Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-4tctr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T19:56:14.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of random range truncations on patterns of evolution in the fossil record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Mark S. Springer
Mark S. Springer*
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, 101 Dahlia, Corona del Mar, California 92625
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both fossil preservation and sampling methods affect perceived patterns of biotic diversity. Artificial range truncations, for example, may lead to incongruences between apparent- and actual-diversity curves. Thus, a catastrophic extinction event may appear gradual. Recent advances in biostratigraphic-gap analysis provide models for the distribution of gap lengths between fossil occurrence horizons and provide methods to place confidence intervals on local taxon ranges and remove the biases caused by artificial range truncations. Confidence intervals for a set of local taxon ranges may then be evaluated collectively to test a hypothesis of co-extinction/co-emigration or co-origination/co-immigration. In the case of terminal Cretaceous ammonites from Seymour Island, range-chart data are compatible with an abrupt extinction event, although the test statistic is not minimized at the stratigraphic horizon that was suggested by Macellari (1986).

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , Fall 1990 , pp. 512 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cox, D. R., and Oakes, D. 1984. Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman and Hall; London.Google Scholar
Edwards, L. E. 1977. Range Charts as Chronostratigraphic Hypotheses, with Applications to Tertiary Dinoflagellates. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Koch, C. F. 1978. Bias in the published fossil record. Paleobiology 4:367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. F. 1987. Prediction of sample size effects on the measured temporal and geographic distribution patterns of species. Paleobiology 13:100–107.Google Scholar
Macellari, C. E. 1986. Late Campanian–Maastrichtian ammonite fauna from Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula). Journal of Paleontology, Memoir 18.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1990a. The fossil record and estimating divergence times between lineages: maximum divergence times and the importance of reliable phylogenies. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30:400–408.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1990b. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges. Paleobiology 16:1–10.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1986a. Biostratigraphic gap analysis. Geology 14:36–38.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1986b. How biostratigraphic gaps form. Journal of Geology 94:875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1982. The adequacy of the fossil record. Pp. 75–117. In Joysey, K. A., and Friday, A. E. (eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science (Washington, D.C.) 177:1065–1071.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976a. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology 2:279–288.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976b. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation. Paleobiology 2:289–297.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1986. Biological extinction in earth history. Science (Washington, D.C.) 231:1528–1533.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1989. The case for extraterrestrial causes of extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 325:421–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Sadler, P. M. 1981. Sediment accumulation rates and the completeness of stratigraphic sections. Journal of Geology 89:569–584.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. M. 1988. Geometry and stratification of uppermost Cretaceous and Paleogene units on Seymour Island, northern Antarctic Peninsula. Pp. 303–320. In Feldman, R. M., and Woodburne, M. O. (eds.), The Geology of Seymour Island, Antarctica. Geological Society of America, Memoir 169.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and Lipps, J. H. 1982. Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in the fossil record. Pp. 291–296. In Silver, L. T., and Schultz, P. H. (eds.), Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, M., and Lilje, A. 1988. Biostratigraphy and gap analysis: the expected sequence of biostratigraphic events. Journal of Geology 96:228–236.Google Scholar
Strauss, D., and Sadler, P. M. 1989. Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for the ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology 21:411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar