Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T12:15:51.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electromigration Behavior of Aluminum Films Deposited by Partially Ionized Beam.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

O. V. Kononenko ,
L. K. Fionova  and
V. N. Matveev
O. V. Kononenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka, Moscow district, USSR.
L. K. Fionova
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka, Moscow district, USSR.
V. N. Matveev
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics Technology and High Purity Materials of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka, Moscow district, USSR.
Get access

Abstract

Aluminum films deposited by partially»ionized beam were stressed by a current density of 2×106 A/cm2 at a temperature of 300°C. The films prepared at the acceleration voltage of 5 kV lived over 200 hours.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 239: Symposium D – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties III , 1991 , 713
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ghate, P.B., IEEE 21st Int. Realibility Phys. Symp. 1062, 292.Google Scholar
2. Attardo, J. and Rosenberg, R., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 2381(1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Vaidya, S. and Sinha, A.K., Thin Solid Films, 75, 253(1981).Google Scholar
4. Harper, J. M. E., Cuomo, J. J., Gambino, R. J., and Kaufman, H.R., in jan bambardment Madification ofsurface fundamental and appli cations, edited by Auciello, O. and Kelly, R. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984), p.127.Google Scholar
5. Yamada, I., and Takagi, T., IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices, 8D–34, 1018(1987).Google Scholar
6. Li, P., Yapsir, A.S., Rajan, K., and Lu, T.-M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 2443(1989).Google Scholar
7. Fionova, L.K., Kononenko, O.V., Matveev, V.N., presented at the 1991 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1991 (unpublished).Google Scholar
8. Valiev, R.Z., Gertzman, V.Yu., and Kaybishev, O.A., Phys. Stat. Sol. 78 177(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Smidoda, K., Gottschalk, W., and Gleiter, H., Acta Metall. 26 833 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Broadbent, S.R., Hammersley, J.M., Proc. Camb. Phi1. Soc. 53, 629 (1957).Google Scholar
11. Shante, V.K.S., Kirkpatrick, S., Adv. Phys. 20, 325(1971).Google Scholar
12. Warrington, D.H., J. Microsc. 102, 3 01(1974).Google Scholar
13. Warrington, D.H., Boon, M., Acta met. 23, 599(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kinsbron, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 968(1980).Google Scholar
15. Blech, I.A., and Kinsbron, E., Thin Solid Films 25, 327(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Blech, I.A., J. Appl. Phys. 47, 1203(1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar