Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:41:00.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SIGNALING AND COMMITMENT: MONETARY VERSUS INFLATION TARGETING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2006

HANS GERSBACH
Affiliation:
University of Heidelberg
VOLKER HAHN
Affiliation:
University of Heidelberg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The article compares the social efficiency of monetary targeting and inflation targeting when central banks may have private information on shocks to money demand and the transparency solution is not feasible because of verifiability problems. Under inflation targeting and monetary targeting, central banks may have an incentive to signal their private information in order to influence the public's expectations about future inflation. We show that inflation targeting is superior to monetary targeting, as it makes it easier for central banks to commit to low inflation. Moreover, central banks that are weak on inflation prefer inflation targeting to monetary targeting.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press