Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T06:30:21.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clarithromycin, a cytochrome P450 inhibitor, can reverse mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis- infected Swiss mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2011

RENU TRIPATHI*
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), Lucknow-226001, India
SWAROOP KUMAR PANDEY
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), Lucknow-226001, India
AMBER RIZVI
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), Lucknow-226001, India
*
*Corresponding author: Division of Parasitology, P.O.Box No. 173, Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR), Chattar Manzil Palace, Lucknow 226001, India. Tel: +91 522 2212411 18 Extn. 4461. Fax: +91 522 223405/223938. E-mail: renu1113@rediffmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During the last 2 decades there have been numerous reports of the emergence of mefloquine resistance in Southeast Asia and nearly 50% resistance is reported in Thailand. A World Health Organization report (2001) considers mefloquine as an important component of ACT (artesunate+mefloquine) which is the first line of treatment for the control of uncomplicated/multi-drug resistant (MDR) Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In view of the emergence of resistance towards this drug, it is proposed to develop new drug combinations to prolong the protective life of this drug. Prior studies have suggested that mefloquine resistance can be overcome by a variety of agents such as ketoconazole, cyproheptadine, penfluridol, Icajine and NP30. The present investigation reports that clarithromycin (CLTR), a new macrolide, being a potent inhibitor of Cyt. P450 3A4, can exert significant resistance reversal action against mefloquine resistance of plasmodia. Experiments were carried out to find out the curative dose of CLTR against multi-drug resistant P. yoelii nigeriensis. Mefloquine (MFQ) and clarithromycin (CLTR) combinations have been used for the treatment of this MDR parasite. Different dose combinations of these two drugs were given to the infected mice on day 0 (prophylactic) and day 1 with established infection (therapeutic) to see the combined effect of these combinations against the MDR malaria infection. With a dose of 32 mg/kg MFQ and 225 mg/kg CLTR, 100% cure was observed, while in single drug groups, treated with MFQ or CLTR, the cure was zero and 40% respectively. Therapeutically, MFQ and CLTR combinations 32+300 mg/kg doses cleared the established parasitaemia on day 10. Single treatment with MFQ or CLTR showed considerable suppression of parasitaemia on day 14 but neither was curative. Follow-up of therapeutically treated mice showed enhanced anti-malarial action as reflected by their 100% clearance of parasitaemia. The present study reveals that CLTR is a useful antibiotic to be used as companion drug with mefloquine in order to overcome mefloquine resistance in plasmodia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

INTRODUCTION

Multi-drug resistant malaria is fast emerging in Southeast Asia, Africa and other continents. The national malaria control programme in tropical countries have reported high levels of resistance to chloroquine, amodiaquine, MFQ, quinine, halofantrine and combinations including pyrimethamine- sulfadoxin and LAPDAP. According to World Health Organization reports (2008), there are approximately 275 million malaria cases throughout the world with nearly 1·1million deaths occurring annually. In a recent report of World Health Organization (2010a), malaria causes about 2414 deaths a day, over 90% of those are in Sub-Sahara Africa. The mortality among the children and infants is highest in Africa with 5 children dying every minute.

During the last 2 decades MFQ (amino alcohol) alone or its combinations with artemisinin derivatives had been preferred over artemether, artesunate monotherapy because of higher cure rates with artesunate + MFQ and artemether + MFQ (Looareesuwan et al. Reference Looareesuwan, Wilariatana, Viravan, Vanijanonta, Pitisutithum and Kyle1997; Price et al. Reference Price, Luxemburger, van Vugt, Simpson, Phaipun, Chongsuphajaisiddhi, Nosten and White1998) but now the resistance against MFQ has attained serious dimensions reaching a level of nearly 50% in Thailand (Nosten et al. Reference Nosten, Kuile, Chongsaphajaisiddhi, White, Kuile, Luxemburger, Webster, Edstein, Phajpun, Thew and White1991). Five fixed-dose ACT's combinations have been identified, namely artemether with lumefantrine, artesunate with MFQ, artesunate with pyronaridine, artesunate with amodiaquine and DHA with piperaquine for the control of uncomplicated P. falciparum (World Health Organization, 2010b, Sinclair et al Reference Sinclair, Olliaro and Garner2010). Because of the emergence of resistance the efficacy of MFQ is being compromised and overall cure rates are declining.

CLTR, a new macrolide, is specifically used for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare (atypical mycobacteria) (Malhotra-Kumar et al. Reference Malhotra-Kumar, Lammens, Coenen, Herck and Goossens2007). This macrolide has also been claimed to be effective against helminth Echinococcus multilocularis by virtue of its inhibition of mitochondrial ribosomes. Further the mitochondrial ribosome in Acanthamoeba castellanii has also been found to be a target for CLTR, resulting in inhibition of encystment of amoebae (Mathis et al. Reference Mathis, Wild, Deplazes and Boettger2004). In vitro anti-malarial activity of CLTR against schizont maturation had been studied in 2 strains of P. falciparum (chloroquine-sensitive P.f.3D7 and chloroquine-resistant P.f.K1) (Wisedpanichkij et al. Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009) but the IC50 values were very high i.e. >10 μ m.

Being the cytochrome P450 inhibitor (Pinto et al. Reference Pinto, Wanq, Chalasani, Skaar, Kolwankar, Gorski, Lianqpunsaqul, Hamman, Arefayene and Hall2005), CLTR in the present communication has been used in combination with MFQ to reverse MFQ resistance of plasmodia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and parasites

Outbred Swiss mice of either sex weighing 22–25 g were procured from the animal facilities at the institute and maintained on commercial pellet diet and water ad libitum under standard housing conditions. Ethical guidelines on handling and use of experimental animals were followed during the conduct of the study.

The rodent malaria parasite P. yoelii nigeriensis multi-drug resistant (MDR) was used in the study, which is resistant to chloroquine (250 mg/kg×4 d), MFQ (128 mg/kg×4 d) and quinine (400 mg/kg×4 d). These are the maximum tested doses for the particular anti-malarials. The parasite was maintained in the animals through sequential passages from the blood of infected mice, obtained by cardiac puncture.

Curative dose of CLTR

To determine the curative dose of CLTR, it was given alone to groups of Swiss mice inoculated with 2×105 multi-drug-resistant rodent malaria parasite P. yoelii nigeriensis-infected erythrocytes. The concentrations at which the drug was administered were 150, 200, 250, and 400 mg/kg×7 days. These doses were given every day in 2 divided doses for 7 days. The route of drug administration was oral. The drug was given twice in a day due to its short elimination half-life. Parasitaemia was monitored by Giemsa-stained thin blood smears on pre-determined days and the rate of survival was duly recorded.

Combination of MFQ and CLTR

To study the effect of the MFQ and CLTR combination, mice were inoculated with 2×105 P. yoelii nigeriensis MDR-infected erythrocytes. At 2–4 h after infection, they were treated with daily doses of MFQ alone (given orally once a day), CLTR alone (given orally twice a day) and with various combination groups of MFQ+CLTR (32+225 mg/kg, 48/32/16+150/75 mg/kg). For therapeutic efficacy of MFQ+CLTR different doses of this combination (64/32+300/150 mg/kg×4 d) were administrated to infected mice with 0·9–2·5% established infection. Mice in the control group were injected with the parasites only. Parasitaemia was monitored by Giemsa-stained thin blood smears on pre-determined days and survival of the mice was duly recorded.

Assessment of anti-malarial interaction between mefloquine and clarithromycin

To obtain numeric values for the type of interactions, results were expressed as the sum of the fractional inhibitory concentrations (sum FIC) at the given effective concentrations by the formula (ECx of agent A in the mixture/ECx of agent A alone)+(ECx of agent B in the mixture/ECx of agent B alone) (Gupta et al. Reference Gupta, Thapar, Wernsdorfer and Bjorkman2002). Sum FIC values indicate the type of anti-malarial interaction as follows: ‘synergistic’ if sum FIC<1; ‘fully additive’ if sum FIC=1; partially additive if sum FIC<2 provided that both contributory FICs<1; ‘antagonistic’ if any FIC>1.

RESULTS

In the present communication anti-malarial assessment of MFQ with CLTR administered orally, has been evaluated against P. yoelii nigeriensis a multi-drug-resistant rodent infection, using random-bred Swiss mice following administration of individual drugs and their combinations. The parasite used in the study was resistant to orally administered chloroquine (250 mg/kg×4 days), MFQ (128 mg/kg×4 days) and quinine (400 mg/kg×4 days). By oral administration of CLTR at doses of 150, 200, 250 and 400 mg/kg×7days it was shown that the antibiotic was fully curative at 400 mg/kg×7 days (Table 1).

Table 1. Curative dose of clarithromycin in Swiss mice infected with Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis MDR

For further studies MFQ dosing was evaluated at 16, 32 and 48 mg/kg×4 days and these doses were found to be suppressive only, resulting in survival of 5 out of 5 mice each at 32 and 48 mg/kg while at 16 mg/kg only 2 mice survived beyond 28 days of observation. CLTR was also administered at 75, 150 and 225 mg/kg×7days, these doses were also suppressive. At the highest dose of CLTR i.e. 225 mg/kg, 5 mice survived beyond 28 days, at 75 and 150 mg/kg doses, only 2 and 4 mice survived. Control untreated mice died of high parasitaemia by day 7.

When the MFQ and CLTR combinations were used at 32 mg/kg and 225 mg/kg respectively, there was 100% cure and none of the treated mice developed parasitaemia up to 28 days of observation, while drugs alone produced only 0 and 40% cure respectively during the observation period of 28 days. In another batch when CLTR dose was reduced to 150 mg/kg with MFQ 48 mg/kg, there was no parasitaemia until 24 days but 2 out of 5 mice developed a low level of parasitaemia on day 28. In the drug groups given MFQ or CLTR, most of the treated mice had developed infection on day 4. Further, lower doses of CLTR i.e.75 and 150 mg/kg combined with MFQ at 16, 32 and 48 mg/kg showed complete suppression of parasitaemia up to day 10 while from day 14 onwards, a low level of parasitaemia appeared, as shown in Table 2. Nevertheless, judging from percentage cure on day 28 in MFQ alone groups which was very low (ranging from 0 to 40%) while the combination groups of MFQ and CLTR showed better protection which ranged from 40 to 100%.

Table 2. Prophylactic response of mefloquine and clarithromycin against MDR Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis in Swiss mice

Number of positive mice/number of total live mice on particular day is given in parentheses.

* Clarithromycin was given in 2 divided doses.

Therapeutic anti-malarial effect

Mice were infected with P. yoelii nigeriensis and treatment was started on day 1 after confirming the average parasitaemia which ranged from 0·9–2·5%. There was an increasing trend of parasitaemia up to 60 h in all the treated batches. In MFQ/CLTR-treated groups parasitaemia started declining after 60 h. In the combination groups (32+300 and 64+300 mg/kg doses), mice showed clearance of parasitaemia on day 10 whereas at the doses of 150+32 and 64 mg/kg, parasitaemia was cleared on day 14. Parasitaemia in single treatments with CLTR or MFQ showed considerable suppression. Follow-up of parasitaemia in the treated mice showed complete clearance in all the combination-treated groups. Amongst the monotherapy with CLTR at 300 mg/kg, parasitaemia was cleared by day 28. Since this parasite is resistant to MFQ, a low level of parasitaemia persisted in the MFQ alone treatment group beyond 28 days. Finally all 4 batches treated with the CLTR and MFQ combination showed enhanced anti-malarial action as reflected by their 100% clearance of parasitaemia (Table 3).

Table 3. Therapeutic response of mefloquine and clarithromycin against MDR Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis in Swiss mice

Treatment was started at 24 h post-infection.

**Clarithromycin was given in 2 divided doses.

Anti-malarial interaction between MFQ and CLTR

The anti-malarial interaction of MFQ in combination with CLTR was assessed against P. yoelii nigeriensis infection in Swiss mice. The median (range) sums of the FICs for the anti-malarial interaction between MFQ and CLTR were <0·66 for prophylactic treatment and for therapeutic treatment it was <0·85. The sums of the FICs of <1·0 in both the experiments indicated synergistic interaction between the two drugs (Table 4).

Table 4. Median (range) sum of FICs for the interaction of mefloquine – clarithromycin against Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis MDR.

Maximum tolerated dose i.e. 300 mg/kg×4 days and 400 mg/kg×7days were given for mefloquine and clarithromycin respectively. FICs- Synergy<1; addtivity 1; antagonism>1.

The present study also reveals that the doses of both drugs administered orally were safe and did not produce any apparent side effects.

DISCUSSION

Our present study has shown the enhanced anti-malarial effect of a conventional anti-malarial MFQ with a new macrolide CLTR.

CLTR has recently been reported to exhibit in vitro anti-malarial activity against the chloroquine-sensitive strain of P. falciparum (3D7) and the chloroquine-resistant strain P. falciparum K1, and the IC50 was reported to be >10μ m for both the strains (Wisedpanichkij et al. Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009). This antibiotic is specifically useful for treatment of Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare (atypical mycobacteria) with a dose schedule of 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Its bioavailability is nearly 50% by the oral route and is the preferred treatment for children. This is preferred for oral use because of its basic stability in the stomach and its ability to achieve high therapeutic levels (Pai et al. Reference Pai, Graci and Amesden2000). CLTR is reported to be metabolized to 4-hydroxy CLTR, which has twice as active anti-bacterial profile compared to its parent drug. The half- life of CLTR has been reported to be 3–7 h while that of its active metabolite is nearly 7 h (Malhotra-Kumar et al. Reference Malhotra-Kumar, Lammens, Coenen, Herck and Goossens2007). This antibiotic has activity against the helminths (Echinococcus multilocularis) and Acanthamoeba castellanii (Mathis et al. Reference Mathis, Wild, Deplazes and Boettger2004, Reference Mathis, Wild, Boettger, Kapel and Deplazes2005).

After developing resistance against chloroquine and fansidar, MFQ was the only mainstay for P. falciparum treatment. During the last 2 decades there have been numerous reports of emergence of MFQ resistance in Southeast Asia (Price et al. Reference Price, Nosten, Luxemburger, Kham, Brockman, Chongsuphajaisiddhi and White1995) and Nosten et al. Reference Nosten, Kuile, Chongsaphajaisiddhi, White, Kuile, Luxemburger, Webster, Edstein, Phajpun, Thew and White1991 had reported nearly 50% MFQ resistance in P. falciparum in Thailand. This drug was considered as the backbone for anti-malarial operation because of its high level of activity and prolonged period of plasma clearance (more than 42 days). In view of the emergence of resistance towards this drug the World Health Organization (2004, 2006) proposed new drug combinations to prolong the protective life of this drug but MFQ in combination with artesunate or artemether could not produce 100% cure (Price et al. Reference Price, Nosten, Luxemburger, Kham, Brockman, Chongsuphajaisiddhi and White1995; Looareesuwan et al. Reference Looareesuwan, Wilariatana, Viravan, Vanijanonta, Pitisutithum and Kyle1997).

Preliminary studies reported earlier suggested that it could be possible to reverse MFQ resistance of P. falciparum. Kyle et al. (Reference Kyle, Milhous and Odula1988) and Odoula et al. (1993) reported that MFQ resistance of P. falciparum could be partly reversed in vitro by reversal agents such as penfluridol. Peters and Robinson (Reference Peters and Robinson1991) reported that MFQ resistance could be reversed in rodents through penfluridol. Cyproheptadine and its derivatives had also been reported to reverse this resistance of P. falciparum in vitro (Baldwin et al. Reference Baldwin, Gabriel, Friedman and Remy1991). Further studies on MFQ resistance reversal by Frederich et al. (Reference Frederich, Hayette, Tits, Mol and Angenot2001) showed the resistance reversal action of icajine against MFQ-resistant P. falciparum in vitro. Icajine was isolated as a menoindole alkaloid from the plant Strychnous myrtoides.

Ketoconazole pharmacokinetic studies had indicated that this anti-fungal had shown inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A, which inhibited the biotransformation of MFQ into 2 major metabolites namely carboxy MFQ and hydroxyl MFQ. The authors had proposed that this inhibition led to the enhanced bioavailability of MFQ resulting in increasing the plasma levels of active drug MFQ through slowing down its conversion to its metabolites. Cytochrome 3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole was reported to potentiate the action against MFQ resistance of the malaria parasite (Awasthi et al. Reference Awasthi, Dutta, Bhakuni and Tripathi2004).

Earlier studies had also reported that a combination of γ-interferon and MFQ was able to partially reverse the MFQ resistance of MDR P. yoelii nigeriensis, and this combination was reported to give 62% protection compared to MFQ alone which protected 25% in mice (Dhawan et al. Reference Dhawan, Awasthi, Tripathi, Puri and Dutta2000). The resistance reversal effect of NP30 (an uncharged poly-ethoxylated non-phenol surfactant) against MFQ resistance of P. falciparum had been documented in an in vitro study (Ciach et al. Reference Ciach, Zong, Kain and Crandall2003). In a subsequent study, the resistance reversal action of ketoconazole, a cytochrome P450 inhibitor, against MFQ-resistant simian malaria P. knowlesi strain W1 had been established (Tripathi et al. Reference Tripathi, Awasthi and Dutta2005). The strain W1 of P. knowlesi has innate resistance against MFQ up to a total dose of 80–160 mg/kg administered over 3–4 days. Combined treatment with 75 mg/kg ketoconazole for 10 days, together with a low dose of MFQ (20 mg/kg×4 days), cured the infection in rhesus monkeys. It was reported that ketoconazole besides having a suppressive anti-malarial action against P. knowlesi, was also effective in reversing the MFQ resistance of the parasite resulting in the curative effect of the combination.

Wisedpanichkij et al. (Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009) studied the in vitro anti-malarial activity of Cyp 3A4 inhibitors namely ketoconazole and CLTR against P. falciparum K1 and 3D7 strains and demonstrated that both the Cyp 3A4 inhibitors showed anti-malarial activity as demonstrated by their IC50 of 3·8 and 4·8μ m for ketoconazole and >10 μ m for CLTR. As compared to these Cyp inhibitors, MFQ tested in vitro showed IC50 8·6 and 12·1 nm against P. falciparum K1 and 3D7 isolates respectively. They provided preliminary in vitro evidence to support the concept that Cyp inhibitors could have a role in reversing MFQ resistance of P. falciparum also. They supported our earlier finding that ketoconazole – a Cyp 3A4 inhibitor could provide a higher concentration of MFQ in plasma due to inhibition of metabolism of MFQ to carboxy MFQ (inactive metabolite) (Fontaine et al. Reference Fontaine, Sousa, Burcham, Duchene and Rahmani2000). Ridtitid et al. (Reference Ridtitid, Wongnawa, Mahatthanatrakul, Raungsri and Sunbhanich2005) had also reported an increased plasma concentration of MFQ in healthy human volunteers administered MFQ together with ketoconazole.

The present paper deals with the anti-malarial action of a new macrolide antibiotic CLTR, an inhibitor of hepatic microsomal Cyp450 enzyme (Brophy et al. Reference Brophy, Isreal, Pastor, Gillotin, Chittick, Symonds, Lou, Sadler and Polk2000; Westphal, Reference Westphal2000; Suzuki et al. Reference Suzuki, Ilda, Hirota, Akimoto, Higuchi, Suwa, Tani, Ishizaki and Chiba2003; Zhou, Reference Zhou2008) that was evaluated in combination with MFQ to assess the reversal of MFQ resistance in P. yoelii nigeriensis in vivo. The anti-malarial action of CLTR has been reported earlier by Wisedpanichkij et al. (Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009) against P. falciparum with IC50 of >10 μ m. Based on in vitro results of the combination of MFQ and ketoconazole (Wisedpanichkij et al. Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009) and in vivo results of P. yoelii nigeriensis (Awasthi et al. Reference Awasthi, Dutta, Bhakuni and Tripathi2004) and P. knowlesi (Tripathi et al. Reference Tripathi, Awasthi and Dutta2005), Wisedpanichkij et al. (Reference Wisedpanichkij, Chaijaroenkul, Sangsuwan, Tantisawat, Boonprasert and Bangchang2009) speculated that being a cyp inhibitor ketoconazole could exert a synergistic effect when tested in combination with MFQ. They also postulated that cyp 3A4 inhibitors, in general, could have a role in reversing MFQ resistance.

The present study also reports that CLTR can exert a curative action against MDR/MFQ-resistant P. yoelii nigeriensis at 400 mg/kg dose×7days schedule. The lower dose 250 mg/kg×7 days produces a suppressive effect with 80% cure. When MFQ was combined with CLTR, a synergistic anti-malarial effect and complete suppression of parasitaemia were observed up to 10 days. Further studies with MFQ 48 mg/kg combined with CLTR 150 mg/kg showed synergistic action as these combinations completely eliminated the P. yoelii nigeriensis parasitaemia beyond 24 days, though trace parasitaemia was observed. When a higher dose of CLTR (225 mg/kg) was combined with a lower dose of MFQ (32 mg/kg), there was complete cure beyond 28 days, indicating synergistic and curative actions of both these drugs in combination.

In order to monitor the therapeutic response of the MFQ and CLTR combination, the treatment was started 24 h after infection in mice, and doses of CLTR 300 mg/kg combined with MFQ at 32 and 64 mg/kg×4 days, the parasitaemia was completely suppressed by day 10 post-infection, and this combination completely cured P. yoelii.nigeriensis infection in both groups beyond 28 days. Even the lower doses of CLTR 150 mg/kg with 32 or 64 mg/kg of MFQ resulted in complete suppression of parasitaemia beyond 14 days of observation.

This study has established that MFQ and CLTR alone exert only suppressive effects on MFQ-resistant P. yoelii.nigeriensis. However, a combination of CLTR 150–300 mg/kg with MFQ 32–64 mg/kg exerts a synergistic effect, resulting in clearing parasitaemia beyond 14 days, and survival of all the treated mice.

The new macrolide CLTR exerts a resistance reversal effect on the MFQ-resistant P. yoelii nigeriensis infection. The data establish that CLTR, being a Cyp3A4 inhibitor, exerts an inhibitory effect on MFQ metabolism to carboxyMFQ. The MFQ-CLTR combination seems to produce significant pharmacokinetic (metabolic) drug interaction leading to a higher serum concentration of MFQ (Ridtitid et al. Reference Ridtitid, Wongnawa, Mahatthanatrakul, Raungsri and Sunbhanich2005). The CLTR–MFQ combination seems to slow down the metabolic conversion of MFQ to carboxy MFQ (inactive), thus helping to maintain a higher concentration of MFQ. These findings suggest that MFQ + CLTR combination therapy could provide elevated levels of MFQ in the blood and it may benefit human anti-malarial treatment of MFQ-resistant P. falciparum infection.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors are thankful to the Director, C.D.R.I. and Head, Division of Parasitology, C.D.R.I. for their continuous support throughout the study. Amber Rizvi and Swaroop K. Pandey acknowledge the financial support from CSIR, New Delhi. The funding for the present study was provided by CSIR-CDRI, India. CDRI communication No. 8065.

References

REFERENCES

Awasthi, A., Dutta, G. P., Bhakuni, V. and Tripathi, R. (2004). Resistance reversal action of ketoconazole against mefloquine resistance of Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis (MDR). Experimental Parasitology 107, 115119.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J., Gabriel, E. F., Friedman, P. A., Remy, D. C. (1991). Method of treating malaria with cyproheptadine derivatives. United States Patent 5021426.Google Scholar
Brophy, D. F., Isreal, D. S., Pastor, A., Gillotin, C., Chittick, G. E., Symonds, W. T., Lou, Y., Sadler, B. M. and Polk, R. E. (2000). Pharmacokinetic interaction between Amprenavir and clarithromycin in healthy male volunteers. Journal of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44, 978984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciach, M., Zong, K., Kain, K. C. and Crandall, I. (2003). Reversal of mefloquine and quinine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum with NP30. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 23932396.Google Scholar
Dhawan, S., Awasthi, A., Tripathi, R., Puri, S. K. and Dutta, G. P. (2000). Reversal of chloroquine/mefloquine resistance of Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis (MDR) by IFN-gamma and chloroquine resistance by Poly ICLC. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 24, 195201.Google Scholar
Fontaine, F., Sousa, G.de., Burcham, P. C., Duchene, P. and Rahmani, R. (2000). Role of cytochrome P450 3A in the metabolism of mefloquine in human and animal hepatocytes. Life Sciences 66, 21932212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederich, M., Hayette, M. P., Tits, M., Mol, P. D. and Angenot, L. (2001). Reversal of chloroquine and mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by the two monoindole alkaloids, Icajine and Isoretuline. Planta Medicine 67, 523–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S., Thapar, M. M., Wernsdorfer, W. H. and Bjorkman, A. (2002). In vitro interactions of artemisinin with atovaquone, quinine and mefloquine against plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46, 15101515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, D. E., Milhous, W. K. and Odula, M. M. J. (1988). Reversal of mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. 37th Annual Meeting of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Washington, D.C. 4–8 December, 1988. p. 218.Google Scholar
Looareesuwan, S., Wilariatana, P., Viravan, C., Vanijanonta, S., Pitisutithum, P. and Kyle, D. E. (1997). Open randomized trial of oral artemether alone and a sequential combination with mefloquine for acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. American Journal Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 56, 613617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra-Kumar, S., Lammens, C., Coenen, S., Herck, K. V. and Goossens, H. (2007). Effect of azithromycin and clarithromycin therapy on pharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant streptococci in healthy volunteers: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet 369, 482490. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60235-9. PMID 17292768.Google Scholar
Mathis, A., Wild, E. C., Boettger, E. C., Kapel, C. M. O. and Deplazes, C. P. (2005). The mitochondrial ribosome as target for macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin in the helminth Echinococcus multiocularis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49, 32513255.Google Scholar
Mathis, A., Wild, P., Deplazes, P. and Boettger, E. C. (2004). The mitochondrial ribosome of the protozoan Acanthamoeba castellanii is the target for macrolide antibiotics. Molecular and Biochemical and Parasitology 135, 225229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosten, F., Kuile, F. T., Chongsaphajaisiddhi, T., White, N. J., Kuile, F. T., Luxemburger, C., Webster, H. K., Edstein, M., Phajpun, L., Thew, K. L. and White, N. J. (1991). MFQ resistant falciparum malaria on the Thailand- Burmese border. Lancet, 337, 11401143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odoula, A. M., Omitowoju, G. O., Genera, L., Kyle, D. E., Milhouse, W. K., Sowunmi, A. and Salako, L. A. (1993). Reversal of mefloquine resistance with penfluoridol in isolates of Plasmodium falciparum from southwest Nigeria. Transaction of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 87, 8183.Google Scholar
Pai, M. P., Graci, D. M. and Amesden, G. W. (2000). Macrolide-drug interaction: An update. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 34, 495513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, W. and Robinson, B. L. (1991). The chemotherapy of rodent malaria. XLVI Reversal of mefloquine resistance in rodent Plasmodium. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 88, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, A. G., Wanq, Y. H., Chalasani, N., Skaar, T., Kolwankar, D., Gorski, J. C., Lianqpunsaqul, S., Hamman, M. A., Arefayene, M. and Hall, S. D. (2005). Inhibition of human intestinal wall metabolism by macrolide antibiotics: effect of clarithromycin on cytochrome P450 3A4/5 activity and expression. Clinical Pharmacological Therapy 77, 178188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, R. N., Luxemburger, C., van Vugt, M., Simpson, J., Phaipun, L., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, T., Nosten, F. and White, N. J. (1998). Artesunate and mefloquine in the treatment of uncomplicated multidrug- resistant hyperparasitaemic falciparum malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92, 207211.Google Scholar
Price, R. N., Nosten, F., Luxemburger, C., Kham, A. M., Brockman, A., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, T. and White, M. N. J. (1995). Artesunate versus artemether in combination with mefloquine for the treatment of multidrug resistant falciparum malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89, 523527.Google Scholar
Ridtitid, W., Wongnawa, M. W., Mahatthanatrakul, W., Raungsri, N. and Sunbhanich, M. (2005). Ketoconazole increases plasma concentrations of antimalarial mefloquine in healthy human volunteers. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 30, 285290.Google Scholar
Sinclair, D., Olliaro, P. and Garner, P. (2010). Guest Editorial: Artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria, but which one? Clinical Evidence 8, 14.Google Scholar
Suzuki, A., Ilda, I., Hirota, M., Akimoto, M., Higuchi, S., Suwa, T., Tani, M., Ishizaki, T. and Chiba, K. (2003). Cyp isoforms invoved in the metabolism of CLTR in vitro: Comparison between the identification from disappearance rate and that from formation rate of metabolites. Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 18, 104113.Google Scholar
Tripathi, R., Awasthi, A. and Dutta, G. P. (2005). Mefloquine resistance reversal action of ketoconazole- A cytochrome P450 inhibitor, against mefloquine resistant malaria. Parasitology 130, 475479.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. F. (2000). Macrolide induced clinically relevant drug interactions with cytochrome P450 A (CYP) 3A4: an update focused on clarithromycin, azithromycin and dirithromycin. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 50, 285295.Google Scholar
Wisedpanichkij, R., Chaijaroenkul, W., Sangsuwan, P., Tantisawat, J., Boonprasert, K. and Bangchang, K. N. (2009). In vitro antimalarial interactions between mefloquine and cytochrome P450 inhibitors. Acta Tropica 112, 1215.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2001). Antimalarial drug combination therapy: Report of WHO Technical Combination, Geneva, Switzerland. (WHO/CDS/RBM/2001·35)Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2004) The World Health Report 2004 – Changing Story. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2006). Facts on ACTs (Artemisinin Based Combinations): An Update. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2008). Malaria Report. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2010 a). Malaria – Disease Burden in SEA Region. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2010 b). Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria. 2nd Edn. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Zhou, S. F. (2008). Drugs behave as substrates, inhibitors and inducers of human cytochrome P450 3A4. Current Drug Metabolism 9, 310322.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Curative dose of clarithromycin in Swiss mice infected with Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis MDR

Figure 1

Table 2. Prophylactic response of mefloquine and clarithromycin against MDR Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis in Swiss mice

Figure 2

Table 3. Therapeutic response of mefloquine and clarithromycin against MDR Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis in Swiss mice

Figure 3

Table 4. Median (range) sum of FICs for the interaction of mefloquine – clarithromycin against Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis MDR.