Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T16:50:12.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science, Religion, and Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Eugenie C. Scott
Eugenie C. Scott*
Affiliation:
National Center for Science Education, Inc., Box 9477 Berkeley, California 94709-0477
Get access

Extract

Evolution is one of the most controversial concepts for teachers to teach. The source of opposition to evolution primarily comes from a perception that acceptance of evolution is somehow incompatible with religion. In this paper, I shall discuss the sometimes bumpy relationships between science, religion and evolution, and what this history means for teachers. First, however, I should define the critical terms evolution, science, and religion.

Type
Faith and Science
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 9: Evolution: Investigating the Evidence , 1999 , pp. 361 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Behe, M., 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bible-Science Association, 1985. 1985 Bible-Science Association Conference Schedule, Aug. 14-15, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
Bishop, G., 1998. The Religious Worldview and American Beliefs About Human Origins. The Public Perspective, August/September, 1998, pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J., 1989. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, P.J., 1999. Going to Extremes in America. (Review of R. Numbers, Darwinism Comes to America) , Science 283:39.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M., 1998. Oppressed by Evolution. Discover, March, 1998, p. 11.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A., 1996. God in the Details. Nature 383:227–28.Google Scholar
Davis, P. and Kenyon, D. H., 1989. Of Pandas and People. Dallas (TX): Haughton.Google Scholar
Durant, J. R., 1987. A Critical-Historical Perspective on the Argument About Evolution and Creation, In Anderson, S. and Peacocke, A., (eds.), Evolution and Creation: A European Perspective, Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Eiseley, L., 1958. Darwin's Century. Garden City (NY): Anchor.Google Scholar
Gallup, G., 1995. Religion in America: Will the Vitality of Churches Be the Surprise of the Next Century? Public Perspective 6:1–8.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., 1992. Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge. Scientific American, July, p 118–121.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., 1991. The God of the Galapagos. Nature 352:485–486.Google Scholar
Paul, John II, 1996. Magisterium (Message to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences) L'Osservatore romano, Oct. 30, p. 3, 7 (also reprinted in the Quarterly Review of Biology, December, 1997, 72:381-383.) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P.J., 1993. Darwin on Trial. Downers Grove (IL): Inter-Varsity Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P.J., 1995. Reason in the Balance. Downers Grove (IL): Inter-Varsity Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D.A., 1985. Geocentricity — a Creationist Consideration. The Christian News, May 27, 1985.Google Scholar
Kosmin, B.A., and Lachman, S., 1993. One Nation Under God; Religion and Contemporary American Society. Harmony, New York.Google Scholar
Miller, K.R., 1996. Darwin's Black Box (a review). Creation/Evolution, 16(2):36–40.Google Scholar
Moore, A.L., 1889. Science and the Faith: Essays on Apologetic Subjects. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Cited in Durant, J., 1987, op. cit. Google Scholar
Murphy, N., 1993. Phillip Johnson on Trial: A Critique of His Critique of Darwin. Perspectives on Science and Christianity, 45(1):26–36 (March, 1993).Google Scholar
Numbers, R. L., 1992. The Creationists. NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Numbers, R.L., 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paley, W., 1803. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: Faulder. 5th ed.Google Scholar
Pennock, R., 1996. Naturalism, Creationism, and the Meaning of Life. Creation/Evolution, 16(2)nr 39: 31–35.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A., 1997. Methodological Naturalism is True by Definition. Origins and Design, Fall, 1997, pp. 22–34 Google Scholar
Raman, V.V., 1998-99. A Hindu View on Science And Spirituality. Science and Spirit, 9(5):6–7, (Winter, 1998-1999).Google Scholar
Ramm, B., 1955. The Christian View of Science and Scripture. London: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. L., 1913. Leaders of Israel. NY: Association Press.Google Scholar
SCIENCE CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK AND CRITERIA COMMITTEE, 1990. Science Framework for California Public Schools, Kindergarten Through Twelve. Sacramento: California Department of Education.Google Scholar
Schadewald, R.J., 1980. Earth Orbits? Moon Landings? A Fraud! Says This Prophet. Science Digest, July, pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
Schadewald, R.J., 1991. Introduction. In DeFord, 1991 (1931) A Reparation: Universal Gravitation a Universal Fake. Fairfield, WA: Ye Galleon Press.Google Scholar
Scott, E.C., 1994. The Evolution of Creationism: The Struggle for the Schools. Natural History, 103:10, 12-13.Google Scholar
Scott, E.C., 1995. Science and Christianity are Compatible — With Some Compromises. The Scientist. January 9, 1995, p. 12.Google Scholar
Scott, E.C., 1997. Antievolutionism and Creationism in the United States. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 26:263–289.Google Scholar
Scott, E.C., 1998. Science and Religion, Methodology, and Humanism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 18(2): 15–16.Google Scholar
Scott, E.C., and Cole, H.P., 1985. The Elusive Scientific Basis of Creation Science. Quarterly Review of Biology 60(1):21–30.Google Scholar
Stevens, P. Jr., 1996. Religion. Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, NY: Henry Holt and Company, p 1088–1100.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H., (ed.), 1983. The Literal Meaning of Genesis (St Augustine); Ancient Christian Writers, vol. 41. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Toumey, C., 1994. God's Own Scientists. New Brunswick (New Jersey): Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, J. C., and Morris, H. R., 1963. The Genesis Flood: The Biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Phillipsburg, (NJ): Presbyterian and Reformed.Google Scholar
Young, D.A., 1982. Christianity and the Age of the Earth. Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan.Google Scholar