two subspecies of yellow wagtail (Motacilla flava) during migration. Parasitology Research 110, 20432051.Google Scholar
Shurulinkov, P, Spasov, L, Stoyanov, G and Chakarov, N (2018) Blood parasite infections in a wild population of ravens (Corvus corax) in Bulgaria. Malaria Journal 17, 33.Google Scholar
Shutler, D, Clark, RG, Rutherford, ST and Mullie, A (1999) Blood parasites, clutch volume, and condition of Gadwalls and Mallards. Journal of Avian Biology 30, 295301.Google Scholar
Šlapeta, J, Morin-Adeline, V, Thompson, P, McDonell, D, Shiels, M, Gilchrist, K, Votýpka, J and Vogelnest, L (2016) Intercontinental distribution of a new trypanosome species from Australian endemic Regent Honeyeater (Anthochaera phrygia). Parasitology 143, 10121025.Google Scholar
Svensson, L (1992) Identification Guide to European Passerines, 4th Edn. Norfolk, UK: British Trust for Ornithology.Google Scholar
Svoboda, A, Marthinsen, G, Turčoková, L, Lifjeld, JT and Johnsen, A (2009) Identification of blood parasites in Old World warbler species from the Danube River Delta. Avian Diseases Digest 53, 634636.Google Scholar
Svobodová, M, Dolnik, OV, Čepička, I and Rádrová, J (2017) Biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of avian trypanosomes. Parasites and Vectors 10, 224.Google Scholar
Tella, JL, Blanco, G, Forero, MG, Gajon, A, Donazar, JA and Hiraldo, F (1999) Habitat, world geographic range, and embryonic development of hosts explain the prevalence of avian hematozoa at small spatial and phylogenetic scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 17851789.Google Scholar
Thomson, RL, Tomás, G, Forsman, JT, Broggi, J and Mönkkönen, M (2010) Predator proximity as a stressor in breeding flycatchers: mass loss, stress protein induction, and elevated provisioning. Ecology 91, 18321840.Google Scholar
Valkiūnas, G (2005) Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Valkiūnas, G, Z̆ic̆kus, T, Shapoval, AP and Iezhova, TA (2006) Effect of Haemoproteus belopolskyi (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) on body mass of the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla. Journal of Parasitology 92, 11231125.Google Scholar
van Riper, C, van Riper, SG, Goff, ML and Laird, M (1986) The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Ecological Monographs 56, 327344.Google Scholar
Ventim, R, Morais, J, Pardal, S, Mendes, L, Ramos, JA and Pérez-Tris, J (2012) Host-parasite associations and host-specificity in haemoparasites of reed bed passerines. Parasitology 139, 310316.Google Scholar
Verhulst, S and Nilsson, (2008) The timing of birds’ breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, 399410.Google Scholar
Votýpka, J, Szabová, J, Rádrová, J, Zídková, L and Svobodová, M (2012) Trypanosoma culicavium sp. nov., an avian trypanosome transmitted by Culex mosquitoes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 62, 745754.Google Scholar
Waldenström, J, Bensch, S, Kiboi, S, Hasselquist, D and Ottosson, U (2002) Cross-species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Molecular Ecology 11, 15451554.Google Scholar
Wood, MJ, Cosgrove, CL, Wilkin, TA, Knowles, SCL, Day, KP and Sheldon, BC (2007) Within-population variation in prevalence and lineage distribution of avian malaria in blue tits, Cyanistes caeruleus. Molecular Ecology 16, 32633273.Google Scholar
Zehtindjiev, P, Ilieva, M, Westerdahl, H, Hansson, B, Valkiunas, G and Bensch, S (2008) Dynamics of parasitemia of malaria parasites in a naturally and experimentally infected migratory songbird, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Experimental Parasitology 119, 99110.Google Scholar
Zehtindjiev, P, Ilieva, M, Krizanauskiene, A, Oparina, O, Oparin, M and Bensch, S (2009) Occurrence of haemosporidian parasites in the paddyfield warbler, Acrocephalus agricola (Passeriformes, Sylviidae). Acta Parasitologica 54, 295300.Google Scholar
Zídková, L, Cepicka, I, Szabová, J and Svobodová, M (2012) Biodiversity of avian trypanosomes. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 12, 102112. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.10.022.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of the 11 sampling locations including the numbers of Aquatic Warblers. The map was created using QGIS (QGIS Development Team, 2018).

Figure 1

Table 1. Patch and landscape metrics of habitat edge used in the study

Figure 2

Table 2. Blood parasites identified in breeding Aquatic Warblers. For Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon, information on the species, host range and transmission was obtained from the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., 2009), as of December 2018, with the transmission of SYAT24, SW5 and SYBOR02 additionally checked in other available literature. A lineage was considered to be transmitted in Europe if it has previously been found in juvenile birds of a migratory species or adult/juvenile birds of a resident species. For Trypanosoma, data were obtained from GenBank (features of deposited sequences) and through screening of published literature

Figure 3

Table 3. Diversity and prevalence of blood parasites in the two studied breeding populations of the Aquatic Warbler. Differences significant at the 0.05 level are marked in bold

Figure 4

Table 4. Model selection results and estimates of the fixed variables converted to odds ratios (OR) from the analysis relating a) landscape metrics and b) individual variables to infection status. Models within ΔAICc⩾2 (i.e. with strong relative support) and ORs different from 1, based on their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), are marked in bold. K – number of estimable parameters. AICc – Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size, ΔAICc – difference of AICc relative to the top model, ωAICc – Akaike weight (probability of a model)

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Probability of infection of Aquatic Warblers by genus Trypanosoma in relation to (a) core area index and (b) edge density of breeding habitat patches. The lines were fitted based on the estimates from the respective top models in Table 4a and the bands show confidence intervals. Circles show infected (y = 1) and uninfected (y = 0) individuals, with the circle area proportional to the number of individuals (n) for a given value of the metric.

Supplementary material: File

Kubacka et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Kubacka et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.3 KB