Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:56:21.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aromatase inhibitors and mood disturbances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Xiomara Rocha-Cadman*
Affiliation:
Psycho Oncology Fellowship Program, Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Psychiatry Services, New York
Mary Jane Massie
Affiliation:
Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York
Katherine Du Hamel
Affiliation:
Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, New York
*
Address correspondence and reprint request to: Xiomara Rocha-Cadman, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., Seventh Floor, New York, New York 10022. E-mail: rochacax@mskcc.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the case of a 56-year old woman with no prior psychiatric history who was diagnosed with hormone receptor positive early-stage breast cancer and who developed severe mood changes after administration of anastrozole, which resolved after discontinuation of treatment. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred hormonal approach for postmenopausal women with estrogen hormone sensitive breast cancer. The third-generation agents (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have been shown to be more effective and safer than the selective estrogen receptor modulators tamoxifen and raloxifen. Treatment strategies with these agents include the use of an AI as an upfront strategy for 5 years, as a sequential approach after 2–3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended use after the classical 5 years of tamoxifen. The side effects of AIs, as compared with selective estrogen receptor modulators, are different, reflecting the specific mechanism of action of these drugs. AIs are well tolerated and cause a lower incidence of gynecological symptoms (vaginal bleeding, discharge, and endometrial neoplasia), venous thromboembolic events, and hot flashes compared with tamoxifen. However, the use of AIs have been associated with loss of bone density, arthralgia, myalgia, a negative effect on lipid metabolism, and cardiovascular risk (Tomao et al., 2011). Mood disturbances, somnolence, anxiety, fatigue, hot flashes, and memory impairment have been reported among patients receiving anastrozole as adjuvant therapy.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

CASE REPORT

Mrs. X, was a 56-year-old Caucasian, married homemaker who lived with her husband and 16-year-old daughter. Her medical and surgical history was significant for hypothyroidism, diverticulosis, allergic rhinitis, Cesarian-section and face lift. Her past psychiatric history was significant for two previous psychiatric treatments. She first sought treatment for depression at age 34 after her mother's death from breast cancer. She was treated with both psychotherapy and paroxetine, which was discontinued because of side effects. Her second treatment was with a marriage counselor to consider marital conflicts. She had no history of substance abuse, psychiatric hospitalizations, or suicide attempts.

She was first diagnosed with breast cancer in July of 2010 after she found a lump on her left breast. She had an MRI that revealed lesions on both breasts. A left breast core biopsy demonstrated a poorly differentiated, ER + , PR + , HER2+ invasive ductal carcinoma. Her right breast findings were consistent with fibrocystic changes and she opted to undergo bilateral mastectomy. Post-surgically she had poor body image and low self-esteem. She received chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and docetaxel from March 2011 to May 2011 followed by adjuvant therapy with anastrozole.

She began anastrozole on August 20, 2011. On November 7, 2011, she told her medical oncologist that her family was complaining about her mood swings. She was raising havoc in her family and because of her behavior everyone hated her. Anastrozole was discontinued and she was switched to letrozole and a day later she reported that she continued to feel extremely depressed and achy. She was instructed to stop the letrozole. On November 17, 2011, two days after discontinuation of Letrozole, she presented with her husband to the emergency care unit with suicidal ideation. She told the psychiatrist: “I have been feeling depressed, moody, angry and irritable for 2 months.” She endorsed recurrent thoughts of death and unspecific suicidal ideation stating: “my family will be better off without me.” She reported feeling depressed, anxious, enraged, guilty, helpless, and hopeless. She was self-isolating, had low energy level, was anhedonic and forgetful and had an inability to concentrate. She also reported recurrent intrusive thoughts of her spouse's infidelity that occurred three years prior to her cancer diagnosis.

Her mental status examination (in the emergency care unit): she was dressed casually, appeared younger than her stated age, and wore a blonde shoulder length wig. She was both tearful and guarded. Her mood was depressed and was congruent with her affect. She had no suicidal ideation or psychotic thought process or content. Her insight and judgment were fair. Her MMSE: 29/30, GAD: 21 (20–27) severe depression, PHQ-9: 19 (15–19) moderately severe. Her treatment recommendations were to follow up in the outpatient clinic for weekly psychotherapy and to consider an antidepressant. She agreed to psychotherapy and declined the proposed pharmacotherapy.

At her first followup visit, on November 30, 2012, she reported a dramatic improvement in her mood after stopping Anastrozole. Her MMSE 30/30, GAD -7: 7, PHQ - 9: 9.

On January 4, 2011, she returned for a followup visit and reported that she had been started on Exemestane on December 6, 2012 and had not experienced any changes in her mood. She reported feeling less depressed, less anxious, and less irritable. Although she felt stressed by construction work in her home, she had returned to her usual activities and had enjoyed visiting her son in Florida. She described feeling better about herself and was looking forward to completing breast reconstruction with tattooing of both breast areolas. She also reported significant improvement in her appetite and concentration. She was able to sleep at night with help of Zolpidem. She denied having any suicidal ideation.

The patient was last seen on March 21, 2012 at which time she reported hot flushes, some sadness and mild irritability, which was alleviated by taking lorazepam 0.5 mg. The patient was exercising an hour a day and was enjoying daily activities. She had no suicidal thinking and continued to take lorazepam 0.5 once a day, zolpidem 10 mg at bedtime, levothyroxine Sodium 0.88 mcg daily, and exemestane 25 mg.

DISCUSSION

Postmenopausal women with hormone responsive breast cancer constitute about 56% of all women with early stage breast cancer (Fink et al., Reference Fink, Sumner, Rosie, Grace and Quinn1996). Although, Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor, was the standard of care for 35 years for women with breast cancer of all stages (Fink et al., Reference Fink, Sumner, Rosie, Grace and Quinn1996), currently, routine adjuvant standard of care for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer is an AI (Fontaine et al., Reference Fontaine, Meulemasns and Huizing2008).

Several trials have demonstrated a benefit from adjuvant AIs in the post-operative treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone responsive (HR+) early stage breast cancer. The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, alone or in combination (ATAC) trial is a phase III multinational, randomized double-blind trial initially comprised of 9366 postmenopausal women with breast cancer, which compared anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen following breast cancer surgery. The combination terminated early leaving further analysis limited to 6241 patients (Howell et al., Reference Howell, Cuzick and Baum2005). At a median followup of 68 months, treatment with anastrozole in HR+ patients revealed significant benefit in disease-free survival and time of recurrence. At 100 months followup, investigators observed a significant benefit in risk of distant metastasis in patients receiving anastrozole.

AIs lower the level of estrogen in the body. In postmenopausal women, the primary estrogen source is derived from conversion of androstenedione (produced by the adrenals) to estrone and estradiol in the peripheral tissues, including skin, adipose tissue, and breast. The enzyme responsible for the conversion is aromatase. AIs block the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol giving a rise in the androgen and a fall in estrogens (Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Williams and Marshall2008). Because premenopausal women have robust estrogen production in the ovaries, these agents are not effective in this population.

AIs are divided into two categories: steroidal/irreversible and nonsteroidal/ reversible inhibitors of estrogen synthesis. The nonsteroidal AIs are anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal compound is exemestane. Both classes reduce circulating estrogen to 1% to 10% of pretreatment levels. Low levels of estrogen in woman are linked with premenstrual syndrome and postmenopausal depression. See Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison between Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors

AIs are generally more manageable than those seen with tamoxifen. There is only one case report of mood change resulting from anastrozole treatment. Goodwin (Reference Goodwin2006) described a woman with a history of post partum depression who experienced labile mood, tremulousness, and difficulty sleeping on anastrozole. On letrozole, the same patient developed “an acute irritable activated mood” followed by a prolonged period of depression after its discontinuation.

Side effects of AI include changes in mood, mental state, cognition, and behavior. Mood disturbances were reported among 597/3092 (19.3%) patients receiving anastrozole vs. 554/3092 (17.9%) patients tamoxifen in the ATAC trial (Howell et al., Reference Howell, Cuzick and Baum2005).

This is a case report of depression following the use of AI in woman with history of breast cancer. AIs are generally well tolerated, and mood disturbances are not among the most commonly reported adverse events.

References

REFERENCES

Berry, J. (2005). Are all aromatase inhibitors the same? A review of controlled clinical trials in breast cancer. Clinical Therapeutics Journal, 27, 16711684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, S. (2003). Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The Oncologist, 9, 126136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, G., Sumner, B.E., Rosie, R., Grace, O. & Quinn, J.P. (1996). Estrogen control of central neurotransmission: Effect on mood, mental state and memory. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 16, 325344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontaine, C., Meulemasns, A., Huizing, M., et al. (2008). Tolerance of adjuvant letrozole outside of clinical trials. The Breast, 17, 376381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, G. (2006). Aromatase inhibitors and bipolar mood disorder: A case report. Bipolar Disorder, 8, 516518.Google Scholar
Henry, N.L., Stearns, V., Flockhart, D.A., et al. (2008). Drug interactions and pharmacogenomics in the treatment for breast cancer and depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 12511255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, D. & Hudis, C. (2003). Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: An update cancer control. Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center,Google Scholar
Howell, A., Cuzick, J., Baum, M., et al. (2005). Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen, Alone, or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The Lancet, 365, 6062.Google Scholar
Perez, E.A. (2007). Safety profiles of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors in adjuvant therapy of hormone-responsive early breast cancer. Annals Oncology, 18, viii–viii 35.Google Scholar
Thomas, R., Williams, M., Marshall, C., et al. (2008). Switching to letrozole or exemestane improves hot flushes, mood and quality if life in Tamoxifen intolerant women. British Journal of Cancer, 98, 14941499.Google Scholar
Tomao, F., Spinelli, G., Vici, P., et al. (2011). Current role and safety profile of aromatase inhibitors in early breast. Cancer Expert Rev Anticancer Therapy, 11, 12531263.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison between Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors