Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-26cps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T13:48:32.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stratigraphic distribution of fossils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Steven M. Holland
Steven M. Holland*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In several increasingly realistic steps, a model of the stratigraphic distribution of fossils is presented. The first and simplest step assumes that if a taxon was extant it will have been preserved. The second step admits that if a taxon was extant, there is some probability less than one that it will have been preserved. This step produces randomly distributed gaps, and fossil ranges that are somewhat shorter than the span of time in which a taxon actually lived. The third step assumes facies-controlled taxa and parasequence-style cyclicity. This produces randomly and nonrandomly distributed gaps, including the anomalously long gaps recognized in confidence limit studies. The final model incorporates depositional sequences and indicates that first and last occurrences will cluster at sequence boundaries and at flooding surfaces in the transgressive systems tract. Across-shelf gradients in diversity, taphonomy, or eurytopy can control the strength, but not the stratigraphic position of these peaks. Comparison of the model to data from the Upper Ordovician suggests that these modeled features are present in the fossil record. Many previously studied paleobiologic patterns may be, at least in part, an artifact of facies control and sequence architecture. Such patterns include gradual or stepwise mass extinction, punctuated morphologic and taxonomic change, iterative evolution, and the replacement of shallow water faunas by deeper water faunas at biomere boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Winter 1995 , pp. 92 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bambach, R. K., and Gilinsky, N. L. 1988. Artifacts in the apparent timing of macroevolutionary “events.” Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 20:A104.Google Scholar
Banerjee, I., and Kidwell, S. M. 1991. Significance of molluscan shell beds in sequence stratigraphy: an example from the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Canada. Sedimentology 38:913–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumiller, T. K., and Ausich, W. I. 1992. The broken-stick model as a null hypothesis for crinoid stalk taphonomy and as a guide to the distribution of connective tissue in fossils. Paleobiology 18:288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, U., and McGhee, G. R. 1985. Evolution in marginal epicontinental basins: the role of phylogenetic and ecologic factors (ammonite replacements in the German Lower and Middle Jurassic). Pp. 164–220in Bayer, U. and Seilacher, A., eds. Sedimentary and evolutionary cycles. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. B. N., and Boucot, A. J. 1972. Silurian graptolite depth zonation. 24th Session International Geological Conference, Section 7, Paleontology, 59–65.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. C. 1992. Coordinated stasis and evolutionary ecology of Silurian–Devonian marine biotas in the Appalachian Basin. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 24:A139.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Goodman, W. M., and LoDuca, S. T. 1990. Sequences, cycles, and basin dynamics in the Silurian of the Appalachian Foreland Basin. Sedimentary Geology 69:191–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, A. H. 1986. Tempo of evolution in a Neogene bryozoan: rates of morphologic change within and across species boundaries. Paleobiology 12:190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. L. 1984. Conodont biofacies and provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196:1–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumings, E. R., and Galloway, J. J. 1913. The stratigraphy and paleontology of the Tanners Creek section of the Cincinnati Series of Indiana. Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources Annual Report 37:353–479.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. R., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1990. Paleoecology: concepts and applications. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82–115in Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in paleobiology. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D. 1976. Ecostratigraphy of Ordovician graptoloids. Pp. 621–643in Bassett, M. G., ed. The Ordovician system. Proceedings of a Palaeontological Association Symposium, Birmingham, September, 1975. University of Wales and National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Finney, S. C. 1986. Graptolite biofacies and correlation of eustatic, subsidence, and tectonic events in the Middle to Upper Ordovician of North America. Palaios 1:435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, D. R., Worley, E. K., and Merrill, A. S. 1981. Distribution patterns of common seastars of the middle Atlantic continental shelf of the northwest Atlantic (Gulf of Maine to Cape Hatteras). Biological Bulletin 160:394–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geitgey, J. E., and Carr, T. R. 1987. Temperature as a factor affecting conodont diversity and distribution. Pp. 241–255in Austin, R. L., ed. Conodonts: investigative techniques and applications. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1993. Nature of the delayed Triassic marine radiation after the end-Paleozoic mass extinction. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 25:A156.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1992. Sequence stratigraphy of the Cincinnatian Series. Pp. 199–227in Davis, R. A. and Cuffey, R. J., eds. Sampling the layer cake that isn't: the stratigraphy and paleontology of the “type Cincinnatian.” Ohio Division of Geological Survey Guidebook No. 13. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1993. Sequence stratigraphy of a carbonate-clastic ramp: the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in its type area. Geological Society of America Bulletin 105:306–322.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S. M.In press a. Using time-environment analysis to recognize faunal events in the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch. In Brett, C. E., ed. Paleontological event horizons: ecological and evolutionary implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M.In press b. Depositional sequences, facies control, and their effects on the stratigraphic distribution of fossils. In Haq, B. U., ed. Sequence stratigraphy and sea-level change. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M., Dattilo, B. F., Miller, A. I., Meyer, D. L., and Diekmeyer, S. C. 1993. Anatomy of a mixed carbonate-clastic depositional sequence: Kope Formation (Upper Ordovician: Edenian) of the Cincinnati Arch. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 25:338.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1980. Apparent versus real biotic effects of transgressions and regressions. Paleobiology 6:397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1974. Biogeographic consequences of eurytopy and stenotopy among marine bivalves and their evolutionary significance. American Naturalist 108:541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. 1989. Extended period of extinctions across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary in planktonic foraminifera of continental-shelf sections: implications for impact and volcanism theories. Geological Society of America Bulletin 101:1408–1419.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 1984. Outcrop features and origin of basin margin unconformities in the Lower Chesapeake Group (Miocene), Atlantic Coastal Plain. Pp. 37–58in Schlee, J. S., ed. Interregional unconformities and hydrocarbon accumulation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Okla.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 1991a. Condensed deposits in siliciclastic sequences: expected and observed features. Pp. 682–695in Einsele, G., ed. Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 1991b. The stratigraphy of shell concentrations. Pp. 211–290in Allison, P. A. and Briggs, D. E. G., eds. Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, G. S. Jr., and Link, R. F. 1970. Statistical analysis of geological data. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C., and Xu, C. 1985. Graptolite distribution and lithofacies: some case histories. Journal of Paleontology 59:636–642.Google Scholar
Loutit, T. S., Hardenbol, J., Vail, P. R., and Baum, G. R. 1988. Condensed sections: the key to age determination and correlation of continental margin sequences. Pp. 183–213in Wilgus, C. K., Hastings, B. S., Kendall, C. G. S. C., Posamentier, H. W., Ross, C. A., and Van Wagoner, J. C., eds. Sea-level changes: an integrated approach. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 42, Tulsa, Okla.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, N., and Keller, G. 1991. Hiatus distributions and mass extinctions at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Geology 19:497–501.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1990. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges. Paleobiology 16:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1986a. Biostratigraphic gap analysis. Geology 14:36–38.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1986b. How biostratigraphic gaps form. Journal of Geology 94:875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F. X. 1977. The graphic correlation method in biostratigraphy. Pp. 165–186in Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J. E., eds. Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Penn.Google Scholar
Mitchum, R. M., and Van Wagoner, J. C. 1991. High-frequency sequences and their stacking patterns: sequence-stratigraphic evidence of high-frequency eustatic cycles. Sedimentary Geology 70:131–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osleger, D., and Read, J. F. 1993. Comparative analysis of methods used to define eustatic variations in outcrop: Late Cambrian interbasinal sequence development. American Journal of Science 293:157–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1984. The biomere problem: evolution of an idea. Journal of Paleontology 58:599–611.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E., and Holland, S. M. 1993. Ecologic and environmental patterns of extinction: comparison of Late Cambrian and Middle Ordovician extinctions. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 25:332.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1982. The adequacy of the fossil record. Pp. 75–117in Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E., eds. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1991. A kill curve for Phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiology 17:37–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, G. 1940. Paleoecological factors controlling the distribution and mode of life of Cretaceous ammonoids in the Texas area. Journal of Paleontology 14:299–323.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1964. Time in stratigraphy. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Lipps, J. H. 1982. Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in the fossil record. Geological Society of America Special Paper 190:291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, M., and Lilje, A. 1988. Biostratigraphy and gap analysis: the expected sequence of biostratigraphic events. Journal of Geology 96:228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, D., and Sadler, P. M. 1989. Classical confidence intervals and the Bayesian probability estimates for the ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology 21:411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The Conodonta: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology, and evolutionary history of a long-extinct animal phylum. Clarendon, New York.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C., and Bergström, S. M. 1984. Conodont provinces and biofacies of the Late Ordovician. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196:69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1911. Revision of the Paleozoic systems. Geological Society of America Bulletin 22:281–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wagoner, J. C., Mitchum, R. M., Campion, K. M., and Rahmanian, V. D. 1990. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Methods in Exploration Series, No. 7. Tulsa, Okla.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wagoner, J. C., Nummedal, D., Jones, C. R., Taylor, D. R., Jennette, D. C., and Riley, G. W. 1991. Sequence stratigraphy applications to shelf sandstone reservoirs. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Okla.Google Scholar
Walton, W. R. 1955. Ecology of living benthonic foraminifera, Todos Santos Bay, Baja California. Journal of Paleontology 29:952–1018.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D., and Kennedy, W. J. 1993. Maastrichtian ammonites from the Biscay Region (France, Spain). Paleontological Society Memoir 34:1–58.Google Scholar
Ward, P., Wiedmann, J., and Mount, J. F. 1986. Maastrichtian molluscan biostratigraphy and extinction patterns in a Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary section exposed at Zumaya, Spain. Geology 14:899–903.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D., Kennedy, W. J., MacLeod, K. G., and Mount, J. F. 1991. Ammonite and inoceramid bivalve extinction patterns in Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sections of the Biscay region (southwestern France, northern Spain). Geology 19:1181–1184.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westrop, S. R., and Ludvigsen, R. 1987. Biogeographic control of trilobite mass extinction at an Upper Cambrian “biomere” boundary. Paleobiology 13:84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1970. Communities and ecosystems. Macmillan. New York.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B. 1993. Anoxia as the cause of the end-Permian mass extinction. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 25:A155.Google Scholar
Wignall, P. B., and Hallam, A. 1992. Anoxia as a cause of the Permian/Triassic extinction: facies evidence from northern Italy and the western United States. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 93:21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar