Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-g4kps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T12:19:26.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Silica-Nanoparticle Dispersion on Holographic Recording in Methacrylate-Based Photopolymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hiroshi Takahashi ,
Takahiro Naitoh  and
Yasuo Tomita
Hiroshi Takahashi
Affiliation:
htakahas@ee.uec.ac.jp, University of Electro-Communications, Electronics Engineering, 1-5-1, Chofu-Gaoka,, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan, +81-424-43-5208, +81-424-43-5208
Takahiro Naitoh
Affiliation:
htakahas@ee.uec.ac.jp, University of Electro-Communications, Electronics Engineering, 1-5-1, Chofu-Gaoka, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan
Yasuo Tomita
Affiliation:
htakahas@ee.uec.ac.jp, University of Electro-Communications, Electronics Engineering, 1-5-1, Chofu-Gaoka, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Transmission volume holograms recorded in two types of methacrylate-based photopolymer films that include benzyl n-butyl phthalate (BBP) or Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are studied. It is shown that both BBP and PMMA molecules can be uniformly dispersed into methacrylate monomers and that a refractive index modulation as high as ∼0.005 is recorded by optimizing their volume concentrations. Moreover, it is also shown that the additional doping of silica nanoparticles substantially suppresses polymerization shrinkage without increasing optical scattering loss.

Keywords

polymeroptical propertiesorganic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 939: Symposium O – Hybrid Organic/Inorganic/Metallic Electronic and Optical Devices , 2006 , 0939-O06-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kogelnik, H. and Shank, C. V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 152 (1971).Google Scholar
2 Kogelnik, H. and Shank, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2327 (1972).Google Scholar
3 Tsutsumi, N., Kawahira, T. and Sakai, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 13, 2553 (2003).Google Scholar
4 Tagaya, A., Koike, Y., Nihei, E., Teramoto, S., Fujii, K., Yamamoto, T. and Sasaki, K., Appl. Opt. 34, 988 (1995).Google Scholar
5 Chujo, K., Plastics. 54, 71 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Goda, H. and Fujiwara, T., Plasticsage. 48, 130 (2002).Google Scholar
7 Yang, F., Ou, Y. and Yu, Z., J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 69, 355 (1998).Google Scholar
8 Suzuki, N., Tomita, Y. and Kojima, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4121 (2002).Google Scholar
9 Suzuki, N. and Tomita, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42, L927 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Suzuki, N. and Tomita, Y., Appl. Opt. 43 (2004) 2125.Google Scholar
11 Takahashi, H., Naito, T. and Tomita, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 5023 (2006).Google Scholar
12 Takahashi, H., Yamauchi, J. and Tomita, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 44, L1008 (2005).Google Scholar
13 Okamoto, T., Ohmori, R., Hayakawa, S., Seo, I. and Sato, H., Opt. Rev. 4, 516 (1997).Google Scholar
14 Kojima, T. and Tomita, Y., Opt. Rev. 9, 222 (2002).Google Scholar
15 Kogelnik, H., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 48, 2909 (1969).Google Scholar
16 Krieger, I. M., Adv. Colloid & Interface Sci. 3, 111 (1973).Google Scholar
17 Dahr, L., Schnoes, M. G., Wysocki, T. L., Bair, H., Schilling, M. and Boyd, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1337 (1998).Google Scholar