Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-15T09:50:56.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The paragenesis of kyanite-eclogites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

C. E. Tilley
C. E. Tilley*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Haüy's original definition of eclogite, the presence of kyanite as an accessory constituent was recognized, and it is apparent that he was familiar with examples from the Sau Alps and Styria. The best known of eclogites—those of the Bavarian Fichtelgebirge (e.g. Silberbach, Weissenstein, and Eppenreuth)—contain significant kyanite interspersed among the omphacite grains or associated with accessory quartz and muscovite in the rocks. Of these rocks rather extended descriptions have been published. Analyses of the minerals and the rocks themselves belong to an early date and do not reach the standard of modern analyses. Later, Drill (1902) published a systematic account of these Bavarian eclogites and has added an analysis of an eelogite with kyanite from Unterpferdt near Silberbach and an analysis of a garnet from a Silberbach eclogite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 24 , Issue 155 , December 1936 , pp. 422 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haüy, R. J., Traité de Minéralogie, 2nd edition, 1822, vol. 2, p. 456 ; vol. 4, p. 458.Google Scholar
2. von Gerichten, E., Ann. Chem. Pharm., 1874, vol. 17l, p. 183 ; 1877, vol. 185, p. 209.Google Scholar
3. Düll, E., Geognostische Jahreshefte, München, 1902, pp. 65-156.Google Scholar
4. Ippen, J. A., Mitt. Naturwiss. Ver. Steiermark, 1892, pp. 1-44.Google Scholar
5. Lipold, M. V., Jahrb. Geol. Reichsanstalt, Wien, 1856, vol. 7, p. 332.Google Scholar
6. Hezner, L., Tschermak's Min. Pert. Mitt., 1903, vol. 22, pp. 437, 505.Google Scholar
7. Kieslinger, A., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., 1928, Aht. I, vol. 137, p. 439.Google Scholar
8. Franchi, S., Neues Jahrb. Min., 1902, vol. ii, p. 112.Google Scholar
9. Brière, Y., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1920, vol. 43, p. 72. [Min. Abstr. 1-163, 284.]Google Scholar
10. Williams, A. F., Genesis of the diamond, 1932, 2 vols. [M.A. 5-97.]Google Scholar
11. Eskola, P., Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., 1920, vol. 6, p. 168. [M.A. 1-207.]Google Scholar
12. Eskola, P., Vid.-Selsk Skrifter, Kristiania, Mat.-Nat. KI., 1921, no. 8. [M.A. 2-313.]Google Scholar
13. Sahlstein, TH. G., Medd. om Grønland, 1935, vol. 95, no. 5, p. 19.Google Scholar
14. Alderman, A. R., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, 1936, vol. 92, part 4 {in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Clough, C. T., Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland (Glenelg), 1910, p. 34.Google Scholar
16. von Philipsborn, H., Abhandl. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Phys. Kl., 1928, vol. 40, no. 3, p. 17. [M.A. 4-84.]Google Scholar
17. Boeke, H. E., Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1913, vol. 53, p. 149.Google Scholar
18. Heritsch, H., Centralblatt Min., 1931, p. 364; Zeits. Krist., 1933, vol. 85, p. 392. [M.A. 5-381.]Google Scholar