Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-6tpvb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T14:00:59.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The classical AI planning problems in the mirror of Horn linear logic: semantics, expressibility, complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2002

MAX KANOVICH
Affiliation:
Russian State University for the Humanities,Miusskaya 6, 125267 Moscow, Russia. Email: max@kanovich.dnttm.rssi.ru, mk@lipn.univ-paris13.fr
JACQUELINE VAUZEILLES
Affiliation:
LIPN, UPRESA CNRS 7030, Institut Galilée, 99 Avenue J.-B.Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France. Email: jv@lipn.univ-paris13.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We introduce Horn linear logic as a comprehensive logical system capable of handling the typical AI problem of making a plan of the actions to be performed by a robot so that he could get into a set of final situations, if he started with a certain initial situation. Contrary to undecidability of propositional Horn linear logic, the planning problem is proved to be decidable for a reasonably wide class of natural robot systems.

The planning problem is proved to be EXPTIME-complete for the robot systems that allow actions with non-deterministic effects. Fixing a finite signature, that is a finite set of predicates and their finite domains, we get a polynomial time procedure of making plans for the robot system over this signature.

The planning complexity is reduced to PSPACE for the robot systems with only pure deterministic actions.

As honest numerical parameters in our algorithms we invoke the length of description of a planning task ‘from W to ’ and the Kolmogorov descriptive complexity of AxT, a set of possible actions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 Cambridge University Press