Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T03:53:04.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atom-Probe Field-Ion Microscopy of Grain Boundary Segregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

L. V. Alvensleben  and
P. Haasen
L. V. Alvensleben
Affiliation:
Institut für Metallphysik, Universität Göttingen, Hospitalstr. 3-5, D–3400 Göttingen and Sonderforschungsbereich 126, Göttingen/Clausthal, F.R.G.
P. Haasen
Affiliation:
Institut für Metallphysik, Universität Göttingen, Hospitalstr. 3-5, D–3400 Göttingen and Sonderforschungsbereich 126, Göttingen/Clausthal, F.R.G.
Get access

Abstract

Grain boundary analysis with the help of atom-probe field-ion microscopy (APFIM) needs an aimed tip-preparation technique unless the grain size of the material is very small. With the help of a dedicated FIM-tipholder for the TEM the distance grain boundary-apex is determined and reduced by a controlled backpolishing method to make the grain boundary accessible to APFIM analysis. Tilt angle and tilt axis of the grain boundary were determined analyzing the Kikuchi diagrams of the two grains. In nickel 1 at% carbon some atoms image “brighter” than others. With the help of the drop of the detector current it can be shown that these atoms are carbon. With the help of this feature the distribution of the carbon atoms in the matrix can directly be determined in the FIM. A segregation of carbon at grain boundaries was detected with the atomprobe.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 138: Symposium Q – Characterization of the Structure and Chemistry of Defects in Materials , 1988 , 479
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Watanabe, T., Res Mechanica 11, 47 (1984)Google Scholar
2. Gleiter, H. and Chalmers, B., Progr. Mat Sci., 16 (1972)Google Scholar
3. Grabke, H.J., Ber. d. Bunsengesellschaft 69/5, 409 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Alvensleben, L.v. accepted for publication J. de Physique, colloque, (1988)Google Scholar
5. Karlsson, L., Nordön, H., Acta Metall. 36, 13 (1988)Google Scholar
6. McLean, D. Grain boundaries in metals, Oxford Univ. Press (1957)Google Scholar
7. Stadelmann, P.A. Ultramicroscopy 21, 131 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Warrington, D. H. and Bufalini, P., Scripta Metall. 5, 771 (1971).Google Scholar
9. Klement, U., private communicationGoogle Scholar
10. Maller, E.W. and Tsong, T.T. FIM principles and applications, Am. Elsevier Publishing Comp. N. Y. (1969)Google Scholar
11. Parthasarathy, T.A., Shewmon, P.G., Scripta Metall. 17, 943 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar