Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-64ff6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T15:26:01.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leiv Egil Breivik and Ernst Håkon Jahr (eds.): Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 43 (Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1989).

Review products

Leiv Egil Breivik and Ernst Håkon Jahr (eds.): Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 43 (Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1989).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Lyle Campbell
Lyle Campbell
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , June 1992 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. 1975. Towards a Typology of Change: Bifurcating Changes and Binary Relations. In Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (eds.), Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, vol. 2, pp. 17–60.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 1980a. Morphological Change: Towards a Typology. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical Morphology. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 1980b. Russian Conjugation: Acquisition and Evolutive Change. In Traugott, E.C. et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 285–302.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 1988. Center and Periphery: Adoption, Diffusion and Spread. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical Dialectology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 39–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C&bell, L. & Ringen, J. 1981. Teleology and the Explanation of Sound Change. In Dressier, W. et al. (eds.), Phonologica. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. 1977. Syntactic Developments in the Verb Phrase of Ecuadorian Quechua. (Studies in Generative Grammar, 2.) Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press (Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. 1980. Sound Change and Child Language. In Traugott, E. C. et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 303–320.Google Scholar