Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T09:50:39.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stress Corrosion Cracking of Copper:Nuclear Waste Containers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. King ,
C. D. Litke  and
B. M. Ikeda
F. King
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO, kingf@aecl.ca
C. D. Litke
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO, kingf@aecl.ca
B. M. Ikeda
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE ILO, kingf@aecl.ca
Get access

Abstract

The extent of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of copper nuclear waste containers is being predicted on the basis of a “limited propagation” argument. In this argument, it is accepted that crack initiation may occur, but it is argued that the environmental conditions and material properties required for a through-wall crack to propagate will not be present.

In this paper, the effect of one environmental parameter, the supply of oxidant (Jox), on the crack growth rate is examined. Experiments have been conducted on two grades of Cu in NaNO2 environments using two loading techniques. The supply of oxidant has been varied either electrochemically in bulk solution using different applied current densities or by embedding the loaded test specimens in compacted buffer material containing O2 as the oxidant. Measured and theoretical crack growth rates as a function of Jox are compared with the predicted oxidant flux to the containers in a disposal vault and an estimate of the maximum crack depth on a container obtained.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 887
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. King, I. F., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-1 1550, COG-96-94 (1996).Google Scholar
2. ASTM Standard, Section 3, Vol.03.01, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1994, E 399-90.Google Scholar
3. Clarke, C.F., Hardie, D. and Ikeda, B.M., Corros. Sci. 36, p. 487–509 (1994).Google Scholar
4. King, F. and Litke, C.D., Ontario Hydro Report No. 06819-REP-01200-0010 R00 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Parkins, R.N. and Singh, P.M., Corrosion 46, p. 485–499 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Benjamin, L.A., Hardie, D. and Parkins, R.N., Br. Corros. J. 23, p. 89–95 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Yu, J. and Parkins, R.N., Corros. Sci. 27, p. 159–182 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Pednekar, S.P., Agrawal, A.K., Chaung, H.E. and Staehle, R.W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, p. 701–702 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Sieradzki, K., Sabatini, R.L. and Newman, R.C., Met. Trans. 15A, p. 1941–1946 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Cassagne, T.B., Kruger, J. and Pugh, E.N.in Environmentally Assisted Cracking, edited by Lisagor, W.B., Crooker, T.W. and Leis, B.N. (American Society for Testing and Materials STP 1049, Philadelphia, PA, 1990), p. 59–75.Google Scholar
11. Aaltonen, P., Hanninen, H. and Kemppainen, M., Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies Report, YJT-84-21 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Beavers, J.A and Durr, C.L., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report, NUREG/CR-5710 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Pettersson, K. and Oskarsson, M., Materials Research Center Report, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, TRITA-MAC-0611 (1997).Google Scholar
14. King, F., Litke, C.D. and Ikeda, B.M. in CORROSION/99 (NACE International, Houston, TX, 1999), paper 482.Google Scholar
15. King, F. and Kolar, M. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 412, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996), p. 555–562.Google Scholar
16. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Gascoyne, M., Onagi, D., Thomas, D.A., Hamon, C.J., Watson, R. and Porth, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-11532, COG-96-14 (1996).Google Scholar