Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T23:03:31.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Dimensional Modeling of Anisotropic Stress Effects in Thermal Oxidation of Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xiaopeng Xu ,
Norbert Strecker  and
Victor Moroz
Xiaopeng Xu
Affiliation:
Avant! Corporation, 46871 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, CA94538, U.S.A.
Norbert Strecker
Affiliation:
Avant! Corporation, 46871 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, CA94538, U.S.A.
Victor Moroz
Affiliation:
Avant! Corporation, 46871 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, CA94538, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Three-dimensional analyses of anisotropic stress effects during thermal oxidation of silicon are performed in this study using finite strain formulation. A reaction rate model that conjugates pressure to a crystalline direction dependent activation volume is employed for the modeling of facet formation in an STI MOSFET device. The numerical results agree well with TEM observations. The 3-D nature of stress evolution in fabrication process is demonstrated and the implication of stress relaxation on device performance in a strained SiGe based device is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 731: Symposium W – Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Materials Behavior and Evolution , 2002 , W8.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moroz, V., et al., in Proceedings of the 31st European Solid State Device Research Conference, 2001, pp. 371–374.Google Scholar
2. Taurus-Process Users Manual. Avant! Corporation, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Deal, B.E. and Grove, A.S., J. Appl. Phys., 36, 3770 (1965).Google Scholar
4. Senez, V., et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., 43, 720 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Garikipati, K., et al., Comp. Model. Engrg. Sci., 1, 65 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Hu, S. M. et al., Appl. Phys. 61, 783 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Sethian, J. A., Level Set Methods, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
8. Wake, D., et al., in Proceedings of the 7th International Meshing Roundtable, 1998, pp 159–165. Google Scholar