Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:14:46.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Usnea chaetophora, a lichen new to the Macaronesian Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Israel Pérez-Vargas ,
Consuelo Hernández-Padrón ,
Rosario Arroyo  and
Estela Seriñá
Israel Pérez-Vargas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal (Botánica), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Email: ispeva@ull.es
Consuelo Hernández-Padrón
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal (Botánica), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Email: ispeva@ull.es
Rosario Arroyo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal I, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Estela Seriñá
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal I, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Short Communications
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 347 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2010

Knowledge of species distribution is an integrative tool between systematics and ecology and therefore indispensable for the evaluation of biodiversity. The distribution data for species is also essential for estimating their extinction risk and classification into threat categories (Litterski & Otte Reference Litterski and Otte2002).

The genus Usnea Adans. is a cosmopolitan and very species-rich lichen genus. It currently comprises c. 300–600 species according to different authors (Kirk et al. Reference Kirk, Cannon, David and Stalpers2001; Wirtz et al. Reference Wirtz, Printzen, Sancho and Lumbsch2006). According to Clerc (Reference Clerc1998, Reference Clerc2004) between 700–800 taxon names have been published in this genus, but probably c. 50% of them will have to be reduce to synonymy in the future. On the African continent there are c. 140 species (Feuerer Reference Feuerer2009), of which 40 are present in the Canary Islands (Hafellner Reference Hafellner1995, Reference Hafellner1999, Reference Litterski and Otte2002, Reference Hafellner2005; Hernández Padrón Reference Hernández Padrón, Izquierdo, Martín, Zurita and Arechavaleta2004), although this number may eventually be reduced to 20 (Clerc Reference Clerc2006).

In recent years, several treatments of Usnea, either taxonomic or phylogenetic have tried to reduce confusion in this genus (Clerc Reference Clerc1998, Reference Hernández Padrón, Izquierdo, Martín, Zurita and Arechavaleta2004, Reference Clerc2006, Reference Clerc, Nash, Gries and Bungartz2007; Herrera-Campos et al. Reference Herrera-Campos, Clerc and Nash1998; Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998; Halonen Reference Halonen2000; Fos & Clerc Reference Fos and Clerc2000; Articus et al. Reference Articus, Mattsson, Tibell, Grube and Wedin2002; Wirtz et al. Reference Wirtz, Printzen, Sancho and Lumbsch2006; Torra & Randlane Reference Torra and Randlane2007). Even so, the genus is still insufficiently known (Articus et al. Reference Articus, Mattsson, Tibell, Grube and Wedin2002) in many regions even in Europe (Torra & Randlane Reference Torra and Randlane2007) and tropical and subtropical areas.

During recent studies of the lichen flora of the Canary Islands by the first author, and in connection with the revision of the genus Usnea in the Iberian Peninsula being carried out by the last two authors, some Usnea specimens have been found in some localities in “La Caldera de Taburiente” National Park, La Palma, Canary Islands. Among different species, we have found some interesting specimens determined as Usnea chaetophora Stirt. To our knowledge, these specimens represent the first record from Africa and Macaronesia and are the most southern reports known. In addition, a new chemotype of this species has been identified.

Morphology of the lichen specimens was examined using a Leica ZOOM 2000. Chemical constituents were identified by thin-layer chromatography using solvent systems A, B and C (Culberson Reference Culberson1972; Culberson et al. Reference Culberson, Culberson and Johnson1981; Culberson & Johnson Reference Culberson and Johnson1982; Elix & Ernst-Russell Reference Elix and Ernst-Russell1993). Authentic samples of Usnea chaetophora (identified by P. Clerc and deposited in the personal herbarium of J. Etayo) were checked.

Usnea chaetophora Stirt.,

Scott. Naturalist nov. ser. 1: 76 (1883).

(Fig. 1)

Fig. 1. Usnea chaetophora TFC Lich: 7024. A, habit; B, base; C, soralia; D, segments with annular cracks. Scales: A = 2 cm; B = 1mm; C & D = 0·5 mm.

Thallus pendulous, more than 15 cm in length, distinguished by the numerous and smooth branches and large number of segments with annular cracks, base distinctly blackened. Papillae and fibrils sparse and irregularly distributed. Soralia mainly punctiform and without isidiomorphs, slightly tuberculate. Cortex moderately thick and medulla dense and white.

Two chemotypes have previously been recognized: chemotype I, with usnic and salazinic acids (K+ yellow to red and Pd+ yellow to orange), and chemotype II, with usnic acid only (K− and Pd−) (Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998; Torra & Randlane Reference Torra and Randlane2007). We found only chemotype I among the specimens collected but discovered a new chemotype (III) with usnic and salazinic acids and barbatic acid as accessory substance.

Fig. 2. World distribution of Usnea chaetophora (• records extracted from the bibliography; ▴ new records). One dot may represent several localities.

Table 1. Main differences between Usnea chaetophora and related species.

According to Halonen et al. (Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998) and Halonen (Reference Halonen2000), this is a coastal species, or with distinct coastal tendencies. In fact, all their collections from British Columbia are at, or close to, sea level. However, in Europe it seems that it can grow inland (Torra &Randlane Reference Torra and Randlane2007). Our collection was at 1600 m alt., although we bear in mind the size of La Palma island is only 708 km2.

Worldwide, this species is sparsely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 2). In addition to the new records from the Canary Islands, Usnea chaetophora is known from a few localities in Europe where it seems to be rare (James et al. Reference James, Clerc, Purvis, Purvis, Coppins, Hawksworth, James and Moore1992; Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998; Torra & Randlane, Reference Torra and Randlane2007), including Turkey (Aslan et al. Reference Aslan, Aptroot and Yazici2002). Nevertheless, the reports from Nordland are very doubtful (Bjerke et al. Reference Bjerke, Elvebakk and Elverland2006). In North America it seems to be restricted to the Pacific Coast of Canada and the NW of USA, but the extent of the North American distribution is poorly known (Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998).

U. chaetophora is close to U. filipendula Stirt. s. lat. This species also has salazinic acid as the main secondary compound but is distinguished by the abundance of branches, fibrils and papillae. Furthermore, it has abundant and tall isidia on soralia (Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998; Azami et al. Reference Azami, Seriñá and Arroyo2004).

Usnea chaetophora may also resemble other pendulous species for example U. articulata (L.) Hoffm., U. barbata (L.) Weber & F. H. Wigg., U. schadenbergiana Göpp. & Stein, or U. trichodea Ach., all of them present in the Canary Islands. Usnea articulata has conspicuous annulations that are very swollen (James et al. Reference James, Clerc, Purvis, Purvis, Coppins, Hawksworth, James and Moore1992). In many cases, the density of the medulla is a good character to distinguish U. barbata and U. chaetophora (Torra & Randlane Reference Torra and Randlane2007). Usnea schadenbergiana and U. trichodea do not contain salazinic acid, and the first has a different morphology and the latter has a brown central axis (Halonen et al. Reference Halonen, Clerc, Goward, Brodo and Wulff1998) (Table 1).

The status of U. chaetophora is not clear and some authors have pointed out the need for a critical revision, not only of this species (James et al. Reference James, Clerc, Purvis, Purvis, Coppins, Hawksworth, James and Moore1992) but of the whole pendulous species group (Halonen Reference Halonen2000).

Selected specimens examined. Spain: Canary Islands: La Palma, “El Bejenado”, Caldera de TaburienteNational Park, UTM: 219450/317695, 1600 m alt., on Pinus canariensis, 2000, C. Hernández & P.L. Pérez de Paz TFC Lich: 2775 (chemotype III), 7024 (chemotype I).

The authors are very grateful to Dr P. Clerc for confirming this species and by his many and helpful suggestions. This research was supported by DGICYT (Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación), project: CGL2007-066734-C03-01/BOS. The first author is greatly obliged to University of La Laguna for supporting him with a grant and to Dr J. W. Bjerke for supplying literature; L. Fraile-McCord is acknowledged for linguistic corrections.

References

Articus, K., Mattsson, J.-E., Tibell, L., Grube, M. & Wedin, M. (2002) Ribosomal DNA and β-tubulin data do not support the separation of the lichens Usnea florida and U. subfloridana as distinct species. Mycological Research 106: 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslan, A., Aptroot, A. & Yazici, K. (2002) New lichens for Turkey. Mycotaxon 84: 277–280.Google Scholar
Azami, N., Seriñá, E. & Arroyo, R. (2004). The Usnea species of Morocco in R.-G. Werner's Herbarium. Bryologist 107: 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerke, J.W., Elvebakk, A. & Elverland, E. (2006) The lichen genus Usnea in Norway north of the Arctic Circle: biogeography and ecology. Nova Hedwigia 83: 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clerc, P. (1998) Species concepts in the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes). Lichenologist 30: 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clerc, P. (2004) Notes on the genus Usnea Adanson. II. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 88: 79–90.Google Scholar
Clerc, P. (2006) Synopsis of Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes) from the Azores with additional information on the species in Macaronesia. Lichenologist 38: 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clerc, P. (2007) Usnea In Lichen Flora of the Great Sonoran Desert Vol 3 (Nash, T. H. III, Gries, C. & Bungartz, F., eds): 302–335. Tempe: Lichens Unlimited.Google Scholar
Culberson, C. F. (1972) Improved conditions and new data for the identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chromatographic method. Journal of Chromatography 72: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culberson, C. F., Culberson, W. L. & Johnson, A. (1981) A standardized TLC analysis of ß-orcinol depsidones. Bryologist 84: 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culberson, C. F. & Johnson, A. (1982) Substitution of methyl tert.-butyl ether for diethyl ether in the standardized thin-layer chromatographic method for lichen products. Journal of Chromatography 238: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elix, J. A. & Ernst-Russell, K. D. (1993) A Catalogue of Standardized Thin Layer Chromatographic Data and Biosynthetic Relationships for Lichen Substances, 2nd Edn. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Feuerer, T. (ed.), (2009) Checklists of lichens and lichenicolous fungi. Version 1 February 2009. – http://www.checklists.deGoogle Scholar
Fos, S. & Clerc, P. (2000) The lichen genus Usnea on Quercus suber in Iberian cork-oak forest. Lichenologist 32: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafellner, J. (1995) A new checklist of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Insular Laurimacaronesiaincluding a lichenological bibliography for the area. Fritschiana 5: 1–132.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (1999) Additions and corrections to the checklist and bibliography of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of insular Laurimacaronesia. I. Fritschiana 17: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (2002) Additions and corrections to the checklist and bibliography of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of insular Laurimacaronesia. II. Fritschiana 36: 1–10.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (2005) Additions and corrections to the checklist and bibliography of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of insular Laurimacaronesia. III. Fritschiana 50: 1–13.Google Scholar
Halonen, P. (2000) Studies on the lichen genus Usnea in East Fennoscandia and Pacific North America. Academic Dissertation. Faculty of Science, University of Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
Halonen, P., Clerc, P., Goward, T., Brodo, I. M. & Wulff, K. (1998) Synopsis of the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes) in British Columbia, Canada. Bryologist 101: 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández Padrón, C. E. (2004) Lichenes, Lichenicolous Fungi. In Lista de Especies Silvestres de Canarias (Hongos, Plantas y Animales Terrestres) (2004) (Izquierdo, I., Martín, J. L., Zurita, N. & Arechavaleta, M., eds): 58–84. Gobierno de Canarias: Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial.Google Scholar
Herrera-Campos, M. A., Clerc, P. & Nash, T. H. III (1998) Pendulous species of Usnea from the temperate forests in Mexico. Bryologist 101: 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P. W., Clerc, P. & Purvis, O. W. (1992) Usnea. In The Lichen Flora of Great Britain and Ireland (Purvis, O. W., Coppins, B. J., Hawksworth, D. L., James, P. W. & Moore, D. M., eds): 620–629. London: Natural History Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Kirk, P. M., Cannon, P. F., David, J. C. & Stalpers, J. A. (eds) (2001). Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi. 9th Edition. Wallinford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Litterski, B. & Otte, V. (2002) Biogeographical research on European species of selected lichen genera. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 82: 83–90.Google Scholar
Torra, T. & Randlane, T. (2007) The lichen genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes, Parmeliaceae) in Estonia with a key to the species in the Baltic countries. Lichenologist 39: 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, N., Printzen, C., Sancho, L.G. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2006) The phylogeny and classification of Neuropogon and Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) revisited. Taxon 55: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Usnea chaetophora TFC Lich: 7024. A, habit; B, base; C, soralia; D, segments with annular cracks. Scales: A = 2 cm; B = 1mm; C & D = 0·5 mm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. World distribution of Usnea chaetophora (• records extracted from the bibliography; ▴ new records). One dot may represent several localities.

Figure 2

Table 1. Main differences between Usnea chaetophora and related species.