Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T03:19:20.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anti-, non-, or post-Saidian?: The challenge of discussing German Orientalism

Review products

MarchandSuzanne L.German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race, and Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 526 pages.

WokoeckUrsula. German Orientalism: The Study of the Middle East and Islam from 1800 to 1945. London: Routledge, 2009, 333 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Malte Fuhrmann*
Affiliation:
Orient-lnstitut İstanbul, Susam Sok, 16-18/8, TR-34433 Cihangir-İstanbul, Turkey, fuhrmann@oidmg.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2012

References

Berman, Nina. Orientalismus, Kolonialismus und Moderne: Zum Bild des Orients in der deutschsprachigen Kuttur um 1900. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1996.Google Scholar
Federal Archives — Military Archive, Freiburg i. Br., Imperial Navy Series; ΒΑ-MA RM 40/214.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer ed. “German Orientalism.” Special issue, Comparative Studies on Africa, South Asia and the Middle East 24, no. 2 (2004).Google Scholar
Kontje, Todd Curtis. German Orientalisms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öztürk, Ali Osman. Alman Oryantalizmi: 19. Yüzyıl Alman Kültüründe Türk Motifi. Ankara: Vadi, 2000.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1978.Google Scholar