Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T01:45:05.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Patients are Prisoners They Lose Their Right to Refuse Life-Maintaining Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

George J. Annas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Providing proper health care to prisoners is often more of a myth than a reality. Nonetheless, prison officials contend that the death of a prisoner due to inadequate medical care both undermines the confidence of society in the prison system, and can create an “explosive reaction” from other inmates who view the death as preventable. Therefore it is probably not surprising that when 24-year-old Kenneth Myers, serving seven to ten years at MCI Concord, a medium security prison in Massachusetts, refused to consent to hemodialysis for the treatment of chronic glomerulonephritis and uremia, prison officials went to court to obtain an order permitting them to forceably treat him.

Type
Health Law Notes
Information
Nursing Law & Ethics , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , February 1980 , pp. 3
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Comm. of Correction v. Myers. ____ N.E. ____ 2d (Mass. 1979).Google Scholar
2. Superintendent of Belchertowit State School v. Saikewicz. 370 N.E. 2d 417 (Mass. 1977). For a detailed discussion of this case. see. Annas, G.J., Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: Decision-Making for the Terminally III Incompetent. American Journal Of Law & Medicine 4(4):367 (Winter 1979).Google Scholar