Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-15T09:33:13.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrosion of archaeological model glasses after 32 years of burial at Ballidon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Sean D. McLoughlin ,
Neil C. Hyatt ,
R. J. Hand  and
William E. Lee
Sean D. McLoughlin
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Neil C. Hyatt
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
R. J. Hand
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
William E. Lee
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Get access

Abstract

The groundwater corrosion of three archaeological model glass compositions, a replica Roman glass (B1), a medieval glass (B2) and a 17th century glass (B3), recovered from the Ballidon burial site, were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. Given the equivalent burial conditions for all three glasses, the different corrosion mechanisms of these glasses are dependent principally upon composition, and in particular the dominant alkali and network former content. Composition B1 was found to the most durable glass and showed progressive Na leaching coupled with dissolution of the silicate matrix in the outermost 5μm after 32 years of burial. The B2 and B3 compositions were found to be less durable and corroded via congruent dissolution of the silicate matrix and in situ condensation, resulting in the formation of a discrete 5-15μm thick layer after only 1 year of burial. The formation of a protective Ca-rich surface layer was observed for B2, hindering successive inward growth of the dissolution reaction and favouring localised pitting of the extant layer. The protective surface phenomenon was not observed for B3, and a large increase in layer thickness was observed after nine years of burial.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 1.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Fletcher, W.W., J. Glass Studies, 14, 149 (1972).Google Scholar
2. Hand, R.J., Glass Tech., in press (2005).Google Scholar
3. Newton, R.G., Glass Tech., 22, 42 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Newton, R.G., Glass Tech., 29, 106 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Macquet, C. and Thomassin, J.H., Appl. Clay Sci., 7, 17 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Römich, H., MRS Bull., 28, 500 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Sterpenich, J. and Libourel, G., Chem. Geol., 174, 181 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Bange, K., Anderson, O., Rauch, F., Lehuédé, P., Rädlein, E., Tadokoro, N., Mazzoldi, P., Rigato, V., Matsumoto, K. and Farnworth, M., Glass Sci. and Tech.,74, 127 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Clark, D.E., Pantano, C.G. and Hench, L.L., “Corrosion of Glass”, (1979), New York Press.Google Scholar
10. Gottardi, V., “The Chemical Durability of Glass: A Bibliographic Review of Literature”, Vol. 1., (1972), Charleroi, Belgium: Institut National du Verre.Google Scholar
11. Newton, R.G. and Davison, S., “Conservation of Glass”, (1989), London: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
12. Wicks, G.G., in: “Corrosion of Glasses, Ceramics and Ceramic Superconductors”, Ed. Clark, D.E. and Zoitos, B.K., (1992), Noyes Publications: New Jersey.Google Scholar
13. Wicks, G.G., J. of Nucl. Mater., 298, 78 (2001).Google Scholar
14. Bernardi, A. and Becherini, F., Rivista della Stazione Sperimentale del Vetro, 32, 28 (2002).Google Scholar