Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T11:08:37.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory Of 3d Transition Metal Defects In 3C SiC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Harald Overhof
Harald Overhof*
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Universität-GH Paderborn, D-33098 Paderborn, Federal Republic of Germany, foverl@pbhrzc.uni-paderborn.de
Get access

Abstract

The electronic properties of 3d transition metal (TM) defects located on one of the four different tetrahedral positions in 3C SiC are shown to be quite site-dependent. We explain the differences for the 3d TMs on the two substitutional sites within the vacancy model: the difference of the electronic structure between the carbon vacancy VC and the silicon vacancy VSi is responsible for the differences of the 3d TMs. The electronic properties of 3d TMs on the two tetrahedral interstitial sites differ even more: the TMs surrounded tetrahedrally by four Si atoms experience a large crystal field splitting while the tetrahedral C environment does not give rise to a significant crystal field splitting at all. It is only in the latter case that high-spin configurations are predicted.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 442: Symposium E – Defects in Electronic Materials II , 1996 , 637
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ludwig, G. W. and Woodbury, H. H., in Solid State Physics, ed. by Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F., and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, New York, 1962), Vol.13, p. 223.Google Scholar
2. Beeler, F., Andersen, O. K., and Scheffler, M., Phys. Rev. B 41, 1603, (1990).Google Scholar
3. Wang, C., Bernholc, J., and Davis, R. F, Phys. Rev. B 38, 12 752, (1988).Google Scholar
4. Gunnarsson, O., Jepsen, O., and Andersen, O. K., Phys. Rev. B 27, 7144, (1983).Google Scholar
5. Baraff, G. A. and Schlüter, M., Phys. Rev. B 30, 3460, (1984).Google Scholar
6. Zunger, A., in in Solid State Physics, ed. by Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F., and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, New York, 1986), Vol.39, p. 275.Google Scholar
7. März, M., Reinke, J., Greulich-Weber, S., Spaeth, J.-M., Overhof, H., Mokhov, E. N., Roenkov, A. D., and Kalabukhova, E. N., Semic. Science and Technol. 98, 439, (1996).Google Scholar